Packaging waste by waste management operations (env_waspac)

National Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Interregional Packaging Commission / Interregionale Verpakkingscommissie / Commission interrégionale de l'Emballage


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Interregional Packaging Commission / Interregionale Verpakkingscommissie / Commission interrégionale de l'Emballage

1.2. Contact organisation unit

general direction

1.5. Contact mail address

Gaucheretstraat 92-94, 1030 Schaarbeek

Rue Gaucheret 92-94, 1030 Schaerbeek


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

30 June 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

30 June 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

30 June 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Reporting for the reference year 2023 is done in accordance with the new calculation rules. As off 2020, Belgium no longer uses the old calculation method.

The derogation to make use of the delegated act on average loss rates has not been applied.

3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection

Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks

Name of institution Description of key responsibilities
1) Fost Plus (F+), Olympiadenlaan 2, 1140 Evere 1) accredited compliance organisation for household packaging waste
2) Valipac (VIP), Koningin Astridlaan 59 bus 11, 1780 Wemmel 2) accredited compliance organisation for industrial and commercial packaging waste
3) Interregional Packaging Commission (IRPC), Gaucheretstraat 92-94 Rue Gaucheret 1030 Brussel / Bruxelles

3) The individual responsible companies for packaging supplies their data directly to the IRPC; the IRPC does a thorough analysis of all data supplied by these individual responsible  companies mentioned above.

Furthermore, the IRPC performs corrections and verifications on the data supplied by Fost Plus and Valipac.

3.2. Classification system

See 3.2.1.

3.2.1. Classification of treatment operations

The R and D-classificationcodes as described in the annex I (Disposal operations) and in the annex II (Recovery operations) of the Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, is used. 

3.3. Coverage - sector

Waste.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Recycling rate for wood = (recycling (184 198) + repair (33 943)) / (waste generated (281 071) + repair (33 943))  = 69.25%.

Belgium wishes to take into account the amount of metals in incineration bottom ash (IBA) for the calculation of the targets.

3.4.1. Types of reuse system in place for each material type

For household packaging it concerns mostly glass bottles with deposit.
For industrial and commercial packaging waste it concerns mostly crates, barrels and palets, both in closed loop and in open loop reuse systems.

3.4.2. Other recovery of waste

Incineration in cement kilns, blast furnaces, drying kilns, biomassinstallations.

The IRPC confirms that the results in the column for "Recovery" are the sum of both and include as well "Energy recovery (R1)" as "Incineration at waste incinerators with energy recovery".

3.4.3. Information on temporary storage of packaging waste

This is not relevant.

3.5. Statistical unit

Eurostat.

3.6. Statistical population

Belgian companies.

3.7. Reference area

Belgium.

3.8. Coverage - Time

1 year.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Tonnes.


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Accord de coopération du 4 November 2008 concernant la prévention et la gestion des déchets d'emballages.

Samenwerkingsakkoord van 4 November 2008 betreffende de preventie en het beheer van verpakkingsafval.

Directive 94/62/EC sets out the EU’s rules on managing packaging and packaging waste (Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste).

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

IVCIE collects the data from the producer responsibility organisations.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

No confidential informaton in the questionnaire.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Not applicable.

8.2. Release calendar access

Not applicable.

8.3. Release policy - user access

Not applicable.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Annually.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications
10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Not applicable - to be developed.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not applicable.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Annual report of the Interregional Packaging Commission.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Interregionale verpakkingscommissie (ivcie.be).

10.7. Quality management - documentation

National quality validation standards. For details see section 18.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Guidelines in regional legislation apply.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

For details see section 18.4.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Eurostat and other users.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Publications are available for users on IVCIE website.

12.3. Completeness

EPR scheme data controlled by Fost Plus and Valipac are additionally controlled by the Interregional Packaging Commission and are the main source of the Belgian statistics. For details see section 18.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

For household one-way packaging, the recycling data are extremely complete, no extrapollation is needed. For reusable household packaging: data are statistically correct but less controls are performed on the data.

For non household one-way packaging there are no issues concerning the accuracy of data. For reusable non household packaging: data are statistically correct but less controls are performed on the data.

There are less reliable data on open loop reusable packaging put onto the market (for the first time). A detailed questionnaire sent by Valipac or the Belgian authorities to European multinational companies will have very limited effect. The pallet pool is an international pool and the pallets are not allocated to a specific country. The few companies replying will generally have difficulty estimating correctly a replacement rate specific for Belgium or will attribute the replacements exclusively to the country where they are based or to the country where the pallets are repaired.

13.1.1. Statistical surveys used regarding packaging waste generation and treatment

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.

Component of packaging waste Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.

13.1.2. Statistical surveys used regarding reusable packaging

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.

Packaging material Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.

13.2. Sampling error

No complete data as yet available. On the most important data sources, sampling errors are determined. 

13.3. Non-sampling error

There are few reliable data on open loop reusable packaging put onto the market (for the first time).

A detailed questionnaire sent by Valipac or the Belgian authorities to European multinational companies will have very limited effect. The pallet pool is an international pool and the pallets are not allocated to a specific country. The few companies replying will generally have difficulty estimating correctly a replacement rate specific for Belgium or will attribute the replacements exclusively to the country where they are based or to the country where the pallets are repaired.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

For POM data, reporting for year N is done by members to Fost Plus and Valipac by March of year N+1.

For recycling/recovery data, reporting by waste operators is done monthly or two-monthly.

14.2. Punctuality

For the POM data, some members' declarations are late. Procedures are in place to remedy this, including penalties and termination of membership. There are no statistical data, but it is not considered a major problem.

For recycling/recovery data punctuality is not a problem.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

No differences.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Information not available.

15.4. Coherence - internal

Information not available.

15.4.1. Explanation for any component with a greater than 10 % variation

Explanation detailing the causes of the tonnage difference (in relation to which waste streams, sectors or estimates have caused the difference, and what the underlying cause is) for any component of packaging waste generated and recycled which shows greater than a 10 % variation from the data submitted for the previous data year.

Material Variation (%) Main reason for variation
 Plastic packaging waste - part composite packaging (recycled - difference DY2022 vs DY2023) 26.1% increase  A bigger share of the Polyal-fraction was sent to recycling.
Ferrous metals packaging waste - part recuperation of metals from waste incinerator ashes (recycled - difference DY2022 vs DY2023) 23.3% decrease This decrease is due to a change in the market (POM): steel cans are being replaced by aluminium cans. 
Other materials (recycled - difference DY2022 vs DY2023) 147.4% increase This increase is only 2053 tons. It is due to a new recycler for "jute" (textile) packaging reporting to Valipac.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

No backwards corrections of data series. No revised data available on previous years. The new calculation method, applied from the referenceyear 2020 on, requires additional data, which are not available for previous years. There are no other changes to the methodology then the application of the new calculation method for the targets.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

EPR scheme data are the main source of the Belgian statistics; other sources give additional information and are used as a cross-check.

18.1.1. Waste samples from waste analysis

The waste samples for waste analysis are taken from:

 

Approach Details about the flows of waste covered
Directly from the bin  not applicable
From the waste trucks  not applicable
Other approaches  not applicable
18.1.2. Source of waste flow data for estimation
  Sources Materials covered
Waste collectors  Not applicable   Not applicable 
Waste treatment operators  Not applicable   Not applicable 
Municipalities  Not applicable   Not applicable 
Others  Not applicable   Not applicable 
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Data on selective waste flows collected for recycling are collected continuously by Fost Plus and Valipac (on a monthly or two-monthly basis).

Statistical data on the presence of packaging in household and non-household residual waste are collected by the regions, normally every 5 years.

18.3. Data collection

See 18.1 and 18.2.

18.3.1. Description of the methodology and verification of data on packaging waste generated in case waste analysis is used

Only used as partial cross-check.

18.3.2. Description of the methodology to report on composite packaging

The drink cartons are composite packaging, consisting of (in average) 75% cardboard fibres - which is recycled as paper and cardboard composite, and a fraction of 25% polyal. This fraction of polyal consists of plastic and less than 5% aluminum. For the reporting year 2023, a increased part of the polyal fraction was recycled (26.90%), whilst 56.15% was incinerated with energy recovery and 16,96% was landfilled.

18.3.3. Description of methods for determining packaging waste treatment
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Data collection methods
Administrative reporting yes  no no  no  no no  no  no 
Surveys  yes   no no  no no no no  no 
Electronic registry  yes   no no no   no no  no  no 
Waste analysis  yes   no  no   no  no no  no  no 
Data from waste operators  yes   no  no   no  no no  no  no 
Data from municipalities  yes   no  no   no  no no  no  no 
Data from extended producer responsibility schemes  yes   no no  no  no no  no  no 
Other no  no no  no  no no  no  no 

Additional information about the methodology, including the combination of methods used:

18.3.4. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on the generation and treatment of packaging waste

Fost Plus:
Generation of packaging waste: every Fost Plus member must enter its tonnages put on market, in an online declaration system.
Treatment of packaging waste: normally, the recycled tonnage is registered continuously by the recycler in an online application. Exceptionnally, a yearly attestation (signed by the recycler) is accepted. Fost Plus has large and homogenous streams; this makes it possible to take a more limited sample, which nevertheless has sufficient value.

 

Valipac:
Generation of packaging waste: Every Valipac-member enters his tonnage put on market in on online declaration system. Data are verified and processed by Valipac.
Treatment of packaging waste: every one of the >220 waste management companies reports periodically and yearly. Periodical data are controlled by Valipac and year data are controlled by an independent expert.

18.3.5. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on reusable packaging

Fost Plus: Members must also declare the reusable packaging in their declaration: the number of units placed on the market per retail packaging sheet or per average packaging sheet of a product family ('flat-rate' declaration). No extrapolations are applied; all members who put reusable packaging on the market must declare it.

 

Valipac: regularly a study is executed with regard to the newly placed on the market reusable industrial & commercial packaging waste in Belgium; this study is then updated annually. Since 2020, the IRPC has done annually a monitoring of the use of reusable packaging, analysing in detail the declarations by the companies that use the highest amonts of reusable packaging per type of product.

18.3.6. Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash

Calculation of recycling of metals from incinerator bottom ash : Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash in accordance with the Commission Implementing Act adopted in accordance with Article 37(7) of Directive 2008/98/EC.

 

Data Description of the measurement method to obtain the data
Total amount of metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash Household, metal and aluminium packaging waste recycled from incinerator can not exceed the difference between the global POM quantities and the global quantities collected through separate collection. Analysis are made on the incoming flow for incinertion to estimate the amount of household metal packaging present in the metal outcoming flow of municipals incinerators. An extraction grade, representing the process losses, for the metal packaging waste (0,85%) and an extraction grade for aluminium packaging waste (0,80%) is applied on the result of this calculation. Various cross-checks with information coming from other countries were made to confirm the extraction grades used. Recycled attest, for those quantities are received from the incinerator.

The amount of metal industrial packaging waste coming from incinerator is calculated through waste analysis made on a representative sample of mixed industrial waste sent to incineration. Those analysis are made every year. An extraction grade of 85% (same as for household packaging) is applied on the result of the analysis to take the proces losses into consideration.

 
Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken

Household, metal and aluminium packaging waste recycled from incinerator can not exceed the difference between the global POM quantities and the global quantities collected through separate collection. Analysis are made on the incoming flow for incinertion to estimate the amount of household metal packaging present in the metal outcoming flow of municipals incinerators. An extraction grade, representing the process losses, for the metal packaging waste (0,85%) and an extraction grade for aluminium packaging waste (0,80%) is applied on the result of this calculation. Various cross-checks with information coming from other countries were made to confirm the extraction grades used. Recycled attest, for those quantities are received from the incinerator.

The amount of metal industrial packaging waste coming from incinerator is calculated through waste analysis made on a representative sample of mixed industrial waste sent to incineration. Those analysis are made every year. An extraction grade of 85% (same as for household packaging) is applied on the result of the analysis to take the proces losses into consideration.

 

 
Proportion of waste entering incineration plants that is packaging waste, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken

Household, metal and aluminium packaging waste recycled from incinerator can not exceed the difference between the global POM quantities and the global quantities collected through separate collection. Analysis are made on the incoming flow for incinertion to estimate the amount of household metal packaging present in the metal outcoming flow of municipals incinerators. An extraction grade, representing the process losses, for the metal packaging waste (0,85%) and an extraction grade for aluminium packaging waste (0,80%) is applied on the result of this calculation. Various cross-checks with information coming from other countries were made to confirm the extraction grades used. Recycled attest, for those quantities are received from the incinerator.

The amount of metal industrial packaging waste coming from incinerator is calculated through waste analysis made on a representative sample of mixed industrial waste sent to incineration. Those analysis are made every year. An extraction grade of 85% (same as for household packaging) is applied on the result of the analysis to take the proces losses into consideration.

  
18.4. Data validation

See 18.4.1-18.4.5.

18.4.1. Detailed description of the system for quality control and traceability for packaging waste pursuant to Article 6a(3) and (8) of Directive 94/62/EC

Fost plus:
Fost Plus launches tender procedure for the purchase and effective recycling of the household packaging waste materials.
Each participant has to provide proof that the waste materials are at least transformed into a raw material that can be used directly by the manufacturers of finished products.
Besides strict exclusion grounds, Fost Plus applies selection criteria related to the technical and financial competence of each participant.
In the event of recycling outside the European Union, each participant must demonstrate that the operating conditions (with regard to environmental and social aspects) are fully equivalent to the conditions determined by the member states.
As a consequence, the household packaging recycling that is organised by Fost Plus is 100% recycled in the European Union.
Fost Plus has direct contracts with the recycling companies and in the contract it is stated that the contractor accepts that Fost plus or any other person designated by them is entitled to inspect or have inspected the flow of materials which is made available, at any time during the contract. Moreover, the contractor accepts that Fost Plus is entitled to organise an audit at the contractor’s in order to examine the flow of the materials and in order to control the actual removal and recycling or recovery of the materials, including the last phase of this recycling and recovery. These audits occur minimally once every 2 years at each contractor. In the event of the contractor calling on the services of one or more subcontractor(s), the requirements described above also apply to the subcontractor(s). Hence, Fost plus can guarantee effective recycling of each material at any time during the contract.

 

Valipac:
82.6% of the one-way industrial packaging waste is recycled in the EU. Specifically for plastics exported outside the EU, Valipac has a traceability and audit plan to ensure 100% traceability and 90% operational compliance by 2024, as stated in the Accreditation of Valipac for the period 2022-2026. Belgian affliliated Waste management companies and affiliated European Traders, contracted by Valipac provide data which ensure the traceability of the exported industrial packaging waste. Audits outside the EU are executed by SGS. For 2023, Valipac achieved for plastics a traceability of 98,7% and a rate of proven operational compliance of 94%. For cardboard Valipac achieved in 2023 a traceability of 97.8%.

18.4.2. Traceability of waste treated outside the member State and ensuring its treatment in conditions broadly equivalent to the requirements of EU environmental law
Packaging waste material Subject to final treatment in the Member State (yes/no) Shipped to another EU Member State (yes/no) Exported outside the EU (yes/no) Description of specific measures for quality control and traceability of packaging waste, in particularly as regards monitoring and validation of data
Plastic  yes  yes  yes Fost plus:

Fost Plus launches tender procedure for the purchase and effective recycling of the household packaging waste materials.
Each participant has to provide proof that the waste materials are at least transformed into a raw material that can be used directly by the manufacturers of finished products.
Besides strict exclusion grounds, Fost Plus applies selection criteria related to the technical and financial competence of each participant.
In the event of recycling outside the European Union, each participant must demonstrate that the operating conditions (with regard to environmental and social aspects) are fully equivalent to the conditions determined by the member states.

As a consequence, the household packaging recycling that is organised by Fost Plus is 100% recycled in the European Union.
Fost Plus has direct contracts with the recycling companies and in the contract it is stated that the contractor accepts that Fost plus or any other person designated by them is entitled to inspect or have inspected the flow of materials which is made available, at any time during the contract. Moreover, the contractor accepts that Fost Plus is entitled to organise an audit at the contractor’s in order to examine the flow of the materials and in order to control the actual removal and recycling or recovery of the materials, including the last phase of this recycling and recovery. These audits occur minimally once every 2 years at each contractor. In the event of the contractor calling on the services of one or more subcontractor(s), the requirements described above also apply to the subcontractor(s). Hence, Fost plus can guarantee effective recycling of each material at any time during the contract.

Valipac:

82.6% of the one-way industrial packaging waste is recycled in the EU. Specifically for plastics exported outside the EU, Valipac has a traceability and audit plan to ensure 100% traceability and 90% operational compliance by 2024, as stated in the Accreditation of Valipac for the period 2022-2026. Belgian affliliated Waste management companies and affiliated European Traders, contracted by Valipac provide data which ensure the traceability of the exported industrial packaging waste. 

Wood yes yes  yes same as plastics
Ferrous metals yes yes  yes  same as plastics
Aluminium yes yes  yes  same as plastics 
Glass yes  yes  yes  same as plastics 
Paper and cardboard yes  yes  yes  same as plastics 
Others yes  yes yes

same as plastics 

18.4.3. Description of measures to ensure broadly equivalent waste treatment

For household packaging waste: see above.

For non-household packaging waste: see above; the described audit procedure includes the assessment of the broadly equivalent waste treatment. In the case of an infringement, an "orange or red flag"-procedure is activated, which, in most cases, obliges recyclers to remedy the problem in time for a follow-up audit. In a limited numer of cases (major infringements) a "final red flag" is given, which will end the export to that recycler.

18.4.4. Verification of data on packaging waste generated

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic yes  yes yes  Systematic verifications are integrated in both the Fost Plus system and the Valipac system, in accordance with rules set by the IRPC. The IRPC does similar verifications for self-complying companies.    
Wood yes  yes  yes  Systematic verifications are integrated in both the Fost Plus system and the Valipac system, in accordance with rules set by the IRPC. The IRPC does similar verifications for self-complying companies.    
Ferrous metals yes  yes  yes  Systematic verifications are integrated in both the Fost Plus system and the Valipac system, in accordance with rules set by the IRPC. The IRPC does similar verifications for self-complying companies.    
Aluminium yes  yes  yes   Systematic verifications are integrated in both the Fost Plus system and the Valipac system, in accordance with rules set by the IRPC. The IRPC does similar verifications for self-complying companies.   
Glass yes  yes  yes   Systematic verifications are integrated in both the Fost Plus system and the Valipac system, in accordance with rules set by the IRPC. The IRPC does similar verifications for self-complying companies.   
Paper and cardboard yes  yes  yes   Systematic verifications are integrated in both the Fost Plus system and the Valipac system, in accordance with rules set by the IRPC. The IRPC does similar verifications for self-complying companies.   
Others yes  yes  yes  Systematic verifications are integrated in both the Fost Plus system and the Valipac system, in accordance with rules set by the IRPC. The IRPC does similar verifications for self-complying companies.    
18.4.5. Verification of data on packaging waste recycling

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic yes  yes    yes  All household packaging waste recyclers are systematically audited by Fost Plus. All non-household packaging waste collectors and sorters are systematically audited by Valipac; for traders and recyclers of non-household packaging waste, until 2018, a verification program was set up with the IRPC; in 2019 these waste flows were all mapped, to allow for a systematic auditing of traders and recyclers; the new auditing protocols have entered into force. Both Fost Plus and Valipac and also the IRPC do additional checks.  
Wood yes   yes   yes   All household packaging waste recyclers are systematically audited by Fost Plus. All non-household packaging waste collectors and sorters are systematically audited by Valipac; for traders and recyclers of non-household packaging waste, until 2018, a verification program was set up with the IRPC; in 2019 these waste flows were all mapped, to allow for a systematic auditing of traders and recyclers; the new auditing protocols have entered into force. Both Fost Plus and Valipac and also the IRPC do additional checks.  
Ferrous metals yes   yes   yes    All household packaging waste recyclers are systematically audited by Fost Plus. All non-household packaging waste collectors and sorters are systematically audited by Valipac; for traders and recyclers of non-household packaging waste, until 2018, a verification program was set up with the IRPC; in 2019 these waste flows were all mapped, to allow for a systematic auditing of traders and recyclers; the new auditing protocols have entered into force. Both Fost Plus and Valipac and also the IRPC do additional checks. 
Aluminium yes   yes   yes    All household packaging waste recyclers are systematically audited by Fost Plus. All non-household packaging waste collectors and sorters are systematically audited by Valipac; for traders and recyclers of non-household packaging waste, until 2018, a verification program was set up with the IRPC; in 2019 these waste flows were all mapped, to allow for a systematic auditing of traders and recyclers; the new auditing protocols have entered into force. Both Fost Plus and Valipac and also the IRPC do additional checks. 
Mixed waste yes   yes   yes   All household packaging waste recyclers are systematically audited by Fost Plus. All non-household packaging waste collectors and sorters are systematically audited by Valipac; for traders and recyclers of non-household packaging waste, until 2018, a verification program was set up with the IRPC; in 2019 these waste flows were all mapped, to allow for a systematic auditing of traders and recyclers; the new auditing protocols have entered into force. Both Fost Plus and Valipac and also the IRPC do additional checks.  
Others yes   yes   yes   All household packaging waste recyclers are systematically audited by Fost Plus. All non-household packaging waste collectors and sorters are systematically audited by Valipac; for traders and recyclers of non-household packaging waste, until 2018, a verification program was set up with the IRPC; in 2019 these waste flows were all mapped, to allow for a systematic auditing of traders and recyclers; the new auditing protocols have entered into force. Both Fost Plus and Valipac and also the IRPC do additional checks.  
18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Methods for determining packaging waste generation
Approach % of waste generated based on this approach
Approach 1
Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR data, complemented with estimates to ensure full coverage of the EPR data
Main source - 100 %  
Approach 2
POM based on sources other than EPR (e.g. based on production and import statistics and factors to estimate the amount of packaging associated to these product flows)
only partially used for double-checks
Approach 3
Waste analysis
 Additional method, used for double checks - we are developing this method as a full secundary method, to be used for balancing of data
Other approaches : Not applicable 
18.5.1.1. Approach 1 - Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
EPR scheme data 100  100  100   100  100  100 100  100  At least 300 kg in total of all packaging 
Administrative reporting different from EPR Not applicable   Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Surveys Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Electronic registry: Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Other : Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered 

 

18.5.1.2. Approach 2 - Put on the market (POM) calculated from production and reign trade statistics and using coefficients of packaging for the sold goods in question

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Production statistics not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  not applicable    not applicable   not applicable  not applicable   not applicable    not applicable 
Foreign trade statistics not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  
Specific surveys : not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  
Electronic registry : not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  
Other : not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered

 

18.5.1.3. Approach 3 - Waste analysis

Packaging waste generated estimated by waste analysis

 

Type of waste Number of samples taken Total volume or weight of samples taken What proportion does the sample represent of the total waste generated
(in %)
Frequency of sample
Volume in cubic metres Weight in tonnes
Mixed household and similar waste  not applicable   not applicable  not applicable   not applicable    not applicable 
Separately collected municipal waste not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  
Separately collected business waste not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  
Others : not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable   not applicable  
18.5.2. Information on estimates for packaging placed on the market

Data from Fost Plus and Valipac do not cover the total market; an extrapolation was made based on the estimate of the total market by the accredited compliance organisations Fost Plus and Valipac (based on internal studies). Over the past years, these estimates have been improved on the basis of additional analyses and internal research made by the accredited compliance organisations Fost Plus and Valipac, under the supervision of the IRPC.  

18.5.3. Presence and calculation of estimates and indication of added volume in % of the total
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Validation
Corrections for underreporting of units covered by the above sources Yes (included in estimates for freeriders)   Yes (included in estimates for freeriders)  Yes (included in estimates for freeriders) Yes (included in estimates for freeriders)  Yes (included in estimates for freeriders)   Yes (included in estimates for freeriders)  Yes (included in estimates for freeriders)  Yes (included in estimates for freeriders)
Estimates for units below the threshold (de minimis) Yes - 0.02% (of total market)    Yes - 0.05% (of total market)   Yes - 0.01% (of total market)   Yes - 0.01% (of total market)   Yes - 0.00% (of total market)   Yes - 0.00% (of total market)   Yes - 0.02% (of total market)   Yes - 0.01% (of total market) 
Estimates for other units legally exempt from reporting There are no such units   There are no such units There are no such units  There are no such units  There are no such units  There are no such units   There are no such units There are no such units 
Estimates for freeriders Yes - 13.56% (of total market)  Yes - 10.94% (of total market)  Yes - 8.20% (of total market)  Yes - 14.47% (of total market)   Yes - 4.27% (of total market) Yes - 10.52% (of total market)   Yes - 17.83% (of total market)  Yes - 8.71% (of total market)
Private imports /exports by private parcels Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)   Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)  Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)  Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)  Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)  Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)  Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)  Yes - included in private imports / exports (from journeys)
Private imports /exports (from journeys)  Yes - 2.71% (of total market) Yes - 0.46% (of total market) 
Yes - 0.00% (of total market)   Yes - 0.00% (of total market)  Yes - 0.00% (of total market)  Yes - 13.10% (of total market)  Yes - 0.00% (of total market)  Yes - 0.00% (of total market)
Internet imports and exports i.e. on-line sales  Yes - 0.16% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going  Yes - 0.02% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going  Yes - 0.00% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going  Yes - 0.00% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going  Yes - 0.00% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going  Yes - 0.00% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going  Yes - 0.36% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going  Yes - 0.00% (of total market) - this figure is probably underestimated; the rest is included in estimates for freeriders - additional analysis are on-going
Other corrections  no no  no  no  no  no  no  no
18.5.4. Measurement points for recycling applied

Packaging waste material

Description of measurement points used (at calculation point or at the output of sorting operation with subtraction of non-target materials as appropriate, end-of-waste criteria, etc.), including variation at regional and local level

Plastic Measurement at the input of the recycling proces with substraction of non-target materials as appropriate 
Wood Measurement at the input of the recycling proces with substraction of non-target materials as appropriate 
Ferrous metals Measurement at the input of the recycling proces with substraction of non-target materials as appropriate 
Aluminium Measurement at the input of the recycling proces with substraction of non-target materials as appropriate 
Glass Measurement at the input of the recycling proces with substraction of non-target materials as appropriate 
Paper and cardboard Measurement at the input of the recycling proces with substraction of non-target materials as appropriate 
Others Measurement at the input of the recycling proces with substraction of non-target materials as appropriate 
18.5.4.1. Detailed description of the methodology to calculate the amount of non-target materials removed between the measurement and the calculation points, where applicable

Examples are included in the study ordered by the IRPC and executed by COMASE concerning "Analyse des chiffres sous-jacents servant au rapportage de la CIE sur les résultats en matière de recyclage et de valorisation des déchets d’emballages". This study can be made available.

18.5.4.2. Detailed description of how compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants has been identified and recorded in the data

In 2023 there was 1409 tons of composted paper-cardboard going into anaerobic composting.

18.5.5. Methodology to determine recycled amounts from composite packaging or packaging composed of multiple materials

Drink cartons consist for 75% of cardboard fibres that are recycled and for 25% of polyal. A part of the polyal fraction was recycled (26.90%) and another part was incinerated with energy recovery (56.15%); the remaining quantities (16.96%) were put into landfill. The average composition was determined on the basis of data received from packer/fillers and from producers of drink cartons. The cardboard fibres are recycled in paper mills.

18.5.6. Use of Average Loss rates (ALRS)

Description of the sorted packaging waste to which ALRs are applied, types of sorting plants to which different ALRs apply, the methodological approach to calculating ALRs at such point(s), including the statistical accuracy of any surveys used, or the nature of any technical specifications.

 

Sorted waste material and sorting plant type ALR applied (in %) Description
 not applicable  not applicable  not applicable
18.6. Adjustment

All data received from Fost Plus, Valipac and individual compliers have already been corrected to take into account impurities and humidity. This means that further adjustments are not necessary. More information under 18.6.2.

18.6.1. Adjustment for impurities and humidity
Factors Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Correction factors for impurities and humidity in % of waste not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable
How the correction factors are derived not applicable
If no correction of impurities and humidity is applied, how they are accounted  See 18.6
18.6.2. Attribution of waste to packaging and non-packaging types and correction for humidity

Description, where applicable, of the methodology to exclude non-packaging waste from the reported amount of recycled packaging waste and of the methodology to correct the amount of packaging waste at the measurement point in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging (including by using relevant European standards). Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of packaging waste (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 paper/cardboard  not applicable  not applicable Paper and cardboard is a mixed flow packaging & non-packaging. To determine the proportion of packaging in the flow, the IRPC organises at least every 5 years, composition analysis of the flow. The last one was made in 2023, but the 2023 data are still based on the 2018 study. For 2023, 32% of the mixed flow is considered packaging; however, as of 2024 the percentage will rise to 53%. The 32% is most likely an underestimation.

A correction for moisture in cardboard packaging is made by deducting the relative surplus of humidity between humidity of put-on-market cardboard packaging and humidity of cardboard packaging waste ready for recycling. This correction is already done by Fost Plus and Valipac.

18.6.3. Attribution of waste

Description of the methodology to exclude waste originating from other countries, where applicable. Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of waste from the Member State (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
  Not applicable    Not applicable    Not applicable The accredited compliance organisation for household packaging waste Fost Plus, and the accredited compliance organisation for industrial and commercial packaging waste Valipac, and also the individual responsible packaging companies, all use a calculation method by witch they guarantee that only packaging waste that is generated on the Belgian territory, is taken into account.


19. Comment Top

No further comment.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top