Enforcement of Immigration Legislation (migr_eil)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: Police and Border Guard Board


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Police and Border Guard Board

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Development Department

Analysis Bureau

1.5. Contact mail address

tiiu-liisa.rummo@politsei.ee


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

1. Introduction

This metadata information is provided by Estonia's authorities to ensure compliance with the requirements of Articles 5 and 7 of Regulation 862/2007 on Community Statistics on Migration and International Protection.

As required by Article 9 of the Regulation 862/2007, Member States must report to Eurostat on the data sources used, the reasons for the selection of these sources and the effects of the selected data on the quality of the statistics. Member States shall provide it with all the information necessary to evaluate the quality, comparability and completeness of the statistical information.

The reference terms for the assessment of quality compliance are provided by Eurostat in the EIL technical guidelines applied for 2014 reference period (See section 3.4 Statistical concepts and definitions from the EIL ESMS file).

 

2. General description of the statistical domain at national level

EIL National System (level of development, main changes that affected the system in the last years and further development)

The data about immigration is stored in two databases. Estonia has a border contor data base and data base for proceeding of illegal immigration. Some data is stored in Excels, where Data is collected manually.

 

Legal national framework relevant for EIL statistics

Not available information.

 

Institutional infrastructure (list of the institutions involved in managing the EIL registers and the institutions involved in the production of the EIL statistics)

Police and Border Guard Board, IOM

 

General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens refused entry at the external borders

For Non-Eu citizen official at externals borders compile act of refusal for entry together with entry ban.

 

General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present

They are registered as illegals and depends on the case, officials compile departure order.

 

General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens ordered to leave

All the data about is stored in database.

 

General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens returned following an order to leave

Official will enter the data to database, if the have confirmation about departure.

 

3. Main problems that affect the quality of the data and what tables are concerned including the compliance status with the definitions from EIL Technical Guideline

(See metadata information including concepts and definitions from the EIL ESMS file)

There are no big problems.

2.2. Classification system

The national system is using the same system of classification of "grounds for refusal" as laid down in Annex V, part B of the Schengen Borders Code (see: EIL Technical Guidelines).

Classification of citizenship is based on the ISO-3166 code list (using alpha-2).

 

2.3. Coverage - sector

Enforcement of immigration legislation.

 

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Third country nationals:

Any person who is not a citizen of the Union within the meaning of Article 17 (1) of the Treaty, including stateless persons (see Art. 2.1 (i) of the Council Regulation (EC) no 862/2007).

Third country nationals refused entry at the external border:

Third country nationals formally refused permission to enter the territory of a Member State (see Art. 2.1 (q) and 5.1(a) of the Council Regulation (EC) no 862/2007). The external border is defined as in the Schengen Borders Code (Council Regulation (EC) No 562/2006, more details on Article 2.2). For countries which are not in the Schengen area, the external border is the same as the international border. The grounds for refusal refer to the Annex V part B of the Schengen Border Code, which is an administrative document in use in most of the Member States.

Each person is counted only once within the reference period, irrespective of the number of refusals issued to the same person.

Third country nationals found to be illegally present:

Third country nationals who are detected by Member States' authorities and have been determined to be illegally present under national laws relating to immigration (see Art. 2.1 (r) and 5.1(b) of the Council Regulation (EC) no 862/2007). This category relates to persons who have been found to have entered illegally (for example by avoiding immigration controls or by employing a fraudulent document) and those who may have entered legitimately but have subsequently remained on an illegal basis (for example by overstaying their permission to remain or by taking unauthorised employment).

Only persons who are apprehended or otherwise come to the attention of national immigration authorities are recorded in these statistics. These are not intended to be a measure of the total number of persons who are present in the country on an unauthorised basis.

Each person is counted only once within the reference period.

Third country nationals ordered to leave:

Third country nationals found to be illegally present who are subject to an administrative or judicial decision or act stating that their stay is illegal and imposing an obligation to leave the territory of the Member State (see Art. 7.1 (a) of the Regulation).  

These statistics do not include persons who are transferred from one Member State to another under the mechanism established by the Dublin Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 and (EC) No 1560/2003, for these cases see related Dublin Statistics).

Each person is counted only once within the reference period, irrespective of the number of notices issued to the same person.

Third country nationals returned following an order to leave:

Third country nationals who have in fact left the territory of the Member State, following an administrative or judicial decision or act stating that their stay is illegal and imposing an obligation to leave the territory (see Art. 7.1 (b) of the Council Regulation (EC) no 862/2007). On a voluntary basis Member States provide Eurostat with a subcategory which relates to third country nationals returned to a third country only.

Persons who left the territory within the year may have been subject to an obligation to leave in a previous year. As such, the number of persons who actually left the territory may be greater than those who were subject to an obligation to leave in the same year.

The EIL statistics based on Council Regulation (EC) no 862/2007 include forced returns and assisted voluntary returns. Unassisted voluntary returns are included where these are reliably recorded. Data do not include persons who are transferred from one Member State to another under the mechanism established by the Dublin Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 604/2013 and Council Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 amended by Council Regulation (EC) 118/2014, for these cases see related Dublin Statistics).

Each person is counted only once within the reference period.

Starting with  first reference year 2014 new statistics on third country returned were as well collected by Eurostat on voluntary basis. These new statistics are using the following definitions:

Voluntary Return

Voluntary Return refers to the situation in which the third-country national complies voluntarily with the obligation to return (i.e. no enforcement procedure had to be launched) and this departure is confirmed by the information from eg. the border authority or the consulate authorities in the country of origin or other authorities such as IOM or any other organisations implementing a program to assist migrants to return to a third-country. Definition based on Art 3.8 Directive 115/2008/EC.

Enforced return

Enforced return, removal refers to the situation in which the third-country national is subject to the enforcement of the obligation to return (the enforcement procedure has been launched). Definition based on Art 3.5 and 3.8 Directive 115/2008/EC.

Other concluded return

Other concluded return refers to the situation in which one can reasonably presume that the third country national was returned based on some assumptions (some information are missing and the departure is not confirmed by the information from the border authority).

Assisted Return

Assisted Return refers to the situation in which the third-country national was assisted to return. He/she is the beneficiary of a national or EU MS cooperative program to encourage return and to provide reintegration assistance. The TCN received (i) an in-kind assistance prior to departure (e.g. purchase of plane tickets) and/or (ii) in-cash allowances at the point of departure/upon arrival and/or (iii) an in-kind or in-cash reintegration assistance. Please note that beneficiaries of assisted return programs are mostly TCN who voluntarily return but some may also have been returned by force Definition based on Art 3.8 Directive 115/2008/EC and Asylum and Migration Glossary 2.0.

Non-Assisted Return

Non-Assisted Return refers to the situation in which the third-country national is recorded with departure and he/she does not receive a support and assistance from the national authorities.

Readmission agreement

Readmission agreement refers to the situation where an international agreement exists between the reporting country and the country of return (of the third country national returned) under which the readmission procedure is set out.

Transit country

Transit country refers to the country that is considered intermediary destination of the TCN returned on the way to the country of Citizenship

 

2.5. Statistical unit

Each table refers to the number of persons, not to the number of administrative decisions or acts.

 

2.6. Statistical population

Please see point 2.4 "Concepts and definitions".

 

2.7. Reference area

Not available.

2.8. Coverage - Time

Not available.

2.9. Base period

Not available.


3. Statistical processing Top
3.1. Source data
  Presentation of the data source(s)/national registers
Third-country nationals refused at border  Police and Border Guard Board
Third country nationals found to be illegally present  Police and Border Guard Board
Third country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave  Police and Border Guard Board
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship  Police and Border Guard Board
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship  Police and Border Guard Board
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship  Police and Border Guard Board, IOM
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship  Police and Border Guard Board
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by destination country and citizenship  Police and Border Guard Board
3.2. Frequency of data collection
 Frequency of EIL data collection at national level

 Frequency   (Delete non-relevant atributes)

Third-country nationals refused at border Monthly
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present Monthly
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave Monthly
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship Monthly
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third-country by type of return and citizenship Monthly
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship Monthly
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship Monthly
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship Monthly
3.3. Data collection

 

The data about immigration is stored in two databases. Estonia has a border contor data base and data base for proceeding of illegal immigration. Some data is stored in Excels, where data is collected manually.

3.4. Data validation

Description of the data validation system at national level

N/A

Validation procedure Applied
Checks of totals consistency Not available information.
Checks of magnitude of changes over time Not available information.
Using intervals of values for outliers/errors detection Not available information.
Using visual validation (visual verification of the tables or the graph resulted) Not available information.
Checking the data integrity over each processing step Not available information.
Using special programs/software for data validation Not available information.
Checking if the double counting cases are excluded Not available information.
Checking the consistency between Y2 and Y3 datasets Not available information.
Checking the consistency between “TCNs subjects to an obligation to leave” and “TCNs who actually left the territory”. Not available information.
Checking the consistency between “TCNs who returned to a Third Country” and “TCNs who actually left the territory”. Not available information.
Analyse the statistics reported by other countries Not available information.

Checking if the double counting cases are excluded - Checking the consistency between “TCN-s subjects to an obligation to leave” and “TCN-s who actually left the territory”. - Checking the consistency between “TCN-s who returned to a Third Country” and “TCN-s who actually left the territory”.

3.5. Data compilation

Estimations used: Details on the estimations done for EIL statistics (methodology applied and the concerned categories and tables)

 

No estimations used.

 

3.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

We compile data in compliance with the Council Regulation (EC) 862/2007 and following guidelines and instructions provided by Eurostat. Before sending the data, consistent validation checks are performed.

4.2. Quality management - assessment

4.2.1. Description of the Quality management system at national level

We are uncharged of periodical and spot control in the database.

 

4.2.2. General Quality assesment                                             (Delete non-relevant atributes: Good quality / Sufficient quality / Poor quality) Details in case of sufficient quality / Poor quality
 Topics

Output/Product Quality

Process Quality

Institutional Environment

Third-country nationals refused at border Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third country nationals found to be illegally present Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by destination country and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  

 

  • Good quality (extensive quality) - covers all quality requirements, substantial quality checks are performed and a very good cooperation exists between institutions.
  • Sufficient quality (acceptable quality) - covers minimum requirements, but issues still exist and more information/validation is needed for a better quality assessment and acceptable cooperation issues exists.
  • Poor quality (inadequate quality) - the data do not meet the minimum requirements or there is not enough information for quality assessment and important cooperation issues exists.


5. Relevance Top
5.1. Relevance - User Needs

1. General aspects

The statistics collected under the Regulation 862/2007 are widely used in official publications and by a wide range of users at national, European and International level.

Main users of EIL statistics at national level
The EIL statistics produced are regularly used by national administrations, academic researchers and civil society groups working on a wide range of topics including the integration of immigrants, the development and monitoring of national asylum and immigration procedures, and the projection of the future population and labour force.

Main users of EIL statistics at European and International level
The main users of EIL statistics are Eurostat, DG Home Affairs and EASO. The statistics are used in several publications of the Commission, as well as in the preparation of regular reports, policy proposals and analysis. The statistics also provide an input to the EMN studies and reports that address specific issues of current policy importance.

 

2. EIL data publication at national level

Presentation of the EIL statistics published at national level

Not available information.

 

Differences between the data provided to Eurostat and the data published at national level 

Not available information.

5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Not available information.

5.3. Completeness

Completeness of the data provided based on Articles 5 and 7 Regulation 862/2007 (mandatory data provision) and justification of the missing mandatory breakdowns and completeness of the data provided on voluntary basis.

 

Completeness of the data                                                             (Delete non-relevant atributes: Available / Not Available / Not applicable)
 Categories Availability Details related to not applicable and not available selected cases
Third-country nationals refused at border    
Citizenship categories Available  
Grounds of refusal categories Available  
Border categories (land, sea, air) Available  
Third country nationals found to be illegally present    
Citizenship categories Available  
Age categories Available  
Sex categories Available  
Third country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave    
Citizenship categories Available  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship Available  
Citizenship categories Available  
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Type of return categories Available  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Type of assistance received categories Available  
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Type of agreement procedure categories Available  
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by destination country and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Destination Country categories Available  
5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available information.


6. Accuracy and reliability Top

Not available information.

6.1. Accuracy - overall
1. Accuracy of the total provided for each dataset 
  The interval in which the real population could be comparing with the total provided
100% = high accuracy (total provided reflects the real measured population)
 Details
Third-country nationals refused at border   100%  
Third country nationals found to be illegally present   100%  
Third country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave   100%  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship   100%  
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship   100%  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship   100%  
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship   100%  
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by destination country and citizenship   100%  

 

2. Accuracy of the total provided for each category 

(Delete non-relevant atributes for Accuracy issue: No / Yes; Overestimation / Underestimation  and delete/change/adapt the text for impact percentage)

  Accuracy issue Description of the accuracy issue Details about the impact on the statistics reported
Third-country nationals refused at border      
Citizenship categories
No
   
Grounds of refusal categories No    
Border categories (land, sea, air) No    
Third country nationals found to be illegally present      
Citizenship categories No    
Age categories No    
Sex categories No    
Third country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave      
Citizenship categories No     
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship No    
Citizenship categories No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No    
Type of return categories No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No     
Type of assistance received categories No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No    
Type of agreement procedure categories No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by destination country and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No    
Destination Country categories No    
6.2. Sampling error

Procedures and classifications used in case of missing information (e.g. unknown citizenship, age, etc)

Unknown citizenship, age and gender is classified as unknown.

 

6.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable.

6.3. Non-sampling error

Not applicable.

6.3.1. Coverage error

Not applicable.

6.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate
Over-coverage                              (Delete non-relevant atributes: 0% / 1% / 5% / 10% / 15% / 20% / >20%)
  The proportion of cases recorded that do not belong to the target population (%)
Third-country nationals refused at border 0%
Third country nationals found to be illegally present 0%
Third country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave 0%
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by destination country and citizenship 0%
6.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

6.3.2. Measurement error
Double counting                                         (Delete non-relevant atributes:  No / Yes; 0% / 1% / 5% / 10% / 15% / 20% / >20%)

 

One person can be included more than once in the reference datasets Share of "double counting" cases in the total for the datasets Description of the non-compliance issue

Third country nationals refused at border

No    
Third country nationals found to be illegally present No    
Third country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave No    
Third country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship No    

Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship

No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third country by destination country and citizenship No    
6.3.3. Non response error

Not applicable.

6.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not applicable.

6.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not applicable.

6.3.4. Processing error

Not applicable.

6.3.4.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

6.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.

6.5. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

6.6. Data revision - practice

Details related to the data revision policy and expected revisions of the data sent to Eurostat

Annual data revision.

6.6.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top
7.1. Timeliness

Data should be supplied to Eurostat no later than 3 months after the end of the reference period.

 

7.1.1. Time lag - first result

Possible annual date when the available data has sufficient quality to be published (sent to Eurostat)

 By the end of march.

7.1.2. Time lag - final result

By the end of march.

7.2. Punctuality

Problems with data provision to Eurostat in due time and the impact of these problems on the data quality provided to Eurostat

No problems.

 

7.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Not available information.


8. Coherence and comparability Top
8.1. Comparability - geographical

1. Provision of data using the Eurostat EIL Technical Guidelines and exceptions applied

Fully compliance

 

2. Details on categories of Non-EU citizens difficult to be classified using the reference definitions from EIL technical guidelines and the categories excluded from these reasons (excluded from the statistics reported)

Fully compliance

 

3. Description of records related to "Unknown" country of citizenship category

When the identification of the citizenship couldn't be established.

 

4. Description of records related to "Unknown" age category

When the age of the person couldn't be established.

 

5. Description of records related to "Unknown" sex category

When the sex of the person couldn't be established.

 

6. Establishing the reported ground in case of “multiple grounds” for the same refusal and the impact on double counting of the person in the same dataset

It is applied the methodological procedure of "one ground per refused person", as laid down in EIL Technical Guidelines (procedure of "higher” ground overrules the “lower” ground for refusal).

 

7. Type of "external border" applicable

Land boarder, Sea border and Air border.

 

 

8. The definition of “refused Non-EU citizens” applied

The Schengen Borders Code's refusal definition is applies for the Statistics reported to Eurostat

 

9. The correspondence between the national system of “grounds for refusal" classification and Schengen Borders Code classification.

Fully consistency

 

10. The definition of “Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present” applied

Applicable.

 

 

11. The definition of “Non-EU citizens ordered to leave” applied

 Applicable.

 

12. The definition of “Non-EU citizens returned following an order to leave” applied

Applicable.

8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable

8.2. Comparability - over time

Methodological changes between the present reference year and previous year(s)

None

Justification of the important changes in figures reported for the present reference year and previous year(s)

None

8.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not available information.

8.3. Coherence - cross domain

1. Links between the statistics on refused Non-EU citizens and the statistics on Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present.

Fully Compliance

 

2. Links between the statistics on Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present and the statistics on Non-EU citizens with obligation to leave.

Fully Compliance

 

3. Links between the statistics on Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present and the statistics on Non-EU citizens with obligation to leave.

Fully Compliance

 

4. Coherence between the EIL statistics and Asylum statistics

Fully Compliance

 

5. Dublin cases included in EIL statistics and the impact on the totals provided 

Fully Compliance

 

6. Inclusion of voluntary returned Non-EU citizens in the statistics on Non-EU citizens who actually left the territory 

Fully Compliance

 

7. Links between the EIL statistics and Asylum statistics and details related to the asylum applicant(s) case(s) included in EIL statistics. 

Fully Compliance

8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

8.6. Coherence - internal

4. Links and differences between the Non-EU citizens with obligation to leave and Non-EU citizens who actually left the territory

Each category is well delimitated.

 

5. Links and differences between the Non-EU citizens who actually left the territory and Non-EU citizens who left the territory to a third country

 

Each category is well delimitated.

 


9. Accessibility and clarity Top
9.1. Dissemination format - News release

News releases on-line.

9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Publications, e.g.: https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/en/books/21827

9.3. Dissemination format - online database

Presentation of the National online national database for EIL data accessible to the public and the accessibility procedure

Not available information.

9.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not available information.

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not available information.

9.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available information.

9.6. Documentation on methodology

Member States have the responsibility to send the statistics on enforcement of immigration legislation to Eurostat. Eurostat provide Technical Guidelines to the member States describing the procedures and the quality requirements for the statistics collected. Enforcement of immigration legislation data contain statistical information based on Article 5 and 7 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of 11 July 2007.

9.7. Quality management - documentation

Presentation of the available quality management - documentation

The compilation of statistics on enforcement of immigration legislation is based on Article 5 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of 11 July 2007 which depicts in details the data provisions Member States are bound to supply Eurostat with.

 

 

9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not available information.

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

Not available information.


10. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


11. Confidentiality Top
11.1. Confidentiality - policy

Not applicable.

11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Not applicable.


12. Comment Top

The following classification is used for data availability at Eurostat level:

The term "not applicable" relates to the categories of permits which do not exist in national legislation/administrative procedures and therefore such statistics cannot be issued.

The term "not available" relates to categories of data that exist in the national legal/administrative system but cannot be delivered under EIL data collection for various reasons (e.g. data cannot exist, data exist but are not collected, data are unreliable, etc.).


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top