Continuing vocational training in enterprises (trng_cvt)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Ministry of Labour, Solidarity and Social Security


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministry of Labour, Solidarity and Social Security

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Office for Strategy and Planning

1.5. Contact mail address

Praça de Londres, nº 2 3º

1049-056 LISBOA PORTUGAL


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 27/02/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 27/02/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 27/02/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The Continuing Vocational Training Survey (CVTS) collects information on enterprises’ investment in the continuing vocational training of their staff. Continuing vocational training (CVT) refers to education or training measures or activities which are financed in total or at least partly by the enterprise (directly or indirectly). Part financing could include the use of work-time for the training activity as well as financing of training equipment.

Information available from the CVTS is grouped around the following topics:

- Provision of CVT courses and other forms of CVT (training/non-training enterprises)

- CVT strategies

- Participants in CVT courses

- Costs of CVT courses

- Time spent in CVT courses

- Characteristics of CVT courses

- Assessment of CVT activities

The CVTS also collects some information on initial vocational training (IVT).

For further information see the CVTS 6 legislation (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/legislation) and the CVTS 6 implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.2. Classification system

The main groupings for enterprises are by economic activity (NACE), size group and training/non-training enterprises.

3.3. Coverage - sector

Sections B to S (excluding O, P, Q, T, U).

The group 949 - Activities of other membership organisations and the subclass 6832 - Co-property Administration were excluded from the target population.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Definitions as well as the list of variables covered are available in the CVTS 6 implementation manual (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training/methodology).

3.5. Statistical unit

Enterprise.

Enterprise definition is compliant with Council Regulation (EEC) No 696/93.

3.6. Statistical population

Enterprises with at least 10 persons employed, belonging to Sections B to S (excluding O, P, Q, T, U). The group 949 and the subclass 6832 were excluded from the target population.

The number of enterprises in the target population was 41 566.

Variable A2tot (persons employed) refers to 31 December 2020.

3.7. Reference area

Portugal.

3.8. Coverage - Time

1999, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Number, EUR.


5. Reference Period Top

The reference year for CVTS 6 is the calendar year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

At European level

Basic legal act: Regulation (EC) No 1552/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council

Implementing act: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1153/2014, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 198/2006

At national level

Not applicable

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

PT follows the The European Statistics Code of Practice

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

PT follows the The European Statistics Code of Practice


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The release calendar is publicly available on the GEP´s website.

8.2. Release calendar access

http://www.gep.mtsss.gov.pt/calendario 

8.3. Release policy - user access

The statistical information is disseminated simultaneously to all users. There is no privileged access to the information.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Every 5 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Not applicable.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

The results of CVTS 6 will be disseminated by a Summary Report and a more detailed publication (available at  http://www.gep.msess.gov.pt/Statistics/Vocational Training Statistics).

The publication for CVTS 2020 is available from March 3 (in Portuguese only).

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Online database available at www.ine.pt.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not applicable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Only allowed to scientific purposes and in the GEP safe center. STATA software is used.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

By request, additional information can be provided in table format.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Available in GEP and Statistics Portugal websites.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Available in GEP and Statistics Portugal websites: https://smi.ine.pt/DocumentacaoMetodologica/Detalhes/1685

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Available in GEP and Statistics Portugal websites.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Available in GEP and Statistics Portugal websites: https://smi.ine.pt/DocumentacaoMetodologica/Detalhes/1685 


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Due to the use of different sources (survey and administrative data), some inconsistencies were detected. In these cases, enterprises were contacted to clarify (e.g. high CVT costs and a low number of CVT hours).

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The qualitative questions raise some problems because we cannot assure that the person who answers has the suited level of responsibility needed to have reliable information. In our opinion, qualitative questions are more suitable for face to face surveys.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main users are the Ministry of Labour and Social Security (to evaluate the law enforcement concerning vocational training), Statistics Portugal, Ministry of Education and researchers from Universities (specific studies and modelling). Employer's associations and unions also use this information for labour negotiations. 

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

No survey on users satisfaction was done. However we have some feedback from the users and they would like to have more disaggregation concerning economic activity and regional level.

12.3. Completeness

No deviation except NACE group 949 (see 3.3).

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

The accuracy of statistical outputs indicates the degree of closeness of estimates to the true values. Several types of error contribute to the error of the statistics. Statistics can be different from the true values because of random variability (the statistics change from one to another implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of possible values of the statistics is different from the true value due to systematic effects). The sampling errors that are due to the fact that only a sample is surveyed.

In CVTS 6 to measure the accuracy of the estimates, the sampling errors were used. The estimated coefficients of variation for the key variables for all enterprises are lower than 2.5%, except for the variables cost (3.96%), direct costs (3.9%), labour costs of participants in CVT courses (4.58%), the total number of enterprises providing IVT (5.15%) and for the ratio of the total number of enterprises that provided any form of CVT to the total number of enterprises (5.15%). See table 13.2.1 "Sampling errors - indicators" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

The overall unit response rate is 60.1%.

13.2. Sampling error

Sampling Method

For this survey a sample of enterprises has been taken according to a sampling design that means stratification with random sampling within strata. The samples within strata were taken without replacement.

The sampling frame was stratified by: region (NUTS at level I - Mainland, Autonomous Regions of Madeira and of Azores), Economic activity of enterprise, 20 NACE Rev. 2 categories (B, C10-C12, C13-C15, C17-C18, C19-C23, C24-C25, C26-C28 and C33, C29-C30, C16+C31-32, D-E, F, G(45), G(46), G(47), I, H, J, K(64,65), K(66), L+M+N+R+S) and 3 size categories. The size classification of enterprises was: 10 - 49, 50 - 249, 250 and more persons employed.

For the Mainland, the sample size and the allocation were calculated with the maximum length of half confidence interval equal to 0.2 and assuming a response rate of 60%. The following formula was used for calculating the sample size in each stratum:

where:

          n h     = the number of sampling units in the stratum cell, h

          rh      = the anticipated response rate in the stratum cell, h

          c       = maximum length of half the confidence interval

          teh     = the anticipated proportion of training enterprises in stratum cell, h

          Nh    = the number of enterprises (training and non-training) in stratum cell, h

The minimum number of enterprises sampled in each stratum was 10.

The survey is exhaustive for the regions of Madeira and Azores: all enterprises in these regions are completely enumerated.

The survey gross sample was 6583 enterprises.

For each sample stratum, systematic sampling was used to take the pre-defined number of sampling units from the sampling frame.

Estimation / grossing-up procedures

The estimation and grossing-up procedures are described in Annex 1.



Annexes:
Annex 1 - Estimation and grossing-up procedures
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The coefficients of variation for the key statistics are presented in table 13.2.1 "Sampling errors - indicators" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)" broken down by NACE or size classes.

13.3. Non-sampling error

See the following sections.

13.3.1. Coverage error

The information on activity, region and number of persons employed in the sample frame is comprehensibly updated annually, with reference to the month of October. Due to the timely updating of the sample frame, coverage errors are negligible.

See table 13.3.1 "Coverage error" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

See table 13.3.1.1 "Over-coverage - rate" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)". 

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

13.3.2. Measurement error

The electronic questionnaire doesn't allow item non-response. The major part of the questionnaire was related to qualitative questions (quantitative data was obtained by an administrative source).

13.3.3. Non response error

In order to reduce the non-response rate, enterprises received a letter informing on the survey and its purposes. Because the enterprises have already provided information on training carried out during 2020 (through an administrative source), they were informed that a light version of the European questionnaire would be applied. After the data collection a first reminder was sent out by email. The second reminder was sent 2 weeks after. Besides this, specialized staff were available to support enterprises by phone or by internet.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The overall unit non-response rate was 39.9%. The unit non-response rates by NACE categories and size categories are presented in table 13.3.3.1 "Unit non-response - rate" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

Unit non-response is treated by re-weighting. The survey weights were adjusted to compensate for non-response. The set of responding units within each stratum is considered as the sample. For strata with only non-responses, no imputation was done.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Item non-response were not allowed by the electronic questionnaire.

See table 13.3.3.2 "Item non-response - rate" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

13.3.4. Processing error

It was used a web survey to collect the qualitative data and data on training costs, training contributions and training receipts. For this reason, the validations embedded in the electronic questionnaire were relatively simple and were executed before transmitting the questionnaire. Upon arrival to the statistical office, warning checks were again performed and corrected, if it was the case. Coherence checks were applied when linking the data from the survey with the data from the administrative source.

The main errors result from the inconsistency between the answers given in the survey and the information from the administrative source (e.g. number of persons employed, existence of courses internal/external). Other errors are mainly related to hours worked and labour costs. The number of errors were not accounted.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

18 months.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

22 months.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

22 months

14.2. Punctuality

In accordance with the Regulation.

See table 14.2 "Project phases - dates" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Not applicable.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

No remarks.

No additional variables related to COVID-19 were collected.

See table 15.1 "Comparability - geographical" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See table 15.2 "Comparability - over time" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)". 

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See table 15.3 "Coherence - cross-domain" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

CVTS results for a given reference year are based on the same microdata and results are calculated using the same estimation methods, therefore the data are internally coherent.


16. Cost and Burden Top

No studies were carried out on this issue.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not applicable.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

See table 18.1 "Source data and data collection" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Every 5 years.

18.3. Data collection

See also table 18.1 "Source data and data collection" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)".

18.4. Data validation

It was used a web survey. The validations are embedded in the electronic questionnaire. Warnings and fatal errors are created when data is outside the predefined parameters. Fatal errors prevent data sending and cannot be overruled, except by the statistical staff with a specific password.

After data transmission, warning checks are again performed and if it was the case, some corrections are made.

18.5. Data compilation

Data are processed by IBM SPSS Statistics - version 25.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

See table 18.5.1 "Imputation - rate" in annex "PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)". 

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top

No remarks.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
PT - QR tables CVTS 2020 (excel)