Packaging waste by waste management operations (env_waspac)

National Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Danish Environmental Protection Agency (DEPA)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Danish Environmental Protection Agency (DEPA)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Waste and Data

1.5. Contact mail address

Lerchesgade 35
5000 Odense C
Denmark


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

9 July 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

9 July 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

9 July 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The data on waste amounts is sourced from the Danish Waste Data System (WDS), which covers the collection and treatment of all types of waste, including packaging waste. This dataset is complemented by Waste Composition Analyses (WCA), which measure the amount of packaging in mixed waste and the amount of target materials in separately collected streams.
The WCAs have been carried out over the past few years by the DEPA, municipalities, and various companies. Data from these reports has been used to establish national coefficients for packaging that are multiplied by the amounts of waste as registered in the WDS.

Reporting is done according to the new calculation rules.

The derogation to make use of average loss rates has been applied.

3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection

Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks

Name of institution Description of key responsibilities
 The Danish Environmental Protection Agency  Data collection, validation, consolidation and reporting
 Om Affald  Data validation, calculations and reporting
3.2. Classification system

Waste is classified based on the EU's EWC (LoW) and Danish waste codes (Appendix 2) Bekendtgørelse om Affaldsdatasystemet

3.2.1. Classification of treatment operations

We utilize the Danish treatment codes for waste management reporting. These codes include recycling, incineration, landfilling, special treatment, tax-free incineration, tax-free landfilling, preparation for reuse, and other final material recovery. When reporting recycling values to Eurostat, we aggregate waste data marked with the Danish codes for recycling, preparation for reuse, or special treatment combined with R2 to R12. When reporting energy recovery values to Eurostat, we aggregate waste data marked with the Danish codes for incineration or tax-free incineration, or special treatment combined with R1, D10, or R13

3.3. Coverage - sector

Data covers all sectors - household, business, industry, recycling sites, etc

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Wish to take into account the amount of metals in incineration bottom ash (IBA) for the calculation of the targets.

3.4.1. Types of reuse system in place for each material type

Glass: National bottle deposit system and bottle washing in place for glass,
Plastic: Reuse of boxes in industies,
Metal: Reuse of e.g. gas cylinders,
Wood: Reuse pool system and repair of wood pallets.

3.4.2. Other recovery of waste

Packaging is primarily sent for recycling and incineration with energy recovery.

3.4.3. Information on temporary storage of packaging waste

The assumption is made that the amount of packaging in the waste stream has been introduced to the market in the same year.

3.5. Statistical unit

All reporting waste operators.

3.6. Statistical population

All reporting waste producers.

3.7. Reference area

Denmark

3.8. Coverage - Time

This report covers 2023. Data is expected to be stored for a minimum of 20 years

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Tonnes


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Please find information at this websites:

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable. Data is produced directly in EPA.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Public Administration Act. 
European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Executive Order on the Waste Data System

All data are aggregated before being published.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The Waste Statistics is published annually and expected to be available at the end of the year.
The Packaging Waste Statistics is published annually and expected to be available at the end of the year.

8.2. Release calendar access

It is not established by law and therefore there is no official calendar.

8.3. Release policy - user access

The statistics are published on EPS's website. Most often, a news item is made in this connection


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Ad-hoc press releases linked to the data.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications
10.3. Dissemination format - online database

The Danish Waste Data System - Access requires a the Danish Digital ID (MitID) - foreign companies required to report data gets a one time token.

The Danish National Waste Data System.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Waste statistics data 2018-2022

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not applicable.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Statistik for emballageforsyning og indsamling af emballageaffald 2022 (Waste packaging report for 2022).

 Opdateret metode til udarbejdelse af emballagestatistik (Methodology for reporting on packaging waste).

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Not available.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

A detailed description of the Danish Waste Data System can be found in Appendix 1 of the following report: Waste Statistics 2015

In general, all waste collectors, receivers, exporters, and importers are required to report information on the type, mass, treatment, producer, and receiver of waste to the Danish Waste Data System.
To prevent double counting of waste flows, all waste outputs from a waste receiver are marked and excluded. Other reports and descriptions of the system can be found at the following website:
Affaldsdatasystemet (ADS) - Miljøstyrelsen

Further infomation can be found here: Find affaldsdata - Miljøstyrelsen.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not available.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Statistics Denmark, Department of the Ministry of the Environment, municipalities, private companies, etc.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Webinars, e.g. talks with trade association etc. 

12.3. Completeness

Primary, secondary and transport packaging made of wood, metal, plastic, paper and cardboard, glass are covered. Final treatment by waste operators is estimated. 


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Regarding the amounts of treated packaging waste, there is a very small risk of double counting or wrong code-combination when reporting to the Danish waste data system.
The data quality is considered to be good, as the statistics are compiled on the basis of a solid data.
There is a difference between POM and waste generation.

13.1.1. Statistical surveys used regarding packaging waste generation and treatment

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.

 

Component of packaging waste Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
13.1.2. Statistical surveys used regarding reusable packaging

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.

 

Packaging material Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
13.2. Sampling error

Not applicable

13.3. Non-sampling error

Errors can occur on different stages of data production.
The consultant who prepares the packaging statistics and data for the EU report carries out specific quality assurance and validation of relevant data. These validations are reviewed with EPA.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

1 year nationally

14.2. Punctuality

There is no time lag.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

Denmark's calculation method is very different from other EU countries, as DK has a Waste Data System with very precise data on waste in Denmark.
Therefore, it can be difficult to make comparison with other european countries. 

15.2. Comparability - over time

Due to EU requirements for reporting quantities of packaging waste that is actually recycled, there was a break in data between 2019 og 2020.
Denmark have introduced a new calculation method in relation to quantities actually recycled, which is used for plastic, glas and paper/cardboard packaging only. 
DK do not have data specifically for aluminum and iron, therefore we use an estimated percentage for the distribution of the two types. 

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

Actual recycling rates has changed for plastic, fiber and glass due to change in methodology. In previous years Denmark made use of estimated loss rates, whereas from the data year 2023 a dynamic model is used for calculation of actual recycling rates. 

15.4.1. Explanation for any component with a greater than 10 % variation

Explanation detailing the causes of the tonnage difference (in relation to which waste streams, sectors or estimates have caused the difference, and what the underlying cause is) for any component of packaging waste generated and recycled which shows greater than a 10 % variation from the data submitted for the previous data year.

Material Variation (%) Main reason for variation

 Reuse of metal packaging
Split of sales and transport packaging for reuse

 

 >10% Methodogical improvement of aluminium vs. ferrous metals from estimate to data input from operators. The overall amounts has hence not changed drastically, but the spilt between materials have been improved.
An improved estimate have been applied. The overall amounts has hence not changed drastically, but the spilt between reuse packaging type have been improved.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Executive Order on the Waste Data System

17.2. Data revision - practice

We did not correct backwards data series. We are unfortunately not able to send the revised data for previous years.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

The data on waste amounts is sourced from the Danish Waste Data System, which covers the collection and treatment of all types of waste, including packaging waste.
This dataset is complemented by waste composition analyses, which measure the amount of packaging in mixed waste and the amount of target materials in separately collected streams.
The waste analyzes have been carried out over the past few years, the latest in 2023. These are summaries of data from reports made by DK EPA, municipalities and various companies. The distributions for the waste are then multiplied by the amounts of residual waste in ADS.

18.1.1. Waste samples from waste analysis

The waste samples for waste analysis are taken from:

 

Approach Details about the flows of waste covered
Directly from the bin  Yes. See 18.1.2
From the waste trucks  No
Other approaches  No
18.1.2. Source of waste flow data for estimation
  Sources Materials covered
Waste collectors  No  No
Waste treatment operators  No  No
Municipalities  No  No
Others 100% - The method used combines the results from several waste analyses with our data from ADS (total waste generation) . The data on waste amounts is sourced from the Danish Waste Data System, which covers the collection and treatment of all types of waste, including packaging waste. This dataset is complemented by waste composition analyses, which measure the amount of packaging in mixed waste and the amount of target materials in separately collected streams. The waste analyzes have been carried out over the past few years. These are summaries of data from reports made by DK EPA, municipalities and various companies. The distributions for the waste are then multiplied by the amounts of residual waste in ADS  All packaging
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Data is collected from companies at least once a year. Sorting analyzes are performed less frequently. 

18.3. Data collection

Appendix 1: Publications.

18.3.1. Description of the methodology and verification of data on packaging waste generated in case waste analysis is used

By utilizing data from the Danish Waste Data System, it is possible to combine waste analysis data, enabling the calculation of the amount of packaging in residual waste streams, among others.
Additionally, waste analyses have been conducted to distinguish between packaging and non-packaging waste, such as plastic, in separately collected waste

18.3.2. Description of the methodology to report on composite packaging

The amount of composite is calculated from ADS data. The amount is then distributed among the individual fractions.

 

18.3.3. Description of methods for determining packaging waste treatment
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Data collection methods
Administrative reporting No  No No  No No  No  No  No
Surveys No No No  No No No  No No 
Electronic registry No   No  No  No No  No  No No 
Waste analysis No No No  No  No No  No No 
Data from waste operators Yes Yes  Yes   Yes Yes  Yes  Yes  No 
Data from municipalities No  No No No  No  No No No
Data from extended producer responsibility schemes No  No  No No No No  No  No 
Other No  No No  No No No  No No 

 

Additional information about the methodology, including the combination of methods used:

A detailed description of the Danish Waste Data System can be found in Appendix 1 of the following report:  publications
In general, all waste collectors, receivers, exporters, and importers are required to report information on the type, mass, treatment, producer, and receiver of waste to the Danish Waste Data System. To prevent double counting of waste flows, all waste outputs from a waste receiver are marked and excluded. Other reports and descriptions of the system can be found at the following websites:

18.3.4. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on the generation and treatment of packaging waste

No surveys used. All waste is reported with treatment and waste type.

18.3.5. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on reusable packaging

Questionnaires are used to obtain data about reusable packaging from major actors within the industry. But uncertainty arises due to the absence of a comprehensive system for registering reused packaging, and only a few industries or companies maintain detailed statistics on these quantities.
There is especial a lack of knowledge about the number of circulation cycles per year and the overall lifespan of the packaging.

18.3.6. Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash

Calculation of recycling of metals from incinerator bottom ash : Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash in accordance with the Commission Implementing Act adopted in accordance with Article 37(7) of Directive 2008/98/EC.

 

Data Description of the measurement method to obtain the data
Total amount of metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash Based on the Danish waste data system regarding metal waste is derived from the calculated amounts of packaging metal waste sent to incineration, predominantly in mixed household waste. In this estimation, it is assumed that 90% of metal packaging waste that is not otherwise accounted for is incinerated, and 75% of the remaining amount is lost during the incineration process. 
Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken The amounts of metal packaging waste sent for incineration are estimated based on the difference between the generated waste amount and the amount of metal packaging waste collected for recycling. It is assumed that 90% of metal packaging waste not otherwise accounted for is incinerated, and that 75% of the incinerated metal packaging waste is lost during the incineration process. Of the remaining waste, 70% is considered recycled. 
Proportion of waste entering incineration plants that is packaging waste, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken Approximately 17.000 ton metal packaging waste was estimated to have been incinerated in 2023  
18.4. Data validation

The Danish waste data system, an electronic registry, enables quality control of waste dataset and is available by the municipalities that actively monitors waste streams for compliance with current legislation, including legislation on waste and packaging.

18.4.1. Detailed description of the system for quality control and traceability for packaging waste pursuant to Article 6a(3) and (8) of Directive 94/62/EC

The Danish waste data system, an electronic registry, enables quality control of waste dataset and is available by the municipalities that actively moniters waste streams for compliance with current legislation, including legislation on waste and packaging.
The consultant who prepares the packaging statistics and data for the EU report carries out specific quality assurance and validation of relevant data. These validations are reviewed with EPA.

18.4.2. Traceability of waste treated outside the member State and ensuring its treatment in conditions broadly equivalent to the requirements of EU environmental law
Packaging waste material Subject to final treatment in the Member State (yes/no) Shipped to another EU Member State (yes/no) Exported outside the EU (yes/no) Description of specific measures for quality control and traceability of packaging waste, in particularly as regards monitoring and validation of data
Plastic Yes Yes No  Export document.
Wood Yes No No  No
Ferrous metals Yes Yes No  Export document.
Aluminium Yes Yes No  Export document.
Glass Yes Yes No  Export document.
Paper and cardboard Yes Yes Yes  Export document.
Others No No No  No
18.4.3. Description of measures to ensure broadly equivalent waste treatment

Description can be found here:
Legislation on shipment of waste - The Danish Environmental Protection Agency

18.4.4. Verification of data on packaging waste generated

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic  yes  yes  no Visual
Wood  yes  yes  no Visual 
Ferrous metals  yes  yes   no  Visual 
Aluminium   yes   yes  no Visual
Glass  yes  yes  no Visual
Paper and cardboard  yes  yes  no  Visual
Others  yes yes  no   Visual
18.4.5. Verification of data on packaging waste recycling

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic  yes  yes  no   visual
Wood yes yes  no   visual
Ferrous metals  yes  yes  no  visual 
Aluminium  yes  yes no   visual
Mixed waste yes  yes no   visual
Others yes  yes no   visual 
18.5. Data compilation

See below

18.5.1. Methods for determining packaging waste generation
Approach % of waste generated based on this approach
Approach 1
Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR data, complemented with estimates to ensure full coverage of the EPR data
Not applicable  
Approach 2
POM based on sources other than EPR (e.g. based on production and import statistics and factors to estimate the amount of packaging associated to these product flows)
Not applicable  
Approach 3
Waste analysis
 Not applicable 
Other approaches : 100% - The method used combines the results from several waste analyses with our data from ADS (total waste generation) . The data on waste amounts is sourced from the Danish Waste Data System, which covers the collection and treatment of all types of waste, including packaging waste. This dataset is complemented by waste composition analyses, which measure the amount of packaging in mixed waste and the amount of target materials in separately collected streams. The waste analyzes have been carried out over the past few years. These are summaries of data from reports made by DK EPA, municipalities and various companies. The distributions for the waste are then multiplied by the amounts of residual waste in ADS 
18.5.1.1. Approach 1 - Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
EPR scheme data Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Administrative reporting different from EPR Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Surveys Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable 
Electronic registry: Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Other : Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered 

18.5.1.2. Approach 2 - Put on the market (POM) calculated from production and reign trade statistics and using coefficients of packaging for the sold goods in question

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Production statistics  Not available  Not available  Not available  Not available Not available   Not available Not available   Not available Not available 
Foreign trade statistics  Not available Not available  Not available  Not available  Not available   Not available  Not available  Not available Not available 
Specific surveys :  Not available Not available  Not available  Not available  Not available  Not available  Not available   Not available Not available 
Electronic registry :  Not available Not available  Not available   Not available  Not available Not available  Not available   Not available Not available 
Other :  Not available Not available  Not available  Not available   Not available Not available   Not available Not available  Not available 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered

18.5.1.3. Approach 3 - Waste analysis

Packaging waste generated estimated by waste analysis

 

Type of waste Number of samples taken Total volume or weight of samples taken What proportion does the sample represent of the total waste generated
(in %)
Frequency of sample
Volume in cubic metres Weight in tonnes
Mixed household and similar waste  Not available  Not available   Not available   Not available    Not available 
Separately collected municipal waste  Not available  Not available   Not available   Not available   Not available  
Separately collected business waste  Not available  Not available   Not available   Not available   Not available  
Others :  Not available  Not available   Not available   Not available    Not available 
18.5.2. Information on estimates for packaging placed on the market

These quantities are calculated based on the BEA method. You can read more about this calculation here: Waste packaging report for 2022

18.5.3. Presence and calculation of estimates and indication of added volume in % of the total
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Validation
Corrections for underreporting of units covered by the above sources No  No No  No  No  No No  No
Estimates for units below the threshold (de minimis) No  No  No  No No No No No 
Estimates for other units legally exempt from reporting No No No No  No No  No  No 
Estimates for freeriders  No No No  No  No  No No No 
Private imports /exports by private parcels  No  No No No  No No  No  No 
Private imports /exports (from journeys)  No No   No No No No  No  No
Internet imports and exports i.e. on-line sales  No No  No  No No  No  No  No 
Other corrections  No  No  No  No No No No No 

This is not relevant to our method. If it has ended up as waste in Denmark, it counts, as we have reports from all waste handling companies.

18.5.4. Measurement points for recycling applied

Packaging waste material

Description of measurement points used (at calculation point or at the output of sorting operation with subtraction of non-target materials as appropriate, end-of-waste criteria, etc.), including variation at regional and local level

Plastic The amount of waste collected for recycling is multiplied by the average loss rates to determine the actual amount being recycled 
Wood The amount of waste collected for recycling is multiplied by the average loss rates to determine the actual amount being recycled 
Ferrous metals The amount of waste collected for recycling is multiplied by the average loss rates to determine the actual amount being recycled 
Aluminium The amount of waste collected for recycling is multiplied by the average loss rates to determine the actual amount being recycled 
Glass The amount of waste collected for recycling is multiplied by the average loss rates to determine the actual amount being recycled 
Paper and cardboard The amount of waste collected for recycling is multiplied by the average loss rates to determine the actual amount being recycled 
Others Not applicable 
18.5.4.1. Detailed description of the methodology to calculate the amount of non-target materials removed between the measurement and the calculation points, where applicable

We are able to sort data specifically for packaging waste by using the Danish waste codes, such as "Packaging plastics" or "Packaging wood".
When these codes are combined with relevant EWC codes, we can achieve a higher level of reliability regarding the type of waste being reported

18.5.4.2. Detailed description of how compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants has been identified and recorded in the data

Composting facilities in Denmark generally do not receive waste containing compostable plastic or cardboard and paper as part of the targeted materials.

18.5.5. Methodology to determine recycled amounts from composite packaging or packaging composed of multiple materials

The collection of composite materials is a new process, and as a result, no quantities have been collected for recycling yet. However, with the new sorting requirements in Denmark, it is now necessary to collect composite waste, which is expected to result in quantities collected for recycling in the future. As part of this effort, an assessment will also be made of the distribution to the individual fractions. It's important to note that composite waste is not identified separately in the Danish waste data system at the moment.

18.5.6. Use of Average Loss rates (ALRS)

Description of the sorted packaging waste to which ALRs are applied, types of sorting plants to which different ALRs apply, the methodological approach to calculating ALRs at such point(s), including the statistical accuracy of any surveys used, or the nature of any technical specifications.

 

Sorted waste material and sorting plant type ALR applied (in %) Description
 Plastic 44% Appendix 8: Explanation for calculation of actual recycling at municipal level, 2022
 Fiber  5%  Appendix 8: Explanation for calculation of actual recycling at municipal level, 2022
 Glass 
21% Appendix 8: Explanation for calculation of actual recycling at municipal level, 2022
 Metal  13%

Average loss rates used to estimate the actual recycling in Appendix 9 of the Waste Statistics 2019 report

 Wood   9%

Average loss rates used to estimate the actual recycling in Appendix 9 of the Waste Statistics 2019 report

18.6. Adjustment

See below

18.6.1. Adjustment for impurities and humidity
Factors Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Correction factors for impurities and humidity in % of waste  not available   not available  not available   not available   not available   not available   not available   not available 
How the correction factors are derived  not available
If no correction of impurities and humidity is applied, how they are accounted  not applicable
18.6.2. Attribution of waste to packaging and non-packaging types and correction for humidity

Description, where applicable, of the methodology to exclude non-packaging waste from the reported amount of recycled packaging waste and of the methodology to correct the amount of packaging waste at the measurement point in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging (including by using relevant European standards). Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of packaging waste (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
18.6.3. Attribution of waste

Description of the methodology to exclude waste originating from other countries, where applicable. Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of waste from the Member State (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 All  All  100% The Danish waste data system only collects data on the primary waste stream, and therefore, imports are considered secondary waste and are not included in the reporting.


19. Comment Top

No comment.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top