|
Source 1 |
Source 2 |
Source 3 |
Source 4 |
Have new data sources been introduced since the previous quality report? |
NO |
|
|
|
If yes, which new data sources have been introduced since the previous quality report? |
|
|
|
|
Type of source? |
|
|
|
|
To which Table (Reg 543/2009) do they contribute? |
|
|
|
|
Have some data sources been dropped since the previous quality report? |
NO |
|
|
|
Which data sources have been dropped since the previous quality report? |
|
|
|
|
Type of source? |
|
|
|
|
Why have they been dropped? |
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
In Integrated Farm Statistics (IFS) years, survey data are used as the main basis for areas, and in non-IFS years, they are used only for some specific details (in the case of crops in greenhouses and kitchen gardens). |
|
|
|
Data sources: Please indicate the data sources which were used for the reference year on which is reported
|
Type |
Name(s) of the sources |
If other type, which kind of data source? |
Table 1: Crops from arable land |
|
|
|
Early estimates for areas |
Administrative data |
Land use data from the IACS |
|
Final area under cultivation |
Survey Administrative data |
Crop Production Survey Land use data from the IACS |
|
Production |
Survey |
Survey of Yields, Crop Production Survey |
|
Yield |
Other |
|
Calculation on the basis of areas and production |
Non-existing and non-significant crops |
Administrative data |
Land use data from the IACS |
|
Table 2: Vegetables, melons and strawberries |
|
|
|
Early estimates for harvested areas |
Administrative data |
Land use data from the IACS |
|
Final harvested area |
Survey Administrative data |
Crop Production Survey, Farm Structure Survey Land use data from the IACS |
|
Production |
Survey |
Survey of Yields, Crop Production Survey |
|
Non-existing and non-significant crops |
Administrative data |
Land use data from the IACS |
|
Table 3: Permanent crops |
|
|
|
Early estimates for production area |
Administrative data |
Land use data from the IACS |
|
Final production area |
Survey Administrative data |
Crop Production Survey Land use data from the IACS |
|
Production |
Survey |
Survey of Yields, Crop Production Survey |
|
Non-existing and non-significant crops |
Administrative data |
Land use data from the IACS |
|
Table 4: Agricultural land use |
|
|
|
Main area |
Survey Administrative data |
Crop Production Survey Land use data from the IACS |
|
Non-existing and non-significant crops |
Administrative data |
Land use data from the IACS |
|
Total number of different data sources |
4 |
|
|
Additional comments |
Rows of early estimates include data on areas delivered to Eurostat every year in September. From 2013, almost the whole UAA is covered by land use data from IACS.
Data source for the humidity |
Put x, if used |
Surveyed: farmers report the humidity |
|
Surveyed: farmers convert the production/yield into standard humidity |
|
Surveyed: whole sale purchasers report the humidity |
|
Surveyed: whole sale purchasers convert the production/yield into standard humidity |
|
Surveyed by experts (e.g. test areas harvested and measured) |
|
Estimated by experts |
x |
Other type |
|
If other type, please explain |
|
Additional information |
|
|
|
|
Which method is used for calculating the yield for main arable crops? |
production divided by harvested area |
If another method, describe it. |
|
|
Definitions |
Question |
In case yes, how do they differ? |
Do national definitions differ from the definitions in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 543/2009? |
NO |
|
Are there differences between the national methodology and the methodology described in the Handbook concerning e.g. the item and aggregate calculations? |
NO |
|
Are special estimation/calculation methods used for main crops from arable land? |
NO |
|
Are special estimation/calculation methods used for vegetables or strawberries? |
NO |
|
Are special estimation/calculation methods used for permanent crops for human consumption? |
NO |
|
Are special estimation/calculation methods used for main land use? |
NO |
|
Do national crop item definitions differ from the definitions in the Handbook (D-flagged data)? |
NO |
|
In case yes, how do they differ? ( list all items and explanations) |
|
|
In case data are delivered for one of the items below, describe the crop species included in the item: |
C1900 - Other cereals n.e.c. (buckwheat, millet, etc.) P9000 - Other dry pulses and protein crops n.e.c. R9000 - Other root crops n.e.c. I1190 -Other oilseed crops n.e.c G9100- Other cereals harvested green (excluding green maize) G9900 - Other plants harvested green from arable land n.e.c. F3900 - Other berries n.e.c. PECR9 - Other permanent crops |
C1900: buckwheat P9000: chick peas, lentils, mixed grain of pulses, vetches R9000: fodder roots I1190: hempseed, sunflower seeds, oil radish, white mustard, soya bean G9100: all cereals harvested green, including buckwheat G9900: winter rape and turnip rape harvested green; spring rape and turnip rape harvested green F3900: buckthorn, chokeberry (Aronia), cranberry PECR9: christmas trees, willows |
Population
Which measures were taken in order to make sure that the requirement stipulated in Art. 3.2 are met? (Statistics shall be representative of at least 95 % of the areas of each table in the Regulation). |
The frame for sample surveys is drawn from the Farm Register, which covers all holdings. The sample is representative of the whole population of holdings. |
Is the data collection based on holdings? |
YES |
If yes, how the holdings were identified? |
Unique statistical farm identifier |
If not, on which unit the data collection is based on? |
Data on holdings are available from the Farm Register, which is updated regularly on the basis of administrative and statistical sources. |
When was last update of the holding register? (month/year) |
July 2022 (for Crop Production 2022 purposes) |
Was a threshold applied? |
NO |
If yes, size of the excluded area |
Area excluded on the basis of the threshold in % of the total area for that crop |
Cereals for the production of grain (in %) |
|
Dried pulses and protein crops (in %) |
|
Root crops (in %) |
|
Oilseeds (in %) |
|
Other industrial crops (included all industrial crops besides oilseeds) (in %) |
|
Plants harvested green from arable land (in %) |
|
Total vegetables, melons and strawberries (in %) |
|
Cultivated mushrooms (in %) |
|
Total permanent crops (in %) |
|
Fruit trees (in %) |
|
Berries (in %) |
|
Nut trees (in %) |
|
Citrus fruit trees (in %) |
|
Vineyards (in %) |
|
Olive trees (in %) |
|
Survey method (only for census and surveys)
|
Survey 1 |
Survey 2 |
Survey 3 |
Survey 4 |
Survey 5 |
Survey 6 |
Survey 7 |
Name of the survey |
Integrated Farm Statistics (Agricultural Census) 2020 |
Survey of Yields |
Crop Production Survey |
|
|
|
|
Which survey method was used? |
On-line electronic questionnaire filled in by respondent Telephone interview, electronic questionnaire |
On-line electronic questionnaire filled in by respondent Telephone interview, electronic questionnaire |
On-line electronic questionnaire filled in by respondent Telephone interview, electronic questionnaire |
|
|
|
|
If 'other', please specify |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide a link to the questionnaire |
https://www.stat.ee/sites/default/files/2020-08/PL2020_Kysimustik_EE.pdf |
https://www.stat.ee/sites/default/files/kysimustikud/2022/21214129922_Questionnaire_as_a_PDF_file_en.pdf |
https://www.stat.ee/sites/default/files/kysimustikud/2022/21214130622_Questionnaire_as_a_PDF_file_en.pdf |
|
|
|
|
Data entry method, if paper questionnaires? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative data (This question block is only for administrative data)
|
Admin source 1 |
Admin source 2 |
Admin source 3 |
Admin source 4 |
Admin source 5 |
Admin source 6 |
Name of the register |
Land use data from IACS (Register of Agricultural Support and Agricultural Parcels) |
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
The aim of the Register of Agricultural Support and Agricultural Parcels is to gather, process and preserve data on support granted through the implementation of measures related to the common agricultural policy, state measures for organising rural life and the agricultural market, and measures for organising the fisheries market. |
|
|
|
|
|
Data owner (organisation) |
Ministry of Rural Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
Update frequency |
Continuous |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference date (month/year) |
October 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal basis |
The main legal act for this domain is the European Union Common Agricultural Policy Implementation Act (adopted on 19 November 2014). |
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting unit |
Persons participating in the measures related to the common agricultural policy |
|
|
|
|
|
Identification variable (e.g. address, unique code, etc.) |
The data were linked with holdings through the client ID, personal ID code or commercial registry code. |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of mismatches (%) |
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
How were the mismatches handled? |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Degree of coverage (holdings, e.g. 80%) |
99.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Degree of completeness (variables, e.g. 60%) |
The total UAA is covered. In general, administrative data are of good quality but there is no full information about greenhouse crops, kitchen gardens and some other specific crops. |
|
|
|
|
|
If not complete, which other sources were used ? |
In addition to administrative data, survey data are used to calculate final results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Were the data used for sample frame? |
Sample frame Validation |
|
|
|
|
|
Data used for other purposes, which? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which variables were taken from administrative sources? |
Land areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were there any differences in the definition of the variables between the administrative source and those described in the Regulation? |
NO |
|
|
|
|
|
Please describe the differences |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
What measures were taken to eliminate the differences? |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
How was the reliability, accuracy and coherence (comparison to other available data) of the data originated from administrative data source (ante- and/or ex-post) checked? |
Administrative data about areas are of very good quality, and they are also the basis for agricultural supports. Individual data are received and processed. Trends are checked in the case of aggregated data. |
|
|
|
|
|
What were the possible limitations, drawbacks of using the data from administrative source(s)? |
Difference of units |
|
|
|
|
|
Expert estimations (This question block is only for expert estimates)
|
Expert estimate 1 |
Expert estimate 2 |
Expert estimate 3 |
Expert estimate 4 |
Expert estimate 5 |
Expert estimate 6 |
Name of the estimation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data owner (organisation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update frequency (e.g. 1 year or 6 months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference date (Month/Year e.g. 1/22 - 8/22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use purpose of the estimates? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What kind of expertise the experts have? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What kind of estimation methods were used? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were there any differences in the definition of the variables between the experts' estimates and those described in the Regulation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If yes, please describe the differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What measures were taken to eliminate the differences? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How were the reliability, accuracy and coherence (comparison to other available data) of the data originated from experts' estimates (ante- and/or ex-post)checked? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What were the possible limitations, drawbacks of using the data from expert estimate(s)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|