Farm structure (ef)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: REPUBLIC OF CROATIA - CROATIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS 


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA - CROATIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS 

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Spatial statistics Directorate/Agricultural, Production and Structural Statistics Department

1.5. Contact mail address

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA - CROATIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS

Ilica 3, 10000 Zagreb

Republic of Croatia

www.dzs.hr

 

Spatial statistics Directorate/Agricultural, Production and Structural Statistics Department          

Branimirova 19, 10 000 Zagreb


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 18/03/2021
2.2. Metadata last posted 10/03/2021
2.3. Metadata last update 18/03/2021


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force.  They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment.

The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies.

The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods.
The data collections are organised in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and have a new structure, consisting of a core data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries.

3.2. Classification system

Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications.

The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding.

The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2019/2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:

  • for core: location of the holding, legal personality of the holding, manager, type of tenure of the utilised agricultural area, variables of land, organic farming, irrigation on cultivated outdoor area, variables of livestock, organic production methods applied to animal production;
  • for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities": farm management, family labour force, non-family labour force, other gainful activities directly and not directly related to the agricultural holding;
  • for the module "Rural development": support received by agricultural holdings through various rural development measures;
  • for the module "Animal housing and rural development module":  animal housing, nutrient use and manure on the farm, manure application techniques, facilities for manure.
3.5. Statistical unit

See sub-category below.

3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding

The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups:

- A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops

- A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops

- A.01.3: Plant propagation

- A.01.4: Animal production

- A.01.5: Mixed farming or

- The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity.

Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included.

3.6. Statistical population

See sub-categories below.

3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension)

The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex.



Annexes:
3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
Yes
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment”

The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1.

3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management”

A subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2. (not only agricultural holdings with at least one of the following: bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry).

3.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

3.7.1. Geographical area covered

The entire territory of the country.

3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

Not applicable.

3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding
The main building for production
The location where all agricultural activities are situated
The majority of the area of the holding
The most important parcel by physical size
The most important parcel by economic size
The residence of the farmer (manager) not further than 5 km straight from the farm
3.7.4. Additional information reference area

Not available.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 2007 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports).

3.9. Base period

The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output.


4. Unit of measure Top

Two kinds of units are generally used:

  • the units of measurement for the variables (area in hectares, livestock in (1000) heads or LSU (livestock units), labour force in persons or AWU (annual working units), standard output in Euro, places for animal housing etc.) and
  • the number of agricultural holdings having these characteristics.


5. Reference Period Top

See sub-categories below.

5.1. Reference period for land variables

The use of land refers to the 12-month period ending on 1st June within the reference year 2020. In the case of successive crops from the same piece of land, the land use refers to a crop that is harvested during the reference year, regardless of when the crop in question is sown.

5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices

The 12-month period ending on  1st June within the reference year 2020.

5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing

The reference day 1st  June within the reference year 2020.

5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management

The 12-month period ending on 1st June 2020. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing.

5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force

The 12-month period ending on 1st June 2020 within the reference year 2020.

5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures

The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020.

5.7. Reference day for all other variables

The reference day 1st June within the reference year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See sub-categories below.

6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements
Legal act
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements

Act on Agricultural Census 2000.

6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements

https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2019_06_63_1233.html

6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements

2020

6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents
Yes
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Act on Agricultural Census 2020 gives Croatian Bureau of Statistics (CBS) rights to access data available in administrative sources and databases (IACS, vineyard register, records relating to rural development measures). Furthermore, there are written agreements with data providing and receiving agencies.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Statistical data collected for IFS2020, according to the Law on official statistics (NN, br. 25/20.) is confidential and its purpose is restricted exclusively to statistical usage. Authorised interviewers are obliged to respect these restrictions. The results will be published in a cumulative form which prevents displaying data on individuals.

Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (recital 24 and Article 20(4)) of 11 March 2009 (OJ L 87, p. 164), stipulates the need to establish common principles and guidelines ensuring the confidentiality of data used for the production of European statistics and the access to those confidential data with due account for technical developments and the requirements of users in a democratic society.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1. Aggregated data

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold)
Dominance rule (The n largest contributions make up for more than k% of the cell total)
Secondary confidentiality rules
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells
Table redesign (Collapsing rows and/or columns)
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells)
Rounding: controlled, deterministic or random (Round each cell value to a pre-specified rounding base)
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods

In the ongoing CBS restructuring, it is foreseen to place the focal point for ensuring confidentiality, including provision of guidance, recommending appropriate methodologies and periodical examination of methods used for data protection, within the Statistical Business Register, Classifications, Sampling, Statistical Methods and Analyses Department. A filter is applied during the table compilation using the following processes:

• dominance treatment: if any holdings account for at least 85% of the value, this value is put to zero;

• small number of units: if a value is calculated from less than 3 holdings, this value is put to zero;

• rounding: the values are rounded to the closer multiple of 10.

7.2.2. Microdata

See sub-categories below.

7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination
Yes
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation
Micro-aggregation
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology

The information is provided in the Ordinance on Conditions and Terms of Using Confidential Data for Scientific Purposes (Official Gazette, No. 137/13) which defines in detail conditions, modalities and measures for protecting confidential information (research proposal submitted by independent researchers or research entities referred to in Article 2 of the Ordinance; access to confidential data on the basis of research proposals submitted and approved; confidential declaration has to be signed by any individual researcher using confidential data; special contract has to be concluded inter CBS and independent researcher or research entity; access to confidential data may be granted only for the period of the duration of the research project, max 5 years; obligations for taking all legal, administrative, technical and organisational safeguards of the confidential data for scientific purpose which have been granted; confidential data must be destroyed when the research project is finished; after expiry of the research project, the researchers or research entity are obliged to provide CBS with references to all reports that have been produced using the data; termination access to data etc.).

Each usage of confidential information is regulated through a specific contract with CBS, which strictly regulates this issue.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Notifications about the dissemination of statistics are published in the calendar of statistical data issues. This Calendar contains the review of publications planned to be issued in current year and by the end of May for next year, which depends on when the processing of a particular statistical survey can be finished and on whether it is feasible to make a particular kind of publication or not. All Calendars are publicly available.

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/kalendar/2021/Kalendar2021.pdf

8.3. Release policy - user access

Data are disseminated according to a predefined calendar and are simultaneously available to all users on the pages of CBS.

8.3.1. Use of quality rating system
No
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system

Not applicable.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Every 3-4 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See sub-categories below.

10.1.1. Publication of news releases
Yes
10.1.2. Link to news releases

 https://web.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/publication/2020/01-01-29_01_2020.htm

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See sub-categories below.

10.2.1. Production of paper publications
No
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications
No
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link

Not applicable.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See sub-categories below.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

We do not monitor and record the number of consultations of data tables in the field of farm structure.

10.3.2. Accessibility of online database
Yes
10.3.3. Link to online database

Database with IFS2020 data is available on the website of CBS: Statistical database

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See sub-category below.

10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata
Yes
10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

See sub-categories below.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata
No
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata

Not applicable.

10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology
No
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook

Not applicable.

10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers
Yes
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers

Title - Upute za popisivače; Upute za poslovne subjekte.

Publisher - CROATIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS

Year - 2020

Please see the annexes.



Annexes:
10.6.7 Upute za popisivače
10.6.7. Upute za poslovne subjekte
10.7. Quality management - documentation

CBS accepted Total quality management (TQM) approach as the general model for quality management, quality assessment and quality improvement. To support implementation of this model the basic strategic document is developed where the following main cornerstones of the TQM model are explained and described:

• High quality statistical processes and products

• User satisfaction

• Professional orientation of the employees

• Efficiency of the processes

• Reduction of the response burden

For each of these general aims, concrete actions are foreseen and plans for their implementation described.

https://www.dzs.hr/Eng/international/Quality_Report/Quality_Report_Documents/Quality_Report_Statistical_TQM.pdf


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

11.1.1. Quality management system
Yes
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures
Training courses
Use of best practices
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures

In order to establish a comprehensive system of quality, the Croatian Bureau of Statistics applies the model of Total Quality Management, which also contains the Code of Practice of European Statistics. This model offers a possibility of continuous improvement for each business process. It focuses not only on products and services, but also to users and their satisfaction, the active participation of employees, long-term business success and social benefit. The communication is recognized as a key element of all statistical processes that affect the business success.



Annexes:
11.1.3. Total quality management
11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures

We started preparing files for import into the Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM) application from 2019 onwards.



Annexes:
11.1.4. Quality report statistical processes template
11.2. Quality management - assessment

In general, the data quality is good.

See attached files.



Annexes:
11.2. Per Review Croatia 2015
11.2. Progress report on implementation of the Code of Practice 2017


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Ministry of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Government of the Republic of Croatia, researchers and the general public for the purpose of forming economic policy and allocating state budget resources.

12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes

Some of the characteristics were added to the questionnaire for national purposes only:

• holder's name and surname,

• areas under triticale (included in other cereals),

• areas under secondary crops,

• address of the holder,

• number of trees in extensive orchards and olive groves and number of vines in vineyards – needed for calculation of production,

• all spices of vegetables are added in open fields, in glasshouses and in kitchen gardens.

 

The characteristics surveyed only for national purposes are used in EAA, for updating farm register and for calculating standard output.

12.1.2. Unmet user needs

There is no information about unmet user needs.

12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs

Not applicable.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

CBS conducts user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. User satisfaction survey
Yes
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey

2015

12.2.3. Satisfaction level
Satisfied

Annexes:
12.2.3. Satisfaction survey 2015
12.3. Completeness

Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on: Eurostat's website.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

See categories below.

13.2. Sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex.



Annexes:
13.2.1. Relative standard errors
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

Not applicable. Core and modules are carried out as a census. 

13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors

Not applicable. Core and modules are carried out as a census. 

13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality
None
13.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted.
The over-coverage rate is calculated as the share of ineligible holdings to the holdings designated for the core data collection. The ineligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status that are not imputed nor re-weighted for (therefore considered ineligible).
The over-coverage rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat. 



Annexes:
13.3.1.1 Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Below thresholds during the reference period
Temporarily out of production during the reference period
Ceased activities
Merged to another unit
Duplicate units
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error
Removal of ineligible units from the records, leaving unchanged the weights for the other units
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error

Core indicators as well as modules were surveyed as a census, no re-weighting was used and therefore ineligible units were just not taken into account when calculating totals.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate

Under-coverage is very low as the frame for survey was statistical Register of agricultural holdings (SRAH) that has been updated with all available administrative sources.

13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Units with outdated information in the frame (variables below thresholds in the frame but above thresholds in the reference period)
Other
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error

Further updating of SRAH.

13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error

Not available.

13.3.1.4. Misclassification error
No
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error

Not applicable.

13.3.1.5. Contact error
Yes
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error

Contact information is constantly updated. Information comes  from the SBR, IACS or direct information from respondents in the census questionnaire.

13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality
Low
13.3.2. Measurement error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors

Statistics corrects possible errors of measurement using the logic-numeric control. We are trying to avoid the measurement error by training of interviewers and supervisors, control data and process validation. Characteristics that are complicated for both respondents and interviewers are related to labour force, animal housing and manure management.

After data entry, extreme values of variables are checked and corrected if necessary.

13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors
Complexity of variables
Unclear questions
Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error
Pre-testing questionnaire
Pre-filled questions
Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents
On-line FAQ or Hot-line support for enumerators or respondents
Training of enumerators
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality
Low
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error

The CAPI application contains logic-numeric controls which warning interviewer on possible measurement caused errors. Also, the set of basic checks are implemented in CAWI application in order to reduce measurement errors. Remaining errors are mostly detected throw data processing and corrected accordingly.

13.3.3. Non response error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted.
The unit non-response rate is calculated as the share of eligible non-respondent holdings to the eligible holdings.  The eligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status which are imputed or re-weighted for (therefore considered eligible).
The unit non-response rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat.

13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response
Failure to make contact with the unit
Refusal to participate
Inability to participate (e.g. illness, absence)
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response
Follow-up interviews
Reminders
Imputation
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis

The unit non-response rate was very low and no special analysis was made.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

The item non-response is very low and it is not specially measured. 

13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response
Skip of due question
Farmers do not know the answer
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response
Follow-up interviews
Imputation
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality
Low
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error

Unit non-response is handled by imputation of information from the available administrative sources.

13.3.4. Processing error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors
Data processing
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods
Previous data for the same unit
Other
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors

Within data validation tool exist lot of the numeric-logical controls and active signals that practically prevent the creation of processing errors.

13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections

Only employees from the Agricultural, Production and Structural Statistics Department, who were directly involved in data processing, were authorised to make corrections.

13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality
Low
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error

Not available.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result
Time lag - first result
Reference period 1 June 2020
Published 30 November 2020
Difference number of months 5
14.1.2. Time lag - final result

 

Reference period

1 June 2020

Published

31 December 2021

Difference number of months

19

 

Last day of the reference period

31 December 2020

Day of publication of final results

31 December 2021

Difference number of months

12

14.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery

Not requested.

14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication

Data are published according to the planned timetable.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See sub-categories below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics.

15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

The definition of agricultural holdings is in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met
 

 

 

Total

Covered by the thresholds

Attained coverage

Minimum requested coverage

1

 2

3=2*100/1

4

UAA excluding kitchen gardens

 1506742,33

 1503751.2555

 99,8%

 98%

LSU

 757862.867

 752898.446

 99,3%

 98%

 
 
15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat

No differences.

15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences

Not applicable.

15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook

There are no deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and the EU handbook.

15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job

The information is available in the annex. 
The number of working hours and days in a year for a full-time job correspond to one annual working unit (AWU) in the country. One annual work unit corresponds to the work performed by one person who is occupied on an agricultural holding on a full-time basis. Annual working units are used to calculate the farm work on the agricultural holdings.



Annexes:
15.1.4.1.1. AWU
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients

No national livestock coefficients are used.

HR has used the same livestock coefficients as those set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.”

No deviations. 

15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.5. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

No deviations.

15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.6. Common land
The concept of common land exists
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data
Yes
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected

Not applicable.

15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land
Common land is included in the land of agricultural holdings renting or being allotted the land based on written or oral agreements.
Common land is included in separate records representing virtual entities without managers.
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land
Surveys
Administrative sources
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land

In IFS2020, the land used as common land was directly attached to farms and also collected as common land units at regional level. The common land is mainly in state ownership. The obtained area of common land used by the farm was mainly added to the rough grazing area of the farm. A separate questionnaire for common land was not used in FSS questionnaire.

Concerning data coming from administrative source (Ministry of Agriculture), the area of common land is recorded in a special unit in the dataset at level of NUTS3 regions (15 units). In terms of tenure classification is treated as common land.

The area of permanent grassland in state owned is on around 1 million hectares in Croatia based on cadastral data (but not all area is used) and in common land units utilised area of grasslands is presented.

15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections

It was not possible to allocate the common land on farms with grazing livestock because data on lower NUTS were not available.

15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products

See sub-categories below.

15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

No deviations.

15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country

There are no differences in methods across regions within the country.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See sub-categories below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

10 years.

15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.2.2. Description of changes

Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However, our country does not raise fur animals.

15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.3.2. Description of changes

A new threshold - for mushrooms -  was applied in 2020 (this category was non-significant in 2016).

Due to the changes in thresholds, the holdings with mushrooms are included. The impact on total utilised agricultural area and number of holdings is minor, but the impact on SO's is not negligible.

15.2.4. Geographical coverage

See sub-categories below.

15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.4.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.5.2. Description of changes

Legal personality of the agricultural holding

In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.

Other livestock n.e.c.

In FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."

Livestock units

In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.

Organic animals

While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included.

15.2.6. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.6.2. Description of changes

In FSS 2016, the 12-month period for land and labour force variables is from 1 June 2015 to 31 May 2016. 

In IFS 2020, the 12-month period for land and labour force variables is from 2 June 2019 to 1 June 2020.

15.2.7. Common land

See sub-categories below.

15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.7.2. Description of changes

The methods used in 2016 were as follows:

- Common land is included in the land of agricultural holdings renting or being allotted the land based on written and oral agreements.

- Common land is included in the land of agricultural holdings based on a statistical model.

- Common land is included in separate records representing virtual entities without managers.

 

In 2020, these two methods have been used:

- Common land is included in separate records representing virtual entities without managers

- Common land is included in the land of agricultural holdings renting or being allotted the land based on written and oral agreements.

15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat
Animal production statistics.
- A2120, there is increase trend of calves for fattening.
- A2300F In 2020 there is decreasing trend due to low purchase price of milk in Croatia and lot of dairy farms stopped with activity and on the other hand, the number of suckler cows is increasing.
- Number of holdings growing animals is decreasing during the years. Especially it is visible in the dairy: sector where number of holdings produces milk significantly decreased in the last decade.
 
Crops production statistics.
- C1300F, there has been an upward trend in barley production, especially for malting barley.
- C1400T, there is a constant decrease in the area of oats.
- F2000T, F3000T and F4000T, there is increase trend of area under figs, pomegranate, nuts (especially walnuts), berries (especially rosehip).
- Regarding the irrigable area the strategic goal (National Project of Irrigation and Land and Water Management in the in the Republic of Croatia) is to have the 65 000 hectares under irrigation until 2030.
Concerning the decreasing area under grapes for other wines and grapes for table use that is result of grubbing up and diseases.
 
Labour force.
- MOGA-NFAM_RH the number of non-family labour force regularly working on the holding and having other gainful activities (related to the agricultural holding) as their main activity is increased due the fact that farmers used more measures from rural development programmes that require the employment of the non-family labour force engaged in OGA.
15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time
Yes
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See sub-categories below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts.

15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level
Yes
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level

IFS micro level data were compared with “Annual Crop Statistics” and “Animal Production Statistics”. There were differences related to the animal production statistics occurred due to the different reference dates.

15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level
Yes
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level

For animal production statistics, the differences occurred between IFS and animal production statistics are due to the different reference dates.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules.


16. Cost and Burden Top

See sub-categories below.

16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics

Within the framework of the IFS2020, the regular annual Survey on Areas Sown and Survey on early crops and fruits was carried out. With this kind of organisation we carried out only one survey and reduced the response burden on farmers. On the other hand, we have to provide results for the Survey on Areas Sown much earlier than for the IFS, which means more burdens for the CBS.

The biggest burden is on biggest units for which we have full coverage in the sample and for all cycles of surveys while for the smaller units the Classifications, Sampling, Statistical Methods and Analyses Department controlled that the same unit is not included in the sample in consecutive number of times. 

16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat
Further automation
Increased use of administrative data
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains

Not available.

16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes)

See sub-categories below.

16.3.1. Core

Not available.

16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘

Not available.

16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’

Not relevant (data were collected from the administrative source).

16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’

Not available.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Revision Policy of the Croatian Bureau of Statistics is based on the principles of the European Statistics Code of Practice.

Revision policy of the Croatian Bureau of Statistics distinguishes three types of revisions: regular revisions, major revisions and unscheduled revisions. 

Unplanned revision of the IFS2020 may be carried out. In any case it is necessary to clarify the reasons for a revision (mistake in data sources or calculations or due to the unexpected changes in the methodology or data sources).

17.2. Data revision - practice

Data revision is not planned so far.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top


Annexes:
18. Timetable_statistical_process
18.1. Source data

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1. Population frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1.1. Type of frame
List frame
18.1.1.2. Name of frame

Statistical Register of Agricultural holdings.

18.1.1.3. Update frequency
Annual
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.2.2. Sampling design

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension

See sub-categories below.

18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.3.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.4.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.5. Module “Rural development”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.5.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.6.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable.

18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection

Not applicable.

18.1.13. Administrative sources

See sub-categories below.

18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them

The information is available on Eurostat's website.

18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources

See the attached Excel file in the Annex.



Annexes:
18.1.13.2. Description_quality_administrative sources
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used
None
18.1.14. Innovative approaches

The information on innovative approaches is available on  Eurostat's website.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between.

18.3. Data collection

See sub-categories below.

18.3.1. Methods of data collection
Postal, non-electronic version
Postal, electronic version (email)
Face-to-face, electronic version
Telephone, electronic version
Use of Internet
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires
Not applicable
18.3.3. Questionnaire

Please find the questionnaire in annex.



Annexes:
18.3.3 Questionnaire for private family farms in Croatian
18.3.3 Questionnaire for business entities in Croatian
18.3.3 Questionnaire for private family farms in English
18.3.3 Questionnaire for business entities in English
18.4. Data validation

See sub-categories below.

18.4.1. Type of validation checks
Completeness checks
Range checks
Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation
Interviewers
Supervisors
Staff from local departments
Staff from central department
Other
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation

Validation rules were used in the questionnaires and within special data processing tool. Additional validations were done through special queries.

18.5. Data compilation

Not applicable.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

The imputation rate is 6,9%. Imputation is done for unit non-response and includes all corresponding variables from the administrative sources.

18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor
Not applicable
18.6. Adjustment

Covered under Data compilation.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture.


19. Comment Top

See sub-categories below.

19.1. List of abbreviations

AWU - Annual working unit 

CAP – Common Agricultural Policy

CAPI –  Computer Assisted Personal Interview

CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview

CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview

CBS - Croatian Bureau of Statistics

EAA - Economic accounts for Agriculture 

EU - European Union

FSS – Farm Structure Survey

GSBPM - Generic Statistical Business Process Model

IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System

IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics

LSU – Livestock units

NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities

NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics

PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview

SBR - Statistical business register 

SO – Standard output

SRAH - Register of agricultural holdings 

TQM - Total quality management

UAA – Utilised agricultural area

19.2. Additional comments

No additional comments.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top