Packaging waste by waste management operations (env_waspac)

National Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

1.5. Contact mail address

Producer Responsibility Team

Seacole Building

1 Marsham St 

London

SW1P 4DF


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

22 October 2024

2.2. Metadata last posted

22 October 2024

2.3. Metadata last update

22 October 2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Northern Ireland reports in accordance with the new calculation rules.

The derogation to make use of average loss rates has not been applied.

3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection

Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks.

Name  Description of key responsibilities
Environment Agency  Regulator
Scottish Environmental Protection Agency  Regulator
Natural Reources Wales  Regulator
Northern Ireland Environment Agency  Regulator
Accredited exporters and reprocessors  Submission of data regarding tonnages of material recycled/exported                       
Producers  Submission of data regarding tonnages of packaging handled
Compliance Schemes   Management, validation and submission of member data to the Regulators                       
Defra  Government Dept
3.2. Classification system

RD codes from Directive 2008/98/EC.

3.2.1. Classification of treatment operations

RD codes from Directive 2008/98/EC.                              

3.3. Coverage - sector

Not clear what is being asked for.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Northern Ireland does wish to take into account the amount of wooden packaging that is repaired for reuse in the calculation of the targets laid down in point (f), point (g) (ii), point (h) and point (i) (ii) of Article 6(1) of Directive 94/62/EC.

Northern Ireland wishes to take into account the amount of metals in incineration bottom ash (IBA) for the calculation of the targets.

3.4.1. Types of reuse system in place for each material type

Pallets - wood.

3.4.2. Other recovery of waste

Other recovery’ of waste - not available.

100% of energy recovery is from R1 incinerators.

3.4.3. Information on temporary storage of packaging waste

The UK does not routinely collect this data, as storgare requirements fall under a separate set of Regulations.

Under the provisions within the Regulations operators are permitted to store packaging waste prior to recycling, but it is only eligible to be counted against targets for the year in which it was received. The conditions and criteria for storage will be site specific and linked to the reprocessor/exporter accreditation.

The regulators seek to ensure that only eligible packaging waste is counted as part of their audit and inspection regime.                                     

3.5. Statistical unit

Waste producer.

3.6. Statistical population

All waste producers’ companies.

3.7. Reference area

Northern Ireland.

3.8. Coverage - Time

1 year.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Tonnes.


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Directive 94/62/EC sets out the EU’s rules on managing packaging and packaging waste ( Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste).

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Institutional Mandate - data sharing :  Statistics on packaging and packaging waste are in accordance with the Commission Decision 2005/270/EC.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

All data are aggregated before being published.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Not applicable.

8.2. Release calendar access

Not applicable.

8.3. Release policy - user access

Not applicable.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Not applicable.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Please find the information at these websites:

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Please find information at this website (Environment agency).

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not applicable.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not applicable.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

No documentation apart from metadata.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

No documentation available.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

No QA procedure.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

No Quality management assessment.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Eurostat, other users.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Not available.

12.3. Completeness

Data are complete.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

The main issue is the proportion of the market that is not required to report the amount of packaging handled, due to the de minimis for small businesses in the UK regulations. This requires research to calculate the total packaging POM, taking into account the non-reported fraction.    

The UK has a voluntary system for accreditation of packaging waste reprocessors and exporters. Due to the financial advantage of accedtiation (the ability to sell evidence of recycling), it is assumed that the majority of operators are captured in the system and report data though there is not total coverage. However, it is likley that there is an amount of recycling (and exporting) for which data is not captured.                               

The data for Northern Ireland is based on the agreed methodology for calculating the packaging on that market.                                  

13.1.1. Statistical surveys used regarding packaging waste generation and treatment

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.

 

Component of packaging waste Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
All types of packaging placed on the market  2022-30  tonnes  100%  Not available  95%  <5%  We have adusted PoM data based on the latest research  Not available

The latest PackFlow report will be published later in 2024.

13.1.2. Statistical surveys used regarding reusable packaging

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.

 

Packaging material Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
13.2. Sampling error

Standard <5%.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Inconsistencies occur, as even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers and can therefore not be disaggregated.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

T+ 18 months.

14.2. Punctuality

Data delivered to Eurostat before 01.07.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

There have been no changes to method for calculation. Any changes result from updates in the data.                                  

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

Not applicable.

15.4.1. Explanation for any component with a greater than 10 % variation

Explanation detailing the causes of the tonnage difference (in relation to which waste streams, sectors or estimates have caused the difference, and what the underlying cause is) for any component of packaging waste generated and recycled which shows greater than a 10 % variation from the data submitted for the previous data year.

Material Variation (%) Main reason for variation
 Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable


16. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Northern Ireland did not correct backwards data series.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Details can be found - National Packaging Waste Database (environment-agency.gov.uk).

18.1.1. Waste samples from waste analysis

The waste samples for waste analysis are taken from:

 

Approach Details about the flows of waste covered
Directly from the bin  Not applicable
From the waste trucks  Not applicable
Other approaches  Not applicable
18.1.2. Source of waste flow data for estimation
  Sources Materials covered
Waste collectors  Not applicable All
Waste treatment operators  Not applicable All 
Municipalities  Not applicable All
Others  Not applicable All
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Data is reported by producers annually.

data is reported by reprocessors and exporters quartly.

18.3. Data collection

Data is provided by producers, reproessors and exporters.

18.3.1. Description of the methodology and verification of data on packaging waste generated in case waste analysis is used

The data for NI is calculated using the agreed methodolgy, based on size of the NI market.

18.3.2. Description of the methodology to report on composite packaging

All composites, where it is not possible for the materials to be easliy separated, are reported under the majority material.                                     

18.3.3. Description of methods for determining packaging waste treatment
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Data collection methods
Administrative reporting No No  No No  No  No  No  No
Surveys No No No  No No  No  No  Yes
Electronic registry No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 
Waste analysis No  No No Yes No  No  Yes Yes
Data from waste operators No  Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 
Data from municipalities No  No  No No  No  No  No  No 
Data from extended producer responsibility schemes No  Yes Yes Yes Yes es Yes No
Other No No  No  No  No  No  No  No 

 

Additional information about the methodology, including the combination of methods used:

The UK has adopted a position of counting the recovery and recycling at the point packaging waste enters a UK recovery or recycling facility or at the point of no return for exported packaging waste destined for recovery/recycling outside of the UK. Reprocessors and exporters submit reprocessing logs via an online portal (NPWD) this automatically uploads the data onto the quarterly returns on NPWD which they then have to submit to the relevant agency by the above deadlines.
The data provided on a quarterly basis is the amount of packaging waste received or exported for recovery/recycling, split across the type of packaging material i.e. paper, plastic, wood etc.

Submitted data is checked as part of a desk based assessment and is also audited as part of site based inspection. During a site visit the EA t have recorded the heycorrect tonnages of packaging material by cross checking with other information, including waste transfer notes, weighbridge tickets, delivery notes, commercial contracts, financial payments, export documentation and their own internal recording systems which records each transaction.

18.3.4. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on the generation and treatment of packaging waste

Method statements can be found in each of the packaging flow reports (see links in SUB-conceptS of 10).

These are being reviewed and will be updated in 2023.                                       

18.3.5. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on reusable packaging

The data for Northern Ireland is based on the agreed methodology for calculating the packaging on the NI market.                                       

18.3.6. Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash

Calculation of recycling of metals from incinerator bottom ash : Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash in accordance with the Commission Implementing Act adopted in accordance with Article 37(7) of Directive 2008/98/EC.

 

Data Description of the measurement method to obtain the data
Total amount of metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash An agreed percentage of aluminium packaging waste that is contained in the non-ferrous element extracted from incinerator bottom ash (IBA) has been agreed with the relevant material organisaiton, based on compositional analysis.                        
Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken Aluminium evidence can be issued on 70% of the non-ferrous metal recovered from IBA.                        
Proportion of waste entering incineration plants that is packaging waste, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken Data not collected                         
18.4. Data validation

For PoM data, this is cross checked with inductry production data, sales data and data on waste collection from municipal sources.

18.4.1. Detailed description of the system for quality control and traceability for packaging waste pursuant to Article 6a(3) and (8) of Directive 94/62/EC

Any exporter who wishes to issues Packaging Waste Export Recycling Notes (PERNs) is required to seek accreditation by the relevant regulator. The accrediation process requires each exporter to demonstrate how it will comply with the broadly equivalent requirements (by providing details of the final destination sites for any related exports) and compliance with any relevant regulations for waste export - Please find more information at this website (Accreditation).

18.4.2. Traceability of waste treated outside the member State and ensuring its treatment in conditions broadly equivalent to the requirements of EU environmental law
Packaging waste material Subject to final treatment in the Member State (yes/no) Shipped to another EU Member State (yes/no) Exported outside the EU (yes/no) Description of specific measures for quality control and traceability of packaging waste, in particularly as regards monitoring and validation of data
Plastic  Yes  Yes  Yes  Exporters and reprocessors are required to accredit with the relevant Competent Authority, providing details of their operation and submitting quarterly data on packaging waste received and reprocessed.
Wood  Yes  No  No  Exporters and reprocessors are required to accredit with the relevant Competent Authority, providing details of their operation and submitting quarterly data on packaging waste received and reprocessed.
Ferrous metals  Yes  Yes  Yes  Exporters and reprocessors are required to accredit with the relevant Competent Authority, providing details of their operation and submitting quarterly data on packaging waste received and reprocessed.
Aluminium  Yes  Yes  Yes  Exporters and reprocessors are required to accredit with the relevant Competent Authority, providing details of their operation and submitting quarterly data on packaging waste received and reprocessed.
Glass  Yes  Yes  No  Exporters and reprocessors are required to accredit with the relevant Competent Authority, providing details of their operation and submitting quarterly data on packaging waste received and reprocessed.
Paper and cardboard  Yes  Yes Yes   Exporters and reprocessors are required to accredit with the relevant Competent Authority, providing details of their operation and submitting quarterly data on packaging waste received and reprocessed.
Others  n/a  n/a  n/a  Exporters and reprocessors are required to accredit with the relevant Competent Authority, providing details of their operation and submitting quarterly data on packaging waste received and reprocessed.
18.4.3. Description of measures to ensure broadly equivalent waste treatment

Any exporter who wishes to issue Packaging Waste Export Recycling Notes (PERNs) is required to seek accreditation by the relevant regulator. The accrediation process requires each exporter to demonstrate how it will comply with the broadly equivalent requirements (by providing details of the final destination sites for any related exports) and compliance with any relevant regulations for waste export - Please find more information at this website (Accreditation).                                     

18.4.4. Verification of data on packaging waste generated

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic  Yes No   Yes Data from packaging producers is verified at the annual registration stage by the EA through desk top monitoring. The legal requirement is for the submitted data to be as accurate as reasonably possible. The EA assesses the submitted information and data from all (around 6,000) registered producers, including comparing data submissions with those from previous years to determine trend deviations. Where errors and anomalies are identified from the desk based activity these are followed up with individual producers and their representatives.

Using a risk-based approach the EA also undertakes site based inspections of:
 • packaging producers
• compliance schemes
Checks include:
• Detailed examination of methodology for gathering packaging data. This includes upstream checks on the supply of packaging and the associated data, 
Wood  Yes  No  Yes  Data from packaging producers is verified at the annual registration stage by the EA through desk top monitoring. The legal requirement is for the submitted data to be as accurate as reasonably possible. The EA assesses the submitted information and data from all (around 6,000) registered producers, including comparing data submissions with those from previous years to determine trend deviations. Where errors and anomalies are identified from the desk based activity these are followed up with individual producers and their representatives.

Using a risk-based approach the EA also undertakes site based inspections of:
 • packaging producers
• compliance schemes
Checks include:
• Detailed examination of methodology for gathering packaging data. This includes upstream checks on the supply of packaging and the associated data,
Ferrous metals  Yes  No  Yes  Data from packaging producers is verified at the annual registration stage by the EA through desk top monitoring. The legal requirement is for the submitted data to be as accurate as reasonably possible. The EA assesses the submitted information and data from all (around 6,000) registered producers, including comparing data submissions with those from previous years to determine trend deviations. Where errors and anomalies are identified from the desk based activity these are followed up with individual producers and their representatives.

Using a risk-based approach the EA also undertakes site based inspections of:
 • packaging producers
• compliance schemes
Checks include:
• Detailed examination of methodology for gathering packaging data. This includes upstream checks on the supply of packaging and the associated data,
Aluminium  Yes  No Yes   Data from packaging producers is verified at the annual registration stage by the EA through desk top monitoring. The legal requirement is for the submitted data to be as accurate as reasonably possible. The EA assesses the submitted information and data from all (around 6,000) registered producers, including comparing data submissions with those from previous years to determine trend deviations. Where errors and anomalies are identified from the desk based activity these are followed up with individual producers and their representatives.

Using a risk-based approach the EA also undertakes site based inspections of:
 • packaging producers
• compliance schemes
Checks include:
• Detailed examination of methodology for gathering packaging data. This includes upstream checks on the supply of packaging and the associated data,
Glass  Yes  No  Yes  Data from packaging producers is verified at the annual registration stage by the EA through desk top monitoring. The legal requirement is for the submitted data to be as accurate as reasonably possible. The EA assesses the submitted information and data from all (around 6,000) registered producers, including comparing data submissions with those from previous years to determine trend deviations. Where errors and anomalies are identified from the desk based activity these are followed up with individual producers and their representatives.

Using a risk-based approach the EA also undertakes site based inspections of:
 • packaging producers
• compliance schemes
Checks include:
• Detailed examination of methodology for gathering packaging data. This includes upstream checks on the supply of packaging and the associated data,
Paper and cardboard  Yes  No  Yes  Data from packaging producers is verified at the annual registration stage by the EA through desk top monitoring. The legal requirement is for the submitted data to be as accurate as reasonably possible. The EA assesses the submitted information and data from all (around 6,000) registered producers, including comparing data submissions with those from previous years to determine trend deviations. Where errors and anomalies are identified from the desk based activity these are followed up with individual producers and their representatives.

Using a risk-based approach the EA also undertakes site based inspections of:
 • packaging producers
• compliance schemes
Checks include:
• Detailed examination of methodology for gathering packaging data. This includes upstream checks on the supply of packaging and the associated data,
Others Yes  No  Yes   Data from packaging producers is verified at the annual registration stage by the EA through desk top monitoring. The legal requirement is for the submitted data to be as accurate as reasonably possible. The EA assesses the submitted information and data from all (around 6,000) registered producers, including comparing data submissions with those from previous years to determine trend deviations. Where errors and anomalies are identified from the desk based activity these are followed up with individual producers and their representatives.

Using a risk-based approach the EA also undertakes site based inspections of:
 • packaging producers
• compliance schemes
Checks include:
• Detailed examination of methodology for gathering packaging data. This includes upstream checks on the supply of packaging and the associated data,
18.4.5. Verification of data on packaging waste recycling

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic No  No Yes  • Operators who are accredited reprocessors and accredited exporters are raising and issuing the evidence correctly.    
Wood No  No  Yes • Operators are consistent when gathering and supplying evidence of recovering and recycling UK waste packaging.
Ferrous metals No  No  Yes Not available.
Aluminium No  No  Yes To check compliance we undertake compliance monitoring on a risk based system.  Compliance monitoring includes desk top monitoring, announced and unannounced visits.    
Mixed waste No  No  Yes Not available.
Others No  No Yes Not available.
18.5. Data compilation

Not clear what is being asked for.

18.5.1. Methods for determining packaging waste generation
Approach % of waste generated based on this approach
Approach 1
Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR data, complemented with estimates to ensure full coverage of the EPR data
 100
Approach 2
POM based on sources other than EPR (e.g. based on production and import statistics and factors to estimate the amount of packaging associated to these product flows)
Not applicable 
Approach 3
Waste analysis
Not applicable  
Other approaches Not applicable  
18.5.1.1. Approach 1 - Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
EPR scheme data 80 80  80  80  80  80  80  80  No 
Administrative reporting different from EPR No  No  No  No  No  No No  No  No 
Surveys 20 20  20  20  20  20  20  20   
Electronic registry No  No No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Other No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered 

18.5.1.2. Approach 2 - Put on the market (POM) calculated from production and reign trade statistics and using coefficients of packaging for the sold goods in question

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Production statistics Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Foreign trade statistics Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Specific surveys Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Electronic registry Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Other Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered

18.5.1.3. Approach 3 - Waste analysis

Packaging waste generated estimated by waste analysis.

 

Type of waste Number of samples taken Total volume or weight of samples taken What proportion does the sample represent of the total waste generated
(in %)
Frequency of sample
Volume in cubic metres Weight in tonnes
Mixed household and similar waste  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
Separately collected municipal waste  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
Separately collected business waste  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
Others  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
18.5.2. Information on estimates for packaging placed on the market

All methodologies are described in the associated reports on material flows (e.g Packflow-covid-19-reports) funded by Defra and co-written by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP, environmental charity) and Valpak (Environment Consultancy). A Steering group of key stakeholders for each packaging material was consulted to review the research and guide the choice of methodology and data sources. All data used in these reports was deemed reliable, robust and the best available. Accordingly, the estimates of packaging  are as accurate and robust as possible notwithstanding the data limitations. The report quantified UK POM for each material was compiled using a large range of data sources, and developed scenarios for later years based on assumptions of future changes in espected production and sales.

18.5.3. Presence and calculation of estimates and indication of added volume in % of the total
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Validation
Corrections for underreporting of units covered by the above sources No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Estimates for units below the threshold (de minimis) Yes  Yes Yes  Yes Yes  Yes Yes  Yes
Estimates for other units legally exempt from reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Estimates for freeriders Yes Yes Yes Yes  Yes Yes  Yes Yes
Private imports /exports by private parcels No No No  No  No  Yes 0.1% No  No 
Private imports /exports (from journeys) No No No No No No No No
Internet imports and exports i.e. on-line sales No No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Other corrections  Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated. Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated. Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated. Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated. Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated.  Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated  Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated. Even if free-riders contribution to POM is accounted for, it is usually estimated as part of the total proportion of POM not arising from obligated producers, and can therefore not be disaggregated.
18.5.4. Measurement points for recycling applied

Packaging waste material

Description of measurement points used (at calculation point or at the output of sorting operation with subtraction of non-target materials as appropriate, end-of-waste criteria, etc.), including variation at regional and local level

Plastic For operators, guidance is on GOV.UK and there is a section on issuing evidence and standard operating practices which provides a table of material and the point of accreditation.                   
Wood Packaging waste apply to be an accredited reprocessor or exporter - Packaging-waste.
Ferrous metals For operators, guidance is on GOV.UK and there is a section on issuing evidence and standard operating practices which provides a table of material and the point of accreditation.                   
Aluminium Packaging waste apply to be an accredited reprocessor or exporter - Packaging-waste.
Glass For operators, guidance is on GOV.UK and there is a section on issuing evidence and standard operating practices which provides a table of material and the point of accreditation.                   
Paper and cardboard Packaging waste apply to be an accredited reprocessor or exporter - Packaging-waste.
Others

Not available.

18.5.4.1. Detailed description of the methodology to calculate the amount of non-target materials removed between the measurement and the calculation points, where applicable

This is not applicable to the UK system: it is not based on the initial weight collected. The measurement point, which is the same as the point for the issue of evidence of recycing is the point at which no further processing is needed for the material to enter the final reprocessing activity (i.e. 'front of furnace').                                           

18.5.4.2. Detailed description of how compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants has been identified and recorded in the data

details of the quality protocol for compost can be found here.

Organic recycling (R3):

18.5.5. Methodology to determine recycled amounts from composite packaging or packaging composed of multiple materials

Composite materials are counted as part of the majority material, where it is not possible to easily separate.       

18.5.6. Use of Average Loss rates (ALRS)

Description of the sorted packaging waste to which ALRs are applied, types of sorting plants to which different ALRs apply, the methodological approach to calculating ALRs at such point(s), including the statistical accuracy of any surveys used, or the nature of any technical specifications.

     

Sorted waste material and sorting plant type ALR applied (in %) Description
 All Not applicable UK has adopted a position of counting the recovery and recycling at the point packaging waste enters a UK recovery or recycling facility or at the point of no return for exported packaging waste destined for recovery/recycling outside of the UK. The EA has a permitting arrangement which requires those who wish to be a part of the packaging recovery and recycling system to apply for an annual ‘permit’, this enables the EA to continually assess and ensure the accuracy of the data used to count the recovery and recycling of packaging waste.        
18.6. Adjustment

Limited information available. See sections below.

18.6.1. Adjustment for impurities and humidity
Factors Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Correction factors for impurities and humidity in % of waste Not available   Not available   Not available    Not available  Not available   Not available   Not available   Not available  
How the correction factors are derived Not available 
If no correction of impurities and humidity is applied, how they are accounted Not available 
18.6.2. Attribution of waste to packaging and non-packaging types and correction for humidity

Description, where applicable, of the methodology to exclude non-packaging waste from the reported amount of recycled packaging waste and of the methodology to correct the amount of packaging waste at the measurement point in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging (including by using relevant European standards). Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of packaging waste (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 All  Not available  Not available  UK relies on a position whereby operators can count the recycling tonnage inclusive of inherent (natural/background) moisture content but not excess moisture. Some of the protocols (eg EN643) specify a moisture content.             
18.6.3. Attribution of waste

Description of the methodology to exclude waste originating from other countries, where applicable. Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of waste from the Member State (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 All Not available  Not available  The regulators do not routinely collect this information. However, as part of the permit requirement on reprocessors & exporters the regulators require a sampling and inspection plan (S&I plan), which is required to set out the processes that will be followed to ensure and packaging waste counted, and has evidence issued against it, is packaging waste that it has arisen in the UK. The regulators also undertake site audits of reprocessors and exporters which includes supplier checks to validate principally three things, the waste supplied is packaging, the supplied tonnages are accurate, the packaging waste has arisen in the UK.            


19. Comment Top

No comments.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top