|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (CSB ) |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Agricultural and Environment Statistics Department |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | Lāčplēša Street 1, Riga, LV-1301, Republic of Latvia |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 10/06/2019 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 19/06/2019 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 10/06/2019 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
Eggs statistics provide statistics on eggs production for human consumption including eggs for preparation of egg products (excluding eggs intended eggs for incubation). Data collection method is sample survey.
|
|||
3.1.1. The main data source of the information | |||
Eggs producers | |||
3.2. Classification system | |||
NUTS1 |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
NACE 01.47 |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
See:ANNEX III - Draft handbook of statistics on eggs for consumption |
|||
3.4.1. Definition of eggs for consumption under EU methodology | |||
Yes | |||
3.4.2. If not, specify the definition used. | |||
Not applicable |
|||
3.4.3. Definition of egg producer under EU methodology | |||
Yes | |||
3.4.4. If not, specify the definition used | |||
Not applicable |
|||
3.4.5. Definition of laying hens under EU methodology | |||
Yes | |||
3.4.6. If not, please describe the differences | |||
Not applicable |
|||
3.4.7. Definition of ungraded eggs under EU methodology | |||
Not relevant | |||
3.4.8. If not, specify the definition used | |||
Not applicable |
|||
3.4.9. Ungraded Eggs provided separately | |||
Not relevant | |||
3.4.10. Additional comments on statistical concepts and definitions | |||
no comments |
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
Agricultural holding with poultry flock (including laying hens) and producing eggs and poultry meat for consumption |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
All agricultural holdings with poultry and producing eggs and poultry meat for consumption |
|||
3.6.1. Physical, economical or other threshold(s) applied to the data collection | |||
Physical threshold regarding laying hens - >=70 laying hens |
|||
3.6.1.1. COVERAGE | |||
Threshold of 70 laying hens covers 98 % of the statistical population |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
The entire territory of the country |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
Calendar year |
|||
3.8.1. The first survey/data collection | |||
Since 2017 until 2018 and so on |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
2017 |
|||
3.10. Other comments | |||
Untill 2017 statistics on eggs for consumption was obtained using calculation |
|
|||
|
|||
4.1. Unit of measure in million | |||
Yes | |||
4.2. Other unit of measures used | |||
thousand |
|
|||
|
|||
5.1. Reference period in calendar year based | |||
Yes | |||
5.2. Reference date for number of laying hens | |||
31 December of the reference year |
|||
5.3. Additional comments on the reference period/date used | |||
No comments |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
ESS Agreement on statistics on eggs for consumption |
|||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not applicable |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
In order to facilitate correct interpretation of data and to foster dialogue with data users, the CSB develops a unified quality report standard where different data preparation aspects are described in detail:legal basis, methodology,sample design and sample size, data collection and processing methods, definitions etc. Document developed by CSB as quality report is available only in Latvian |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
Not applicable |
|||
12.1.1. Data collected for national purposes | |||
For national purposes data are collected also including eggs for incubation |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
12.3. Completeness | |||
Information on eggs is complete |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
Accuracy is good. The estimation of sampling variance is done by the ultimate cluster method (Hansen, Hurwitz and Madow,1953) and residual estimation from the regression model to take weight calibration into account More detail regarding accuracy: cv's on eggs is 0.0368 |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.2. Comparability - over time | |||
Data are comparable |
|||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
Not applicable |
|||
15.4. Coherence - internal | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
Data source on number of laying hens- information from Animal Register of Agricultural Data Center. Data source on number of eggs for consumption- sample survey |
|||
18.1.1. Description of data collection process | |||
Data on number of laying hens- administrative data. Data on number of eggs for consumption- sample survey The sample is designed as a stratified simple case sample so that the required indicators can be provided by statistical regions in Latvia. |
|||
18.1.2. Model used as a breakdown based on individual information | |||
Not relevant | |||
18.1.3. Method used for the model | |||
Not applicable |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
Q |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
Not applicable (for the 2018 metadata collection) |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
. |
|||
18.5.1. Data compilation process - data weighting | |||
Data weighting is used on eggs for consumption The survey design weights, which are inverse proportional to the probability of inclusion, were adjusted to take into account the responsibility of the stratum. |
|||
18.5.2. Data compilation process | |||
Not relevant | |||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Not applicable |
|
|||
See attached file Annexes: Quarterly survey on poultry production (survey 1-poultry farming) Quarterly survey on poultry production (survey 1-poultry farming) |
|
|||
|
|||