|
|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT) |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Population and Labour Market Statistics Division Wages and Salaries Statistics Section |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | 46, Pireos & Eponiton Str. 18510 - Piraeus |
|
|||
2.1. Data description | |||
The Structure of Earnings Survey 2014 (SES 2014) is the forth of the series of four-yearly surveys carried out by the Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT) under the Council Regulation (EC) No 530/1999, the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1916/2000 (amended) and the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1738/2005. This quality report is prepared in accordance with the Commission Regulation No 698/2006 of 5 May 2006 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No. 530/1999 concerning quality evaluation of structural statistics on labour costs and earnings.
The main purpose of the survey on the structure of earnings in enterprises and services at national level is to produce statistics on the structure of earnings of employees. More specifically, the collected variables refer to:
From a microeconomic perspective, these statistics are a tool for drawing conclusions on the structure of earnings to the branches of economic activity. Moreover, the allocation of earnings may be assessed and interpreted on the basis of the characteristics of the persons employed in the different branches of economic activity. At European level, the survey aims at compiling harmonized statistics providing comparable quantitative and qualitative information for all the EU Member States pertaining to the structure of earnings of employees. |
|||
2.2. Classification system | |||
Economic activity Economic activity is coded in Nace Rev.2. More specifically:
Occupation All occupations are covered, excluding Major group 6 “Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers” of ISCO_08. More specifically:
Education For the years 2002, 2006 and 2010 all education levels are covered and the data were compiled in accordance with the statistical classification ISCED_97. The year 2014 all education levels are covered and the data were compiled in accordance with the statistical classification ISCED_2011. Geographical location Regional breakdown is based on the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS, level 1). |
|||
2.3. Coverage - sector | |||
The enterprises included employ at least 10 employees Economic activity coverage The 2002 survey covered sections C-K of Nace Rev.1.1 The 2006 survey covered sections C-K and in addition from the year 2002 sections M, N and O of Nace Rev.1.1 The 2010 survey covered all the sections B-S of Nace Rev.2, at the same time, the data were also coded in accordance with Nace Rev.1.1, in order to ensure comparability with the previous surveys (2002 and 2006). The 2014 survey covered sections B-S (excluding O) of Nace Rev.2 Geographical coverage Greece, total. |
|||
2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
The concepts and definitions of the basic variables used for the compilation of data of the structure of earnings survey are laid down in Regulation (EC) 1738/2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1916/2000 and Regulation (EC) 530/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Regional Unit is a geographical area and it is defined in accordance with the Municipalities under Kallikratis Plan. In most cases, it refers to a geographical area which is defined by the boundaries of the Department (Nomos).
Local unit of the enterprise is every local branch of the enterprise which is operating in a different physical location and may belong to a different branch of economic activity and it is located in another Regional Unit.
Economic activity of the local unit is the branch of economic activity in which belongs the local unit and may be different from the branch of economic activity of the enterprise.
Group of enterprises An enterprise group is an association of at least two enterprises bound together by legal and/or financial links. A group of enterprises consists of the parent enterprise and the affiliated companies.
Collective pay agreement is any type of agreement signed between the enterprise and the employees or their collective body and may be:
Employed persons, for the purposes of the survey on the structure of earnings, are all the employees of the enterprise, i.e., the salaried personnel and the wage earners
Employees are the employed persons who work and receive remuneration in the form of wages or salaries and have a direct employment contract with the enterprise and are remunerated on the basis of the number of hours worked (full-time or part-time) and the duration of the contract (fixed or indefinite). The following categories are excluded:
Full-time employees are the members of the personnel whose regular working hours are the same as the collectively agreed or customary hours worked in the enterprise, even if their contract is for less than one year.
Part-time employees are the members of the personnel whose regular working hours are less than the collectively agreed or customary hours worked in the enterprise on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.
Seasonal employees are the members of the personnel that are hired under a special work contract designed to cover seasonal needs of the enterprise or the local unit, which are identified in the same time period every year.
Apprentices are those remunerated employed persons who do not fully participate in the production process and work either under an apprentice contract or in the context of a project for which vocational training is most important than productivity.
Occupation, according to the statistical classification of occupation ISCO_08 is the “real” worked mainly performed by the employee. The essential information for determining the occupation is usually the employee’s job title and a description of the main tasks undertaken in the course of his/her duties.
Paid hours cover normal and overtime remunerated hours, hours remunerated with a lower rate even if the difference is covered by social security contributions, as well as hours not worked during the reference periods but nevertheless paid (annual leave, sick leave, official holidays and other hours paid such as for medical examinations).
Special earnings are the payment for shift work, night work and work during weekends, given the fact that they are not counted as overtime pay.
Payments in kind are all the goods and services provided to the employees by the enterprise or the local unit, such as products of the enterprises provided for free or at a reduced price,( e.g. food, beverages, footwear, cloth ware) shelter for the personnel, leased cars, as well as share of the company and other benefits.
Total annual bonuses refer to any irregular payments which did not occur during each pay period, such as holiday bonuses, Christmas and Easter bonuses (13th and 14th month), productivity bonuses, occasional commissions, profit-shares, etc. Bonuses paid regularly on a monthly basis are excluded. |
|||
2.5. Statistical unit | |||
The primary statistical unit is the local unit of the enterprise with average annual employment amounting to, at least, 10 persons and the final statistical unit is the employee. As a register of local units is not available, the primary unit is considered the enterprise with average annual employment amounting to, at least, 10 persons and belongs to sections B-S (excluding O) of Nace Rev.2. |
|||
2.6. Statistical population | |||
The statistical population is the total of the enterprises employing at least 10 employees and belong to sections B-S (excluding O) of Nace Rev.2. |
|||
2.7. Reference area | |||
Greece, total. |
|||
2.8. Coverage - Time | |||
2014 |
|||
2.9. Base period | |||
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1. Source data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Structural Earnings survey covered all local units belonging to enterprises with average annual employment 10 persons or more in the areas of economic activity defined by sections Β-N plus P, Q, R and S of NACE Rev.2. The sampling frame that was used for the selection of the primary sampling units (enterprises) was the updated Business Register with reference year 2010. This register was compiled by data coming from administrative sources (Social Insurance Foundation and Tax Authorities) and updated by the results from SBS of year 2012 as well as the Labour Cost index of year 2013. Specifically for section P the register was updated with data from 2013 whereas for Section Q, the register was updated with data from 2012. In order to trace the local units for data collection, since the survey units are the local units and those were not included in the register of the enterprises, we applied the two-stage stratified random sampling. At the first stage a sample of nh enterprises out of the Nh enterprises was selected in the stratum with equal probabilities of selection, with average annual employment 10 persons or more. Their respective local units were also selected. The following stratification criteria were applied: a. Geographical Region – NUTS 1 (Northern Greece, Central Greece, Attica, Aegean Islands and Crete) b. Two-digit NACE Rev.2 code of economic activity within each geographical region c. Size class of the enterprise. In each of the major strata, the enterprises were stratified into 10 size classes, according to their size, determined by their average annual number of employees in the business register, as follows.
Size classes 5 and over (250+ employees) were exhaustively surveyed (census classes).
Subsequently, mhi employees were selected out of Mhi the employees included in the local unit during the survey period (i=1,2, …,nhi) with equal probabilities of selection. The sample of employees in each final stratum was calculated proportionally to the total number of employees in the stratum. The sample size of employees of the enterprise was allocated proportionally to the local units of the enterprise according to their total number of employees. The total number of employees of the local unit was not included in any register but it was collected and enumerated by the interviewer for each selected enterprise of the sample. In each local unit the selection of the employees to be surveyed was conducted with the use of systematic sampling
The final active sample size of enterprises was 5,319 out of 32,794 (sampling rate=16.2% according to estimations based on sampling data) and the active sample size of employees was 75,640 out of 1,415,071 (sampling rate=5.4%).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2. Frequency of data collection | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The survey on the structure of earnings is conducted every four years. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3. Data collection | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The data are collected through a specially designed questionnaire (questionnaire form 1 and form 2).
The questionnaire Form 1 is the questionnaire used for the entperise and it helps collecting information on the enterprise, such as economic activity, number of persons employed, form of economic and financial control, number of local units of the enterprise, main type of employment contract and whether the company belongs to a Group of enterprises.
The questionnaire Form 2 is used to collect information on the employees. More specifically, the collected data pertain to sex, age, educational attainment, occupation, position, employment status, total length of service in the enterprise, full or part-time employment. In addition, financial data are collected for October of the year when the survey is conducted, such as data on hours paid, overtime pay, on gross earnings, payments related to overtime and payments related to shift work. Furthermore, annual financial data are collected, such as gross earnings, payments in kind and payments related to annual bonuses.
Both questionnaires were developed on paper and in electronic format as a user-friendly Excel application.
The questionnaires are delivered to external survey workers (statistical interviewers) which, once trained, visit the enterprises in order to fill in the questionnaire form 1 with the assistance of the enterprise’s staff or they hand the questionnaire to be filled in by the accountant of the enterprise. Afterwards, they collect the filled in questionnaires and they deliver them back to ELSTAT. Before filling in the questionnaire form 2, they have to be supplied with the payroll list for October (of the specific reference year), that will be used as sampling frame in order to draw the sample of the employees to be surveyed. Afterwards, in cooperation with the staff of the enterprise, they have to fill in the questionnaire form 2.
In cases where the enterprise refuses to cooperate with the statistical interviewers, or refuses to respond, or delays or in case there are particularities, an employee form the Wages and Salaries Statistics Section of ELSTAT pays a visit to the enterprise and collects the necessary information himself. In some cases (due to lack of time) the questionnaire may be delivered and collected by fax or by e-mail.
The same procedure is followed in the Regional Statistical Offices (RSO) of ELSTAT. The questionnaires are sent by post to the RSO and then the completed questionnaires are sent by the RSO back to ELSTAT by post. In some cases (due to lack of time) the questionnaire may be sent and returned by Fax or by e-mail
Non-response is addressed through telephone contact with the enterprise, reminders sent by fax or e-mail or personal visits to the enterprise. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.4. Data validation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Global checks and Plausibility checks have been applied on micro data based on Eurostat’s checks listed in document “Eurostat’s arrangements for implementing the Council Regulation 530/1999, the Commission Regulations 1916/2000 and 1738/2005”. The data are validated by means of a series of logical checks to ensure that the data are reasonable and consistent with other variables. During data processing, the data are checked in order to identify and duly correct any errors. Comparisons are made, mostly as regards employment data, with the data of the Labour force Survey and as regards average monthly salaries with National Accounts. Then the data are checked by employment stratum and by 2-digit branch of economic activity. In case big differences are observed, all the enterprises belonging to the same stratum are investigated. Once identified, the errors are further investigated in cooperation with the enterprise in order to confirm that it is an error or it is just about an unusual value. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.5. Data compilation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The data of the survey on the structure of earnings are produced at two-digit level of Branches of Economic Activities, by earnings and paid hours, by number of employees, sex, age, educational attainment and average annual earnings. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.6. Adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
4.1. Quality assurance | |||
Correctness and completeness checks, as well as quality checks are carried out during the whole process of the compilation of the data of the survey: from the data collection stage to the final compilation of the results.
First of all, well-trained and experienced staff is utilized for all the stages of the compilation of the data, namely for data collection - including communication with the enterprise - initial checks, data entry, checks for outliers and final checks concerning the timeseries characteristics of every enterprise.
Data are validated either before or after data entry by means of logical checks. During data processing the data are checked in order to identify and correct any errors. When an error is identified, the data are further investigated, in cooperation with the enterprises, in order to confirm that it is an error or it is just an unusual value. At the same time, data are checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency of the correlating variables.
The Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT) aims to ensure and further improve the quality of statistics produced and maintain the confidence of users in them. This is achieved through the Quality Policy and Quality Guidelines of ELSTAT, which are posted on the website of ELSTAT and are available at the following links: http://www.statistics.gr/documents/20181/2571f853-1e37-46da-9387-595bbe2a162b |
|||
4.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
The results of the survey on the structure of earnings are reliable, they are transmitted to Eurostat where they are assessed and validated. |
|
|||
5.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
The survey on the structure of earnings meets national needs and the needs of European users. Generally, the survey provides statistical information necessary to improve the competitiveness and performance of the business community. The main users of the survey on the structure of earnings are:
Moreover, the enterprises that have the obligation to fill in the questionnaire are at the same time users of these data. They request relevant data in order to design their remuneration policy, estimate the costs of contractual agreements and study competitiveness in the branch of economic activity they belong to. |
|||
5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Since relevance is not an inherent characteristic of the statistical data, it can be measured only with the help of the user satisfaction survey. ΕLSTAT conducts: a. User Satisfaction Survey A user satisfaction survey is conducted every semester. The results of this survey are published in the Library’s Newsletter (published in Greek and in English), which is issued by the Library and the Section of Statistical Dissemination of ELSTAT, presenting information from the user’s questionnaire. This publication presents data on the number of users in relation with other variables, such as response rate to users’ requests, the kind of requested data, as well as the dissemination mode of statistical information. These characteristics are tabulated and are presented in absolute values and percentages.
b. Users’ Conference Pursuant to its annual statistical programme, ΕLSTAT has been conducting since 2010, on a yearly basis, the Users’ Conference, with the participation of representatives of the public and the private sector, academics and research institutes. The Users’ Conferences offer ELSTAT the opportunity to gather comments and proposals made by users of statistics regarding the dissemination of statistical information, access to statistical data and any shortcomings in the produced statistics. The Users’ Conferences help ELSTAT to derive useful conclusions on the areas of statistical production that need to be improved in order to better fulfill the changing needs of users. Such conclusions are incorporated in the annual and short-term statistical work programmes of ELSTAT. More information on a) the results of the User Satisfaction Survey and b) on the Users Conferences are available on the portal of ELSTAT, at the following link: http://www.statistics.gr/en/user-conference At the end, based on users’ Statistical data requests, the most demanded SES data are earnings breakdowns by occupations, gender, level of education, working time conditions, existence of collective pay agreement, economic activity and different combinations between these variables. |
|||
5.3. Completeness | |||
The 2014 SES satisfies the needs of the main user – European Commission (Eurostat) in terms of:
|
|||
5.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.1. Accuracy - overall | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The errors that have an impact on accuracy of the results are: (a) sampling errors and (b) non-sampling errors.
(a) Sampling errors are due to the fact that the survey is not conducted on all the enterprises of the target population but on a sample of these enterprises. The sample size ensures high accuracy estimation at the level of Greece total. (b) Non-sampling errors mostly refer to measurement errors and non-response errors, on account of non-response of the sample enterprises. Any measurement errors during data collection are identified by means of quality checks are duly corrected. As regards non-response errors, all efforts are made for contacting the enterprises that have not responded by phone or by other means of communication, in order to persuade them to cooperate and give the required information. As a consequence, the overall accuracy of the results of the survey on the structure of earnings is generally considered to be high. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2. Sampling error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The survey on the structure of earnings is a sample survey and therefore sampling errors are observed in the total of estimations and in the estimations at the level of sections of economic activities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The CV of Average Gross Hourly Earnings and Gross earnings in the reference month (October 2014) for 2digit Nace_Rev2 (B-S excluding O) for the year 2014 are:
For the estimation process see Annex:6.2.1 Sampling error - Estimation process For coefficient of variation see Annex: EL_CV tables_SES2014 Annexes: 6.2.1 Sampling error - Estimation process |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3. Non-sampling error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-sampling errors are basically of 4 types: Coverage errors: errors due to divergences existing between the target population and the sampling frame. Measurement errors: errors that occur at the time of data collection. There are a number of sources for these errors such as the survey instrument of collection, the information system. Processing errors: errors in post-data-collection processes such as data entry, keying, editing and weighting Non-response errors: errors due to an unsuccessful attempt to obtain the desired information from an eligible unit. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.1. Coverage error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As the Business Register of ELSTAT on the basis of which the survey was designed, is not fully updated from administrative sources, there were problems of over-coverage and under-coverage. The over-coverage problems are due to non-active enterprises (closed, in bankruptcy/insolvency, not located) and out of scope enterprises (with less than 10 employees). These enterprises were included in the business register, they were selected in the sample, but they were not actually existed at the time of the survey. These enterprises actually reduced the initial sample size of enterprises and consequently of local units. The decrease of the number of sampling units in each stratum inflates the variance of the estimated statistics.
The under-coverage refers to the situation when newly emerged or units with renewed activity with 10+ or more employees were not included in the initial sampling frame. As a result, the under-coverage problem underestimates the produced statistics. Corrections and weighting for non-coverage is difficult, because under-coverage rates cannot be obtained from the sample itself, but only from external sources. The under-coverage was not quantified. Moreover, due to miss-classification problems of the register, some sampling units changed design strata after data collection. These units were allocated to new strata (employment size class, division of economic activity) maintaining their initial probability of selection. This fact changed the initial variation of data, the initial allocation of the sample enterprises, thus inflating the variation of estimations. Therefore, the coefficient of variation of the produced statistics was higher than the coefficient of variation which had been calculated on the basis of the sample design. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No of enterprises included in the sample but ceased to be active or are in fact out of the scope during data collection period.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.2. Measurement error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The questionnaires are filled in through personal interview in the enterprise. The method which is used ensures high quality data, since the statistical interviewers assist the respondents to fill in the questionnaire and or they fill in by themselves the data on employees (questionnaire form 2) and they check very carefully the filled in questionnaires before leaving the enterprise. The statistical interviewers are normally external survey workers and, if necessary, experienced permanent employees of ELSTAT. The interviewers are duly trained during training seminars before the conduct of the survey. The purpose of the training seminars is to enable the interviewers to a) fully understand the definitions and the variables of the survey, b) correctly fill in the survey questionnaire and c) check the questionnaires for any errors through logical checks.
The structure and the size of the questionnaire make it friendly to statistical interviewers and respondents. The questions are clearly stated using the appropriate language and terminology. Furthermore, the compiled guidelines cover analytically all the survey variables. The support and supervision of the collection of questionnaires were decentralized in the Regional Statistical Offices (RSO) of ELSTAT. The checking for the detection of measurement errors was carried out in the RSO. The RSO were also provided by the central office of ELSTAT with written and telephone guidance how to process data and deal with arising problems. The main problem for interviewers is that respondents who keep data differently, do not make further efforts to make them suitable to statistical requirements, or do not understand or read the explanatory notes. After receiving the questionnaires, the statistical office recorded them, and separate valid questionnaires from those to be revised. If they are not thoroughly completed and corrected, the questionnaire is returned to interviewer in order to contact with the enterprise again, otherwise, it cannot be considered as valid. There is a debugging procedure that assures not missing data, coherence among individual characteristics (age, length of service, level of education etc) and coherence among economic data (monthly and annual earnings related to the hours paid etc). If extreme values in data are detected during this phase, a telephone call is made to the respondent for clarifications. All the above ensure the fact that the collected questionnaires are complete and correctly filled in, thus eliminating any measurement errors. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.3. Non response error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non - response errors of the enterprises is addressed by sending reminder letters via fax of email, by calling the enterprises or by paying a visit to the enterprise, in order to collect the requested data.
Response rate as regards employment size classes and the total population was quite satisfactory. In the census strata, where all the population units had been included in the sample, unit response was sometimes quite high, but not 100% for all the combinations of sections and class sizes, on account of non-response of some enterprises. Consequently, some census strata became sampling strata, thus increasing sampling error for the survey characteristics. In order to improve response rate the deadline was prolonged 5 months. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The response rate which was calculated as the ratio of the number of the collected questionnaires divided by the designed sample taking into account the questionnaires not collected as presented in table 6.3.1.1. was 73.9%. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.4. Processing error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Once the data are gathered in the Central Offices of ELSTAT, the following statistical actions take place:
These activities were carried out by expert, permanent staff of the Directorate in charge of the survey. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.4.1. Imputation - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3.5. Model assumption error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.4. Seasonal adjustment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.5. Data revision - policy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The data are not subject to revisions after their publication, since they are final and are not based on estimates. Revisions may take place only if there are changes in methodology or the statistical classifications of the branches of economic activity or occupations. More information on the revision policy implemented by ELSTAT is available at the following link: http://www.statistics.gr/documents/20181/a49dca9a-dacf-4b52-b5df-b156216cb354 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.6. Data revision - practice | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In case the data of the survey on the structure of earnings are revised, this is announced with a relevant Press Release. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.6.1. Data revision - average size | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
7.1. Timeliness | |||
The final results of the 2014 SES transmitted to Eurostat in February 2017, thus the time lag between the transmittion date and the reference period of the data is t+26 months There is a significant time span between the release of the data (2017) and the reference period of them (2014) due to complex reasons as:
|
|||
7.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
t+26 months |
|||
7.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
t+28months |
|||
7.2. Punctuality | |||
The numerous statistical works of the Structure of Earnings Survey were carried out in four phases, as detailed below: Phase 1: Design and preparation of the survey The first phase was carried out from June 2014 to March 2015, and includes the design and the preparatory work for the survey. More specifically, the following actions were:
Phase 2: Data collection The second phase was carried out from Ferbruary 2015 to May 2016. During this phase the following works were:
Phase 3: Data processing The third phase was carried out from September 2015 to October 2016
Phase 4: Evaluation of the results and Dissemination This phase was conducted from November 2016 to April 2017 and the following works were:
|
|||
7.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
8.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
The collected survey variables are fully in line with the relevant definitions laid down in Regulation (EC) 530/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council, thus ensuring comparability of statistics among Member States. |
|||
8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
8.2. Comparability - over time | |||
There are no significant differences in the definitions used in the surveys conducted in 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014, apart from those provided by the relevant Regulations, such as the change in the statistical classifications of economic activities and occupations. The 2002 and 2006 surveys were conducted in accordance with Nace Rev.1.1 and ISCO_88. The 2010 and 2014 survey was conducted with Nace Rev.2. and ISCO_08, yet, in order to ensure comparability with the surveys of 2002 and 2006, the 2010 survey was conducted in accordance with Nace Rev.1.1 and ISCO_88 as well. All the above surveys are in line with European principles. |
|||
8.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
8.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
The data of the survey were compared with the data of the Labour Force Survey in terms of employment and hours worked data. |
|||
8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
No comparisons, the survey is conducted only every 4 years |
|||
8.5. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
The survey on the structure of earnings covers only the enterprises employing at least 10 persons, while National Accounts cover all the enterprises. In order to achieve a level of comparability between National Accounts data and the results of the survey on the structure of earnings, and in order to check their coherence, the earnings per employee must be calculated for each one of these two data sources. When compared, the data prove to be coherent in the majority of the branches of economic activity. |
|||
8.6. Coherence - internal | |||
All data are checked for internal coherence by ELSTAT and Eurostat. |
|
|||
9.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
There is no relevant press release. |
|||
9.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
There are no publications. |
|||
9.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
There is no online database for the results of the Structure of Earnings Survey 2014. |
|||
9.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
Users can be provided with tabulated-aggregated data, after submitting request to the Division of Statistical Information and Publications, completing an online form or via the email address: data.dissem@statistics.gr. |
|||
9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
Microdata, if not confidential, are made available to users after their submitting a request to the: Division of Statistical Information and Publications 46, Peiraios and Eponiton Str., 18510 Piraeus Tel: +30 213 135 2022 Fax: +30 213 135 2312 e-mail: data.dissem@statistics.gr
For confidential reasons, users can have access to micro-data, only under a confidentiality contract and with respect to the valid process. |
|||
9.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not applicable |
|||
9.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
The methodology concerning the compilation of data on Structure of Earnings Survey is laid down in Regulation (EC) No 530/1999 and (EC) 1738/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The survey is a sample survey using the two-stage stratified sampling method. The primary statistical unit is the local unit of the enterprise with average annual employment amounting to at least 10 persons and the final statistical unit is the employee. As a register of local units is not available, the primary unit is considered the enterprise with average annual employment amounting to at least 10 persons and belongs to sections B-S (excluding O) of Nace Rev.2. For more details see above “ Estimation process” (6.2.1). |
|||
9.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
Quality is ensured by ELSTAT by means of logical checks and specialized checks by Eurostat. The user-oriented quality report of the survey on the structure of earnings is available on the portal of ELSTAT at the link: http://www.statistics.gr/en/statistics/-/publication/SJO47/- |
|||
9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable |
|||
9.7.2. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not applicable |
|
|||
The questionnaires used for the survey are 100% harmonized with Eurostat’s questionnaire. Two forms of questionnaires are used, namely:
The questionnaire Form 1 is the questionnaire used for the enterprise and it helps collecting information on the enterprise, such as economic activity, number of persons employed, form of economic and financial control, number of local units of the enterprise, the main type of employment contract and whether the company belongs to a Group of enterprises. The required time needed to fill in the questionnaire Form 1 ranges from 10 to 70 minutes, depending on the size of the enterprise/service. The questionnaire Form 2 is used to collect information on the employees. More specifically, it helps collecting information on:
It should be noted that the survey is conducted by using the two-stage stratified sampling method, with primary statistical unit the local unit of the enterprise with average annual employment amounting to at least 10 persons and final statistical unit the employee. As a register of local units is not available, the primary unit is considered the enterprise with average annual employment amounting to, at least, 10 persons and belongs to sections B-S (excluding O) of Nace Rev.2. Therefore, at a first stage ELSTAT designs a sample of the enterprises and set out the number of employees that should be surveyed per enterprise (8 – 250 employees). At a second stage, during the first visit to the enterprise, a sample of employees is designed from the payroll list, something that is time consuming and increases the difficulty level of the survey. The survey on the structure of earnings is considered by some surveyed enterprises a difficult and time-consuming survey. Complaints have been expressed mostly in terms of size of the questionnaire Form 2 and the detailed analysis of required information, in addition to the fact the necessary data must be collected from the local unit and not from the enterprise and finally complains have been expressed on the size of the sample of employees. The required time for filling in the questionnaire form 2 ranges from 40 – 60 minutes per employee. The total time needed for filling in the questionnaires form 2 for all the employees of the sample per enterprise depends on the size of the enterprises and the information systems of the enterprise. The cost of the survey for 2010 amounted to 342,000 euros and for 2014 amounted to 310,000 euros. |
|
|||
11.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
The issues concerning the observance of statistical confidentiality by the Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT) are arranged by articles 7, 8 and 9 of the Law 3832/2010 as in force, by Articles 8, 10 and 11(2) of the Regulation on Statistical Obligations of the agencies of the Hellenic Statistical System and by Articles 10 and 15 of the Regulation on the Operation and Administration of ELSTAT. More precisely, ELSTAT disseminates the statistics in compliance with the statistical principles of the European Statistics Code of Practice and in particular with the principle of statistical confidentiality. |
|||
11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
ELSTAT protects and does not disseminate data it has obtained or it has access to, which enable the direct or indirect identification of the statistical units that have provided them by the disclosure of individual information directly received for statistical purposes or indirectly supplied from administrative or other sources. ELSTAT takes all appropriate preventive measures so as to render impossible the identification of individual statistical units by technical or other means that might reasonably be used by a third party. Statistical data that could potentially enable the identification of the statistical unit are disseminated by ELSTAT if and only if: a) these data have been treated, as it is specifically set out in the Regulation on Statistical Obligations of the agencies of the Hellenic Statistical System (ELSS), in such a way that their dissemination does not prejudice statistical confidentiality or b) the statistical unit has given its consent, without any reservations, for the disclosure of data. The confidential data that are transmitted by ELSS agencies to ELSTAT are used exclusively for statistical purposes and the only persons who have the right to have access to these data are the personnel engaged in this task and appointed by an act of the President of ELSTAT. ELSTAT may grant researchers conducting statistical analyses for scientific purposes access to data that enable the indirect identification of the statistical units concerned. The access is granted provided the following conditions are satisfied: a) an appropriate request together with a detailed research proposal in conformity with current scientific standards have been submitted; b) the research proposal indicates in sufficient detail the set of data to be accessed, the methods of analyzing them, and the time needed for the research; c) a contract specifying the conditions for access, the obligations of the researchers, the measures for respecting the confidentiality of statistical data and the sanctions in case of breach of these obligations has been signed by the individual researcher, by his/her institution, or by the organization commissioning the research, as the case may be, and by ELSTAT. Issues referring to the observance of statistical confidentiality are examined by the Statistical Confidentiality Committee (SCC) operating in ELSTAT. The responsibilities of this Committee are to make recommendations to the President of ELSTAT on:
|
|
|||
No comments |
|
|||
|
|||
EL_CV tables_SES2014 |