Causes of death (hlth_cdeath)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Domain for Health Data and Digitalisation

1.5. Contact mail address

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

PO BOX  973, Sentrum

N- 5808 Bergen,

Norway


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 05/12/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 27/11/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 27/11/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Data on causes of death (CoD) provide information on mortality patterns and form a major element of public health information.

CoD data refer to the underlying cause of death which - according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) - is "the disease or injury which initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury".

CoD data are derived from death certificates. The information provided in the medical certificate of cause of death is mapped to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD).

 

3.2. Classification system

Eurostat's CoD statistics build on standards set out by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD).

The regional breakdown is based on the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS 2).

 

Classification and updates applied by years

 

Data year ICD classification used (ICD-9, ICD-10) (3 or 4 chars) For ICD-10: updates used
2011  ICD 10 2011
2012  ICD 10 2012 
2013  ICD 10 2013 
2014  ICD 10 2014
2015  ICD 10 2015 
2016  ICD 10 2016 
2017  ICD 10 2017
2018  ICD 10 2018 
2019  ICD 10 2019
2020  ICD 10 2020
2021 ICD 10 2021
3.3. Coverage - sector

Public Health

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Residency: A person that is living in Norway or intend to have residency in the country for 6 months or more, and is registered with an address by the Norwegian National Population Register.  

 

Definition of stillbirth: Gestational age:>= 22 weeks, weight: >=500 g (According to the Medical Birth Registry in Norway (MBRN))

 

Characteristics collectedMedical Birth Registry in Norway (MBRN) collects gestational age, births weight, crown heel lenghts, gender, pluarality, congenital malformations and deformations.

 

 

3.4.1. National definition used for usual residency

A person that is living in Norway or intend to have residency in the country for 6 months or more, and is registered with an address by the Norwegian National Population Register.  

3.4.2. Stillbirth definition and characteristics collected

Definition of stillbirth: Gestational age:>= 22 weeks, weight: >=500 g (According to the Medical Birth Registry in Norway (MBRN))

 Characteristics collectedMedical Birth Registry in Norway (MBRN) collects gestational age, births weight, crown heel lenghts, gender, pluarality, congenital malformations and deformations.

3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical units are the deceased persons and the stillborns, respectively.

 

3.6. Statistical population

The neonates of non-resident mothers are not considered as residents in Norway.

From the reference year 2013 the non-residents dying in Norway are registered but not included in our national statistics (just residents). They have their own special statistics/tables. 

 

Norway includes residents dying abroad in our national statistics. However for about 90% of the deaths we do not know the causes of death for the persons dying abroad. When receiving a death certificate we classify the cause of death acording to ICD-10 codes if reported.

3.6.1. Neonates of non-resident mothers

No, neonates of non-resident mother are not considered as residents in Norway.

3.6.2. Non-residents

From reference year 2013 the non-residents dying in Norway are included in our national statistics.

3.6.3. Residents dying abroad

Yes, Norway includes residents dying abroad in our national statistics. However for about 90% of the deaths we do not know the causes of death for the persons dying abroad. When receiving a death certificate we classify the cause of death acording to ICD-10 codes if reported.

3.7. Reference area

Norway.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Time series available from 1994 onwards.

Note that due to the fact that 2011 data is the first data collection with a legal basis (and few changes in the requested variables and breakdowns), the data before and after 2011 are not always comparable (in part due to the different groupings of causes of deaths). Moreover, time series for data on stillbirths starts in 2011 and no information on previous data is available.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.

 


4. Unit of measure Top

The unit is number.

 


5. Reference Period Top

2021


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

CoD data was submitted to Eurostat on the basis of a gentleman's agreement established in the framework Eurostat's Working Group on "Public Health Statistics" until data with reference year 2010.

A Regulation on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work (EC) No 1338/2008 was signed by the European Parliament and the Council on 16 December 2008. This Regulation is the framework of the data collection on the domain.

Within the context of this framework Regulation, a Regulation on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work, as regards statistics on causes of death (EU) No 328/2011 was signed by the European Parliament and the Council on 5 April 2011. 

CoD data according to this regulation is submitted to Eurostat since reference year 2011.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

COD-data are shared with researchers, students, health authorities, WHO, Eurostat and media.

The Norwegian Legal Regulation Concerning The Cause of Death Registry from 21.12.2001 provides the legal basis for sharing data from the The Cause of Death Registry.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

All users have equal access to anonymous statistical releases from The Cause of Death Registry at the same time, according to the European statistics code of practice.

Access to confidential microdata for scientific purposes may only be granted based on approval by the Norwegian Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC), according to the Health Research Act.

 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

All confidential microdata are treated according to the Norwegian Health Registry Act and the Norwegian Personal Data Act (which incorporates the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)).

Everything we send of personally identifiable data is encrypted, only anonymous aggregated data is sent unencrypted.

We do not provide health data along with birth number or name. If directly identifiable data is provided, serial number and health data are provided on one data set and serial number and ID on another. The datasets can be connected by using serial numbers.

 


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Statistics from the Cause of Death Registry are released annually. Statistics including the statistical year 2021 were released in June 2022.

8.2. Release calendar access

Release dates for statistics published by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) can be found in the Institute's statistics calendar: https://www.fhi.no/hn/statistikk/statistikkalenderen/

8.3. Release policy - user access
  • The European Parliament and Council Act (EU) no. 223/2009 for European statistics of March 2009, concerning the European Statistics System (ESS), is adopted as a regulation to the Norwegian Statistics Act.
  • The superior principles for production of Norwegian statistics are elaborated through guidelines for European statistics (the European Statistics Code of Practice, generally referred to as the Code of Practice).
    • The aim of the guidelines is to ensure the trust of the general public in Norwegian Statistics by establishing principles for the development, production and distribution of the statistics.
    • Central in the Code of Practice are demands for professional independence for the institution that produces the Statistics.
    • The Ministry of Health and Care Services and The Norwegian Institute of Public Health agree that the Code of Practice should be adopted for the production of statistics from the central Norwegian health registers.
  • In line with the Code of Practice, The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry provides equal access for all users to anonymous statistical releases from the registry at the same time, see link below. 

COD-data: http://statistikkbank.fhi.no/dar/

 


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

News releases online.

https://www.fhi.no/nyheter/2023/dodelighet-2022/

https://www.fhi.no/nyheter/2023/stabil-trend-flere-overdosedodsfall-enn-i-2021-men-farre-enn-i-2020/

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Publications for 2021 Causes of death data:

https://www.fhi.no/op/dodsarsaksregisteret/tall-fra-dodsarsaksregisteret-2021/

https://www.fhi.no/op/dodsarsaksregisteret/tall-for-covid-19-assosierte-dodsfall-i-dodsarsaksregisteret-i-2021/

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Please consult free data online:

http://statistikkbank.fhi.no/dar/

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Number of consultations/deliveries of CoD tables to different institutions and researchers.

 

Year

Deliver

2015

142

2016

134

2017

124

2018

161

2019

170

2020

145

2021

193

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

It is possible to apply for access to microdata form Norwegian Institute of Public Health' health registries.

Here you will find guidelines, electronic application forms and other information: https://helsedata.no/

10.5. Dissemination format - other

WHO - tabular data

NOMESCO - tabular data

Occasional reports on special subjects: fhi.no website

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not applicable

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Documents for COD are available in the Norwegian Institute of public health

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Norway has 98 percent metadata completeness

10.7. Quality management - documentation

The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry has fully implemented the IRIS system, with its associated rules and guidelines for selection of underlying cause of death, for routine coding.

In addition, the cause of death is verified against other national health registries, such as the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and the Cancer Registry of Norway, as well as autopsy reports (approximately 8 percent of the deceased in Norway are autopsied), to improve quality.

If the medical data is incomplete, additional information is requested from the institution where the certificate was issued.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The causes of death data are based on a regulation, which defines scope, definitions of variables and characteristics of the data.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not available


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Users of the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry mainly need access to data, information and knowledge for the following purposes:

1. Monitoring causes of death over time
2. Preparation of national, regional and local statistics related to causes of death
3. Research
4. Planning, quality assurance and quality impovement in the Health and Care Services

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Not available

12.3. Completeness

 The cause of death data, as delivered by the Norwegian Institue of Public Health, has a coverage of about 98%.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

1. For mandatory variables: 98 percent

 

2. For voluntary variables: Not applicable

 

3. For additional variables: 

  • External CoD:
    • Place of occurrence for external CoD: 76 percent
    • Activity for external CoD: 23 percent

 


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Not formally validated.

13.2. Sampling error

Not applicable. Data collection is from administrative sources.

 

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Not applicable.

13.3.1. Coverage error

There is approximately 2 percent under-coverage in divergence between the frame population and the target population

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not applicable

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable. Data collection is from administrative sources.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Not applicable

13.3.3. Non response error

In Norway, whenever information on cause of death is missing for a death recorded in the National Population Register, reminders are sent to the council where the death was registered.  For each year information on cause of death is incomplete for about 3 percent of the deaths.  

 

Whenever information on the death certificates is missing or incomplete, additional information is sent to the council physician or to the institutions that applied the death certificate. In Norway in 2021 additional information was requested for about 5 percent of the death certificates received.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not applicable

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Refer point 13.3.3

13.3.4. Processing error

The processing of the data is in accordance with the European standard provided by the IRIS-institute

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness
Year Number of months between the end of the reference year and the publication at national level
2011 10
2012 10
2013 10
2014 10
2015 10
2016 10
2017 11
2018 11
2019 11
2020 5
2021 5

From data collection with reference year 2011 onwards, Eurostat asks for the submission of final data for the year N at N+24 months.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not applicable.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not applicable.

14.2. Punctuality

From data collection with reference year 2011 onwards, Eurostat asks for the submission of final data at national and regional level and related metadata for the year N at N+24 months, according to the Implementing Regulation (EC) No. 328/2011, Article 4.

 

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication
Reference year Time between the end of the reference year and the delivery of final data to Eurostat
2011  -
2012  -
2013  19 months
2014  18 months
2015  18 months
2016  23 months
2017  18 months
2018  18 months
2019  24 months
2020  18 months
2021  18 months


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

All the geographical regions in Norway use the same death certificate, and all the death certificates are coded by the same group of coders at NIPH.

Autopsies influence determination of the underlying cause of death, but the autopsy frequncy may vary from region to region.

Over all, the degree of geographical comparability in the Norwegian Cause of Death registry is high. 

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

Note that due to the fact that 2011 data is the first data collection with a legal basis (and few changes in the requested variables and breakdowns), the data between 1994-2010 and starting from 2011 are not always comparable (In part due to the different groupings of causes of deaths). Moreover time series for data on stillbirths starts in 2011 and no information on previous data is available. From 2018 electronic death certificates started to be used and from 2022 it is compulsory to use electronic death certificate instead of paper version.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

In the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry timeseries are available from 1951-2021.  Recording by different ICD-versions causes breaks in series. ICD-7, 1951-1968; ICD-8, 1969-1985; ICD-9, 1986-1995 and ICD-10, 1996-.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

COD data are matched with The population registry mortality data. If there are any discrepancy we send requst to the municipality where the missing death certificate are located.

For residents dying in Norway, the coverage is about 99%.

Residents dying abroad: We received information for about 20% of Norwegian persons dying abroad. (The underlying cause is missing for nearly 90% of the residents dying abroad.)

The number of deaths in the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry is verified against mortality data in The National Population Register of Norway. In case of discrepancies, local authorieties are contacted to ensure that missing death certificates are issued. 

For residents dying in Norway, the coverage is about 99%.

For residents dying abroad, the coverage is about 20%. The underlying cause is missing for nearly 90% of the residents dying abroad.

 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable, only annual data are available.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The Cause of Death statistics are internally coherent, consistent and comparable for all years preceding and including the reference year 2012. However, from the reference year 2013 The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) has extracted data from two sources, The Cause of Death Registry and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). There may therefore be some inconsistencies in data from the two time periods.

The statistics are compiled on the basis of common standards recommended by WHO (ICD-10) and Eurostat (IRIS, MUSE, EU-regulation April 2011).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The cost and burden of the data collection is reduced by using validation and dissemination IT tools.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

There is no systematic revision of previous year data. 

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

The Cause of Death data are based on information of the death certificates, medical and forensic autopsies and results from queries regarding missing information on the certificates.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual.

The source data is collected consecutively.

18.3. Data collection

 

 

18.3.1. Certification

 

Table on certification (Percentage)

Year

All doctors (certifiers) trained in the certification All doctors (certifiers - pathologists or others doctors) trained in the post-mortem examination (autopsies) Certificates filled by persons who attended a course on certification or post-mortem examination Death certificates that are queried (only queries related to medical part of the death certificate should be included) Replies received for queries sent Deaths where the underlying cause is changed as a result of the query Death certificates with incorrect sequence
2011  100 %  100 %  not applicable 1,5-2 %  65-70%  not applicable  not applicable
2012  100 %  100 %   not applicable 1,5-2 %  65-70% not applicable  not applicable
2013  100 %  100 %   not applicable 1,5-2 %  65-70%   not applicable  not applicable
2014  100 %  100 %   not applicable 1,5-2 %  65-70% not applicable  not applicable
2015  100 %  100 %   not applicable 1,5-2 %  65-70%  not applicable not applicable
2016  100 %  100 %   not applicable 1,5-2 %  65-70% not applicable not applicable
2017  100 %  100 %   not applicable 1,5-2 %  65-70% not applicable not applicable
2018  100 %  100 %   not applicable  1,5-2 %  65-70%  not applicable not applicable
2019  100 %  100 %   not applicable  1,5-2 %  65-70%  not applicable not applicable
2020  100 %  100 %  not applicable  3-4 %  70-80 %  not applicable  not applicable
2021  100 %  100 %  not applicable  5-6 %  70-80 %  not applicable  not applicable
18.3.2. Automated Coding
Data year Use of any form of automated coding System used (IRIS, MICAR, ACME, STYX, MIKADO, others)
2011 Yes  IRIS 
2012 Yes   IRIS 
2013 Yes   IRIS 
2014 Yes   IRIS 
2015 Yes   IRIS 
2016 Yes   IRIS 
2017 Yes   IRIS 
2018 Yes   IRIS 
2019 Yes  IRIS
2020 Yes  IRIS
2021 Yes IRIS
18.3.3. Underlying cause of death
Data year Only manual selection of underlying cause Manual with ACME decision tables (if yes, version of ACME) ACS utilising ACME decision tables (if yes, version of ACME) Own system (ACS without ACME) Comments
2011     2011.10     
2012     2011.10    
2013     2013     
2014     2014     
2015     2014,2016     
2016     2016     
2017     2017    
2018     2018     
2019     2019    
2020     2020     
2021     2021    
18.3.4. Availability of multiple cause
Data year Information stored in the national CoD database, UC (Underlying cause) or MC (Multiple cause)
2011 UC+MC 
2012 UC+MC
2013 UC+MC
2014 UC+MC 
2015 UC+MC
2016 UC+MC
2017 UC+MC
2018 UC+MC
2019 UC+MC
2020 UC+MC
2021 UC+MC
18.3.5. Stillbirths and Neonatal certificates

 

We use the same death certificate for the neonates as we do for other deaths. In addition, the Cause of Death Registry and the Medical Birth Registry cooperate and exchange data.

a) Stillbirths

A civil notification is reported to the Norwegian National Registry stating that the infant/fetus was stillborn. In addition, the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) receives a notification with information that the fetus/infant was stillborn and also the above mentioned data (characteristics of the fetus and information about the mother and the pregnancy). If there is an autopsy, the MBRN gets a copy of the autopsy report, and the causes of death are coded by a physician at the MBRN using the ICD-10. 

 

b) Neonates

The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry gets supplementary information from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). In addition a medical adviser gives support in choosing the underlying code. No; Neonates of non-residents motheres are not considered as resident in Norway.

18.4. Data validation

The statistics cover all persons registered by the The National Population Register of Norway (*) as inhabitants of Norway (residents) at their death, regardless of whether the death took place in Norway or abroad. In addition all non-resident persons dying in Norway are included, from the reference year 2013.

(*) The Norwegian Tax Administration is resposible ensuring that the The National Population Register of Norway is complete and up-to-date.

18.4.1. Coding

Description of coding procedure (central level, distributed among other bodies, etc.): All coding is centralised (NIPH)

Description of the procedures to detect errors (i.e.errors such as potential inconsistency in the death certificate or error due to mistake when filling the deaths certificates): The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry has fully implemented the IRIS system, with its associated rules and guidelines for selection of underlying cause of death, for routine coding. IRIS detects inconsistencies in the sequence in the death certificate and also rejects codes that cannot be the underlying cause of death.

Description of the measures taken in order to solve detected errors: If the medical data is incomplete, additional information is requested from the institution where the certificate was issued. The processing also includes reviewing and correcting the individual variables, including that the certificate is completed and that the above values are reasonable considering, among other things, the deceased's age and gender. 

Coding performed by a certifier: None

Estimation of the percentage of autopsy from which information is available for coding: Approximately 8 percent of the deceased in Norway are autopsied.

Description of double coding exercises and rate of codification errors for underlying cause of death: None

 

18.4.2. Unspecified CoD code

ICD codes for the underlying cause (% of the Total)

Year Unspecified CoD (for ICD10: R00-R99 codes, for ICD9: 780-790 codes) Unknown CoD (for ICD10: R98-R99 codes, for ICD9: 799.9, 798.9, 798.2 codes) Deaths due to senility (for ICD10: R54 code, for ICD9: 797 code) Deaths due to exposure to unspecified factor (for ICD10: X59 code, ICD9: 928.9 code)
2011 3,6 %  0,9 %  0,9 %  1,6 %
2012 3,7 %  0,7 %  1,1 %  1,6 %
2013 4,2 %  1,4 %  0,9 %  1,6 %
2014 3,8 %  1,1 %  0,9 %  1,6 %
2015 3,2 %  0,7 %  0,9 %  0,6 %
2016 3,2 %  0,6 %  0,9 %  0,6 %
2017 2,8 %  0,6 %  0,7 %  1,2 %
2018 3,2%  0,8 %  0,9 %  1,5 %
2019 3,0 % 0,9 % 0,7 % 1,3 %
2020 3,0 % 0,8 % 0,7 % 1,1 %
2021 3,0 % 0,8 % 0,8 % 0,7 %
18.4.3. Unknown country or region

Unknown country/region (%) for residents and non-residents who died in the country

 

Year Residents Non-residents
Unknown residency (NUTS2) Unknown occurrence (NUTS2) Unknown residency (country) Unknown residency (NUTS2) Unknown occurrence (NUTS2)
2011  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % NA NA NA
2012  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % 98 %  1 %  ~ 0 %
2013  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % 64 %  33 %  ~ 0 %
2014  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % 31 %  60 %   ~ 0 %
2015  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % 20 %  64 %  8 %
2016  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % 26 %  62 %  9 % 
2017  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % 46 % 10 %  7 % 
2018  ~ 0 %  ~ 0 % 52 %   7 % 2 % 
2019  ~ 0 %  0,1 % 48 %  7 % 8 %
2020  ~ 0 %  0,8 % 68 % 20 % 13 %
2021  ~ 0 %  1,9 % 66 % 44 % 15 %
18.4.4. Validation of the coverage

The coverage of the annual 2021 was 98 percent, after sending out reminders during the year

18.5. Data compilation

Not applicable.

The coding of diagnoses is according to ICD-10, and the underlying cause of death is identified by IRIS/MUSE.

The UC codes are further aggregated to the European Shortlist of causes of death (COD-SL-2012).

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

18.6. Adjustment

Age adjusted rates are compiled by the European Standard Population (ESP2013).

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top

None.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top