Packaging waste by waste management operations (env_waspac)

National Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Ministry of Energy


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministry of Energy

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department for Specific Waste Streams

1.5. Contact mail address

H-1117 Budapest, Október huszonharmadika u. 18.


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

29 July 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

29 July 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

29 July 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Table 1 figures are reported according to new calculation rules, as it is compulsory from reporting year 2020.

The derogation to make use of the delegated act on average loss rates has not been applied.

3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection

Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks

Name of institution Description of key responsibilities
National Tax and Customs Administration  Responsible for collection of producers environmental product fee (tax) reports (put on the market (consumption))
Environmental protection departments of regional government offices  Responsible for collection of waste management companies reports in National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Waste Management System (HIR) Electronic Waste Management System (EHIR)
Government Office of Pest County National Department for Environmental and Nature Protection and Waste Management Responsible for collection of yearly reports about packaging reuse from producers concerned  
National Coordination of Waste Management and Asset Management Plc. Responsible for collection of yearly collection and treatment data of waste management public service providers 
3.2. Classification system

The packaging and packaging waste data are broken down by waste categories (packaging material) and by treatment operation. The reporting methodology and details on packaging and packaging waste are laid down in Commission Decision 2005/270/EC of 22 March 2005 establishing the formats relating to the database system pursuant to Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. Data displayed in Eurostat's database are broken down by waste categories (waste) and by waste management operations.

Waste categories:

  • Paper and cardboard packaging;
  • plastic packaging;
  • wooden packaging;
  • metallic packaging;
  • glass packaging;
  • other packaging.


Metallic packaging is further split into the categories ferrous metal packaging and aluminium packaging (Table1) and aluminium packaging and steel packaging (Tabl 1a).

Waste management operations:

  • a. Waste generated;
  • b. Recovery (sum of: c, d and e);
  • c. Recovery — energy recovery from packaging waste;
  • d. Recovery — other (other than energy recovery and recycling);
  • e. Recycling (sum of f, g and h);
  • f. Recycling in the Member State;
  • g. Recycling in other Member States of the EU;
  • h. Recycling outside the EU;
  • i. Repair.
3.2.1. Classification of treatment operations

Classification of recycling, other recovery and disposal according to Annex I and II. Separate national codes for pre-treatment processes, for preparing for reuse of organic materials and for composting are in use.

3.3. Coverage - sector

Waste management.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

We would like to take into account of wooden packaging repaired for reuse.

We would like to take into account of ferrous metals from IBA.

3.4.1. Types of reuse system in place for each material type

Reuse system of more producers:

  • Glass: reuse system of certain wineries with standardized bottles for wines;
  • cooperation between breweries reuse system to exchange each others bottles taken-back;
  • Furthermore multiple packaging are reused by several producers, most important:
  • Glass: bottles for certain wines, beers, spirits, fruit sirups and for certain mineral waters and soft drinks in HORECA-sector
  • Plastic: bottles for mineral water, boxes and tanks for different industry usage
  • Metal: beverage kegs for beer, boxes
  • Wood: pallets, also in leasing-system, boxes
3.4.2. Other recovery of waste

No figures reported to other recovery.

43,62% of Energy Recovery that is from R1 incinerators, out of all Energy Recovery reported. Cement kills were not taken into account at all as R1 incinerators, only in sum of energy recovery.

3.4.3. Information on temporary storage of packaging waste

Reported data through electronic registries.

Information on temporary storage: open and closing stock, balance of separate collected packaging wastes at waste collectors in 2023 (sum of all collectors).

kg Open stock Closing stock Balance (stock)
Plastic (EWC 150102, 60% of EWC 200139)

31 932 596

32 451 206

518 610

Wood (EWC 150103)

6 792 853

10 434 097

3 641 244

Metal (EWC 150104) 3 298 653 4 970 993

1 672 340

Glass (EWC150107)

6 142 262

8 961 835

2 819 573

Paper and cardboard (calculated from EWC 150101, 200101, 191201)

35 469 866

33 626 884

-1 842 982

Composite (EWC 150105)

1 140 365

1 814 390

674 025

Others (EWC 150106, 150109, 150110, 150111) 23 935 140 25 187 965 1 252 555
3.5. Statistical unit

Only some smaller data collections are made directly to this statistics.

Data used for this statistics are mostly collected from other reasons and from enterprises (environmental product fee, waste management data, municipal waste analysis).

3.6. Statistical population

Companies putting packaging and packed products on the Hungarian market.

Waste management operators in Hungary.

3.7. Reference area

Hungary.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Year 2023.

3.9. Base period

No base period.


4. Unit of measure Top

Tonnes.


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

European level:

National level:

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Quarterly data transfer of aggregated, anonymised data of environmental product fee declarations from National Tax and Customs Administration to ministry responsible for waste management. 

Statistics on packaging and packaging waste are in accordance with the Commission Decision 2005/270/EC.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality of data collected data or of databases used is guaranteed by the fact, that it is an aggregated country statistics. All data are processed, there is no direct dissemination of data reported by respondents. Furthermore, confidentiality of data submitted by respondents of the few direct data collection is guaranteed by the data collector.

European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

No confidential cells are necessary to use because of the number of respondents. All data are aggregated before being published


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Statistical information is not published on national level, only on the portal of Eurostat.

8.2. Release calendar access

See Eurostat information.

8.3. Release policy - user access

See the release policy of Eurostat.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annualy.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

No national dissemination. For EU-dissemination, see Eurostat's dissemination policy.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

No national dissemination. For EU-dissemination, see Eurostat's dissemination policy.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

For background data used for reporting waste recycling and recovery figures see:

Hungarian National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR): Please find information at this website.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See Eurostat's dissemination policy.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

See Eurostat's dissemination policy.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

No national documentation. For European documentation see Eurostat portal.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

No national quality documentation. For European documentation see Eurostat portal.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

No specific quality management system is used.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

No specific quality management system is used. For POM for the second half-year, two parallel data sources are compared.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

National, regional and international users: 

  • national government;
  • business associations and non-governmental organisations;
  • academia – universities, colleges, schools, research institutes, etc.;
  • media – newspapers, radio and TV stations, magazines, etc.;
  • general public;
  • international organisation.
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

No national user satisfaction surveys are made.

12.3. Completeness

Completeness is according to requirements of EU COM relevant regulations and guidelines.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Material composition of composite packaging recycling is based mainly on composition of POM of composite packaging, which is a hypothesis. 

  1. In yearly POM-reports producers report about reusable packaging put on the market. These figures are for reusable packaging, not for actually reused. Actually reused packaging of producers that register itself at waste management authority is in most cases free from environmental product fee/EPR-fee and do not have to be reported. Therefore the figures for reusable packaging contain actually reused reusable packaging only in certain cases. It is also estimated that some amounts are duplicated, as they are reported by producers which do not take care of whether reusable packaging they put on the market has been already used - and are therefore free from product fee/EPR-fee - or not.
  2. There is a yearly national reporting obligation for producers reusing packaging about reused packaging in Government Regulation 442/2012. (XII. 28.) about packaging and packaging waste management activities. 
13.1.1. Statistical surveys used regarding packaging waste generation and treatment

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.

Component of packaging waste Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
No statistical surveys used   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable
13.1.2. Statistical surveys used regarding reusable packaging

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.

 

Packaging material Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
No statistical surveys used  Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable   Not applicable
13.2. Sampling error

Not appplicable.

13.3. Non-sampling error

There are cases when the sold packaging material will be used for the production of non-packaging products. In some cases, producers do not have this information and report and pay for the packaging material that won't be packaging. To estimate this non-packaging reported as packaging, biggest retail chains were asked to provide data about packaging material sales (mostly directly to end-users) in 2023. Figures were extrapolated using market share (all materials except wood). At wooden packaging, double reporting of product fee/EPR-fee because of unclaimed fee was estimated to 10%. 


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Reporting by Member State 18 Month after reference period. Dissemination by Eurostat usually 6 months after reporting deadline.

14.2. Punctuality

Reporting short before deadline.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

The geographical comparability of Member States's reports is ensured by the application of common definitions as in EU directive 94/62/EC, in Commission Decision 2005/270/EU and in EU Commission Guidance to packaging waste reporting. However, as it is an aggregated report using basically databases based on national data collections, and because of the complexity of the report enables certain diffferencies, certain differencies, such as the used databases are present between member states.

15.2. Comparability - over time

Usage of new calculation rules in Table 1 since reporting year 2020: cross-check with waste analysis. Moving production of wooden chips and pellets from wooden packaging waste for energy production from recycling to energy recovery. Reporting according to old calculation rules in Table 1a.

Reports according to Government Regulation 442/2012. (XII. 28.) (see 13.1. point 2.) about reused wooden packaging could have been integrated into figures, however, data accuracy is far not full.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Basis of waste composition analysis (cross-check) is the mixed muncipal waste generated as reported in yearly municipal waste report.

15.4. Coherence - internal

No inconsistensies.

15.4.1. Explanation for any component with a greater than 10 % variation

Explanation detailing the causes of the tonnage difference (in relation to which waste streams, sectors or estimates have caused the difference, and what the underlying cause is) for any component of packaging waste generated and recycled which shows greater than a 10 % variation from the data submitted for the previous data year.

Material Variation (%) Main reason for variation
wooden packaging waste generation -14,9% Possibly general bad national economy performance.
alauminium packaging waste generation -11,1% Possibly general bad national economy performance.
other packaging waste generation 27,3% At small amounts even change in the performance of some actors can lead to significant changes in overall figures.
plastic packaging waste recycling -23,1% Decrease partly parallel to waste generation decrease, partly because of start of new, concession-based EPR at 1st July 2023.
wooden packaging waste recycling 30,7% 2022 data was unusually low. 
ferrous metal packaging waste recycling -12,8% Decrease partly parallel to waste generation decrease. Partly becuase of change in estimation base.
aluminium packaging waste recycling -46,1% Decrease partly parallel to waste generation decrease. Partly becuase of change in estimation base.
glass packaging waste recycling -27,5% Decrease partly parallel to waste generation decrease, partly because of start of new, concession-based EPR at 1st July 2023.
other packaging waste recycling -92,5% There were no such waste recycling at all in 2023. 
repair of wooden packaging  -31,9% Decrease partly parallel to waste generation decrease, partly possibly because of overall bad national economy performance.
energy recovery of plastic packaging waste -20,1% Both incineration of RDF from mixed municipal waste as well as from mixed municipal packaging waste were significant lower than in 2022. These may have been at least partly because of decrease in waste generation.
energy recovery of paper packaging waste -33,6% Both incineration of RDF from mixed municipal waste as well as from mixed municipal packaging waste were significant lower than in 2022. These may have been at least partly because of decrease in waste generation.

All figures are based on reports of producers and recyclers.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Data revision is connected to:

  • check of report by Eurostat and it's contractor;
  • plastic own resource EU Commission visit.
17.2. Data revision - practice

No backwards correction.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data
  • Environmental product fee declaration data.
  • National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management System (EHIR).
  • Nationwide analysis of mixed, mixed separate collected and bulky municipal waste (2022-2023).
  • Paper waste analysis data of paper mill Hamburger Hungária Ltd.
  • Packaging material sales figures of biggest FCMG retailers.
  • Reports of producers according to Government Decree 442/2014. on packaging reuse.
  • Declarations of energy recovery of RDF/SRF produced by public service providers from mixed municipal waste and separate collected waste residues.
18.1.1. Waste samples from waste analysis

The waste samples for waste analysis are taken from:

 

Approach Details about the flows of waste covered
Directly from the bin No
From the waste trucks Yes: mixed household waste; mixed, separately collected municipal waste (typically EWC 150106); mixed municipal waste from litter cleanup; separately collected bulky municipal waste; 
Other approaches  No
18.1.2. Source of waste flow data for estimation
  Sources Materials covered
Waste collectors National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR) Collected municipal waste by all collectors
Waste treatment operators National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR). Analysis figures for paper and cardboard waste for recycling  Exact sorting results of all sorted EWC 15 01 to diverse EWCs 
Municipalities  Not applicable  Not applicable
Others  Not applicable  Not applicable
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Year.

18.3. Data collection

Data.

18.3.1. Description of the methodology and verification of data on packaging waste generated in case waste analysis is used

Nationwide analysis of mixed, mixed separate collected and bulky municipal waste was carried out in 2022-2023, these figures were used.
No analysis, but exact sorting results of all sorted EWC 15 01 to diverse EWCs were used. Analysis of paper and cardboard waste for recycling was carried out by the country's only one paper mill.

18.3.2. Description of the methodology to report on composite packaging

Composite material were reported according to material paper, glass, metals, plastics and others (Table1). PoM was reported by producers separately in packaging material codes (80-99) as in Commision Decision 97/129/EK. Material composition in each code was estimated. No less estimations than 5%.

18.3.3. Description of methods for determining packaging waste treatment
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Data collection methods
Administrative reporting No  Yes  Yes  No  No Yes Yes  Yes
Surveys No   No No  No  Yes   No No No 
Electronic registry No No  No  No  No  No  No   No
Waste analysis No  Yes  No  No  No  No  Yes  No 
Data from waste operators No  Yes  No  No  No  No Yes No 
Data from municipalities No  No  No  No  No No   No No 
Data from extended producer responsibility schemes  Yes No  No  No   No No  No   Yes
Other No  No  No   calculated from recycling rate of former years and from data for waste generated  calculated from recycling rate of former years and from data for waste generated   No  No  No 

 

Additional information about the methodology, including the combination of methods used:

 

National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Information System (EHIR): Please find information at this website.

18.3.4. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on the generation and treatment of packaging waste

Biggest retail chains for fast moving consumer goods were reported about sales of certain packaging materials to end-users for corrections of PoM. Packaging material sold to private households for private aims (such as glasses for preservation and storage in kitchen, aluminium foil for household use, etc.) are not considered as packaging.

18.3.5. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on reusable packaging

No surveys used.

 

18.3.6. Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash

Calculation of recycling of metals from incinerator bottom ash : Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash in accordance with the Commission Implementing Act adopted in accordance with Article 37(7) of Directive 2008/98/EC.

 

Data Description of the measurement method to obtain the data
Total amount of metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash  The metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash is the amount of EWC 19 01 02 that was handed over for recycling by waste incinerators. This data comes from National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Information System (EHIR).
Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken  Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate was calculated from the declaration of a pre-treatment facility, where the output amounts of the IBA pre-treatment was known (EWC 19 01 12 and EWC 19 10 01). The declaration data comes from National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Information System (EHIR).
Proportion of waste entering incineration plants that is packaging waste, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken

The calculation method to obtain the data depends on the kind of incineration plant:
1) WtE plant (currently one plant is in operation in Hungary)
2) hazardous waste incinerators
In the case of the WtE plant, no metal-containing IBA was transferred to a pre-treatment facility in 2023.

For hazardous waste incinerators, we have selected waste categories that either contain mainly metals or may contain packaging scrap. From these, those containing packaging metal waste were selected and the input theoretical packaging waste content was determined by multiplying the calculated packaging metal content by the packaging metal content ratio based on the results of the pre-treatments reported in the OKIR database with the same EWC. This theoretical input packaging metal waste content was divided by the mass of all selected metal-containing incinerated hazardous waste to obtain the estimated packaging-derived metal content IBA (currently no more accurate data are available for this approximation, however, we consider this to be an underestimate of the packaging content, so it is highly likely that this is certainly the amount that can be found in the IBA from hazardous waste incinerators.

The domestic and export ratio was calculated in the same way for WtE and hazardous waste incinerators. Taking into account that typically after pre-treatment the EWC of IBA iron concentrate changes and is mixed with iron waste from other sources, the domestic-export ratio was calculated for the total amount transferred by the pre-treater under the changed EWC.

18.4. Data validation

See 18.4.1-18.4.5.

18.4.1. Detailed description of the system for quality control and traceability for packaging waste pursuant to Article 6a(3) and (8) of Directive 94/62/EC

Control-mechanism of packaging EPR via National Tax and Customs Authority. Itemized inspection of collection and recycling at Ministry of Energy (state PRO).

18.4.2. Traceability of waste treated outside the member State and ensuring its treatment in conditions broadly equivalent to the requirements of EU environmental law
Packaging waste material Subject to final treatment in the Member State (yes/no) Shipped to another EU Member State (yes/no) Exported outside the EU (yes/no) Description of specific measures for quality control and traceability of packaging waste, in particularly as regards monitoring and validation of data
Plastic yes yes yes Following three data sources are used and compared: 
  • exports reported by waste collectors into National Environmental Information System (OKIR) as part of yearly collectors reporting
  • exports reported according to Regulation (EC) 1013/2006
  • exports reported in EPR-System
Wood yes  yes  yes  Following three data sources are used and compared: 
  • exports reported by waste collectors into National Environmental Information System (OKIR) as part of yearly collectors reporting
  • exports reported according to Regulation (EC) 1013/2006
  • exports reported in EPR-System
Ferrous metals        exports reported according to Regulation (EC) 1013/2006
Aluminium        exports reported according to Regulation (EC) 1013/2006
Glass yes  yes yes  Following three data sources are used and compared: 
  • exports reported by waste collectors into National Environmental Information System as part fo yearly collectors reporting
  • exports reported according to Regulation (EC) 1013/2006
  • exports reported in EPR-System
Paper and cardboard yes  yes yes

Following three data sources are used and compared:

  • exports reported by waste collectors into National Environmental Information System as part fo yearly collectors reporting
  • exports reported according to Regulation (EC) 1013/2006
  • exports reported in EPR-System
 
Others yes   yes yes Following three data sources are used and compared: 
  • exports reported by waste collectors into National Environmental Information System as part fo yearly collectors reporting
  • exports reported according to Regulation (EC) 1013/2006
  • exports reported in EPR-System
18.4.3. Description of measures to ensure broadly equivalent waste treatment

Rules and control of transboundary waste shipments according to Regulation (EC) No. 1013/2006 and Basel Convention. Beyond these, mandatory return of copy of Annex VII (green list) to Hungarian competent authority within 3 days.

18.4.4. Verification of data on packaging waste generated

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic yes  yes no Cross-check with figures from waste analysis. Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 
Wood yes  yes  no   Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022.
Ferrous metals yes  yes no  Cross-check with figures from waste analysis. Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 
Aluminium yes  yes  no  Cross-check with figures from waste analysis. Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 
Glass yes  yes no  Cross-check with figures from waste analysis. Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 
Paper and cardboard yes  yes  no  Cross-check with figures from waste analysis. Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 
Others yes  yes  no  Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 
18.4.5. Verification of data on packaging waste recycling

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic yes yes  no

Cross-check of waste collected and sent to recycling by state PRO and figures of recycling in National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR).
Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 

Wood yes  yes  no 

Cross-check of waste collected and sent to recycling by state PRO and figures of recycling in National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR).
Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022. 

Ferrous metals yes  yes  no 

Cross-check of waste collected and sent to recycling by state PRO and figures of recycling in National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR).
Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022.

Aluminium yes  yes  no 

Cross-check of waste collected and sent to recycling by state PRO and figures of recycling in National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR).
Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2012-2022.

Mixed waste no yes  no  Time-series check is the comparison with reported figures in 2022. 
Others no no no  no 
18.5. Data compilation

See 18.5.1.-18.5.6.

18.5.1. Methods for determining packaging waste generation
Approach % of waste generated based on this approach
Approach 1 Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR data, complemented with estimates to ensure full coverage of the EPR data  20,86%
Approach 2 POM based on sources other than EPR (e.g. based on production and import statistics and factors to estimate the amount of packaging associated to these product flows) 0% 
Approach 3 Waste analysis  79,78%
Other approaches :  not applicable
18.5.1.1. Approach 1 - Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
EPR scheme data 97,3%   95,67%  87%  99,81% 96,47%   99,3%  99,95% 100%   Exeption 1: no data collection for certain multiple used packaging with deposit, as these are exempted from environmental product fee.

Exeption 2: packaging imported or produced by (agricultural) farmers under 50 million HUF yearly turnover, as they are exempted from reporting obligation.
Exeption 3: packaging, where environmental product fee is taken over from producers by (agricultural) farmers by contract, as their figures cannot be determined obviously from reported figures. As amounts where environmental product fee is taken over by from producers by contract is very low, figure is seen as not relevant.

Administrative reporting different from EPR 0% 0% 0% 0%  0%  0%  0%  0%
Surveys 0%  0%  0%  0%  0%  0%  0%  0% 
Electronic registry: 0% 0%  0%  0%  0%  0%  0%  0% 
Other : data request from producers, extrapolation: 2,7% estimation:  data request from producers, extrapolation: 0,27% data request from producers, extrapolation:12,47%  data request from producers, extrapolation: 0,67%  data request from producers, extrapolation: 0,26%    0% 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered 

18.5.1.2. Approach 2 - Put on the market (POM) calculated from production and reign trade statistics and using coefficients of packaging for the sold goods in question

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Production statistics 0 0 0 0 0
Foreign trade statistics
Specific surveys :
Electronic registry :
Other :

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered

18.5.1.3. Approach 3 - Waste analysis

Packaging waste generated estimated by waste analysis

 

Type of waste Number of samples taken Total volume or weight of samples taken What proportion does the sample represent of the total waste generated
(in %)
Frequency of sample
Volume in cubic metres Weight in tonnes
Mixed household and similar waste 352    aprox. 176  0.0073 quarterly
Separately collected municipal waste 55    aprox. 27.5  0.0124  quarterly 
Separately collected business waste not applicable   not applicable not applicable not applicable
Others: Mixed municipal waste from litter cleanup 27   aprox. 13.5 0.0158 quarterly
Others:Separately collected bulky municipal waste:  11    aprox. 5.5  0.0023  only spring and summer

 Figures of the last WCA from 2022-2023 were used. Therefore 2022 total waste figures are used for calculation of proportion. 

 

18.5.2. Information on estimates for packaging placed on the market

EPR POM-data is a result of comparison of figures from environmental product fee reports (for both the first- and the second-half of the year) and from EPR-reports (second-half of the year). However, in case of inland production, packaging material (used to produce packaging), not packaging itself is the subject of this product fee. There are cases when the sold packaging material will be used for the production of non-packaging products or they will be used for own consumption and not for production at all. If the producer of the packaging material knows, that there won't be produced any packaging from the material of the customer, the producer can reclaim the fee. However, in some cases producers do not have this information and report and pay for the packaging material that won't be packaging. To estimate this non-packaging reported as packaging, biggest retail chains were asked to provide data about packaging material sales (mostly directly to end-users) in 2023. Figures were extrapolated using market share (all materials except wood).

At plastic packaging, industrial non-packaging applications of typically packaging materials (furniture and decoration plates, edge protection fils) were estimated to 1,5%.

At wooden packaging, double reporting of product fee because of unclaimed fee was estimated to 10%. 

18.5.3. Presence and calculation of estimates and indication of added volume in % of the total
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Validation
Corrections for underreporting of units covered by the above sources SUM of the different materials  No No  No  No No No No
Estimates for units below the threshold (de minimis)   No No  No  No  No  No  No 
Estimates for other units legally exempt from reporting   No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Estimates for freeriders   No  No  No  No  No No  No 
Private imports /exports by private parcels   No No  No  No  No  No  No 
Private imports /exports (from journeys)   No  No  No  No  No  No  No
Internet imports and exports i.e. on-line sales   No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Other corrections  see 18.5.2.  see 18.5.2.  see 18.5.2.   see 18.5.2.    see 18.5.2.    see 18.5.2.   see 18.5.2.    see 18.5.2. 
18.5.4. Measurement points for recycling applied
Packaging waste material

Description of measurement points used (at calculation point or at the output of sorting operation with subtraction of non-target materials as appropriate, end-of-waste criteria, etc.), including variation at regional and local level

Plastic as in Annex II 
Wood wooden chips or pellets as output of shredder (R3) for recycling
Ferrous metals as in Annex II 
Aluminium as in Annex II  
Glass as in Annex II  
Paper and cardboard as in Annex II  
Others as in Annex II  
18.5.4.1. Detailed description of the methodology to calculate the amount of non-target materials removed between the measurement and the calculation points, where applicable

All waste treatment companies are obliged to report amounts treated yearly to National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR) by EWC. Recyclers have to report recycled amount of an exact EWC without waste amounts that were generated during pre-treatment prior to recycling. Generation and trade/treatment of these secondary wastes - including origin - are to report separate and per EWC.

18.5.4.2. Detailed description of how compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants has been identified and recorded in the data

Packaging waste composting was only included at wooden packaging wastes. All waste treatment facilities report recycled waste into National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR). Data can be filtered among others according to EWC and treatment operation. Composting facilities that recycle packaging waste all need to have a licence for the specific packaging waste and for treatment R3 according to Annex II WFD or R3c (composting) according to national legislation.

18.5.5. Methodology to determine recycled amounts from composite packaging or packaging composed of multiple materials

As the state PRO ordered itself the collection and recycling of composite pakcaging wastes, these were known, what type (beverage carton, etc.) they are. Further reported 15 01 05 recycled amounts in EHIR OKIR were classified to 80-99 composite material packaging codes based on PoM share of different material codes. Exact sorting results of sorted EWC 15 01 05 to diverse EWCs reported into National Environmental Information System (OKIR) Electronic Waste Management Information System (EHIR) were also used.

18.5.6. Use of Average Loss rates (ALRS)

Description of the sorted packaging waste to which ALRs are applied, types of sorting plants to which different ALRs apply, the methodological approach to calculating ALRs at such point(s), including the statistical accuracy of any surveys used, or the nature of any technical specifications.

 

Sorted waste material and sorting plant type ALR applied (in %) Description
 No average loss rates are applied  not applicable  not applicable
18.6. Adjustment

See 18.6.1-18.6.3.

18.6.1. Adjustment for impurities and humidity
Factors Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Correction factors for impurities and humidity in % of waste 15,31%  15,02%   8,46% 8,96%  8,96%   2,19% 26,73%  24,03% 
How the correction factors are derived Wet weight is calculated by wet composition. Dry weight = wet weight - humidity (correction factor) 
If no correction of impurities and humidity is applied, how they are accounted  not applicable

Above humidity figures are measured, therefore above humidity percentages are figures without taken into account of plastic, paper, metal, etc. from composite packaging. Humidity of composite packaging is measured separately: 19,24%. Total humidity is calculated with composite packaging together. calculation of humidity is not a part of balancing all reported figures on Table1 and Table1a are already after deduction of humidity.

18.6.2. Attribution of waste to packaging and non-packaging types and correction for humidity

Description, where applicable, of the methodology to exclude non-packaging waste from the reported amount of recycled packaging waste and of the methodology to correct the amount of packaging waste at the measurement point in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging (including by using relevant European standards). Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of packaging waste (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
paper and cardboard paper mill 92% of EWC 150101, 99% of 191201, 50% of 200101 The only one paper mill reports yearly the share of cardboard, the share of packaging in mixed paper wastes and the share of production residues in all wastes treated by the mill, separately for each EWC-code. These shares are used also for exported wastes. Humidity is already deducted from figures reported by the paper mill as recycled.  
plastic recycling plant   60% Estimated packaging amount in EWC 200139; Recycled EWC 200139 were only 470 tons.
18.6.3. Attribution of waste

Description of the methodology to exclude waste originating from other countries, where applicable. Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of waste from the Member State (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
All materials All facilities 100% Actual reported data through electronic registry about imported wastes. 


19. Comment Top

No comment.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top