Government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) (gba)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Swiss Federal Statistical Office (FSO)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Division WI/ section WSA

1.5. Contact mail address

Office Fédéral de la Statistique (OFS)

Espace de l'Europe 10

2010 Neuchâtel

SWITZERLAND


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 14/04/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 14/04/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 14/04/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Government Budget Allocations for R&D (GBARD) measure government support to research and experimental development (R&D) activities, and thereby provide information about the priority Governments give to different public R&D funding activities. This type of funder-based approach for reporting R&D involves identifying all the budget items that may support R&D activities and measuring or estimating their R&D content (FM 2015, Chapter 12).

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics.

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2020 of 30 July 2020.

The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/ of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (europa.eu)).

Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 1197/2020, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

3.2. Classification system

Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) is based on the Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS) at one digit level.

3.2.1. National classification
National nomenclature of SEO used  Federal data providers distribute their data, i.e. intramural R&D expenditure and extramural R&D expenditure (R&D contracts, R&D contributions (subsidies)) according to NABS chapters, 2007.
As for indirect cantonal and federal funds, they are included in the category (NABS 12) “Research financed by general university funds”.
Correspondence table with NABS  The NABS classification is used for the collection at level 1 (chapters) (13 categories). 
3.2.2. NABS classification
Deviations from NABS  The break down is at the level of NABS chapters only. No break down possible by NABS sub-chapters 
Problems in identifying / separating NABS chapters and sub chapters  The break down is at the level of NABS chapters only. No break down possible by NABS sub-chapters 
Ability to distribute Non-oriented research and General University Funds (GUF) by fields of R&D   Neither non-oriented research nor GUF can be broken down by FORD. 
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  We use Frascati Manual definition of R&D. The definition is sent with the questionnaire 
Coverage of R&D or S&T1 in general  R&D only
Fields of R&D (FORD) covered

Natural Sciences and Engeneering (NSE) + Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH)

1) Science & Technology

3.3.2. Definition and coverage of government

GBARD statistics are assumed to report detailed data on all the government's budget items that may support R&D activities and to measure or estimate their R&D content. For the purposes of GBARD, the Government sector comprises (a) the central (federal) government, (b) regional (state) government and (c) local (municipal) government subsectors (FM2015, Chapter 12).

 

Levels of government Definition Included / Not included Comments
Central (federal) government  The definition of “Federal State” comprises the general services of the Federal Government and legally independent federal institutions.   Included  
Regional (state) government  For the provincial level (cantons), R&D indirect cantonal funds (governed by the Act on higher education) are included in GBARD. It corresponds to the GUF. Only a small part of other R&D cantonal funds are included in GBARD. This information on R&D direct cantonal funds comes from the administrative data of the Higher Education Sector.   Included partially (Only R&D indirect cantonal funds, included in the GUF and partial R&D direct cantonal funds from the Higher Education Sector).   There are no survey at the provincial (cantonal) level. 
Local (municipal) government  There are no R&D data on communal level.  Not included  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not requested.

3.5. Statistical unit

institutional unit

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units, which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Definition of the national target population  governmental institutions
Estimation of the target population size -
3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Not requested.


5. Reference Period Top

a) Calendar year: Y

 

b) Fiscal year:

    Start month:

    End month:


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

GBARD statistics are based on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

6.1.2. National legislation

There is no special national law.

6.1.3. Standards and manuals

Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 Ordonnance concernant l'exécution des relevés statistiques du 30 juin 1993

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Not applicable


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Not applicable

8.2. Release calendar access

Not applicable

8.3. Release policy - user access

Not applicable


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

The collection of GBARD data is conducted and disseminated on an yearly basis


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  N  
Ad-hoc releases    

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Mean of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

Y

S&T Indicators: In the indicator, GBARD.

indicator in French and in German.

 https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/education-science/technologie/systeme-indicateurs/acces-indicateurs/input-s-t/credits-budgetaires-r-d.html

Specific paper publication

(paper, online)

   

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Free online database (S-T Indicators) accessible on our website

S&T Indicators: In the indicator, GBARD.

indicator in French and in German.

 https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/education-science/technologie/systeme-indicateurs/acces-indicateurs/input-s-t/credits-budgetaires-r-d.html

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  No access rights - it is public 
Access cost policy It is free.
Micro-data anonymisation rules  
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y  aggregate figures  
CD-ROMs    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests   aggregate figures  
Other    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

-

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

In 2021, the FSO introduced a methodological revision of the calculation of GBARD, based on administrative data. The new methodology was applied retrospectively to the series of all national GBARD data from 2017 onwards. The GBARD methodology is described in a FSO publication (link bellow)

https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/education-science/technologie/systeme-indicateurs/acces-indicateurs/input-s-t/credits-budgetaires-r-d.assetdetail.21364556.html

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, etc.)   To increase clarity we add definitions and comments to the Indicators on Internet and to the
publications
Request on further clarification  No requests
Measure to increase clarity  NO
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

-

11.2. Quality management - assessment

 The overall assessment of the GBARD data is good. Some weaknesses might appear by using R&D coefficients


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level

Users’ class1

Description of users

Users’ needs

 1 - International institutions.

 OECD and ESTAT

 All R-D statistics.

 1 - National level

 

State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI).

The SERI within the Federal Department of Home Affairs is the federal government's specialised agency for national and international matters concerning general and university education, research and innovation.

 All R-D and STI statistics needed for the drafting of the message on the promotion of education, research and innovation” and for the strategic controlling of education, research and innovation

All the R-D gender statistics.

 1 - National level

 State Secretariat for Economic
Affairs (SECO).The SECO is the
Confederation's competence
centre for all core issues relating
to economic policy.

 All kind of R-D and STI statistics.

 1 - National level

 Economisuisse: Federation of the Swiss
companies.

 All the R-D statistics. The federation supports the BERD survey and the final report of the BERD survey.

 1 - National level

 Banks and enterprises.

 All kind of R-D and STI statistics.

 3 -Media

 Media in general and in particular:
“economic life, the review of
economic policy”. Published under the auspices of
the Secretariat for Economic
Affairs SECO, this review:
“economic life, the review of
economic policy” analyzes every
month the economic evolution of
the country. Moreover, it
regularly publishes statistical
data of which R-D statistics.

 Main R-D statistics.

 4- Researchers and strudents

 Universities in general and in
particular: the Swiss Institute for
Business Cycle Research (KOF)
within the Swiss Federal Institute
of Technology of Zurich, (ETHZ).
The KOF within the Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology
of Zurich supplies information
in the range of the economic and
market research.

 R-D statistics for the validation of the
Innovation survey.

 4- Researchers and strudents

 Universities in general and in
particular: the Chair of Economics
and Management of Innovation
(CEMI) within the Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology of
Lausanne, (EPFL).
CEMI - the Chair of Economics
and Management of Innovation -
is a research laboratory
established at EPFL to develop
teaching and research in the area
of economics and management
of innovation, knowledge and
technology.

 All kind of R-D and STI statistics.

 4- Researchers and strudents

 Researchers and students.

 All kind of R-D and STI statistics.

 

 

 

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, Other Ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No national user satisfaction survey has been undertaken
User satisfaction survey specific for GBARD statistics  -
Short description of the feedback received  -
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

-

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012.

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells
Provisional budget statistics1    X        
Obligatory final budget statistics1    X        
Optional final budget statistics2    X        

1)  Criteria: Obligatory data (provisional budget and final budget). Only 'Very Good' = 100% and 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

2)  Criteria: Optional data (final budget). 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%;'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability – Provisional data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD Y  Yearly   T+6 Provisional data are available since 2021
NABS Chapter level Y  Yearly    T+6   Provisional data are available since 2021
NABS Sub-chapter level N        
Special categories - Biotech        
Special categories - Nanotech N        
Special categories - Security Y  Yearly    T+6  Provisional data are available since 2021

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.2. Data availability – Final data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD  Y-2000  Yearly odd years and 2016 before Reference year 2017  T+12   Before 2017: Every 2 years
NABS Chapter level Y-2000   Yearly odd years and 2016 before Reference year 2017  T+12  Before 2017: Every 2 years 
NABS Sub-chapter level        
Special categories - Biotech        
Special categories - Nanotech N        
Special categories - Security Y-2000    Yearly odd years and 2016 before Reference year 2017  T+12   Before 2017: Every 2 years

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.3. Data availability – Other special categories
Special categories Stage1 Availability1 Frequency of data colletion Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)3 Comments
 Not applicable            

1) Stage: P - provisional, F - final. 

2) Availability of the data: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

3) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
   N/A  N/A N/A  N/A   N/A N/A 

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5) In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for GBARD.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy
5 (Very Good)1 4 (Good)2 3 (Satisfactory)3 2 (Poor)4 1 (Very poor)5
 X        

1) High level of coverage (At least all national or federal ministries and the ministries and agencies responsible for R&D funding at state or regional level). High rate of response (>90%) in data collection. All figures broken down by NABS.  

2) If at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) In the event that the rate of response would be lower than 80% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 70% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) If all the three criteria above described are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

Not requested.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not requested.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

not applicable

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response errors: occur when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

 

a) Problems in obtaining data from targeted information providers:

Not applicable (census)

 

b) Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

c) Effect of non-response errors on the produced statistics:

 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

 

a)       Data processing and editing processes:

Not applicable

 

b)      Description of errors:

 

c)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Model assumption errors occur when the assumptions made for the estimation of parameters, models, the testing of statistical hypotheses, etc., are violated. As a result, the quality of the resulting statistics is affected (e.g. degrees of confidence might be inflated).

Description/assessment: 


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Date of first release of national data:

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Date of first release of national data:

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 6 12
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months) 6
 12
Delay (days)     
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Regulation No 995/2012 or Frascati manual paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issue Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Research and development FM2015 Chapter 2 (mainly paragraphs 2.3 and 2.4).  No deviation  
Coverage of levels of government FM2015, §12.5 to 12.9 No deviation   
Socioeconomic objectives coverage and breakdown Reg. 753/2004: Annex 1, section 2, §4 Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 2, § 5.2. No deviation   
Reference period Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 2, § 4. No deviation   
15.1.3. Deviations from recommendations

GBARD encompass all spending allocations met from sources of government revenue foreseen within the budget, such as taxation. Spending allocations by extra-budgetary government entities are within the scope only to the extent that their funds are allocated through the budgetary process (FM2015 §12.9). The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national GBARD statistics.

 

Methodological issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations  National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Definition of GBARD FM § 12.9  GBARD includes all the budget appropriations for R&D of the federal government and indirect cantonal funds (GUF). It includes part of the direct cantonal funds (from the Higher Education Sector only) as well.
The GBARD data comes from a R&D survey in the federal administration and from universities administrative data (GUF). 
 
Stages of data collection FM2015 §12.41  No deviation  
Gross / net approach, net principle FM2015 §12.20 and 12.21 No deviation   
EU/other funds Eurostat's Methodological Guidelines    
Types of expenditure FM2015 §12.15 to 12.18  No deviation  
Current and capital expenditure FM §12.15    Since 1983, GBARD has included current and capital expenditure.
Between 1977 and 1981, capital expenditure was excluded from the GBARD data.
Extra budgetary funds FM §12.8, 12.20, 12.38  

 

 
Loans FM §12.31, 12.32, 12.34    Loans are not included in GBARD data. 
Indirect funding, tax rebates, etc. FM §12.31 - 12.38  No deviation  Indirect funding (federal and cantonal) is included. It is GUF. There are no tax rebates.
Both indirect and direct federal funds are included in calculating GBARD. Indirect cantonal funds are included in calculating GBARD. Part only of direct cantonal funds are included in calculating GBARD.
Data from 1977 to 1981 are not comparable with current data. They only concern direct federal funds (intramural, contracts and contributions) without the indirect funds allocated to higher education institutions (“hautes écoles”) under the law and without indirect cantonal funds. 
Treatment of multi-annual projects FM2015 §12.44  No deviation  
Treatment of GBARD going to R&D abroad FM2015 §12.19 No deviation   
Criterion for distribution by socioeconomic objective FM2015 §12.50 to 12.71  No deviation  
Method of identification of primary objective Eurostat's Methodological Guidelines, topic 2, statement B.6  No deviation  

Inclusion/exclusion of VAT

FM2015 does not provide with recommendations on this issue. No deviation  VAT is not collected separately.
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
Provisional data     Provisional data are only available since 2021
Final data    2017; 2014; 2012; 2000; 1998, 1992, 1989, 1986, 1983, 1981, 1977, 

2017: change in the methodology 

2014: Little changes in methodology.

1998:- The Federal Office of Agriculture and its research institutes no longer classify their R&D
1992, 1989 and beginning 1986: GBAORD were broken down according to NABS for direct federal funds with the intramural R&D expenditures of the federal public sector. R&D mandates and contributions in Switzerland and abroad are shown under the heading “other civil research”. Indirect federal and cantonal funds are included in GUF. Idem for 1988 and 1990 with the exception that while indirect federal funds are included in GUF, data on indirect cantonal funds are not available.
1983:there is not NABS breakdown for GBAORD except for Defence and GUF. total GBAORD have comprised direct federal funding in Switzerland and abroad (i.e. intramural expenditures, R&D mandates and contributions in Switzerland and abroad) and indirect federal and cantonal funding (governed by the higher education act and GUF). It should be noted that there is a lack of data on indirect cantonal funding for 1988 and 1990.
1977 to 1981 as well as 1983:1977 to 1981 and 1983:total GBAORD comprised direct federal funding in Switzerland and abroad, i.e. direct expenditures in Switzerland and abroad (i.e. intramural expenditures, R&D mandates and contributions in Switzerland and abroad). There is no data on indirect federal and cantonal funding.

2000:Data are based on the ARAMIS information system (databank) and on electronic and paper questionnaires.

2012: Change in the method of estimation of R&D data in the Higher education Sector.

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

GBARD data are higher than GOVERD, for GBARD also includes:
• GUF
• funds allocated for R&D that the performer does not necessarily spend that year or uses for something else (appropriations allocated to universities by the National Science Foundation that are not always spent in their entirety).
• extramural expenditures (mandates and contributions in Switzerland and abroad). 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.4. Coherence - internal

This part compares GBARD statistics from the provisional and final budget for the reference year.

 

 

15.4.1. Comparison between provisional and final data according to NABS 2007
  R&D appropriations in the provisional budget delivered at T+6 R&D appropriations in the final budget delivered at T+12 Difference (of final data)
Exploration and exploitation of the Earth 21.03 21.05 0.02
Environment 31.62 31.65  0.03 
Exploration and exploitation of space 248.62  248.84  0.22 
Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures 20.16  20.18  0.02 
Energy 67.00  67.06  0.06 
Industrial production and technology 326.78  327.07  0.29 
Health 26.37  26.40  0.02 
Agriculture 214.16  217.36  0.19 
Education 14.82 14.83  0.01 
Culture, recreation, religion and mass media 3.02  3.02  0.00 
Political and social systems, structures and processes 222.87 223.07 0.20
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from General University Funds (GUF) 4362.36  4362.36  0.00 
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from other sources than GUF 1770.88 1769.77 -1.11
Defence 42.30 42.34 0.04
TOTAL GBARD 7372.0  7372 .00 0.00 

 In million national currency


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  N/A  
Data collection costs N/A   
Other costs N/A   
Total costs N/A   
Comments on costs
N/A 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  No direct burden on respondent  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  Not applicable  
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  Not applicable  
Total cost  Not applicable  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

-

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

a)       Provisional data:

 

b)      Final data:

 

c)       General University Funds (GUF):

18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
  Provisional data Final data Comments
Data collection method Federal budget analyses since 2017 Federal budget analyses since 2017  All federal departments and offices. 
Stage of data collection      
Reporting units  The institution responsible for administering the budget -- each federal department, office and institution.  

 The institution responsible for administering the budget -- each federal department, office and institution.

 
Basic variable      
Time of data collection (T+x)1)  T+6  T+12  
Problems in the translation of budget items N/A

1) Time of data collection (T+x): T is assumed to represent the end of reference period. x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is collected.

18.3.2. General University Funds (GUF)

The data comes from administrative data of the Higher Education Sector.

18.3.3. Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO)
Level of distribution of budgetary items – institution or programme/project  The unit is the project. Since 2000, data have been compiled via the ARAMIS system (electronic information system on R&D research projects of the federal government). The reporting units (institutions) are the Federal offices and departments. The institutions report their R&D projects in ARAMIS and in a R&D questionnaire. 
Criterion of distribution – purpose or content  Distribution into objectives is made according to the purpose of the programmes or projects. 
Method of identification of primary objectives  Not applicable
Difficulties of distribution  No special difficulties. 
18.3.4. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  No questionnaire for the GBARD
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:

FR: Crédits budgétaires publics de R-D - Mesurer le financement public de la R-D à partir des données tirées des budgets | Publication | Office fédéral de la statistique (admin.ch)

DE: Staatliche F+E-Mittelzuweisung - Messung der staatlichen Finanzierung von F+E anhand von Haushaltsdaten | Publikation | Bundesamt für Statistik (admin.ch)

18.4. Data validation

- Outlier detection (early in the process)

- Checking the population coverage

- Benchmark the responses with the responses of the previous year;

 

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

-

18.5.2. Data compilation methods

See below.

18.5.2.1. Identifying R&D
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D  The reporting unit is provided with the Frascati Manual definition of R&D and is separating itself R&D from non R&D in the projects. 
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  
Coefficient estimation method  Not applicable
Frequency of updating of coefficients  Not applicable
18.5.2.2. General University Funds (GUF)
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D  Not applicable
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  
Coefficient estimation method  Not applicable
Frequency of updating of coefficients Not applicable
18.5.2.3. Other issues
Treatment of multi-annual programmes  Multi-annual programmes are not reported in a single year -- they are allocated to the years in which they are budgeted. 
Possibility to classify budgetary items by COFOG functions  Not applicable
Possibility to classify budgetary items by other nomenclatures e.g. NACE  Not applicable
Method of estimation of future budgets  Not applicable
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top