|
|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Restricted from publication | ||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Restricted from publication | ||
1.5. Contact mail address | Restricted from publication |
|
|||
|
|||
2.1. Data description | |||
Collection of data pursuant to REGULATION (EC) No 1185/2009 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides, ANNEX II, STATISTICS ON AGRICULTURAL USE OF PESTICIDES. The pesticide survey in Bulgaria in 2012 was a sample survey conducted in compliance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009. The aim of the survey is to obtain current and reliable information on the quantities of active substances used in agriculture. |
|||
2.1.1. Main characteristics of statistics | |||
The data is comprehensive and covers the whole country. The selection of crops takes into account the most relevant crops for the national action plan. The selection is designed to be representative of the crops cultivated in the Member State and of the substances used. The crops covered by the statistics are wheat, barley, maize for grain, sunflower, rape crop year 2018, covering 75% of the arable land in Bulgaria and 52% of the UAA in Bulgaria. |
|||
2.1.2. Reference period of data collection | |||
2018 |
|||
2.1.3. National legislation | |||
No | |||
2.1.3.1. National legislation - Name | |||
2.1.3.2. National legislation - Link | |||
2.1.3.3. National legislation - Responsible organisation | |||
2.1.3.4. National legislation - Year of entry into force | |||
2.1.3.5. National legislation - Coverage of variables required under EU legislation | |||
2.1.3.6. Divergence national definitions from EU regulation | |||
Not available |
|||
2.1.3.7. National legislation - Legal obligation for respondents to reply (Yes/No) | |||
No | |||
2.1.4. Additional comments data description | |||
2.2. Classification system | |||
The classification used for pesticides corresponds to Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 (http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1185/2017-03-09) of the European Parliament and of the Council.
|
|||
2.3. Coverage - sector | |||
Wheat, barley, maize for grain, sunflower, rape crop year 2018, covering 75% of the arable land in Bulgaria and 52% of the UAA in Bulgaria. |
|||
2.3.1. Crops covered by the statistics | |||
See the attached excel file in the Annexes. |
|||
2.3.2. Commercial non-agricultural uses of pesticides | |||
Not available |
|||
2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
The data reported are the quantity of each active substances listed in Annex III of Regulation 1185/2009 contained in plant protection products used on a selected crop, expressed in kg.
|
|||
2.5. Statistical unit | |||
agricultural holdings |
|||
2.6. Statistical population | |||
The main sample was selected of population of holdings in IACS ’2018 - wheat, barley, corn for grain, rapeseed and sunflower from which a sample of farms was drawn up. The sample was selected at the level of statistical region. A different number of interviews is filled in for each farm depending on whether it grows any of the listed 5 crops in separate statistical regions.
|
|||
2.7. Reference area | |||
The entire territory of the country. |
|||
2.7.1. Geographical area covered | |||
The entire territory of the country. |
|||
2.7.2. Inclusion of special territories | |||
Not available |
|||
2.8. Coverage - Time | |||
2012 onwards |
|||
2.9. Base period | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on an index number of time series. |
|
|||
Statistical survey |
|||
3.1. Source data | |||
‘See the attached Excel file in the annexes’ |
|||
3.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
a five-year period |
|||
3.3. Data collection | |||
‘See the attached Excel file in the annexes’ |
|||
3.4. Data validation | |||
Data is entered at district level in data entry application, where a set of minimum controls at entry and queries for individual and aggregated data are laid. Individual data are checked for completeness and coherence by a serie of logical and mathematical controls. The individual data is checked through series of logical and mathematical controls. The completeness of the records is checked for the obligatory fields of the questionnaire. The completeness of the units from the list to be surveyed is also checked. Tools used for data validation: - manual for interviewers; - online computer system. Validation is done at district (local collection centre) and central level (final collection centre) of the MAFF. |
|||
3.4.1. Data validation measures | |||
Manual | |||
3.4.2. Target of data validation measures | |||
Consistency | |||
3.4.3. Specification target of data validation | |||
3.5. Data compilation | |||
Methodology for determination of weights (extrapolation factors) 1. Design weights Taking the inverse of the inclusion probabilities 2. Adjustment of weights for non-response No 3. Adjustment of weights to external data sources No |
|||
3.6. Adjustment | |||
Not applicable |
|
|||
|
|||
4.1. Quality assurance | |||
The accuracy is obtained by calculating the random sampling error. |
|||
4.1.1. Quality management system in organisation | |||
Yes | |||
4.1.2. Specification of implementation | |||
|
|||
4.1.3. Peer review | |||
No | |||
4.1.4. Main conclusions peer review | |||
4.1.5. Future quality improvements | |||
Further automation | |||
4.1.6. Specification of quality improvements | |||
4.1.7. Additional comments quality assurance | |||
4.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
The data covers the whole country. The selection of crops takes into account the most relevant crops for the national action plan, covering 75% of the arable land and 52% of the total UAA. The selection is designed to be representative of the crops cultivated in the Member State and of the substances used. |
|||
4.2.1. Overall quality | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.2. Relevance | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.3. Accuracy and reliability | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.4. Timeliness and punctuality | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.5. Comparability | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.6. Coherence | |||
Stable | |||
4.2.7. Additional comments quality assessment | |||
Not available. |
|
|||
The data is specific with only few potential users. No survey on customer satisfaction on the topic. |
|||
5.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
The data is specific with only few potential users. The potential users are unknown and could not be unidentified. |
|||
5.1.1. Unmet user needs | |||
Not available |
|||
5.1.2. Plans for satisfying unfilled user needs | |||
5.1.3. Additional comments user needs | |||
5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
The data is specific with only few potential users. No survey on customer satisfaction on the topic. |
|||
5.2.1. User satisfaction survey | |||
No | |||
5.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey | |||
5.2.3. Satisfaction level | |||
5.2.4. Additional comments user satisfaction | |||
5.3. Completeness | |||
See sub-category below. |
|||
5.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics because in this data collection, there is no target on the number of data. Member States are asked to collect data on representative crops without stipulating the number of crops. |
|
|||
Data is reliable and accurate. |
|||
6.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
According to Regulation 1185/2009 the five most important crops (with the biggest area or 75% of arable land) have been chosen in order to limit the error coverage, low level measurement error and low level of processing error (data gathered on paper questionnaires and followed by manual data entry in the programm). Non response error - non existant. |
|||
6.1.1. Grading of accuracy | |||
High | |||
6.1.2. Factors lowering accuracy | |||
Other | |||
6.1.3. Specification of factors | |||
6.1.4. Additional comments overall accuracy | |||
6.2. Sampling error | |||
‘See the attached Excel file in the annexes’ |
|||
6.3. Non-sampling error | |||
‘See the attached Excel file in the annexes’ |
|||
6.3.1. Coverage error | |||
The selection of holdings for observation came from a list provided by the IACS that contained holdings growing the observed five crops in the year of observation. |
|||
6.3.2. Measurement error | |||
Measurement errors were mostly detected by control in the computer module or by the additional monitoring of the data at central level. When errors were discovered the regional experts and the surveyors contacted the holder for data clarification and data correction. |
|||
6.3.3. Non response error | |||
If the holder was not available during the first visit, the surveyors were to re-arrange another visit by specified date and time. For this purpose they were supplied with telephone contacts. The questionnaires with inconsistent or missing answers were returned to surveyors for follow up interviews or data clarification by phone. |
|||
6.3.4. Processing error | |||
NA |
|||
6.3.5. Model assumption error | |||
NA |
|||
6.4. Seasonal adjustment | |||
Seasonal adjustment is not applicable to pesticide use statistics since all plant protection treatments associated directly or indirectly with the crop during the reference period are reported. |
|||
6.5. Data revision - policy | |||
Data revision is not envisaged. |
|||
6.6. Data revision - practice | |||
Data will be revised if needed. Data revision is not envisaged. |
|||
6.6.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Data revision is not envisaged. |
|||
6.6.2. Data revisions - conceptual changes | |||
No | |||
6.6.3. Reason for revisions | |||
6.6.4. Impact of revisions | |||
Not important | |||
6.6.5. Additional comments data revisions | |||
|
|||
|
|||
7.1. Timeliness | |||
'The delivery period December 2020 is respected without delay. |
|||
7.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
'Data is not publicated yet. |
|||
7.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
'Data is not publicated yet. |
|||
7.1.3. Reasons for possible long production times? | |||
7.2. Punctuality | |||
'Data is not publicated yet. |
|||
7.2.4. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
NA |
|||
7.2.1. Data release according to schedule | |||
YES | |||
7.2.2. Data release on target date | |||
7.2.3. Reasons for delays | |||
|
|||
8.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
We do not perform comparisons among our national data and the data of other member states. There is no comparison between countries or regions. Data is collected on national level only. Second data set. |
|||
8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in pesticide use statistics. |
|||
8.2. Comparability - over time | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on time series. |
|||
8.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because it is not based on time series. |
|||
8.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
In general there may be a slight possibility to compare the data across domains with data from other sources or statistical datasets such as the survey on pesticide sales, however, thus far the practical comparison did not yield evidence of coincidence. This is as a result of the survey on agricultural use excluding: 1. Different crops not falling within the scope of observation for the survey 2. The quantities and pesticides products applied in domains such as forest, railroad transport, public parks and gardens and other public sites. |
|||
8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
Not applicable for pesticide use statistics, because the data collection is based on a five-year period |
|||
8.5. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
Not applicable, because it has no relevance for national accounts. |
|||
8.6. Coherence - internal | |||
The data set is internally coherent. There is no other dataset available. The pesticides statistics on agricultural use of pesticides is comparable with the administrative data on the placing on the market of pesticides. |
|
|||
Upon request aggregated data |
|||
9.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
No news release. |
|||
9.1.1. Publication of news releases | |||
No | |||
9.1.2. Link to news releases | |||
not applicable |
|||
9.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
Data are disseminated on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry https://www.mzh.government.bg/en/policies-and-programs/reports/agricultural-report/ |
|||
9.2.1. Production of paper publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.2. English paper publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.3. Production of electronic publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.4. English electronic publication | |||
No | |||
9.2.5. Link to publications | |||
9.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
There is no online database. |
|||
9.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
NA |
|||
9.3.2. Accessibility of on-line database | |||
No | |||
9.3.3. Link to on-line database | |||
9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
There are rules for releasing confidential data for the purpose of research and that the provision of confidential data is performed according to these rules. |
|||
9.4.1. Accessibility of micro-data | |||
No | |||
9.4.2. Link to micro-data | |||
not available |
|||
9.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
https://www.mzh.government.bg/en/policies-and-programs/reports/agricultural-report/ Individual data are confidential and are not disseminated as such (affidavit, Law on statistics). No individual data is published. Statistical information summarizing the data for less than three statistical units is not published. Data of a holding representing 90 per cent of the total value of some indicator is not published. |
|||
9.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
There are instructions on paper in the Bulgarian language, circulated prior to the survey. |
|||
9.6.1. Availability of national reference metadata | |||
No | |||
9.6.2. Link to national reference metadata | |||
9.6.3. Availability of methodological papers | |||
Yes | |||
9.6.4. Link to methodological papers | |||
9.6.5. Availability of handbook | |||
No | |||
9.6.6. Link to handbook | |||
9.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
NA |
|||
9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
NA |
|||
9.7.2. Metadata - consultations | |||
NA |
|||
9.7.3. Availability of quality report | |||
9.7.4. Link to quality report | |||
|
|||
High burden on respondents, given the subject matter |
|||
10.1. Efficiency gains | |||
Increased use of administrative data | |||
10.2. Specification efficiency gains | |||
10.3. Measures to reduce burden | |||
Multiple use of the collected data | |||
10.4. Specification burden reduction | |||
|
|||
Individual data are confidential and are not disseminated as such (affidavit, Law on statistics). No individual data is published. Micro-data has not been disseminated. Statistical information summarizing the data for less than three statistical units is not published. Data of a holding representing 90 per cent of the total value of some indicator is not published. Data given to various organisations or legal persons also comply with the requirements of the Statistics Act for statistical confidentiality. |
|||
11.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
All individuals with access to individual data have signed an affidavit, that the data is confidential and will not be disseminated as such (Law on statistics). |
|||
11.1.1. Transmission of confidential national data to Eurostat | |||
Yes | |||
11.1.2. Confidentiality according to Regulation | |||
Yes | |||
11.1.3. Data confidentiality policy | |||
11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
Separate server, secured inner net without access of external users. |
|||
11.2.1. Procedures for confidentiality | |||
11.2.2. Additional comments confidentiality - data treatment | |||
|
|||
NA |
|
|||
|
|||
ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019 (1)1 |