|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | French ministry of agriculture and food (Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation): Statistics and Prospective Department (Service de la Statistique et de la Prospective): |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Department of agricultural, forest and agrifood statistics (Sous-direction des statistiques agricoles, forestières et agroalimentaires: SDSAFA) Unit of structural, environmental and forestry statistics (Bureau des Statistiques Structurelles, Environnementales et Forestières: BSSEF) |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | MAA- SG SSP-BSSEF |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 28/03/2024 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 28/03/2024 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 31/05/2024 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force. They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects. The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies. The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables and maps. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods. |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications. The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding. The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2. |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091. The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874. The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:
|
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding | |||
The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups: - A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops - A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops - A.01.3: Plant propagation - A.01.4: Animal production - A.01.5: Mixed farming or - The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity. Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex. Annexes: 3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings |
|||
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
No | |||
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment” | |||
The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1 The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020. It will be collected in 2023 Structure Survey. |
|||
3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management” | |||
The subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2 with at least one of the following: bovine animals, pigs, sheep, goats, poultry. It may happen that there are no animal present on the holding at the reference date (1st of November 2020) but there is a breeding activity at certain moments of the year. In such case, these holdings have been questioned about manure management. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
3.7.1. Geographical area covered | |||
The entire territory of the country. |
|||
3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories | |||
Overseas territories are included:
|
|||
3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding | |||
The main building for production The most important parcel by physical size |
|||
3.7.4. Additional information reference area | |||
For farms without buildings: the most important parcel by physical size, from IACS if the farm is included in IACS. |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 1966 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports).
|
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output. |
|
|||
Two kinds of units are generally used:
|
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
5.1. Reference period for land variables | |||
The use of land refers to the reference year 2020 :
|
|||
5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices | |||
Reference crop year from 01/11/2019 to 31/10/2020 |
|||
5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing | |||
The reference day is 01/11/2020 for livestock. |
|||
5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management | |||
From 01/11/2019 to 31/10/2020 |
|||
5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force | |||
From 01/11/2019 to 31/10/2020. |
|||
5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures | |||
The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020. |
|||
5.7. Reference day for all other variables | |||
01/11/2020 |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements | |||
Legal act Other formal agreement |
|||
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
|
|||
6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements | |||
|
|||
6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements | |||
2020 |
|||
6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents | |||
Yes | |||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
|
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
|
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1. Aggregated data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells | |||
Threshold rule (The number of contributors is less than a pre-specified threshold) Dominance rule (The n largest contributions make up for more than k% of the cell total) Secondary confidentiality rules |
|||
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells | |||
Cell suppression (Completely suppress the value of some cells) | |||
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods | |||
The data circulates after encryption. |
|||
7.2.2. Microdata | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination | |||
No | |||
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation | |||
Reduction of information | |||
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology | |||
IFS 2020 National micro-data files can be accessed for research purposes.
|
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
There is no online release calendar for IFS 2020 as it is a decennial operation. However, information have been given to users and respondents (see 8.3) for IFS2020. |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
Not applicable |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
There is a newsletter of the Statistical and Foresight Department of the French ministry of agriculture and food. https://agreste.agriculture.gouv.fr/agreste-web/servicon/S.2/listeTypeServicon/ For IFS 2020
|
|||
8.3.1. Use of quality rating system | |||
Yes, another quality rating system | |||
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system | |||
We calculate the sampling errors indicators (see 13.2.1. Sampling error – indicators) and publish if the RSE is considered low. |
|
|||
Data dissemination for farm structure survey is done after each survey :
|
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.1.1. Publication of news releases | |||
Yes | |||
10.1.2. Link to news releases | |||
|
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.2.1. Production of paper publications | |||
Yes, but not in English | |||
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications | |||
Yes, but not in English | |||
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link | |||
Online publications, published by the Statistical and Foresight Department of the French ministry of agriculture and food:
Other publications are planed in 2022. Annexes: National first results, IFS 2020 |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
In march 2022:
|
|||
10.3.2. Accessibility of online database | |||
Yes | |||
10.3.3. Link to online database | |||
https://agreste.agriculture.gouv.fr/agreste-web/disaron/RA2020_001/detail/ The first table is available with provisional results (december 2021):
Other tables are planed with final results in 2022. |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata | |||
Yes | |||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Regional statistical services have their own websites with IFS 2020 results. Example: |
|||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not requested. |
|||
10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata | |||
Yes | |||
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata | |||
Recensement agricole 2020, published by the Statistical and Foresight Department of the French ministry of agriculture and food: https://agreste.agriculture.gouv.fr/agreste-web/methodon/S-RA%202020/methodon/ |
|||
10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology | |||
Yes | |||
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook | |||
IFS 2020 national handbook is not online, but it is available for researchers having an access to microdata. Annexes: National IFS2020 Handbook |
|||
10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers | |||
Yes | |||
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers | |||
|
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
Not available. |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
11.1.1. Quality management system | |||
Yes | |||
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures | |||
Designated quality manager, quality unit and/or senior level committee | |||
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures | |||
There is a quality committee of the Statistical and Foresight Department of the French ministry of agriculture and food. |
|||
11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures | |||
Improvements are in reflexion within our quality committee. |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
A report was published in August 2020 about quality of statistical data published by the Statistical and Foresight Department of the French ministry of agriculture and food "Qualité des données statistiques produites par le SSP" |
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
An user needs consultation was conducted with structure surveys data users in 2019, including:
After a written consultation (e-mail), a final meeting was organised on may 2019. The main groups of variables needed are : 1) General characteristics of farms 2) Variables on livestock 3) Variables on land 4) Labour force. Annexes: List of guests - Final meeting, users consultation |
|||
12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes | |||
Questions were added for national purposes :
|
|||
12.1.2. Unmet user needs | |||
User needs have not been included in our census survey for:
|
|||
12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs | |||
For each survey, there is a committee to share user needs and design the questionnaires. And there is a general committee agricultural statistics users to discuss about new data needs. |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Not for IFS 2020 |
|||
12.2.1. User satisfaction survey | |||
Yes | |||
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey | |||
A satisfaction survey was conducted for agricultural statistics website (Agreste), in 2021 (April-June). |
|||
12.2.3. Satisfaction level | |||
Satisfied | |||
12.3. Completeness | |||
Information on low- and zero prevalence variables is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0. |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
See categories below. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||
Please find the relative standard errors for the main variables in the annex. Annexes: 13.2.1 Relative Standard Errors |
|||
13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | |||
Cases for which estimated RSE are above the thresholds of applicable RSE: Concerned variables include heterogeneous categories, and farms in concerned regions can be very scattered. Moreover, it is possible that we do not well know real values for these variables of these farms in our farm register (BALSA). |
|||
13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors | |||
The estimation of RSEs, expressed as a percentage, is equivalent to the coefficient of variation. It is estimated by the formulae:
The stratification accounts for the calculation of the double inclusion probabilities that will be used for the calculation of the variance. A calibration on margins is carried out. We proceed as follows:
To estimate the double inclusion probabilities of units, the following formulae is used:
The variance is then calculated as follows: Tool: R function ("CALVA") developed within our agricultural statistical service |
|||
13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1. Coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||
The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted. Annexes: 13.3.1.1 Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate |
|||
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
Below thresholds during the reference period Temporarily out of production during the reference period Ceased activities Merged to another unit Duplicate units Other |
|||
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error | |||
Maintain of ineligible units in the records with assignment of 0 weights | |||
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error | |||
Over-coverage occurs when units are included erroneously. To minimise the over-coverage error, the department has been using a sampling frame of farms, which is updated with results of thematic surveys and administrative data. To reduce quality risks in terms of coverage (and before beginning the census), quality operations were realized for the sampling universe for some uncertain units (undetermined between ceased or active, belonging or not to the agricultural sector): regional operators of the ministry were asked to check and, if necessary, correct the information in the sampling frame. |
|||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||
Not requested. |
|||
13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate | |||
To indicate the degree of under-coverage, a numeric rate is not available. However, it was possible to respond for units not present in the sampling frame. The number of added survey was low : 1 247 units, mainly in the overseas departments: 1 213 units. These 1 247 holdings, belongging to the relevant population of the core but not included in the frame, are:
These farms are mainly (1133/1247) farms with both crops and livestock production (545 units), cereals (377 units) and fruits (209 units). |
|||
13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension) | |||
Other | |||
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error | |||
The frame used for the census was built with the maximum of available administrative data sources :
The agricultural census is a mandatory survey. The data collection protocol was made to minimise unit non-response rate. |
|||
13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error | |||
Because of the registration in the business register of all units having an economical activity, the obligation to fill in the census survey and the possibility of fines, the under-coverage is estimated to be very low. Furthermore, there are regular checks on completeness of the frame: the annual coverage rate of the frame by activity was verified. |
|||
13.3.1.4. Misclassification error | |||
Yes | |||
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error | |||
Misclassification errors cannot totally be ruled out but are estimated to be minimal. Initially holdings are selected from the administrative farm register (BALSA) which is constantly updated with both results of thematic surveys and administrative data. Theses information can be incomplete. Some holdings are affected by classification to inadequate strata in the sampling design. However, the region of units is well-known. For type of farms and standard outputs, knowing exactly the “true” value is complicated. It is particularly due to the fact of using classes (for example very small, small, medium and big for standard outputs). For standard outputs, the rate of misclassified units is estimated at about 10 % and lower for classes without continuities (for example “big farms” in the frame and in reality “very small or small“). Concerning type of farms, the rate of misclassified units is also estimated at about 10 % (if we consider that Cereals, oil seed and other field crops are to be in the same stratum). |
|||
13.3.1.5. Contact error | |||
Yes | |||
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error | |||
Contact information is constantly updated. Information comes from administrative data or direct information from respondents in thematic surveys. For units with no phone numbers and email addresses, sampling frame was updated with externals data, subcontracting with companies specialized on businesses contact details. |
|||
13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.2. Measurement error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors | |||
To prevent measurement errors, we pre-tested our questionnaire before data collection, we pre-filled it with IACS data,and surveyors had a complete on line training before data collection. They also had an handbook during data collection, and definitions were included in the on-line or electronic survey for face to face interviews. Moreover, we had cheks during and after data collection. However, we can highlight some difficulties for some variables :
|
|||
13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors | |||
Complexity of variables Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers |
|||
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error | |||
Pre-testing questionnaire Pre-filled questions Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents Training of enumerators |
|||
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error | |||
IACS used to prefill questionnaire for variables of land. |
|||
13.3.3. Non response error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||
The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted. |
|||
13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response | |||
Failure to make contact with the unit Refusal to participate |
|||
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response | |||
Follow-up interviews Reminders Legal actions Imputation Weighting |
|||
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis | |||
|
|||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||
Item non-response was low : unweighted rate <1 % |
|||
13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate | |||
Not applicable |
|||
13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response | |||
Skip of due question Farmers do not know the answer Other |
|||
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response | |||
Follow-up interviews Imputation Other |
|||
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error | |||
Live checks (in data collection tools) to minimise item non response: mandatory fields. |
|||
13.3.4. Processing error | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors | |||
Data processing | |||
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods | |||
Deductive imputation Mean imputation Random hot deck imputation |
|||
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors | |||
To minimise processing errors the information system is extensively tested and manual actions are minimised as much as possible. All corrections are made using R scripts (no manual adjustments) and before data is released, extensive checks and analyses are performed. |
|||
13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections | |||
Standard software tools are used (R mainly, Excel...). Only staff involved in the processing of the agricultural census is authorised to make corrections. |
|||
13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality | |||
Low | |||
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error | |||
Not applicable |
|||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
We studied the outliers. For the outliers, a model is used to compare the values of outliers (for example, livestock numbers for cattle, sheep, goats and poultry or culture surfaces) with values of Balsa frame and administrative data. We correct values if it is necessary. |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
National First results released on december 2021: 12 months after 31 December 2020 |
|||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
Final national file: April 2022. From 31 December 2020: 16 months |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery | |||
Not requested |
|||
14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication | |||
Before data collection, the aim was to publish first results on december 2021. They were finally released on 10 december 2021. Before data collection, the aim was to have final dataset on march 2022. Eurostat file was delivered to Eurostat on march 2022. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No deviations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the thresholds for the data sent to Eurostat, see item 3.6.1. National thresholds: a holding is covered if it meets at least one of the following thresholds: For land variables :
For livestok :
Other thresholds regarding specific productions :
Thresholds are specific in overseas territories.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National thresholds are different from Eurostat ones to keep comparability between time series, and to cover some specific productions in some regions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For national needs, national disseminated results differ from Eurostat ones (the national dataset is different from Eurostat one): see 15.1.3. Concerning the data transmitted to Eurostat the only deviations regarding Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 concerns the animal housing module. In order to record temporary empty places, and to have a clear question for the farmers, we asked for the maximum number of places in 2020, and not the average number of places occupied during the year. This was also the case in 2010 census (keeping time series). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex. Annexes: 15.1.4.1.1. AWU |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FR uses national LSU coefficients, available in annex. Annexes: 15.1.4.1.3 FR LSU coefficients |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.” | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5. Reference periods/days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The use of land refers to the reference year 2020:
For animal housing, we refer to 2020 year, not to a day, in order to avoid specific situations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6. Common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The concept of common land exists | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common land is included in the land of agricultural holdings based on a statistical model. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Administrative sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We used for IFS 2020 administrative data coming from CAP, in order to allocate common land's areas, proportionally on the basis of the grazing livestock of each farm using common land. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There were specific questions for overseas territories, adapted to the local context, for national needs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2. Comparability - over time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 as we raised the thresholds of units sent to Eurostat. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been no changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. Only 31 farms declaring having fur animals are included in IFS 2020 dataset. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For FSS 2016: data for Eurostat is over national thresholds. For IFS 2020: data for Eurostat is over IFS thresholds. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4. Geographical coverage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.4.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mayotte is now included in data transmitted to Eurostat. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.5.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal personality of the agricultural holding In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which trigger fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.
Other livestock n.e.c. In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately. Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."
Livestock units In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02 and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.
Organic animals While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are to be included.
Permanent pasture CAP declarations have been used to fill in the questionnaires. In CAP declarations, farmers declare the total area of fields which is called "graphical area". Following instructions of the declarations, the "eligible area" is determined: all non used areas are deducted. For permanent pasture, the difference may be important in case of a lot of rocks, trees, etc. In such a case, we decided to split the graphical area in two classes: the eligible area is classified as permanent pasture and the non eligible area in other farmland for rough grazing (including when grazing is in wooded areas). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6. Reference periods/days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been no changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.6.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7. Common land | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.7.2. Description of changes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before IFS 2020, common land units were registered as farms. For IFS 2020, there is an allocation of common land's areas, and there is no more records of common land as units. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- share % of holdings class bigger than 100ha increased in 2020 compared to 2016 as some holdings stopped their activities and have been annexed with another ones; common land have been included in the UAA. As consequence also the upper SO_EURO classes increased their share in 2020 as this is linked to the increase of the average surface per farm. Price effect could also explain such increase. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We do not make any comparisons with other agricultural microdata's sources. In fact, the IFS use these information to prefill the questionnaire: CAP for crops, BDNI for bovine livestock, CVI for wine producers. So, the information's within other sources are linked from the start and we don't need to realise further comparisons. For other variables, no microdatasets are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub-categories below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs MAIN AREA in relative terms
Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs MAIN AREA in absolute terms They are issued from the census (exhaustive collect) and based on CAP declarations which are controlled each year. Please note that some definitions have been modified in comparison with other inquiries (eligible area for pastures instead total area, permanent grassland is now 5 years old or more instead of 6 years for the last census,...). Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA in relative terms Concerning the C1200 variable, this item was not collected with this description during the previous inquiries. It may explain the increasing of the areas. Concerning the FRY3 region, the total UAA annually increase; the areas for a lot of crops are increasing too. Coherence cross-domain: IFS vs CULTIVATED AREA in absolute terms The increasing of G2000 and P0000 areas may be explain by the national plan concerning the development of the protein production (in order to replace imported soy). Concerning the C1200 variable, this item was not collected with this description during the previous inquiries (winter cerals mixtures – maslin were not included in the past). It may explain the increasing of the areas. Concerning the C1500 variable, the difference between Eurobase and census is not significant It may be due to annual variations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.4. Coherence - internal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics | |||
In 2020, we didn't realise our national livestock survey (autumn one) for farms with pigs, sheep and goats (regulation 1165/2008). We adapted 202 census questionnaire to meet national livestock survey needs. |
|||
16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat | |||
On-line surveys Increased use of administrative data Further training |
|||
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains | |||
For the first time, for IFS 2020, we had:
|
|||
16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes) | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
16.3.1. Core | |||
Around 30 minutes |
|||
16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘ | |||
Around 50 minutes (including core data). |
|||
16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’ | |||
Administrative data only |
|||
16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’ | |||
Around 50 minutes (including core data). |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
For IFS 2020:
|
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
No revisions to report |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not requested. |
|
|||
Annexes: 18. Timetable_statistical_process |
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1. Population frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.1.1. Type of frame | |||
List frame | |||
18.1.1.2. Name of frame | |||
BALSA: Database for agricultural statistics, our agricultural register (Base de Sondage pour la Statistique Agricole) |
|||
18.1.1.3. Update frequency | |||
Monthly | |||
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.2.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable for 2019/2020. |
|||
18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Sample | |||
18.1.4.2. Sampling design | |||
Systematic sampling sorted on NUST3. The stratification is based on:
For the construction of strata, variables (NUTS2, farm type, standard output and NUTS3) are crossed (in this order). Each strata had to contain a minimum of 50 units. When it is not the case, strata are defined with a neighbour, by grouping in the following order: NUTS3, then if necessary standard output, then farm type. Furthermore, the units for which only farm type is known on the one hand and those for which farm type and standard output are unknown on the other hand, are defined in “special” NUTS2 strata. In total, there are 1 986 strata (without full coverage strata). Tool Palourde (Production d'allocations localement optimisées utilisables pour des résultats sur des domaines d'études - Methodology Department of INSEE) was used.This tool optimises the allocation of the overall stratified simple random sample size with multiple objectives of published data. First, the algorithm calculates the minimum number of units to select from each stratum in order to respect the RSE on the variables of interest with some published data domains (solution by J. Bethel of the problem of optimal multivariate distribution of the sample). A minimum number has been determined and an algorithm (proposed by M. Koubi and S. Mathern) finalise the optimisation on a key variable of interest in the survey, while ensuring that the minimum number of units is correctly selected in each stratum. The chosen key variable of interest is standard outputs because it is overall correlated with the different variables for which the European regulation requires RSE. A minimum of six units is necessary in each stratum and the minimum sampling rate per stratum is 1/50. The resulting sample for France, excluding geographic exhaustiveness, must ultimately include 55 334 units to meet local constraints. The allocations per stratum are calculated to optimise the RSE on “standard output” variable with the constraint of the total allocation of 70 000 surveys. |
|||
18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Stratified one-stage random sampling | |||
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Unit size Unit location Unit specialization |
|||
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Yes | |||
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
There are full coverage strata for:
|
|||
18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
The sample size has been defined in order to meet several requirements: - the cost of the survey: maximum 70 000 units in total - RSE by NUTS 2 under 5 % for land and livestock variables in Annex V of 2018/1091 regulation; |
|||
18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Optimal allocation considering costs | |||
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5. Module “Rural development” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Census | |||
18.1.5.2. Sampling design | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module” | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings | |||
Sample | |||
18.1.6.2. Sampling design | |||
Systematic sampling sorted on NUST3. The stratification is based on:
For the construction of strata, variables (NUTS2, farm type, standard output and NUTS3) are crossed (in this order). Each strata had to contain a minimum of 50 units. When it is not the case, strata are defined with a neighbour, by grouping in the following order: NUTS3, then if necessary standard output, then farm type. Furthermore, the units for which only farm type is known on the one hand and those for which farm type and standard output are unknown on the other hand, are defined in “special” NUTS2 strata. In total, there are 1 986 strata (without full coverage strata). Tool Palourde (Production d'allocations localement optimisées utilisables pour des résultats sur des domaines d'études - Methodology Department of INSEE) was used.This tool optimises the allocation of the overall stratified simple random sample size with multiple objectives of published data. First, the algorithm calculates the minimum number of units to select from each stratum in order to respect the RSE on the variables of interest with some published data domains (solution by J. Bethel of the problem of optimal multivariate distribution of the sample). A minimum number has been determined and an algorithm (proposed by M. Koubi and S. Mathern) finalise the optimisation on a key variable of interest in the survey, while ensuring that the minimum number of units is correctly selected in each stratum. The chosen key variable of interest is standard outputs because it is overall correlated with the different variables for which the European regulation requires RSE. A minimum of six units is necessary in each stratum and the minimum sampling rate per stratum is 1/50. The resulting sample for France, excluding geographic exhaustiveness, must ultimately include 55 334 units to meet local constraints. The allocations per stratum are calculated to optimise the RSE on “standard output” variable with the constraint of the total allocation of 70 000 surveys. |
|||
18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design | |||
Stratified one-stage random sampling | |||
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria | |||
Unit size Unit location Unit specialization |
|||
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling | |||
Yes | |||
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata | |||
There are full coverage strata for:
|
|||
18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size | |||
The sample size has been defined in order to meet several requirements: - the cost of the survey: maximum 70 000 units in total – RSE by NUTS 2 under 5 % for land and livestock variables in Annex V of 2018/1091 regulation; |
|||
18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size | |||
Optimal allocation considering costs | |||
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection | |||
R software was used (Palourde function - INSEE) |
|||
18.1.13. Administrative sources | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them | |||
The information is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources | |||
See the attached Excel file in the Annex. Annexes: 18.1.13.2 Quality description of administrative sources |
|||
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used | |||
The final validated data in the source would not be in time to meet statistical deadlines or would relate to a period which does not coincide with the reference period Other |
|||
18.1.14. Innovative approaches | |||
The information on innovative approaches and the quality methods applied is available on Eurostat's website. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.3.1. Methods of data collection | |||
Face-to-face, electronic version Telephone, electronic version Use of Internet |
|||
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires | |||
Not applicable | |||
18.3.3. Questionnaire | |||
Please find the questionnaire in annex. Annexes: 18.3.3 FR questionnaire - English version 18.3.3 FR questionnaire - French version |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
18.4.1. Type of validation checks | |||
Data format checks Completeness checks Range checks Relational checks Comparisons with previous rounds of the data collection Comparisons with other domains in agricultural statistics |
|||
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation | |||
Interviewers Supervisors Staff from local departments Staff from central department |
|||
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation | |||
|
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
For sample data (LAFO, AHMM), we applied re-weighting. First, new weights are calculated for respondents with the same NUTS3, farm type, standard outputs, legal status and first updating date in the frame Balsa. Then, we used a calibration method using, for each NUTS3, the number of units by standard outputs, the total utilised agricultural area, the total livestock units and the total annual working units. |
|||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | |||
The overall imputation rate is 3%. Imputation is done for unit non-response, and includes all corresponding variables from the core data collection. |
|||
18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor | |||
Design weight Non-response adjustment Calibration |
|||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Covered under Data compilation. |
|||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture. |
|
|||
See sub-categories below. |
|||
19.1. List of abbreviations | |||
CAP – Common Agricultural Policy CAPI – Computer Assisted Personal Interview CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview FSS – Farm Structure Survey IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics LSU – Livestock units NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview SO – Standard output UAA – Utilised agricultural area |
|||
19.2. Additional comments | |||
No additional comments. |
|
|||
|
|||