Vineyard (vit)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: Ministère de l'Agriculture, de la Viticulture et de la Protection des Consommateurs Institut viti-vinicole B.P. 50L-5501 REMICH Tel: (+352) 23 612 1  FAX: (+352) 23 612 612  Email: info@ivv.public.lu  Homepage: www.ivv.public.lu  

Time Dimension: 2015-50

Data Provider: LU1

Data Flow: PERMCRP_VINEQ_5


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: EUROPEAN STATISTICAL DATA SUPPORT

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministère de l'Agriculture, de la Viticulture et de la Protection des Consommateurs

Institut viti-vinicole

B.P. 50
L-5501 REMICH

Tel: (+352) 23 612 1  FAX: (+352) 23 612 612  Email: info@ivv.public.lu  Homepage: www.ivv.public.lu

 

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Section viticulture

 

1.5. Contact mail address

Insitut viti-vinicole

c/o Monsieur Serge Fischer

B.P. 50

L-5501 Remich


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

The vineyard data set includes data on the structure of vineyards in the European Union. It covers the holdings growing vines intended to produce grapes for other purposes than table grapes or growing plants for vegetative propagation of before mentioned vines and the area covered by these vines.  The data concerns the vine types, degree of specialisation of vine-grower holdings, main varieties of grapes and age of plants. Some indicators are collected at national level, others a NUTS2 level.  The data are extracted from the vineyard register. The Member States, which have more than 500 ha of vines for other purpose than table grape production need to collect the data.

2.2. Classification system

The classification system used in the vineyard data has several dimensions:  type of vineyards, degree of specialisation of the holding, main varieties (> 500 ha t national level), age of plants and size classes of holdings. More information can be found in the Handbook.

2.3. Coverage - sector

Growing of grapes for other purposes than table grapes (mainly for wine, juice, raisins) (part of NACE rev.  2 classification of A01.21: growing of grapes) and plant propagation for vines (part of NACE rev.  2 classification of A01.30: plant propagation).

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Statistical characteristics of observations
Is there a national legislation covering structural vineyrd statistics? YES
Name of the legislation
Loi du 9 avril 1982 introduisant un périmètre viticole pour laplantation et la replantation de vignobles Art (4)
 
Cahier des charges pour l'AOP Moselle luxembourgeoise -> compulsary declaration of every vineyard annually.
 
Utilisation des données: Règlement grand-ducal du 21 janvier 1994 autorisant la création et l’exploitation d’une banque de données au profit de l’Institut viti-vinicole.
If yes, provide a link

Perimetre viticole: http://www.legilux.public.lu/leg/a/archives/1982/0028/a028.pdf#page=5

PDO: http://www.ivv.public.lu/beratung/aop_moselle_luxembourgeoise/cahier_aop.pdf

Utilisation des données: http://www.legilux.public.lu/leg/a/archives/1994/0006/a006.pdf#page=11

Scope and coverage of the legislation

Planting, grubbing up,  replanting of vineyards,  Annual declaration

Protection of personal data

Responsable organisation for the legislation

Ministère de l'Agriculture, de la Viticulture et de la Protection des consommateurs
1, rue de la Congrégation
L-1352 Luxembourg

Tél. : (+352) 2478 2478
Fax : (+352) 46 40 27
E-mail : info@ma.public.lu

Precision requirements 

LU uses the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) since 2002 as vineyard registry.

Does the national legal frame foresee the use of the vineyard register?  YES
2.5. Statistical unit

Number of holdings growing vines intended to produce grapes for other purposes than table grapes or growing plants for vegetative propagation of before mentioned vines and the area covered by these vines in hectares.

2.6. Statistical population

All holdings growing vines intended to produce grapes for other purposes than table grapes or growing plants for vegetative propagation of before mentioned vines, having an area bigger than 0.1 hectares registered in the vineyard register. The data collection is limited to the countries having a bigger than 500 ha area of vines grown for other purposes than table grapes.

2.7. Reference area

LUXEMBURG

2.8. Coverage - Time

When was the first (regular) structural vineyard survey / data collection organised?

1880

 

 

 

Frequency of the data collection (if there was one) before 1979 or before EU membership?

No frequency

If not regularly, in which years the vineyards have been surveyed ?

1890

1910

1922

1930

1937

1946

1956

1964

1979

1999

Since 2002: Annual base (1/5/N, sometimes 15/5/N)

2.9. Base period

15.5.N.


3. Statistical processing Top
3.1. Source data

Is the register maintained at national or regional level? National                                
  Register 1 Register 2 Register 3 Register 4 Register 5 Register 6 Register 7 Register 8 Register 9 Register 10 Register 11 Register 12 Register 13 Register 14 Register 15 Register 16 Register 17
Name of the register(s)

IACS - module viticulture

Data owner (organisation)

Ministère de l'Agriculture, de la Viticulture et de la Protection des Consommateurs
Instut viti-vinicole

B.P. 50 L-5501 REMICH

Tel: +352 23 612 1   FAX: +352 23 612 612  Email: info@ivv.public.lu

Contact information of the register authority (email and phone number)

serge.fischer@ivv.etat.lu  Tel: +352 23 612 218  Fax: +352 23 612 612

Legal basis
  • IACS (Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy)
  • Article 145 of REGULATION (EU) No 1308/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILof 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products
  • Loi du 9 avril 1982 introduisant un périmètre viticole pour laplantation et la replantation de vignobles Art (4) (http://www.legilux.public.lu/leg/a/archives/1982/0028/a028.pdf#page=5) 
  • Cahier des charges pour l'AOP Moselle luxembourgeoise -> compulsary declaration of every vineyard annually (http://www.ivv.public.lu/beratung/aop_moselle_luxembourgeoise/cahier_aop.pdf )
  • Utilisation des données: Règlement grand-ducal du 21 janvier 1994 autorisant la création et l’exploitation d’une banque de données au profit de l’Institut viti-vinicole. (http://www.legilux.public.lu/leg/a/archives/1994/0006/a006.pdf#page=11)

 

Does the register contain parcel level data? YES
Are the parcels belonging to the same holder grouped under the same holding-id in the register? YES NO
Is the holding geo-referenced with co-ordinates? Yes, at parcel level
How is the vineyard holding identified in the register? Unique ID of holding
Were all variables taken from vineyard register? YES
If no, which variables were not taken from the register?

Since 2002 Luxemburg has integrated the vineyard register into the IACS.

Why were they not taken from the register? Other reasons
For what purpose the ancillary data sources were used? Other
If other, which was the purpose?


Were other ancillary data sources used? NO  
If yes, which ones? Data source  Type of data source
Name of the data source 1
Name of the data source 2
Name of the data source 3


Additional comments



Annexes:
Information about the system of the LU annual vineyard survey (part of the single IACS application form)
3.2. Frequency of data collection

The EU-level vineyard data collection is done every 5 years under Regulation (EU) 1337/2011. The first data collection takes place 2015. From 1979 until 2009 there was a data collection done every 10 years (basic data) and a smaller annual survey yearly (Council Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 on statistical surveys under vines).

Have you done any national data collections on the structure of vineyards since the 2009 EU-level data collection and before the 2015 EU-level collections? YES
If yes, in which years were they implemented?

Every year


Additional comments

3.3. Data collection

How easy was it  to get access to the vineyard register data (administrative access)?  
The data provider has direct constant access to the vineyard register
Access was granted upon a simple request
Access was granted after some negotiations
Access was granted after lenthy negotiations 
Access was not granted
Were the data from the vineyard register integrated into a statistical holding register? YES
If not, what were the reasons for not doing that?  
There was no need for such an operation
It was not technically possible because of lack of common identifier
It was not feasible due to data protection issues
It was considered too expensive
Other reasons


Additional comments

3.4. Data validation

Which kind of data validation measures are in place? Automatic and Manual
What do they target?  
Unit completeness
Item completeness
Valid value
Time series ranges (outlier detection)
Relational checks between characteristics
Arithmetic calculations (e.g. correctness of aggregates)
Others

The data of the vineyards are integrated into the IACS.  Compliance to REGULATION (EU) No 1306/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy. (Internal and external compliance audits, Quality Management , IT security...)

Is the data cross-validated against another dataset? NO
If yes, which dataset?  
Previous results of vineyard statistics
Annual crop statistics area data
FSS data 
Other dataset


Additional comments

3.5. Data compilation

The data used for this survey has 2 sources:

- automatically calculated by IACS (table 1,2,3)

- calculated in Excel with Pivot Table with dataexport from IACS (table 4)

3.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

Is there a quality management process in place for vineyard statistics? YES
If yes, what are the components?

- double checking of the applications

- Checklists

- Procedures

- IT Security (ISO/CEI 27002)

- Geographical Information System for area control

- Internal and external compliance audits

Was the authority responsible for the vineyard register involved in the quality assurance of the vineyard data? YES
If yes, which data quality improvement actions were proposed to be done to the vineyard register?  
Improvement of coverage of the register (elimination of over-coverage)
Improvement of the coverage of the register (elimination of under-coverage)
Elimination of multiple listings
More frequent updates
Inclusion of new characteristics in the register
Improving the identification of the holding
Other improvement actions
   
Is there a Quality Report available? NO
If yes, please provide a link
   
Has a peer-review been carried out for vineyard statistics? YES
If yes, which were the main conclusions?

Peer review (double checking) for administrativ control of the annual surveys.

What quality improvement measures are planned for the next 5 years?  
Improvement of the vineyard register
Improvement of data validation
Further automation
Quality Report
Peer review
Other

Online Geospatial Application for annual survey.


Additional comments

4.2. Quality management - assessment

   Grading  Comments
How would you describe the overall quality of the structural vineyard statistics?  Very good
How would you describe the relevance of the structural vineyard statistics?  Good

The data asked for is relevant. However data important for agro-environemental use is missing (slope , real area, data for measuring leaf wall area)

How would you describe the accuracy of the structural vineyard statistics?  Very good
How would you describe the comparability of the structural vineyard statistics with other agricultural statistics, e.g. FSS and Annual Crop Statistics?  Very good

In LU, the data already collected by the annual survey is not asked in the FSS. So we have no double data. In fact the remaining questions of the FSS are integrated in our annual survey in the context of the single application form.

How would you describe the coherence (over time) of the structural vineyard statistics?  Very good

Very good since 2005

How would you describe the coherence (across regions in your country) of the structural vineyard statistics?  Very good

1 region = Luxemburg

How would you describe the accessibility of the structural vineyard statistics?  Very good
How would you describe the clarity of the structural vineyard statistics?  Good


Additional comments


5. Relevance Top
5.1. Relevance - User Needs

Is the structural vineyard data necessary at national level? YES
Does Regulation 1337/2011 meet the national structural vineyard data needs? NO
If not, did you add additional characteristics which are needed at national level added to the EU-level list of characteristics? YES
If yes, which ones?

distance between rows (important for calculating the leaf wall area needed for calculating the right pesticide amount)

type of mecanisation (manual or mechanical)

vine training systeme

terrasses

slope (calculated by GIS or on spot)

 

Are there further known unmet user needs? YES
If yes, describe the unmet needs

real area (=area corrected by a slope coefficient in order to give the vinegrower the real area needed for calculating the right pesticide amount and the real yield/ha, which is important for PDO regions with vineyards in steep slopes)

 


Additional comments

5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Has a user satisfaction survey been done? NO
If yes, how satisfied were the users?


Additional comments

5.3. Completeness

Is the vineyard data set complete? YES
If not, which characteristics are missing?


Are all main varieties (> 500ha at natioanl level) listed by name in Table 4? YES  
If not, give the name and area of the main varieties included in class other main red grape varieties Name Area (ha) 
Variety 1
Variety 2
Variety 3
Variety 4
Variety 5
Variety 6
Variety 7
Variety 8
Variety 9
Variety 10
If not, give the name and area of the main varieties included in class other main white grape varieties Name Area (ha) 
Variety 1
Variety 2
Variety 3
Variety 4
Variety 5
Variety 6
Variety 7
Variety 8
Variety 9
Variety 10
If not, give the name and area of the main varieties included in class other main other colour  grape varieties Name Area (ha) 
Variety 1
Variety 2
Variety 3
Variety 4
Variety 5
Variety 6
Variety 7
Variety 8
Variety 9
Variety 10


Additional comments

5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available.


6. Accuracy and reliability Top
6.1. Accuracy - overall

How good is the accuracy of the vineyard statistics? Very good
What are the main factors lowering the accuracy? Coverage errors
If others, which ones?


Additional comments

6.2. Sampling error

Not available

6.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not available

6.3. Non-sampling error

0,52%

6.3.1. Coverage error

In the context of vineyard data collection the non-sampling errors are linked to the quality of the vineyard register

Under coverage

Does the vineyard register include all wine growers of the country? NO
If not, which kinds of wine growers are not included?

Winegrowers who grow vines only for home use (no commercial use)

How many percent of the total number of wine growers are not included?

o%

Every professionnal winegrower which is selling his wine is included.

Winegrower with only domestic use are not.

How big part of the vineyard area is not included?

6,85 ha  (0,52%)

-  0,58 ha in 2015 for  domestic use

-  6,27 ha were "lost in transaction" in 2015. Human error: The holder of this  parcells in 2014 deregistered them in the survey in 2015 and  the new holder forgot to declare them 2015. Regularisation in 2016. 

 

 

Impact of under coverage on the data quality Low


Over coverage

Does the vineyard register include holdings which are not any more active wine growers? NO
If yes, how many years does an inactive holding stay in the register?

0

Are former wine grower holdings, which haven't harvested the grapes for more than 7 years, part of the vineyard data collection? NO
Impact of over coverage on the data quality None


Multiple listing errors

Number of farms listed in the register several times? None
Impact of multiple listings on the data quality None


Misclassification

Does the misclassification of units or characteristics have an impact on the data quality? NO
If yes, to which extent?
Which characteristics are affected?  
Area
Number of holdings
Type of production
Size class
Degree of specialisation
Main varieties
Age class
   
Impact of misclassification on the data quality  None
   
Degree of bias caused by coverage errors Low
What measures were taken to mitigate the impact of coverage errors?  
None
Ancillary data sources were used in parallel to the vineyard register
Statistical correction methods
Others

Peer review (double checking) of administrativ control (IACS quality compliance)

   
In case coverage errors were detected, was the authority responsible for the vineyard register notified? YES
Have actions been taken to improve the register? YES


Additional comments


6.3.2. Measurement error

LU uses 2 different  measures for vineyards area:

- the real area for the IACS payments (Net area) (see http://ies-webarchive-ext.jrc.it/mars/mars/content/download/1362/7750/file/Control_Vineyards_jrc46949_final.pdf)

- the "historical" cadaster area of the parcel for calculating the yield and for Stats.

The 2 areas are cross-checked in order to detect fraud.

It is planned to abandon the cadaster area and to use the real area also for calculating the Yield.

6.3.3. Non response error

In the context of vineyard data collection the non-response is understood as missing characteristics in the vineyard register

Were all characteristics mentioned in Regulation 1337/2011 Annex 2 present in the vineyard register? YES
If not, which were missing?

--

Were ancillary data sources used to fill in the gaps? NO
If yes, which one?

---


Additional comments

6.3.3.6. Unit non-response - rate

Not available.

6.3.3.7. Item non-response - rate

Not available.

6.3.4. Processing error

Not available.

6.3.4.1. Imputation - rate

Not available.

6.3.5. Model assumption error

Not available.

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

Not available.

6.5. Data revision - policy

Not available.

6.6. Data revision - practice

How many data revisions were done?

0

Why were the data revisions done?

Not needed


Additional comments

6.6.4. Data revision - average size

Not available.


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top
7.1. Timeliness

  Register 1 Register 2 Register 3 Register 4 Register 5 Register 6 Register 7 Register 8 Register 9 Register 10 Register 11 Register 12 Register 13 Register 14 Register 15 Register 16 Register 17
Name of the register(s)

IACS - module viticulture

When were the data extracted from the vineyard register? 10/08/2016
When was the latest update of the vineyard register done before the data extraction? 31/01/2016
Update frequency of the register Once per year


Additional comments

Our  IACS 2015 is based on the declarations (single application form) done the 15/5/2015. The year 2015 was closed in January 2016 after data recording and quality control. Than the data was copied to 2016 in Februrary 2016.

7.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not available.

7.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not available.

7.2. Punctuality

Was the dataset delivered to Eurostat by the deadline (30 September 2016)? YES
In case not, how many days delay was there?   


Additional comments

7.2.4. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Not available.


8. Coherence and comparability Top
8.1. Comparability - geographical

Were there any differences in the definition of the characteristics between the national/regional data and those described in Regulation 1337/2011? NO
If yes, which definitions were different?
How would you describe the impact of the differences in definitions for the data comparability at EU level? Very small


Additional comments

8.2. Comparability - over time

Was the national methodology used for compiling 2009 and 2015 structural vineyared data comparable?  Minor differences
Were the definitions used for compiling 2009 and 2015 structural vineyared data comparable?  Same methodology was used
Was the regional breakdown used for compiling 2009 and 2015 structural vineyared data comparable?  Same NUTS2 regions


Additional comments

8.3. Coherence - cross domain

With which other data sources the vineyard data have  been compared?  No comparison
Other statistics
Other registers
   
If no comparisons have been made, why not?

Not needed. There is no double data to compare

Result of the comparison with ACS Fully comparable
If differences were detected, to which characteristics are they linked ? No differences detected
Description of the differences
Result of the comparison with FSS Fully comparable
If differences were detected, to which characteristics are they linked ? No differences detected
Description of the differences
Other comparison results Fully comparable
If differences, please give a brief description of the results of this comparison.


Additional comments

Cross Comparing is not possible. No double data with FSS. Vineyard registry in IACS integrated

8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Nat available.

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

Not available.

8.6. Coherence - internal

Not available.


9. Accessibility and clarity Top
9.1. Dissemination format - News release

  Availability Links
News release  YES

http://www.ivv.public.lu/publikationen/index.html

9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

  Availability Links
Publications YES

http://www.ivv.public.lu/publikationen/index.html

Publications in English NO
9.3. Dissemination format - online database

  Availability Links
On-line database accessible to users  YES

 

 

Website YES

http://www.statistiques.public.lu/stat/ReportFolders/ReportFolder.aspx?IF_Language=fra&MainTheme=4&FldrName=2&RFPath=14

http://www.ivv.public.lu/publikationen/index.html

www.ivv.public.lu/weinbaukarteierhebung/weinbaukartei.xlsx

 

Free/against payment data access policy Free  
9.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not available.

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

  Availability Links
Micro-data access for researchers  YES

On demand

9.5. Dissemination format - other

Excel, XML, ASCII.

9.6. Documentation on methodology

  Availability Links
Methodological report YES

http://www.ivv.public.lu/weinbaukarteierhebung/info_weinbaukartei.pdf

Scientific publications NO
Definitions and classifications YES

http://www.ivv.public.lu/weinbaukarteierhebung/info_weinbaukartei.pdf

9.7. Quality management - documentation

  Availability Links
Quality Report NO
Metadata NO
9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not available.

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

Not available.


10. Cost and Burden Top
Restricted from publication


11. Confidentiality Top
Restricted from publication
11.1. Confidentiality - policy
Restricted from publication
11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment
Restricted from publication


12. Comment Top

None


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top