Crop production (apro_cp)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Environmental Statistics
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Statistics Department

1.5. Contact mail address

Litostrojska cesta 54
SI-1000 Ljubljana


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

Annual crop statistics provide statistics on the area under main arable crops, vegetables and permanent crops and production and yield levels.  The statistics are collected from  a wide variety of sources: surveys, administrative sources, experts and other data providers. The data collection covers early estimates (before the harvest) and the final data. Data are collected mostly at national level but for some crops also regional data exist (NUTS1/2).

2.2. Classification system

Hierarchical crop classification system

2.3. Coverage - sector

Growing of non-perennial crops, perennial crops and plant propagation (NACE A01.1-01.3)

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See: Annual crop statistics Handbook

2.5. Statistical unit

Utilised agricultural area cultivated by an agricultural holding.

2.6. Statistical population

All agricultural holdings growing crops.

2.7. Reference area

The entire territory of the country.

2.8. Coverage - Time

Crop year.

2.9. Base period

Not applicable.


3. Statistical processing Top
3.1. Source data

  Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4
Have new data sources been introduced since the previous quality report?  NO      
If yes, which new data sources have been introduced since the previous quality report?
Type of source?
To which Table (Reg 543/2009) do they contribute?
Have some data sources been dropped since the previous quality report? NO      
Which data sources have been dropped since the previous quality report?
Type of source?
Why have they been dropped?
Additional comments


Data sources: Please indicate the data sources which were used for the reference year on which is reported

  Type Name(s) of the sources If other type, which kind of data source?
Table 1: Crops from arable land      
Early estimates for areas  
Final area under cultivation Census
Survey

Sample survey on area sown

December Livestock survey (secundary crops)

Agricultural census 2020

IACS - subsidies

Production Expert estimate

Harvested production of early crops and early fruits and estimated production of some important late crops – reference date 31.07

Harvested production of late crops, fruits and grapes - reference date 10.11.

Yield Expert estimate

Harvested production of early crops and early fruits and estimated production of some important late crops – reference date 31.07

Harvested production of late crops, fruits and grapes - reference date 10.11.

Non-existing and non-significant crops Census
Survey
Administrative data

Agricultural census 2020

IACS - subsidies

Table 2: Vegetables, melons and strawberries       
Early estimates for harvested areas
Final harvested area Survey

Sample survey on area sown

Production Expert estimate

Harvested production of late crops, fruits and grapes - reference date 10.11.

Non-existing and non-significant crops Census
Survey

Horticultural census

December livestock survey (modul on non-market vegetables)

Table 3: Permanent crops      
Early estimates for production area
Final production area Administrative data

IACS - Register of producers and plantations of fruit trees, Register of olive producers, Vineyard register

Production Expert estimate

Harvested production of early crops and early fruits and estimated production of some important late crops – reference date 31.07

Harvested production of late crops, fruits and grapes - reference date 10.11.

Non-existing and non-significant crops Census
Survey
Administrative data

Agricultural census 2020

IACS - Register of producers and plantations of fruit trees, Register of olive producers, Vineyard register

Table 4: Agricultural land use      
Main area Survey
Administrative data

Sample survey on area sown

Agricultural census 2020

IACS - Register of producers and plantations of fruit trees, Register of olive producers, Vineyard register

IACS - subsidies

Non-existing and non-significant crops Census
Survey
Administrative data

Agricultural census 2020

Horticultural census

Sample survey on area sown

IACS - Register of producers and plantations of fruit trees, Register of olive producers, Vineyard register

IACS - subsidies

Total number of different data sources

10

 

 

 

 
Additional comments

Data source for the humidity

Put x, if used

Surveyed: farmers report the humidity

 

Surveyed: farmers convert the production/yield into standard humidity     

 

Surveyed: whole sale purchasers report the humidity

 

Surveyed: whole sale purchasers convert the production/yield into standard humidity     

 

Surveyed by experts (e.g. test areas harvested and measured)

 

Estimated by experts

 x

Other type

 

If other type, please explain

 

Additional information

 

   


Which method is used for calculating the yield for main arable crops? Production divided by sown area
If another method, describe it.




 

3.2. Frequency of data collection

  Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5 Source 6 Source 7 Source 8 Source 9
Name of data source

Sample survey on area sown

December Livestock survey

Planning (month-month/year)

(MAR-JUNE/2022)

(SEPT-DEC/2022)

Preparation (month-month/year)

(APR-JUNE/2022)

(SEPT-DEC/2022)

Data collection (month-month/year)

(JUNE-AUG/2022)

(DEC/2022-JAN/2023)

Quality control (month-month/year)

(AUG-SEPT/2022)

(JAN-FEB/2023)

Data analysis (month-month/year)

(SEPT2022-MAR/2023)

(JAN-MAR/2023)

Dissemination (month-month/year)

(SEPT2022-MAR/2023)

(FEB-MAR/2023)

If there were delays, what were the reasons?






 

3.3. Data collection

Definitions Question In case yes, how do they differ?
Do national definitions differ from the definitions in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 543/2009? YES

- Harvested area, yield and crop production

Data on harvested area are not collected, but only data on sown area. In the event of a decrease in the area under cultivation due to natural disasters (floods, drought, hail, etc.), this is taken into account as a smaller estimated average yield per hectare of area under cultivation.

- Production area of Permanent crops is including new plantations.

- Dessert apples and pears - all fruits are produced for fresh consumption. After the harvest the product quality and market conditions determine the usage of fruits

Are there differences between the national methodology and the methodology described in the Handbook concerning e.g. the item and aggregate calculations? NO
Are special estimation/calculation methods used for main crops from arable land? YES

Production is being estimated by experts.

Are special estimation/calculation methods used for vegetables or strawberries? YES

Production is being estimated by experts.

Are special estimation/calculation methods used for permanent crops for human consumption? YES

Production is being estimated by experts.

Are special estimation/calculation methods used for main land use? NO
Do national crop item definitions differ from the definitions in the Handbook  (D-flagged data)? YES  
In case yes, how do they differ? ( list all items and explanations)

Celery (V2200) including Celeriac (V4400)
Other fresh vegetables n.e.c. (V9000) including Gourds and pumpkings (V3430)
Common wheat and spelt (C1110) including Durum wheat (C1120)
Peaches (F1210) including Nectarines (F1220)
Olives for oil (O1910) including Olives for table use (O1100)

Apples for processing (F1111) are included in apples for fresh consumption (F1112)

Pears for fresh processing (F1122) are included in pears for fresh consumption (F1121)

In case data are delivered for one of the items below, describe the crop species included in the item: V9000 - Other fresh vegetables n.e.c.

Gourds and pumpkings (V3430)


Population

Which measures were taken in order to make sure that the requirement stipulated in Art. 3.2 are met?
(Statistics shall be representative of at least 95 % of the areas of each table in the Regulation).

Compering with data from other surveys and Statistical Farm Register

Is the data collection based on holdings? YES
If yes, how the holdings were identified? Unique statistical farm identifier
If not, on which unit the data collection is based on?
When was last update of the holding register? (month/year)

2 per year (march, september)

Was a threshold applied? YES
If yes, size of the excluded area  Area excluded on the basis of the threshold in % of the total area for that crop
Cereals for the production of grain (in %)

less than 5 %

Dried pulses and protein crops (in %)

less than 5 %

Root crops (in %)

less than 5 %

Oilseeds (in %)

less than 5 %

Other industrial crops (included all industrial crops besides oilseeds)  (in %)

less than 5 %

Plants harvested green from arable land (in %)

less than 5 %

Total vegetables, melons and strawberries (in %)

less than 5 %

Cultivated mushrooms (in %)

Not collected

Total permanent crops (in %)

less than 5 %

Fruit trees (in %)

less than 5 %

Berries (in %)

less than 5 %

Nut trees (in %)

less than 5 %

Citrus fruit trees (in %)

less than 5 %

Vineyards (in %)

less than 5 %

Olive trees (in %)

less than 5 %


Survey method (only for census and surveys)

  Survey 1  Survey 2 Survey 3  Survey 4 Survey 5  Survey 6 Survey 7
Name of the survey

Sample survey on area sown

December Livestock survey

Which survey method was used? Telephone interview, electronic questionnaire Postal questionnaire filled in by respondent
Telephone interview, electronic questionnaire
If 'other', please specify
Please provide a link to the questionnaire
Data entry method, if paper questionnaires? Manual


Administrative data (This question block is only for administrative data)

  Admin source 1 Admin source 2 Admin source 3 Admin source 4 Admin source 5 Admin source 6
Name of the register

IACS - Register of producers and plantations of fruit trees, Register of olive producers, Vineyard register

IACS - subsidies

Description

Registers were established among others needs for The Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Agricultural Markets and Rural Development (body of the ministry), for the implementation of programs of the agricultural policy reform, alignment to the EU common agricultural policy and payment of SAPARD pre-accession assistance. Since May 2004 has a role of a paying agency for EAGGF funds. All registers are also part of Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS).

IACS - subsidies

Data owner (organisation)

MAFF

MAAF

Update frequency Continuous Once per year or more often
Reference date (month/year)

01.06.2022

01.06.2022

Legal basis
Reporting unit

All producers above threshold

all holdings which applied for direct payments

Identification variable (e.g. address, unique code, etc.)

unique identificator

unique identificator

Percentage of mismatches (%)

Unknown

How were the mismatches handled?
Degree of coverage (holdings, e.g. 80%)

all producers above threshold

 80% of holdings

Degree of completeness (variables, e.g. 60%)

100%

almost complete

If not complete, which other sources were used ?

Sample survey on area sown

Were the data used for sample frame? Validation Sample frame
Data used for other purposes, which?

 

Which variables were taken from administrative sources?

all available

all available

Were there any differences in the definition of the variables between the administrative source and those described in the Regulation? YES YES
Please describe the differences

minor differences in the categories e.g. peaches and nectarines (one variable)

minor differences in the categories e.g. dry beans included in fresh vegetables

What measures were taken to eliminate the differences?

none

data for dry beans from Agricultural census 2020, is excluded from fresh vegatables 

How was the reliability, accuracy and coherence (comparison to other available data) of the data originated from administrative data source (ante- and/or ex-post) checked?
What were the possible limitations, drawbacks of using the data from administrative source(s)?


Expert estimations (This question block is only for expert estimates)

  Expert estimate 1 Expert estimate 2 Expert estimate 3 Expert estimate 4 Expert estimate 5 Expert estimate 6
Name of the estimation

Harvested production of early crops and early fruits and estimated production of some important late crops – reference date 31.07.

Harvested production of late crops, fruits and grapes - reference date 10.11.

Data owner (organisation)

SURS

SURS

Update frequency (e.g. 1 year or 6 months) Yearly Yearly
Reference date (Month/Year  e.g. 1/22 - 8/22)

7/22

10/22

Legal basis
Use purpose of the estimates?

Calculation and estimation of production/yield

Calculation and estimation of production/yield

What kind of expertise the experts have?
What kind of estimation methods were used?

Professional subjective assessment method based on observation of phenomena by means of known facts.

Professional subjective assessment method based on observation of phenomena by means of known facts.

Were there any differences in the definition of the variables between the experts' estimates and those described in the Regulation? NO NO
If yes, please describe the differences
What measures were taken to eliminate the differences?
How were the reliability, accuracy and coherence (comparison to other available data) of the data originated from experts' estimates (ante- and/or ex-post)checked?

Assessment was compared to data on production reported from agricultural bussiness.

Assessment was compared to data on production reported from agricultural bussiness.

What were the possible limitations, drawbacks of using the data from expert estimate(s)?
Additional comments


 

3.4. Data validation

Which kind of data validation measures are in place? Manual
What do they target? Completeness
Is the data cross-validated against an other dataset? YES
If yes, which kind of dataset? Previous results
Farm Structure Survey
Other dataset
If other, please describe






 

3.5. Data compilation

Not Applicable.

3.6. Adjustment

Not Applicable.


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

  Completeness Punctuality Accuracy Reliability Overall quality
How would you describe the overall quality development since the previous quality report? Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable
Is there a quality management process in place for crop statistics? NO        
If, yes, what are the components?        
Is there a quality report available? YES        
If yes, please provide a link(s)

https://www.stat.si/statweb/File/DocSysFile/12354/QR_KME-ZGK-K_2022.pdf

       
To which data source(s) is it linked?

Sample survey on area sown, all surveys mentioned in 3.1

       
Has a peer-review been carried out for crop statistics? NO        
If, yes, which were the main conclusions?        
What quality improvement measures are planned for the next 3 years? Systematic validation improvements
Further automation
       
If, other, please specify        
Additional comments        






 

4.2. Quality management - assessment

See the European level Quality Report.


5. Relevance Top
5.1. Relevance - User Needs

Are there known unmet user needs? YES
Describe the unmet needs

Gathering data on Energy crops (all crops, used for energy purpouses, including green maize, cereals, plants harvested green, etc)

Does the Regulation 543/2009 meet the national data needs? NO
Does the ESS agreement meet the national needs?
If not, which additional data are collected?

data on other crops, not covered by Reg.543/2009

Additional comments






 

5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Have any user satisfaction surveys been done? NO
If yes, how satisfied the users were? Satisfied
Additional comments

There were no satisfaction survey done, but periodicly we organise Statistical advisory committie for Agricultural statistics, where all methodological changes and data needs are discusted with data users.

More about Statistical advisory committies can be found on: http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/NationalStatistics/AdvCommittees






 

5.3. Completeness

See the European level Quality Report

5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

See the European level Quality Report


6. Accuracy and reliability Top
6.1. Accuracy - overall

See the European level Quality Report.

6.2. Sampling error

Sampling method and sampling error

  Survey 1 Survey 2 Survey 3 Survey 4 Survey 5 Survey 6 Survey 7
Name

Sample survey on area sown

December Livestock survey

Sampling basis? List
Area
List
Area
If 'other', please specify
Sampling method? Stratified Stratified
If stratified, number of strata?

4

4

If stratified, stratification basis? Location
Size
Legal status
Location
Size
Legal status
If 'other', please specify
Size of total population

68,142

68,000

Size of sample

55,618

9,461

Which methods were used to assess the sampling error?  Relative standard error Relative standard error
If other, which?
Which methods were used to derive the extrapolation factor?  Basic weight
Non-response
Basic weight
Non-response
If other, which?
If CV (co-efficient of variation) was calculated, please describe the calculation methods and formulas

Coefficient of variation was calculated using SAS procedure PROC SURVEYMEANS for stratified sample design.

Coefficient of variation was calculated using SAS procedure PROC SURVEYMEANS for stratified sample design.

If the results were compared with other sources, please describe the results
Which were the main sources of errors?


Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable


Coefficient of variation (CV) for the area (on the MS level)

  Survey 1  Survey 2 Survey 3  Survey 4 Survey 5  Survey 6 Survey 7
Name of the survey

Sample survey on area sown

Cereals for the production of grain (in %)

0.5

Dried pulses and protein crops (in %)

9.5

Root crops (in %)

1.7

Oilseeds (in %)

0.2

Other industrial crops (included all industrial crops besides oilseeds)  (in %)

 

Plants harvested green from arable land (in %)

0.1

Total vegetables, melons and strawberries (in %)
Cultivated mushrooms (in %)
Total permanent crops (in %)
Fruit trees (in %)
Berries (in %)
Nut trees (in %)
Citrus fruit trees (in %)
Vineyards (in %)
Olive trees (in %)
Additional comments            




 

6.3. Non-sampling error
6.3.1. Coverage error

Over-coverage - rate

Not applicable


Common units - proportion

Not applicable


  Data source 1 Data source 2 Data source 3 Data source 4 Data source 5 Data source 6 Data source 7 Data source 8 Data source 9
Name of the data source

Sample survey on area sown

December Livestock survey

Error type Over-coverage
Contact errors
Over-coverage
Contact errors
Degree of bias caused by coverage errors Low Low
What were the reasons for coverage errors?

The error occurs, because the survey included inadequate reporting units. They were eliminated in the process of data editing.

The error occurs, because the survey included inadequate reporting units. They were eliminated in the process of data editing.

Which actions were taken for reducing the error or to correct the statistics?

Over-coverage was adjusted with the help of extrapolator factor.

Over-coverage was adjusted with the help of extrapolator factor.

Additional comments




 

6.3.2. Measurement error

  Data source 1 Data source 2 Data source 3 Data source 4 Data source 5 Data source 6 Data source 7 Data source 8 Data source 9
Name of the data source

Sample survey on area sown

December Livestock survey

Was the questionnaire based on usual concepts for respondents? YES YES
Number of surveys already performed with the current questionnaire (or a slightly amended version of it)?

19

17

Preparatory (field) testing of the questionnaire? NO NO
Number of units participating in the tests? 
Explanatory notes/handbook for surveyors/respondents?  YES YES
On-line FAQ or Hot-line support for surveyors/respondents? YES YES
Were pre-filled questionnaires used? NO NO
Percentage of pre-filled questions out of total number of questions
Were some actions taken for reducing the measurement error or to correct the statistics? NO NO
If yes, describe the actions and their impact






 

6.3.3. Non response error

Unit non-response - rate

Not applicable


Item non-response - rate

Not applicable


  Survey 1 Survey 2 Survey 3 Survey 4 Survey 5 Survey 6 Survey 7
Name

Sample survey on area sown

December Livestock survey

Unit level non-response rate (in %)

2.41

41.7

Item level non-response rate (in %)              
               - Min% / item

0%

0%

               - Max% / item

0%

0%

               - Overall%

0%

0%

Was the non-response been treated ? YES YES
Which actions were taken to reduce the impact of non-response?

weighting

weighting

Which items had a high item-level non-response rate? 

None

None

Which methods were used for handling missing data?
(several answers allowed)
Weighting Weighting
In case of imputation which was the basis?
In case of imputation, which was the imputation rate (%)?
Estimated degree of bias caused by non-response? Insignificant Insignificant
Which tools were used for correcting the data?

SQL, SAS

SQL, SAS

Which organisation did the corrections?

SURS

SURS

Additional comments




 

6.3.4. Processing error

Not applicable.

6.3.4.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

6.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.

6.5. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

6.6. Data revision - practice

Not applicable.

6.6.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top
7.1. Timeliness

Time lag - first result

120 days


Time lag - final result

356 days


  Cereals Dried pulses and protein crops Root crops Oilseeds Other industrial crops Plants harvested green Vegetables and melons Strawberries Cultivated mushrooms Fruit trees Berries Nut trees Citrus fruit trees Vineyards Olive trees
How many main data releases there are yearly in the national crop statistics for the following types of crops?

3

1

3

2

1

1

0

1

0

2

1

1

0

2

1

How many of them are forecasts (releases before the harvest)?

2

1

2

1

0

0

1

0

28/10/2022

0

0

1

When was the first  forecasting published for the crop year on which is reported? (day/month/year) 28/09/2022 28/10/2022 28/09/2022 28/10/2022

1

28/10/2022
When were the final results published for the crop year on which is reported? (day/month/year) 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023 29/03/2023
Additional comments




 

7.2. Punctuality

See the European level Quality Report

7.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

See the European level Quality Report


8. Coherence and comparability Top
8.1. Comparability - geographical

Not applicable.

8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

8.2. Comparability - over time

Length of comparable time series

Not applicable


  Crops from arable land
(Table 1)
Vegetables, melons and strawberries (Table 2) Permanent crops
(Table 3)
Agricultural land use
(Table 4)
Have there been major breaks in the time series in the previous 5 years? NO NO NO NO
If yes, to which were they related?
If other, which?
Which items were affected?
Year of break (number)
Impact on comparability
Additional comments





 

8.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable

8.3. Coherence - cross domain

With which other data sources the crop statistics data have been compared?  IACS
Other
If others, which?

Agricultural census 2020 (IFS 2020)

If no comparisons have been made, why not?


Differences between ACS and other data sources (%)

Results of comparisons IFS 2020 Vineyard survey 2020 IACS Other source(s)  In case of other sources, which?
Cereals    
Dried pulses and protein crops    
Root crops    
Oilseeds    
Other industrial crops (than oilseeds)    
Plants harvested green    
Total vegetables, melons and strawberries    
Vegetables and melons    
Strawberries    
Cultivated mushrooms  
Total permanent crops

-2,0%

 
Fruit trees

+10,3%

Not applicable.

Berries  
Nut trees  
Citrus fruit trees

Not applicable.

Vineyards

-3.3%

Olive trees

-13.6%

Not applicable.

If there were considerable differences, which factors explain them?

Most of the differences arise due to different reference periods between surveys.

 





 

8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

8.6. Coherence - internal

Not applicable.


9. Accessibility and clarity Top
9.1. Dissemination format - News release

Availability Links
YES






 



Annexes:
Production of early crops and early fruits and yield forecast of some important late crops, Slovenia, 2022
Areas of field products, Slovenia, 2022
Yield forecast of late crops, late fruit and grapes, Slovenia, 2022
Autumn sowing of cereals and oil turniprape, Slovenia, 2022
Si-Stat database
SURS - webpage
9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

  Availability Links
Publications Electronic
Publications in English Electronic






 

9.3. Dissemination format - online database

Data tables - consultations


  Availability Links
On-line database accessible to users YES
Website National language
English





 

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Availability Links
YES

http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/StaticPages/Index/For-Researchers






 

9.5. Dissemination format - other
9.6. Documentation on methodology

  Availability Links
Methodological report English

https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/8017/15-024-ME.pdf

Quality Report English

https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/12354/QR_KME-ZGK-K_2022.pdf

Metadata National language
Additional comments  






 

9.7. Quality management - documentation

Not applicable.

9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not applicable.

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

Not applicable.


10. Cost and Burden Top

Efficiency gains if compared to the previous quality report? Further automation
If other, which?
Burden reduction measures since the previous reference year  Multiple use of the collected data
If other, which?






 


11. Confidentiality Top
11.1. Confidentiality - policy
Restricted from publication
11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment
Restricted from publication


12. Comment Top

 


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top