Packaging waste by waste management operations (env_waspac)

National Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Icelandic Environment and Energy Agency


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Icelandic Environment and Energy Agency

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Circular Economy Unit

1.5. Contact mail address

Suðurlandsbraut 24

108 Reykjavik

Iceland


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

26 June 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

26 June 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

26 June 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

We are reporting in accordance with new calculation rules. 

The derogation to make use of average loss rates has not been applied.

3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection

Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks

Name of institution Description of key responsibilities
Icelandic Recycling Fund For the reporting year, the fund covers plastic, paper, wood, metal and glass packaging. Thus information about generated waste is recieved from the fund.
Waste operators All recycling operators, exporters or other waste operators are legally bound to report all waste treated (or exported) to the EA.
Endurvinnslan ehf.   Legal entity responsible for the Return-Deposit system for beverage packaing.
Icelandic Customs  Waste generated is based on PoM information that the Icelandic Recycling Fund collects from the Icelandic Customs.
3.2. Classification system

The classification system for waste statistics is based on the R/D codes in Annexes I and II of Directive 2008/98/EC.

3.2.1. Classification of treatment operations

The electronic database for waste statistics is based on the R/D codes in Annexes I and II of Directive 2008/98/EC.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The waste statistics in Iceland cover all treated and exported waste from every municipality. 

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

We don't take into account the amount of wooden packaging that is repaired for reuse in the calculation of the targets laid down.

We don't take into account the amount of metals in incineration bottom ash (IBA) for the calculation of the targets.   

3.4.1. Types of reuse system in place for each material type

Details on the types of reuse system in place for each main material type are not available.

3.4.2. Other recovery of waste
  • 182 tons (1,8%) of glass packaging are used as backfilling material. 
  • 772 tons (5,8%) of wooden packaging are used as backfilling material. 
3.4.3. Information on temporary storage of packaging waste

Not applicable.

3.5. Statistical unit

The waste statistics is gathered for Iceland and the Icelandic government by the EA, and is compiled for all municipalities and residents in Iceland. 

3.6. Statistical population

All municipalities and household in Iceland.

3.7. Reference area

Iceland.

3.8. Coverage - Time

The newest data is from 2023, and there is relatively good waste data from 2015 and onwords. But there exists limited data on waste statistics back to the year 1995 for Iceland. 

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Tonnes.


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

Municipalities and waste actors are legally required to turn in data regarding all waste treatment to the Icelandic EA, and the EA are required to collect, process and disseminate the statistics. 

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Icelandice EA shares waste statistics to all Iceland with an online website. 


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Iceland gives permission to disseminate the information contained in this quality report.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Iceland gives permission to disseminate the information contained in this quality report.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The release date has not been fixed for the past years, but it has usually been between 14-17 months after the end of the published calendar year. This is something we would like to improve in the next years. 

8.2. Release calendar access

There is no release calendar. 

8.3. Release policy - user access

The Icelandic EA is required to disseminate the data according to international agreements. 


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

The statistics are disseminated on a yearly basis.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

News regarding waste and waste statistics are published at this website (Fréttir | Úrgangur.is | Umhverfisstofnun (urgangur.is)).

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

The publication news is published at this website (Fréttir | Úrgangur.is | Umhverfisstofnun (urgangur.is)).

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Please find information at this website (Maelabord).

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Microdata is availabe at this website (Mælaborð | Úrgangur.is | Umhverfisstofnun (urgangur.is)).

10.5. Dissemination format - other
10.6. Documentation on methodology

Waste data is published and publicly available on this website (Mælaborð | Úrgangur.is | Umhverfisstofnun (urgangur.is)).

A news article is published on this platform

10.7. Quality management - documentation

There is no documentation on quality management/assessment for the dissemination format of the waste data. 


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

There is an automatic error check tool in the web tool where waste actors turn in their data to the Icelandic EA.

Yearly quality check on waste export, where the EA compares data with data from Icelandic Revenue and Customs. 

Manual checks performed by EA when they receive data from waste actors. 

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Overall our data is okay. The data we get is good but we are lacking more accurate data and more data in general from the waste actors. 


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Municipalities - need to see how they perform regarding treatment and collection of waste.

The public - general curiosity and enquiries.

The Icelandic government - set the requirements and need to know how Iceland performs regarding achieving a circular economy. The data also provides assistance in identifying where and how to take action regarding waste, and which regulations to set to achive set recycling goals.

The Icelandic EA - the data provides assistance in identifying where and how to take action regarding waste, and which areas need to be improved.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

There are no official measures to measure user satisfaction. 

12.3. Completeness

The statistics are limited to the data that is requested to be turned in by waste actors. 


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Generated waste is not completely accurate, as Icelandic Customs use a model to estimate the amount. 

Reusable packaging are placed on market, used and become waste, and there are some methods to estimate the reusability. 

13.1.1. Statistical surveys used regarding packaging waste generation and treatment

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.

 

Component of packaging waste Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 Not applicable  Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable  Surveys are not used for generation and treatment of packaging waste.
13.1.2. Statistical surveys used regarding reusable packaging

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.

 

Packaging material Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
  Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable Surveys are not used for reusable packaging.
13.2. Sampling error

Not applicable. 

13.3. Non-sampling error

Under responsibility of reporting enterprises.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

14-17 months (looking at previous years) between the data is made available and the time it includes.

The data is published for the calendar year.

14.2. Punctuality

There is no target date when the data should be delivered. 


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

Methodology for calculating generated waste changed slightly, the EPR scheme in Iceland (IFR) now oversees glass, metal and wood packaging, in addition to plastic and paper. Therefore the assessment from the contractor (Niras Logysis) was not required for 2023. This may affect those waste fractions slightly. 

Generated wood packaging waste has been greatly underestimated the past years, due to domestic production not taken into account. The domestic production of wood pallets is quite common, to service the fishing industry. Therefore, the value for generated and recycled wood waste increased significantly. 

No corrections made for recycling on plastic and paper packaging based on data from the IRF, as the reported data by waste actors to the Icelandic EA was deemed more accurate. 

Different calculation method for total amount of recycled ferrous. metal packaging waste and aluminium packaging waste. Now the calculation for the amount of recycled ferrous metal and aluminium is based on the proportion of how much of each type is placed on the market, as there is no breakdown of reported treated metal packaging.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

The data is made coherent to some extent with other data sources (like IRF and Customs) by manually adjusting the data. 

15.4. Coherence - internal

The waste data is made sure to be consistent with all the quality checks in place. 

15.4.1. Explanation for any component with a greater than 10 % variation

Explanation detailing the causes of the tonnage difference (in relation to which waste streams, sectors or estimates have caused the difference, and what the underlying cause is) for any component of packaging waste generated and recycled which shows greater than a 10 % variation from the data submitted for the previous data year.

Material Variation (%) Main reason for variation
Generated wood packaging waste 478% Domestic production of wood pallets was not taken into account for previous years.
Generated metal packaging waste 13%

Slight increase due to data coming from the IRF and not Niras (contractor).

Due to small amounts the tonnage difference for this material can cause a variation greater than 10%, but the real difference is not that big. 

Generated aluminium packaging waste 17%

Slight increase due to data coming from the IRF and not Niras (contractor).

Due to small amounts the tonnage difference for this material can cause a variation greater than 10%, but the real difference is not that big. 

Generated paper packaging waste -14%

Underestimation of generated packaging waste, as the calculation method for imported paper packaging by the IRF did not take transportation packaging into account when their was no sales packaging.

Recycling in the member state - plastic 117%

 Better recycling operation by the waste actor.

No corrections made according to recycling data from the IRF, as it usually lowered the recycled amount.

Recycling in the member state - wood 1437%

Drastic increase due to the addition of domestic production of wood pallets. 

Recycling in other member states - plastic 62%

No corrections made according to recycling data from the IRF, as it usually lowered the recycled amount.

Recycling in other member states - ferrous metal 355%

New calculation method, based on the proportion of ferrous metal of generated metal packaging waste, and total amount of recycled metal packaging. Previous calcuation were based on wrong calculation points, as much of the data and calculation was assumed. 

Recycling in other member states - aluminium -16%

New calculation method, based on the proportion of aluminium of generated metal packaging waste, and total amount of recycled metal packaging. Previous calcuation were based on wrong calculation points, as much of the data and calculation was assumed. 

Recycling in other member states - glass 100%

Due to the IRF implementing glass into their EPR-schemeon Jan 1st, 2023, almost all glass packaging waste that was backfilled was sent for recycling instead. 

Recycling in other member states - paper 37%

No corrections made according to recycling data from the IRF, as it usually lowered the recycled amount.

Energy recovery - plastic 35%

Due to small amounts the tonnage difference for this material can cause a variation greater than 10%, but the real difference is not that big. 

Other recovery - wood 6333%

For previous years, wood packaging waste that was backfilled was not reported as other recovery. The real difference is not this big, if backfilling is included for previous years.

Other recovery - glass -98%

Glass packaging waste that was backfilled is now recycled due to the IRF implementing glass packaging into their EPR-scheme on Jan 1st, 2023.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

There is no policy.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Some backwards corrections will most likely be made, especially for wood packaging. 

A correction for glass packaging in 2022 has already been made, as the biggest waste actore in Iceland reported the wrong waste fraction under glass packging waste.

The Icelandic EA can send the revised data at some point, but as of now we are not yet ready. We would like to finish any revisions that we deem necessary before sharing the data again. 


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Data reporting from waste management companies through electronic registry, Icelandic Recycling Fund, Icelandic Customs.

18.1.1. Waste samples from waste analysis

The waste samples for waste analysis are taken from:

 

Approach Details about the flows of waste covered
Directly from the bin  We have not taken waste samples 
From the waste trucks  We have not taken waste samples 
Other approaches  We have not taken waste samples 
18.1.2. Source of waste flow data for estimation
  Sources Materials covered
Waste collectors  No Not applicable
Waste treatment operators Yes Final treatment of waste (waste treatment operators are often the same as the collectors)
Municipalities  Yes Final treatment of waste 
Others  No Not applicable
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Yearly.

18.3. Data collection

Waste management companies are required to register their waste treatment through electronic registry before a certain deadline. 

18.3.1. Description of the methodology and verification of data on packaging waste generated in case waste analysis is used

Packaging placed on market for the calendar year, is assumed to become packaging waste the same year. So packaging placed on market is the same as generated packaging waste. 

18.3.2. Description of the methodology to report on composite packaging

We do not report on composite packaging. 

18.3.3. Description of methods for determining packaging waste treatment
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Data collection methods
Administrative reporting No  No  No  No  No   No No  No 
Surveys No  No  No  No  No  No No  No
Electronic registry No  No No  No  No  No  No  No 
Waste analysis No   No No  No  No  No  No  No 
Data from waste operators No  Yes  Yes Yes Yes   Yes Yes No 
Data from municipalities No  No  No  No  No  No   No No 
Data from extended producer responsibility schemes No  Yes  Yes  Yes Yes  Yes  Yes No 
Other No  No  No  No  No  No   No No 

 

Additional information about the methodology, including the combination of methods used:

The Environment Agency has an electronic database which all waste operators are obliged to hand in waste data before the 1st of May each year. This includes waste treated by the operators themselves as well as exported waste. This data is then reviewed with data from the Icelandic Recycling Fund (the EPR system) in categories currently included in the EPR scheme.  

18.3.4. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on the generation and treatment of packaging waste

We do not use surveys to collect data.

18.3.5. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on reusable packaging

We do not use surveys to collect data.

18.3.6. Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash

Calculation of recycling of metals from incinerator bottom ash : Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash in accordance with the Commission Implementing Act adopted in accordance with Article 37(7) of Directive 2008/98/EC.

 

Data Description of the measurement method to obtain the data
Total amount of metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash Not applicable 
Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken Not applicable 
Proportion of waste entering incineration plants that is packaging waste, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken Not applicable  
18.4. Data validation

Data validation involves comparison with the Icelandic Recycling Fund and Icelandic Customs records. Additionally, an automatic error check is performed upon data submission to the Environmental Agency, complemented by a manual data review.

18.4.1. Detailed description of the system for quality control and traceability for packaging waste pursuant to Article 6a(3) and (8) of Directive 94/62/EC

Data validation involves comparison with the Icelandic Recycling Fund and Icelandic Customs records. Additionally, an automatic error check is performed upon data submission to the Environmental Agency, complemented by a manual data review.

18.4.2. Traceability of waste treated outside the member State and ensuring its treatment in conditions broadly equivalent to the requirements of EU environmental law
Packaging waste material Subject to final treatment in the Member State (yes/no) Shipped to another EU Member State (yes/no) Exported outside the EU (yes/no) Description of specific measures for quality control and traceability of packaging waste, in particularly as regards monitoring and validation of data
Plastic Yes Yes  No No specific measures
Wood Yes No No No specific measures 
Ferrous metals No Yes No No specific measures 
Aluminium No Yes No  No specific measures 
Glass No Yes No  No specific measures 
Paper and cardboard No Yes  No  No specific measures 
Others Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable
18.4.3. Description of measures to ensure broadly equivalent waste treatment

Exporters of waste receive a confirmation from the receiver, confirming the waste has been received and the treatment. 

There is no waste exported outside the Union. 

18.4.4. Verification of data on packaging waste generated

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic Yes Yes No 3rd party weighs the amount continually. IRF does sample checkups
Wood  No No  No  Not applicable
Ferrous metals  No No  No  Not applicable
Aluminium  No No  No  Not applicable
Glass No  No  No   Not applicable
Paper and cardboard Yes Yes  No  3rd party weighs the amount continually. IRF does sample checkups 
Others  No No   No  Not applicable
18.4.5. Verification of data on packaging waste recycling

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic No No  No  Not applicable 
Wood No  No  No  Not applicable 
Ferrous metals No  No  No  Not applicable 
Aluminium No  No  No  Not applicable 
Mixed waste No  No  No  Not applicable 
Others No  No  No  Not applicable 
18.5. Data compilation

Packaging placed on marked and generated packaging waste are estimated according to a model by the Icelandic Customs.

No operation is performed on data for treated packaging waste. 

18.5.1. Methods for determining packaging waste generation
Approach % of waste generated based on this approach
Approach 1
Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR data, complemented with estimates to ensure full coverage of the EPR data
 0
Approach 2
POM based on sources other than EPR (e.g. based on production and import statistics and factors to estimate the amount of packaging associated to these product flows)
100% 
Approach 3
Waste analysis
Other approaches: Modelling  0%
18.5.1.1. Approach 1 - Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
EPR scheme data Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Administrative reporting different from EPR Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Surveys Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Electronic registry Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Other Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered 

18.5.1.2. Approach 2 - Put on the market (POM) calculated from production and reign trade statistics and using coefficients of packaging for the sold goods in question

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Production statistics  Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Foreign trade statistics  100%  100% 100% 100% 100%  100%  100%  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Specific surveys Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Electronic registry Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable 
Other Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered

18.5.1.3. Approach 3 - Waste analysis

Packaging waste generated estimated by waste analysis

 

Type of waste Number of samples taken Total volume or weight of samples taken What proportion does the sample represent of the total waste generated
(in %)
Frequency of sample
Volume in cubic metres Weight in tonnes
Mixed household and similar waste Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Separately collected municipal waste Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Separately collected business waste Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Others Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
18.5.2. Information on estimates for packaging placed on the market

Since Iceland is an island, it is relatively easy to cover the whole market, using the Icelandic Customs. Packaging placed on market is estimated with models from the Icelandic Customs.

18.5.3. Presence and calculation of estimates and indication of added volume in % of the total
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Validation
Corrections for underreporting of units covered by the above sources No No No No No No No No
Estimates for units below the threshold (de minimis) No No No No No No No No
Estimates for other units legally exempt from reporting No   No No   No No   No No  No
Estimates for freeriders No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No
Private imports /exports by private parcels No  No  No  No   No No  No  No 
Private imports /exports (from journeys) No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Internet imports and exports i.e. on-line sales No  No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Other corrections No No   No No   No No   No No 

Placed on market is determined by the import of packaging material, minus the export of any packaging material. Production of packaging material in Iceland is added into the equation with a model derived from Iceland Revenue and Customs. 

 

18.5.4. Measurement points for recycling applied

Packaging waste material

Description of measurement points used (at calculation point or at the output of sorting operation with subtraction of non-target materials as appropriate, end-of-waste criteria, etc.), including variation at regional and local level

Plastic The calculation point is at the gate of a local recycling facility (one operator in the country) or when the material is exported to a recycling operator abroad. The data on exports is then verified and corrected with data from the EPR scheme. 
Wood The calculation point is at the gate of a local recycling facility or when the material is exported to a recycling operator abroad.   
Ferrous metals The calculation point is at the border when the material is exported to a recycling operator abroad. 
Aluminium The calculation point is at the border when the material is exported to a recycling operator abroad. 
Glass The calculation point is at the border when the material is exported to a recycling operator abroad.   
Paper and cardboard The calculation point is at the gate of a local recycling facility or when the material is exported to a recycling operator abroad.  The data on exports is then verified and corrected with data from the EPR scheme. 
Others No 
18.5.4.1. Detailed description of the methodology to calculate the amount of non-target materials removed between the measurement and the calculation points, where applicable

This is not calculated.

18.5.4.2. Detailed description of how compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants has been identified and recorded in the data

This is not recorded in the data.

18.5.5. Methodology to determine recycled amounts from composite packaging or packaging composed of multiple materials

Composite materials are not accounted for.

18.5.6. Use of Average Loss rates (ALRS)

Description of the sorted packaging waste to which ALRs are applied, types of sorting plants to which different ALRs apply, the methodological approach to calculating ALRs at such point(s), including the statistical accuracy of any surveys used, or the nature of any technical specifications.

 

Sorted waste material and sorting plant type ALR applied (in %) Description
 All  Not applied  Not applied
18.6. Adjustment

Data on treated waste is adjusted, where applicapable, to conform to datasets from the Icelandic Recycling Fund and Icelandic Customs.

18.6.1. Adjustment for impurities and humidity
Factors Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Correction factors for impurities and humidity in % of waste Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
How the correction factors are derived Not applicable
If no correction of impurities and humidity is applied, how they are accounted They are not counted, our generated waste is equal to packaging placed on market
18.6.2. Attribution of waste to packaging and non-packaging types and correction for humidity

Description, where applicable, of the methodology to exclude non-packaging waste from the reported amount of recycled packaging waste and of the methodology to correct the amount of packaging waste at the measurement point in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging (including by using relevant European standards). Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of packaging waste (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 All  Not available  Not available  Not available
18.6.3. Attribution of waste

Description of the methodology to exclude waste originating from other countries, where applicable. Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of waste from the Member State (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 All  Not available  Not available  Not available


19. Comment Top

No comment.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top