Causes of death (hlth_cdeath)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: The Danish Health Data Authority


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

The Danish Health Data Authority

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Analytics, Statistics and Economics 

1.5. Contact mail address

AMTR@sundhedsdata.dk


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 25/01/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 25/01/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 25/01/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Data on causes of death (CoD) provide information on mortality patterns and form a major element of public health information.

CoD data refer to the underlying cause which - according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) - is "the disease or injury which initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury".

CoD data are derived from death certificates. The information provided in the medical certificate of cause of death is mapped to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD).

3.2. Classification system

Eurostat's CoD statistics build on standards set out by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD).

The regional breakdown is based on the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS 2).

 

Classification and updates applied by years

 

Data year ICD classification used (ICD-9, ICD-10) (3 or 4 chars) For ICD-10: updates used
2011  ICD-10  
2012  ICD-10  
2013  ICD-10  
2014  ICD-10  
2015  ICD-10  
2016  ICD-10  
2017  ICD-10  
2018  ICD-10

 

2019 ICD-10  
2020 ICD-10  
2021 ICD-10  
3.3. Coverage - sector

Public Health

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Concepts and definitions are described in the Commission regulation (EU) No 328/2011 in articles 2 and 3.

3.4.1. National definition used for usual residency

Persons with a valid Social Security number residing in Denmark

3.4.2. Stillbirth definition and characteristics collected

Stillbirth is defined as all births after gestination of 22 weeks (>=22+0), where the child shows no signs of life at birth

3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical units are the deceased persons and the stillborns, respectively.

3.6. Statistical population

Residence in Denmark at the time of death. 

3.6.1. Neonates of non-resident mothers

No, neonatals of non-resident mothers are not considered residents. 

3.6.2. Non-residents

Non-residents are not included in the National statistics. 

3.6.3. Residents dying abroad

No, residents dying abroad are not included in national statistics. 

3.7. Reference area

National 

3.8. Coverage - Time

Time series for most EU-28 countries and EFTA are available from 1994 onwards (Belgium, Germany: 1992, Ireland: 1993). For some countries data are only available from 1995 (Bulgaria), 1996 (Latvia and Slovakia), 1999 (Cyprus, Poland and Romania) or 2010 (Liechtenstein) onwards.

Note that due to the fact that 2011 data is the first data collection with a legal basis (and few changes in the requested variables and breakdowns), the data between 1994-2010 and starting from 2011 are not always comparable (In part due to the different groupings of causes of deaths). Moreover time series for data on stillbirths starts in 2011 and no information on previous data is available.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

The unit is number.


5. Reference Period Top

Data refer to the calendar year (i.e. all deaths occurring during the year).


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

CoD data was submitted to Eurostat on the basis of a gentleman's agreement established in the framework Eurostat's Working Group on "Public Health Statistics" until data with reference year 2010.

A Regulation on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work (EC) No 1338/2008 was signed by the European Parliament and the Council on 16 December 2008. This Regulation is the framework of the data collection on the domain.

Within the context of this framework Regulation, a Regulation on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work, as regards statistics on causes of death (EU) No 328/2011 was signed by the European Parliament and the Council on 5 April 2011. 

CoD data according to this regulation is submitted to Eurostat since reference year 2011.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Common specifications with the World Health Organisation (WHO) were used in the data collection up to 2010; in addition, Eurostat asks for NUTS level 2. From 2011 onwards, Eurostat changed the specifications to take into account the data collected through the Regulation No 328/2011.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (recital 24 and Article 20(4)) of 11 March 2009 (OJ L 87, p. 164), stipulates the need to establish common principles and guidelines ensuring the confidentiality of data used for the production of European statistics and the access to those confidential data with due account for technical developments and the requirements of users in a democratic society.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

All age groups showing a total mortality of less than 4 cases are considered as confidential. Therefore, any 'confidential' agegroup is grouped with another one to have higher numbers. In practice, this problem mainly occurs for young ages so, either the ages from 0 to 14 years old, or the ages from 0 to 14 and 15 to 24 years old are grouped. The age groups considered as confidential show then the value ':' and the age group '0-14y' (and '15-24y' if needed) shows the sum of all ages before 15 years old (or between 15 and 24 years old). In addition, special measures for ensuring confidentiality may be taken for small countries.

For stillbirth and neonatal figures, no breakdown by parity is displayed to ensure confidentiality.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

December the following year. 

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.esundhed.dk/Emner/Aktuelt/Udgivelseskalender

 

8.3. Release policy - user access

In line with the Community legal framework and the European Statistics Code of Practice Eurostat disseminates European statistics on Eurostat's website (see item 10 - 'Accessibility and clarity') respecting professional independence and in an objective, professional and transparent manner in which all users are treated equitably. The detailed arrangements are governed by the Eurostat protocol on impartial access to Eurostat data for users.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

News releases on-line.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

In our publication "Dødsårsagsregister", and on our website: www.eSundhed.dk

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

https://www.esundhed.dk/home/registre/doedsaarsagsregisteret

 

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Please consult free data on-line or refer to contact details.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Yes

10.5. Dissemination format - other

 

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

No

10.6. Documentation on methodology

https://www.esundhed.dk/Dokumentation

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Documents for COD are available in CIRCABC, Causes of Death section.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

The quality of COD data is subject to the way in which the information on causes of death is reported and classified in each country (i.e. national certification and coding procedures). In general, all countries follow the standards and rules specified in the ICD, and the overall procedures for the collection of COD data are relatively homogenous between European countries (medical certification of cause of death, use of ICD).

However, national differences in interpretation and use of ICD rules exist and as a result important quality and comparability issues remain. Based on the report "Comparability and Quality Improvement of the European Causes of Death Statistics" countries work towards further improving certification and coding procedures.

Ongoing work is reported to Eurostat's Working Group "Public Health Statistics" (documents available on circabc).


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The causes of death data are based on a regulation, which defines scope, definitions of variables and characteristics of the data.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

A quality assessment of Eurostat's COD statistics was organised in May and June 2008. In that framework, a questionnaire was sent to Eurostat's partners (data providers) for COD statistics and a user survey was set up on Eurostat's website, for which 25 partners and 34 users answered. A questionnaire was also filled in by responsible people of COD statistics in Eurostat.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Based on the 34 answers received from the web survey, the main users are Research Institutes,  Universities, Public Government agencies, Private, Commission services and Business companies. On these 34 answers, Eurostat data on Causes of Death are "essential", "important", or "used for background information" for 25 respondents.
Asking about the availability of needed data in the Eurostat production, users are divided in two equivalent part: 12 answered that they do not need statistics on the field not currently available from Eurostat and 13 answered that they need, giving information about defects and lacks of the Eurostat data.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Users were asked to assess each of the classical elements that characterise the quality of statistics.

Respondents generally give high scores to the different dimensions of data quality and to the supporting service that is perceived as "Good or Very Good" by the users (14 out of 21 respondents expressing opinions about this). The overall quality, comprising both data quality and supporting service, is perceived as "Good" or "Very good" by 16 out of 24 respondents to those questions.

Among different data quality dimensions, coherence and comparability receive the higher satisfaction. The less appreciated dimension is the completeness.

12.3. Completeness

.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

1. For mandatory variables:

 100 percent.

2. For voluntary variables:

 100 percent.

3. For additional variables:

  • External CoD

Not available

  • Place of occurrence for external CoD

Not available

  • Activity for external CoD

 Not available


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

The data for 2018 are based on 97 pct. of all incoming death certificates. In those cases were we didn't get the certificate electronically the cause of death is "unknown" in the data. 

13.2. Sampling error

Not applicable. Data collection is from administrative sources.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable.

13.3. Non-sampling error

.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Not applicable.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable. Data collection is from administrative sources.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Not applicable.

13.3.3. Non response error

Not applicable.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.4. Processing error

Not applicable.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness
Year Number of months between the end of the reference year and the publication at national level
2011 12
2012 12 
2013 12 
2014 12 
2015 12 
2016 12 
2017 12 
2018 12 
2019 12
2020 11
2021 11
14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not applicable.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not applicable.

14.2. Punctuality

From data collection with reference year 2011 onwards, Eurostat asks for the submission of final data at national and regional level and related metadata for the year N at N+24 months, according to the Implementing Regulation (EC) No. 328/2011, Article 4.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication
Reference year Time between the end of the reference year and the delivery of final data to Eurostat
2011

24

2012 24 
2013 24 
2014 24
2015 24 
2016 24 
2017 28 
2018 26 
2019 24
2020 24
2021 24


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

There is a small difference in missing certificates across regions. However coding and transmission are equal for all regions. 

Region

Missing certificates (%)
Region Nordjylland 4,67
Region Midtjylland 2,64
Region Syddanmark 1,99
Hovedstaden 4,71
Sjælland 3,97
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

Up until 2018 Denmark have included neonatal deaths where an abortion procedure was performed. These special cases results in a livebirth and therefore they were included in both the General and infant mortality statistics, they were recorded as neonatal deaths (NND). 

As of 2019 these case have been removed from both datasets. 

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

From 2007 the repaorted death data were electronic.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

The data is checked with the national demographic data called CPR-register. The discrepency in total deaths is denoted as Unknowns in the death cause registry. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable, only annual data are available.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The data source between neonates and the general mortality are different. However there should not be any inconsistencies. 


16. Cost and Burden Top

The cost and burden of the data collection is reduced by using validation and dissemination IT tools.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

There is no systematic revision of previous year data. Data are occasionally revised, e.g. if the "NUTS" changes or if a country notifies Eurostat about any changes in the data.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Our CoD database is based on the reported death certificates. In Denmark the death certificates are reported electronically. Almost 98 pct. of all page 2 certificates are reported electronically at the time when the annual statistics is published. Since it is possible to report certifcates afterwards, data for 2019 and before that will getting more complete over the years. 

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual.

18.3. Data collection

.

18.3.1. Certification

 

Table on certification (Percentage)

Year

All doctors (certifiers) trained in the certification All doctors (certifiers - pathologists or others doctors) trained in the post-mortem examination (autopsies) Certificates filled by persons who attended a course on certification or post-mortem examination Death certificates that are queried (only queries related to medical part of the death certificate should be included) Replies received for queries sent Deaths where the underlying cause is changed as a result of the query Death certificates with incorrect sequence  
2020      
         
2012

100

 100  100          
2013

 100

 100  100          
2014  100  100  100          
2015  100  100  100          
2016  100  100  100          
2017  100  100  100          
2018 100 100 100          
2019 100 100 100          
2020 100 100 100          
2021 100 100 100          
18.3.2. Automated Coding
Data year Use of any form of automated coding System used (IRIS, MICAR, ACME, STYX, MIKADO, others)
2011

 Yes

 Acme
2012  Yes  Acme
2013  Yes  Acme
2014   Yes  Acme
2015   Yes  Acme/Iris
2016   Yes  Acme/Iris
2017   Yes  Acme/Iris
2018   Yes  Acme/Iris
2019 Yes Acme/Iris
2020 Yes Acme/Iris
2021 Yes Acme/Iris
18.3.3. Underlying cause of death
Data year Only manual selection of underlying cause Manual with ACME decision tables (if yes, version of ACME) ACS utilising ACME decision tables (if yes, version of ACME) Own system (ACS without ACME) Comments
2011    ACME 2007      
2012    ACME 2011      
2013    ACME 2012      
2014    ACME 2012      
2015    ACME/IRIS      
2016    ACME/IRIS      
2017     ACME/IRIS      
2018     ACME/IRIS       There is extend manual validation. For 2018 we use the ACME tables updated from the IRIS - group
2019   Acme/Iris       There is extend manual validation. For 2019 we use the ACME tables updated from the IRIS - group
2020   Acme/Iris     There is extend manual validation. For 2020 we use the ACME tables updated from the IRIS - group
2021   Acme/Iris     There is extend manual validation. For 2021 we use the ACME tables updated from the IRIS - group
18.3.4. Availability of multiple cause
Data year Information stored in the national CoD database, UC (Underlying cause) or MC (Multiple cause)
2011  MC
2012   MC
2013   MC
2014   MC
2015   MC
2016   MC
2017   MC
2018   MC
2019 MC
2020 MC
2021 MC
18.3.5. Stillbirths and Neonatal certificates

There is no special death certificate for neonates and stillbirths. 

18.4. Data validation

The national death registry is compared to the CPR registry. 

18.4.1. Coding

Description of coding procedure (central level, distributed among other bodies, etc.): 

Coding is done manually by employees of the responsible government agency

Description of the procedures to detect errors (i.e.errors such as potential inconsistency in the death certificate or error due to mistake when filling the deaths certificates):

 The IRIS algorithm evaluates all data for consistency with WHO guidelines and corrects where necessary. Certain of these corrections as well as select groups of causes are flagged for manual validation 

Description of the measures taken in order to solve detected errors:

 Trained professionals evaluate the output of IRIS with supplementary information on the death certificates and contact the submitting doctors where necessary

Coding performed by a certifier:

IRIS is an algorithm developed and maintained by Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) in Cologne. This is based on up-to-date guidelines for coding with ICD10 as decided by WHO.

Estimation of the percentage of autopsy from which information is available for coding:

Autopsy findings can be written on any death certificate but the fields are not mandatory. The information in these fields is available for review but is text-based and thus not harmonized as quantifiable data points.

Description of double coding exercises and rate of codification errors for underlying cause of death:

 

18.4.2. Unspecified CoD code

ICD codes for the underlying cause (% of the Total)

Year Unspecified CoD (for ICD10: R00-R99 codes, for ICD9: 780-790 codes) Unknown CoD (for ICD10: R98-R99 codes, for ICD9: 799.9, 798.9, 798.2 codes) Deaths due to senility (for ICD10: R54 code, for ICD9: 797 code) Deaths due to exposure to unspecified factor (for ICD10: X59 code, ICD9: 928.9 code)
2011        
2012        
2013        
2014        
2015        
2016        
2017        
2018        
2019  7,6  5,1  2,1  0
2020 8,6 6,1 2,2 0
2021        
18.4.3. Unknown country or region

Unknown country/region (%) for residents and non-residents who died in the country

 

Year Residents Non-residents
Unknown residency (NUTS2) Unknown occurrence (NUTS2) Unknown residency (country) Unknown residency (NUTS2) Unknown occurrence (NUTS2)
2011          
2012          
2013          
2014          
2015          
2016          
2017          
2018          
2019  0,0  5,7  18,1  98,3  40,7
2020  0,0  5,4  28,8  98,1  38,5
2021          
18.4.4. Validation of the coverage

.

18.5. Data compilation

Not applicable.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top