Causes of death (hlth_cdeath)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: The Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

The Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Health Statistics Unit of Department of Research and Health Statistics

1.5. Contact mail address

Duntes Street 22, K-5, Riga, Latvia, LV-1005


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 07/07/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 03/07/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 03/07/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Data on causes of death (COD) provide information on mortality patterns and form a major element of public health information.

COD data refer to the underlying cause which - according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) - is "the disease or injury which initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury".

Causes of death are classified by the 86 causes of the "European shortlist" of causes of death. This shortlist is based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD).

COD data are derived from death certificates. The medical certification of death is an obligation in all Member States. Countries code the information provided in the medical certificate of cause of death into ICD codes according to the rules specified in the ICD.

Data are broken down by sex, 5-year age groups, cause of death and by residency and country of occurrence. For stillbirths and neonatal deaths additional breakdows might include age of mother.

Annual national data are provided in absolute number, crude death rates and standardised death rates. At regional level (NUTS level 2) the same is provided in form of 3 years averages. Annual crude death rates are also available at NUTS level 2.

3.2. Classification system
Data year ICD revision used (ICD-8, ICD-9, ICD-10) For ICD-10: updates used
1990 ICD-9  
1991 ICD-9   
1992 ICD-9   
1993 ICD-9   
1994 ICD-9   
1995 ICD-9   
1996 ICD-10   
1997 ICD-10   
1998 ICD-10   
1999 ICD-10   
2000 ICD-10   
2001 ICD-10   
2002 ICD-10   
2003 ICD-10   
2004 ICD-10   
2005 ICD-10  ICD-10 Second Edition, Geneva, 2004
2006 ICD-10  ICD-10 Second Edition, Geneva, 2004
2007 ICD-10  ICD-10 Cumulative Updates 1996-2006
2008 ICD-10  Amendments March 2008 (NHCS)
2009 ICD-10  Updates 2007
2010 ICD-10  Cumulative official updates to ICD-10 WHO February 2009
2011 ICD-10  Cumulative official updates to ICD-10 WHO February 2009
2012 ICD-10  Cumulative official updates to ICD-10 WHO January 2011
2013 ICD-10 Cumulative official updates to ICD-10 WHO January 2011
2014 ICD-10 Cumulative official updates to ICD-10 WHO January 2011
2015 ICD-10 Cumulative official updates to ICD-10 WHO January 2011
2016 ICD-10 Fifth edition 2016
2017 ICD-10 Fifth edition 2016
2018 ICD-10 Fifth edition 2016
2019 ICD-10 Fifth edition 2016
2020 ICD-10 Fifth edition 2016 with official updates
2021 ICD-10 Fifth edition 2016 with official updates
3.3. Coverage - sector

Public Health

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

1. National definition used for usual residency

Resident population refers to persons permanently residing in Latvia and residents of Republic of Latvia residing abroad for a period less than one year.

 

2. Stillbirths

a) National definition used for stillbirths

Stillbirth – is foetus born lifeless after 22 weeks of pregnancy (after 154 days, when weight of foetus is 500 g, usually). Death is confirmed with fact that foetus is not breathing after separation from mother and showing no evidence of life as heart activity, pulsation of umbilical cord or motion of muscles.

 

b) What are the characteristics that you collect (gestational age, weight, crown-heel)?

We collect gestational age, weight and crown-heel.

3.4.1. National definition used for usual residency

Resident population refers to persons permanently residing in Latvia and residents of Republic of Latvia residing abroad for a period less than one year.

3.4.2. Stillbirth definition and characteristics collected

Stillbirths

a) National definition used for stillbirths

Stillbirth – is foetus born lifeless after 22 weeks of pregnancy (after 154 days, when weight of foetus is 500 g, usually). Death is confirmed with fact that foetus is not breathing after separation from mother and showing no evidence of life as heart activity, pulsation of umbilical cord or motion of muscles.

 

b) What are the characteristics that you collect (gestational age, weight, crown-heel)?

We collect gestational age, weight and crown-heel.

3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical units are the deceased persons and the stillborns, respectively.

3.6. Statistical population

1. Neonates: Are neonatals of non-resident mothers considered residents?

Neonatal of non-resident mother considered resident when father is resident. When both mother and father is non-residents – non-resident.

 

2. Coverage

a) Do you include non-residents in your national statistics?

No

 

b) Do you include residents dying abroad in your national statistics? If yes, how do you record the cause of death? 

Yes, we record them as died abroad - if we receive a medical certificate or certificate of death. In case we have no information about cause of death, the recorded cause of death is R99. 

3.6.1. Neonates of non-resident mothers

Neonatal of non-resident mother considered resident when father is resident. When both mother and father is non-residents – non-resident.

3.6.2. Non-residents

Mortality registry contain information about non-residents' deaths.

3.6.3. Residents dying abroad

The data about residents dying abroad are included in the Mortality registry in case if such information has received. Most often is missing the information about cause of death, external cause of death. The information abot sex, age and month of death is more or less available.

3.7. Reference area

Latvia

3.8. Coverage - Time

Time series available from 1996 onwards.

 

3.9. Base period

Constant series refers to calendar year.


4. Unit of measure Top

The data are published in absolute numbers, crude death rate and standardised death rate.


5. Reference Period Top

Data refer to the calendar year (i.e. all deaths occurring during the year).

The last reference year provided 2021.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Countries submitted data to Eurostat on the basis of a gentleman's agreement established in the framework Eurostat's Working Group on "Public Health Statistics" until data with reference year 2010. The first data submitted according to the Regulation (EU) No 328/2011 is data with reference year 2011.
A Regulation on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work (EC) No 1338/2008 was signed by the European Parliament and the Council on 16 December 2008. This Regulation is the framework of the data collection on the domain.
Within the context of this framework Regulation, a Regulation on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work, as regards statistics on causes of death (EU) No 328/2011 was signed by the European Parliament and the Council on 5 April 2011.

Legal acts that assign responsibility as well as the authority to the CDPC for the collection, processing, and dissemination of statistics.

Statistics Law,

Law on Registration of Civil Status Acts,

Republic of Latvia, Cabinet Regulation No.761, Regulations Regarding Registers of Civil Status Acts

Republic of Latvia, Cabinet Regulation No. 241, By-laws of the Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

 

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

ESTAT, WHO, EMCDDA


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (recital 24 and Article 20(4)) of 11 March 2009 (OJ L 87, p. 164), stipulates the need to establish common principles and guidelines ensuring the confidentiality of data used for the production of European statistics and the access to those confidential data with due account for technical developments and the requirements of users in a democratic society.

Law on the Rights of Patients.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

All age groups showing a total mortality of less than 4 cases are considered as confidential. Therefore, any 'confidential' agegroup is grouped with another one to have higher numbers. In practice, this problem mainly occurs for young ages so, either the ages from 0 to 14 years old, or the ages from 0 to 14 and 15 to 24 years old are grouped. The age groups considered as confidential show then the value ':' and the age group '0-14y' (and '15-24y' if needed) shows the sum of all ages before 15 years old (or between 15 and 24 years old). In addition, special measures for ensuring confidentiality may be taken for small countries.

For stillbirth and neonatal figures, no breakdown by parity is displayed to ensure confidentiality.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The data is released according to the release calendar. 

8.2. Release calendar access

The release calendar can be accessed on the CDPC homepage.

8.3. Release policy - user access

The data release policy is based on publication calendar. All data users have equal access to information when data will be available, what are the definitions and metadata.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

News releases on-line.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Annual data published on homepage.

Data Presentation System (contain data for 1989-2017).

Health Statistics Database (contain data for 2008-2023).

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Please consult free data on-line or refer to contact details.

https://statistika.spkc.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/Health/Health__Mirstiba/?tablelist=true 

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not available

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Micro-data are not disseminated.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not available.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Methodological documents are available together with published data.

https://statistika.spkc.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/Health/Health__Mirstiba/?tablelist=true

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

100%

10.7. Quality management - documentation

The quality of COD data is subject to the way in which the information on causes of death is reported and classified in each country (i.e. national certification and coding procedures). In general, all countries follow the standards and rules specified in the ICD, and the overall procedures for the collection of COD data are relatively homogenous between European countries (medical certification of cause of death, use of ICD).

However, national differences in interpretation and use of ICD rules exist and as a result important quality and comparability issues remain. Based on the report "Comparability and Quality Improvement of the European Causes of Death Statistics" countries work towards further improving certification and coding procedures.

Ongoing work is reported to Eurostat's Working Group "Public Health Statistics" (documents available on circabc).


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The causes of death data are based on a regulation, which defines scope, definitions of variables and characteristics of the data.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not available.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Based on the 34 answers received from the web survey, the main users are Research Institutes,  Universities, Public Government agencies, Private, Commission services and Business companies. On these 34 answers, Eurostat data on Causes of Death are "essential", "important", or "used for background information" for 25 respondents.
Asking about the availability of needed data in the Eurostat production, users are divided in two equivalent part: 12 answered that they do not need statistics on the field not currently available from Eurostat and 13 answered that they need, giving information about defects and lacks of the Eurostat data.

 

The main mortality data users in Latvia are:

Ministry of Health

Other state institutions

Self-governments

Health Registries

Universities

Insurance companies

Researchers

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Users were asked to assess each of the classical elements that characterise the quality of statistics.

Respondents generally give high scores to the different dimensions of data quality and to the supporting service that is perceived as "Good or Very Good" by the users (14 out of 21 respondents expressing opinions about this). The overall quality, comprising both data quality and supporting service, is perceived as "Good" or "Very good" by 16 out of 24 respondents to those questions.

Among different data quality dimensions, coherence and comparability receive the higher satisfaction. The less appreciated dimension is the completeness.

 

There are no user satisfaction surveys or other user consultations performed in Latvia.

12.3. Completeness

All data received are disseminated on Eurostat's website.

The only problem is data about death cases for persons deceased abroad. This information is not received completely yet. However, we are improving the data flow, so data for 2022 should contain all information about deceased persons abroad too.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Mandatory variables are provided completely.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

All known death cases are registered.

13.2. Sampling error

Not applicable.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable

13.3. Non-sampling error

Not applicable.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Not applicable.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Not applicable.

13.3.3. Non response error

Not applicable.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.4. Processing error

Not applicable.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

From data collection with reference year 2011 onwards, Eurostat asks for the submission of final data for the year N at N+24 months.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not applicable.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not applicable.

14.2. Punctuality

From data collection with reference year 2011 onwards, Eurostat asks for the submission of final data at national and regional level and related metadata for the year N at N+24 months, according to the Implementing Regulation (EC) No. 328/2011, Article 4.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication
Reference year Time between the end of the reference year and the delivery of final data to EUROSTAT
2014 24
2015 24
2016 24
2017 24
2018 22
2019 24
2020 18
2021 18

 

 


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

The data are comparable between the regions of the country.

The process of collecting, coding, transmission the data is the same for all regions.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

The comparability of the data over time in the National database is from 1996.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

The data before and after 2011 are not always comparable due to the fact that 2011 data is the first data collection with a legal basis and there were some changes in the requested variables and breakdowns.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

The main problem is the loss of medical information for deaths of residents of Latvia registered abroad. At this moment it is impossible to indicate the % of missing certificates for deaths registered abroad, as all find cases are registered. This information could be available for data starting from 2022.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable, only annual data are available.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

All known deaths are registered in the death registry. 


16. Cost and Burden Top

The cost and burden of the data collection is reduced by using validation and dissemination IT tools.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Data is systematically revised with Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Data are occasionally revised, e.g. if the "NUTS" changes or if a country notifies Eurostat about any changes in the data.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Data are collected by two certificates - Medical death certificate and Medical perinatal death certificate.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Civil registry offices submit death certificates once a month.

18.3. Data collection
1. Automated Coding
Data year a) Did you use any form of automated coding? [Yes / No] b) If yes, please indicate the system used (IRIS, MICAR, ACME, STYX, MIKADO, others)
1990 No  
1991 No   
1992 No   
1993 No   
1994 No   
1995 No   
1996 No   
1997 No   
1998 No   
1999 No   
2000 No   
2001 No   
2002 No   
2003 No   
2004 No   
2005 No   
2006 Yes  ACME
2007 Yes  ACME 
2008 Yes  ACME 
2009 Yes  ACME 
2010 Yes  ACME 
2011 Yes  ACME 
2012 Yes  ACME 
2013 Yes ACME
2014 Yes ACME + IRIS 
2015 Yes ACME + IRIS 
2016 Yes ACME + IRIS
2017 Yes ACME + IRIS
2018 Yes ACME + IRIS
2019 Yes ACME + IRIS
2020 Yes ACME + IRIS
2021 Yes ACME + IRIS

 

2. Underlying cause of death selection and modification
Data year a) only manual selection of underlying cause b) manual with ACME decision tables (if yes, which version of ACME) c) ACS utilising ACME decision tables (if yes, which version of ACME) d) own system (ACS without ACME) e) Comments
1990 Yes No  No No  
1991 Yes  No  No  No   
1992 Yes  No  No  No   
1993 Yes  No  No  No   
1994 Yes  No  No  No   
1995 Yes  No  No  No   
1996 Yes  No  No  No   
1997 Yes  No  No  No   
1998 Yes  No  No  No   
1999 Yes  No  No  No   
2000 Yes  No  No  No   
2001 Yes  No  No  No   
2002 Yes  No  No  No   
2003 Yes  No  No  No   
2004 Yes  Yes  No  No  Partly, Instruction Manual
Part 2c 2004 CDC USA
2005 No  Yes, 2005 No  No  The whole year, Instruction Manual Part 2c 2005 CDC USA
2006 No  Yes, 2005;
for external causes and perinatal deaths
ACME 2006.03 No  Half a year with ACS ACME
2007 No  Yes, 2006;
for external causes and perinatal deaths
ACME 2007.02 No  Fully time with ACME
2008 No  ICD-10 ACME  2008 (in particular cases) ACME 2008.10 No  Fully time with ACME 
2009 No  For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME 2009.10 No  Fully time with ACME 
2010 No  For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No  Fully time with ACME 
2011 No  For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No  Fully time with ACME 
2012 No  For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No  Fully time with ACME 
2013 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with ACME 
2014 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with ACME  
2015 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with ACME  
2016 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with IRIS
2017 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with IRIS
2018 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with IRIS
2019 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with IRIS
2020 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with IRIS
2021 No For external causes, perinatal deaths ACME/TRANSAX Version 2010.10 No Fully time with IRIS

 

3. Information available in the national COD database
Data year Which information do you store in your national COD database - the underlying cause (UC) only or multiple causes (MC)?
1990 There is no data
1991 There is no data 
1992 There is no data 
1993 There is no data 
1994 There is no data 
1995 There is no data 
1996 UC 
1997 UC 
1998 UC 
1999 UC + MC 
2000 UC + MC 
2001 UC + MC 
2002 UC + MC 
2003 UC + MC 
2004 UC + MC 
2005 UC + MC 
2006 UC + MC 
2007 UC + MC 
2008 UC + MC 
2009 UC + MC 
2010 UC + MC 
2011 UC + MC 
2012 UC + MC 
2013 UC + MC
2014 UC + MC 
2015 UC + MC 
2016 UC + MC 
2017 UC + MC 
2018 UC + MC 
2019 UC + MC 
2020 UC + MC
2021 UC + MC

 

4. Stillbirths and Neonates: Do you have a different death certificate or do you code these data differently from other deaths? If yes, how?

a) Stillbirths

For perinatal deaths (stillbirths and children aged less than 7 days) we use separate certificate of death.

 

b) Neonates

For neonates aged less than 7 days we use separate death certificate, and for neonates 7-27 days old we use general Medical certificate of cause of death. 

18.3.1. Certification

See in 18.3

18.3.2. Automated Coding

See in 18.3

18.3.3. Underlying cause of death

See in 18.3

18.3.4. Availability of multiple cause

See in 18.3

18.3.5. Stillbirths and Neonatal certificates

See in 18.3

18.4. Data validation

The coding is only on the Central level.  Data comparison is performed with other available data sources.  Certificates are updated after the consultation with certifiers. The information from all autopsies is available for coding. Double coding exercises are performed within activities of Nordic-Baltic Mortality group.

18.4.1. Coding

Description of coding procedure (central level, distributed among other bodies, etc.):

 Central level

Description of the procedures to detect errors (i.e.errors such as potential inconsistency in the death certificate or error due to mistake when filling the deaths certificates):

 Data comparison with other available data sources

Description of the measures taken in order to solve detected errors:

 Consultation with certifiers, certificates' updating

Coding performed by a certifier:

 Not applicable. The coding is only on the central level.

Estimation of the percentage of autopsy from which information is available for coding:

  Information from all autopsies are available for coding

Description of double coding exercises and rate of codification errors for underlying cause of death:

 Double coding exercises are performed within activities of Nordic-Baltic Mortality group

18.4.2. Unspecified CoD code

Not available

18.4.3. Unknown country or region

Not available

18.4.4. Validation of the coverage

Register of Natural Persons

18.5. Data compilation

CDPC of Latvia is in charge of data compilation.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

18.6. Adjustment

WHO and EUROSTAT coding rules are used to reach international standards.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top

None.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top