Packaging waste by waste management operations (env_waspac)

National Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Ministry for the Ecological Transition 


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministry for the Ecological Transition 

1.2. Contact organisation unit

General Direction of Risk Prevention (GDRP) – Direction Générale de la Prévention des Risques (DGPR)

1.5. Contact mail address

Ministère de la transition écologique et de la cohésion des territoires

Direction Générale de la Prévention des Risques

Tour Séquoia 1 place Carpeaux

92055 LA DÉFENSE CEDEX


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified

30 June 2025

2.2. Metadata last posted

30 June 2025

2.3. Metadata last update

30 June 2025


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

France uses as mainly method the placed on the market approach based on production/import statistics to quantify the packaging waste generated. These data, mainly, come from INSEE (annual production surveys realised by branch of activity according to the Prodcom nomenclature) and from the customs service. These data are supplemented by data from surveys conducted by national sectorial federations of packaging, most often annually, to their members and by other studies or surveys realised in order to collect data required in the framework of the Directive 94/62/EC and the Decision 2005/270/EC.

France uses recycling data collected by PROs in the framework of the EPR scheme which covers household packaging and has set up many reporting campaigns from recycling plants in order to collect recycled packaging waste data. When data cannot be measured at calculation point, the derogation to make use of average loss rates has been applied.

France applies the new calculations rules according to Decision 2005/270/EC. 

3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection

Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks

Name of institution Description of key responsibilities
 ADEME  Reporting to Eurostat
 INSEE  Production of packaging
 Customs  Import and export of packaging
 Citeo  French PRO
 Leko  French PRO
 CSVMF  French glass federation
 COPACEL  Association of French Paper Industries
 CAP  Cardboard and Stationery Federation
 COF  Corrugated packaging
 ACN  Carton packaging
UIPP French wood-based panel manufacturers organization
SIEL Light wooden packaging
FNB Pallets
SEILA Industrial wooden packaging
ANIA Agri-food industry (integrated packaging production)
FICT Delicatessen (integrated packaging production)
Syndifrais Dairy product (integrated packaging production)
Syndilait Milk (integrated packaging production)
MENM Mineral water (integrated packaging production)
SBSA (formerly BRF) Refreshing drink (integrated packaging production)
ELIPSO French association of plastic and flexible packaging manufacturers
POLYVIA French association of plastic transformers
VALORPLAST Recycling of plastic packaging
SRP Union of plastics regenerators
FNADE Union of industries engaged in environmental activities
FEDEREC Union of recycling companies
SNEFID Union of entrepreneurs in the waste sector
SNFBM French metal packaging industry association
RECYCLACIER French metal recycling association
FAR French aluminium recycling association
3.2. Classification system

INSEE data: Data for national packaging production are provided annually by INSEE (National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies) through the INSEE annual production survey. The annual production survey (EAP) constitutes a fundamental element of the industrial statistics system. It is the main source of economic information on production at a detailed level.

France uses a product’s classification in 10 digits (PRODFRA codes) on PRODCOM codes and the French Product Classification (FPC): INSEE website.  The sections of the PRODFRA nomenclature are coded in ten positions: the first eight include the eight positions of the associated PRODCOM code if it exists. The last two are used to refine the nomenclature. The French PRODFRA nomenclature corresponds to the finest description of industrial products as used by production statistics.

The main objective of the annual production survey (EAP) is to provide the elements enabling the production of detailed data on industrial production, both to meet the requirements of the European EBS (European business statistics) regulation, but also to respond to the demands of national users (requests of professional unions, public authorities, …).

The annual production survey is conducted by branch of activity. It is exhaustive for companies with more than 20 employees or with more than 5 million euros in turnover. The exhaustive stratum represents more than 96% of total industry turnover. Moreover, companies involved in industrial activities and not surveyed in the exhaustive part of the annual production survey are interviewed by sampling (the sample is taken randomly each year).

 

Customs data: Data (imports and exports in weight, by CN8 code and HS code) for comext are provided annually by the Customs (Finances).

Data are available by aggregated countries but only the total value per CN8 code is used (in case of strong annual evolutions, we can check country by country).

Within the General Directorate of Customs and Indirect Duties (DGDDI), the Department of Statistics and Foreign Trade Studies (DSECE) is the service responsible for monitoring and analyzing evolutions in France's foreign trade in terms of goods.

Foreign trade statistics are statistics governed by legal provisions:

  •  European: Regulation (EC) No. 223/2009 of March 11, 2009 (revised version of 2015) relating to European statistics, Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of November 27, 2019 relating to European business statistics, repealing ten acts in the field of business statistics known as the “EBS Regulation”, as well as Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 establishing technical specifications and implementing rules pursuant to the Regulation (EU) 2019/2152.
  • National: law no. 51-711 of June 7, 1951 on the obligation, coordination and secrecy in matters of statistics.

The customs statistical network cooperates with the directorates and services that use foreign trade data:

  • At the national level: INSEE (preparation of quarterly and annual national accounts), Directorate General of the Treasury, Energy Observatory, Bank of France (preparation of the balance of payments) and of course the technical ministries (industry, agriculture, transport, ...) directly use customs data for the analysis of their area of ​​expertise.
  •  At European level: statistical data are transmitted each month by Customs to Eurostat for the preparation in combined nomenclature of the EU trade balance with third countries, and intra-European Union statistics. The DSECE participates in European work for the evolution of statistical practices.
  • Other international organizations (OECD, IMF, UN, etc.), which establish comparative statistics on countries, also use the customs source.

  About recycling,for each material, we use “EPR national standards” defined in the framework of the “household packaging EPR” in France (see the agreement specifications Legifrance).  In complement, use some relevant existing standards (example: EN 643 for paper and cardboard) or denomination of flows we defined with professional organization specially for example for flows of industrial and commercial packaging because it doesn’t exist national standards (because no EPR established in France in 2023 on industrial and commercial packaging)

3.2.1. Classification of treatment operations

The R/D codes in Annexes I and II of Directive are solely used. The decree of December 12, 2022 sets the data that the PROs have to report to the administrative authority. For any treatment operation, the code of the treatment that was carried out has to be specified (article 6) for each flow.

3.3. Coverage - sector

Quantification of empty packaging placed on the market in France:

The tables below present the PRODCOM codes (within which the PRODFRA codes are considered) and CN8 Customs codes considered for each material. France uses mainly PRODFRA codes to estimate the quantity of empty packaging produce in France and placed on the French market. The list of CN-codes is used by France to quantity imported and exported empty plastic packaging. When the descriptions of PRODFRA and CN codes are not enough precise to determine the part of packaging, France uses data from other sources (data produced by national sectorial federations mainly). 

  • Steel material:

INSEE-SSNE nomenclature

Customs nomenclature

PRODCOM Code

Description

PRODCOM Unit

CN8 Customs Code

Description

Customs unit

25.29.12.00*

Metal containers for compressed or liquefied gases

Mass

73.11.00

Iron or steel containers, with or without weld, for compressed or liquefied gas

Units and Mass

25.92.11.33

Cans made of iron and steel, closed by welding or crimping, used for preserving food and drink, with capacity of less than 50 L

Units

73.10.21.11

Cans made of iron or steel, with capacity of less than 50 L, which are to be closed by welding or crimping, of a kind used for preserving food

Mass

25.92.11.35

Cans made of iron or steel, closed by welding or crimping, with capacity of less than 50 L, for drinks

Units

73.10.21.19

Cans of iron or steel, with capacity of less than 50 L, which are to be closed by welding or crimping, of a kind used for drinks (drinks cans)

Mass

25.92.11.50

Cans made of iron and steel, closed by welding or crimping, with capacity of less than 50 L, other than those used for food or drink

Units

73.10.21.99

Iron or steel cans, with capacity of less than 50 L, closed by welding or crimping, the walls of which are more than 0.5 mm thick (except for compressed or liquefied gases and except for cans of a type used for foodstuffs and beverages)

Mass

73.10.21.91

Iron or steel cans, with capacity of less than 50 L, closed by welding or crimping, the walls of which are less than 0.5 mm thick (except for compressed or liquefied gases and except for cans of a type used for foodstuffs and beverages)

25.91.12.00

Tanks, casks, drums made of iron or steel except for compressed gas of less than 50 L capacity

Units

73.10.29.10

Light industrial packaging: packaging for chemical and industrial products and packaging for industrial use

Mass

73.10.29.90

Tanks, drums, cans and similar containers made of iron or steel, for any material, with a capacity of less than 50 L and a wall equal to or more than 0.5 mm thick, not specified elsewhere (except for compressed or liquefied gases or with mechanical or thermal devices and except for cans)

Mass

25.92.13.30

Base metal crown corks

Units

83.09.10.00

Base metal crown corks

Mass

25.92.13.50

25.92.13.70

Base metal closures, stoppers, caps and accessories of SH 83.09 not referenced elsewhere

Mass

83.09.90.90

Base metal stoppers, caps and lids, including screw caps and pouring stoppers, capsules for bottles, threaded bungs, bung covers, seals and other packing accessories (excluding crow corks, lead closures or stoppers, aluminium stoppers or closures more than 21 mm in diameter)

Mass

List of PRODCOM and CN8 Customs codes considered for the steel material.

*only for refillable steel gas cylinders

 

  • Aluminium material:

INSEE-SSNE nomenclature

Customs nomenclature

PRODCOM Code

Description

PRODCOM Unit

CN8 Customs Code

Description

Customs unit

25.92.12.10

Soft tubular cases made of aluminium, for any use except for compressed gases with capacity of =< 300 litres

Units

76.12.10.00

Flexible aluminium tubular cases

Mass

25.92.12.40.10

Rigid tubular aluminium cases, for any purpose except compressed gas of a capacity =< 300 litres

Units

76 12 90 30

+

76 12 90 80

Aluminium tanks, drums, cans, boxes and similar containers for all materials (excl. compressed or liquefied gases), of a capacity <= 300 l, not specified elsewhere, (excl. soft tubular cases, aerosol containers and containers made from thin sheets and strips of a thickness <= 0.2 mm)

Mass

25.92.12.40.30 + 25.92.12.40.40

Aluminium containers of a capacity < 50 litres for other products

Units

25.92.12.60

Aluminium containers of a capacity =< 300 litres for aerosol cans

Units

76.12.90.20

Aluminium containers of a kind used for aerosols

Mass

25.92.13.30

Base metal crown corks

Units

83.09.10.00

Base metal crown corks

Mass

25.92.13.50

Closure products: tear-off, screw-on, wide-opening capsules, etc.

Mass

83.09.90.10

Tin-plated or aluminium stoppers, closures of a diameter > 21 mm

Mass

25.92.13.70

Closure systems: muzzles, metal plates, guarantee capsules

Mass

83.09.90.90

Base metal closures, stoppers, caps and accessories of SH 83.09 not referenced elsewhere

Mass

List of PRODCOM and CN8 Customs codes considered for the aluminium sector

  • Wood material:

INSEE-SSNE nomenclature

Customs nomenclature

PRODCOM Code

Description

PRODCOM Unit

CN8 Customs Code

Description

Customs unit

16.24.11.33

Wooden pallets, pallet collars

Units

44.15.20.20

Wooden pallets, pallet collars

Mass

16.24.11.35

Pallet boxes and other wooden loading trays

Units

44.15.20.90

Box pallets and other wooden loading trays (excl. frames and containers specially designed and equipped for one or more modes of transport, as well as single pallets and pallet hoists)

Mass

16.24.13.20

Food packaging made of wood and boxes made of sawn wood, or panels with or without packaging

Mass

44.15.10.10

Packing cases, boxes and crates made of wood

Mass

16.24.13.50

Cable drums, made of wood

Mass

44.15.10.90

Drums, cable drums

Mass

List of PRODCOM and CN8 Customs codes considered for the wood material

 

  • Paper & cardboard material:

INSEE-SSNE nomenclature

Customs nomenclature

PRODCOM Code

Description

PRODCOM Unit

CN8 Customs Code

Description

Customs unit

17.21.12.30

Bags of a width at the base ≥ 40 cm

Mass

48.19.30.00

Bags made of paper, cardboard, cellulose wadding or webs of cellulose fibres, with a base width of ≥ 40 cm (large bags)

Mass

17.21.12.50

Bags, other than those with a base width of 40 cm or more, pouches (excluding for disks) and cones

Mass

48.19.40.00

Bags, pouches and cones made of paper, cardboard, cellulose wadding or webs of cellulose fibres (excl. disk bags and bags with a base width of ≥ 40 cm)

Mass

17.21.13.00

Cartons and boxes of corrugated paper or cardboard

Mass

48.19.10.00

Boxes and cases of paper or corrugated cardboard

Mass

48.08.10.00

Paper and corrugated cardboard in rolls or sheets

Mass

17.21.14.00

Folding boxes and boards, made of paper or non-corrugated cardboard (compact cardboard)

Mass

48.19.20.00

Folding boxes and boards, made of paper or non-corrugated cardboard (small flat bags and cardboard)

Mass

17.21.15.30

Mixed boxes, kegs and drums, made of compact cardboard

Mass

17.12.31

17.12.41

17.12.41

17.12.42

17.12.51

17.12.60

17.12.71

Paper and cardboard useful covers, kraft paper for bags, sulphite paper, other recycled paper, grease-free paper and straw and creped paper and cardboard for packaging

Mass

48.19.50.00

Packaging, incl. paper, cardboard, cellulose wadding or webs of cellulose fibres (excl. boxes and cases and bags)

Mass

48.21.10.10

48.21.10.90

Printed labels of any kind, made of paper or cardboard

Mass

17.29.19.57

Paper pulp moulded or pressed articles (incl. egg boxes)

Mass

48.23.70.10

48.23.70.90

Blister packs for eggs and moulded or pressed articles made of paper pulp

Mass

List of PRODCOM and CN8 Customs codes considered for the paper and cardboard sector

 

  • Plastic material:

INSEE-SSNE Nomenclature

Customs nomenclature

PRODCOM Code

Description

PRODCOM Unit

CN8 Customs Code

Description

Customs unit

22.22.11.00

Bags, sachets, sleeves, cones made of ethylene polymers

Mass

39.23.21.00

Bags, sachets, sleeves made of ethylene polymers

Mass

22.22.12.00

Bags, sachets, sleeves, cones made of other plastic materials (excl. ethylene)

Mass

39.23.29.10

PVC bags, sachets, sleeves

Mass

Mass

39.23.29.90

Bags, sachets, sleeves and cones made of plastic materials (excl. polymers of ethylene or polyvinyl chloride)

Mass

22.22.13.00

Boxes, crates, lockers and similar articles made of plastic material

Mass

39.23.10.00

Boxes, crates, lockers and similar articles for transport or packing made of plastic material

Mass

22.22.14.50

Carboys, bottles, flasks and similar articles made of plastic materials of a capacity <= 2 l

Units

39.23.30.10

Carboys, bottles, flasks and similar articles for transport or packing made of plastic materials of a capacity <= 2 l

Mass

22.22.14.70

Carboys, bottles, flasks and similar articles made of plastic materials of a capacity >2 L

Units

39.23.30.90

Carboys, bottles, flasks and similar articles for transport or packing made of plastic materials of a capacity > 2 L

Mass

22.22.19.25

Stoppers, lids, caps and other closures systems made of plastic materials

Mass

39.23.50.10

Caps or closure systems made of plastic materials

Mass

39.23.50.90

Stoppers, lids, caps and other closures made of plastic materials (excl. caps or overcaps)

Mass

22.22.19.50 (10 to .80)

Other articles, made of plastic, for transport or packing, including extruded nets

Mass

39.23.90.00

Articles for transport or packing, made of plastic materials

(excl. other codes)

Mass

List of PRODCOM and CN8 Customs codes considered for the plastic material

  • Glass material:

INSEE-SSNE Nomenclature

Customs nomenclature

PRODCOM Code

Description

PRODCOM Unit

CN8 Customs Code

Description

Customs unit

23.13.11.10

Glass sterilising jars; glass stoppers, lids and other glass closure systems

Mass

70.10.20.00

Glass stoppers, lids and other closures

Mass

70.10.90.10

Glass sterilising jars

Mass

23.13.11.20

Containers obtained from a glass tube (excl. glass sterilising jars)

Units

70.10.90.21

Tubular packaging and other containers made from a glass tube, for commercial packaging (excl. vials)

Mass

23.13.11.30

Glass containers of nominal capacity >=2.5 litres (excl. glass sterilising jars)

Mass

70.10.90.31

Carboys, bottles, flasks, jars, pots, tubular packaging and other glass containers for transport or commercial packaging, of a nominal capacity >= 2.5 L

Mass

23.13.11.40

Colourless glass bottles and flasks of nominal capacity <2.5 litres, for food and beverages

Mass

70.10.90.41

Colourless glass bottles and flasks for the commercial transport or packaging of food and drink, of nominal capacity >=1 L but < 2.5 L

Mass

70.10.90.43

Same for nominal capacity > 0.33 L but <1 L

Mass

70.10.90.45

Same for nominal capacity >= 0.15 L but <= 0.33 L

Mass

70.10.90.47

Same for nominal capacity < 0.15 L

Mass

23.13.11.50

Coloured glass bottles and flasks of nominal capacity <2.5 litres, for food and beverages

Mass

70.10.90.51

Coloured glass bottles and flasks for the commercial transport or packaging of food and drink, of nominal capacity >=1 L but < 2.5 L

Mass

70.10.90.53

Same for nominal capacity > 0.33 L but <= 1 L

Mass

70.10.90.55

Same for nominal capacity <= 0,15 L but >= 0.33 L

Mass

70.10.90.57

Same for nominal capacity < 0.15 L

Mass

23.13.11.60

Glass containers for transporting or packaging of foodstuffs and beverages other than bottles and flasks of nominal capacity <2.5 litres

Mass

70.10.90.61

Carboys, pots, jars, tubular packaging and other glass containers for the commercial transport or packaging of food and drink products, of nominal capacity >= 0.25 L but < 2.5 L (excl. Flasks and bottles)

Mass

70.10.90.67

Same for nominal capacity < 0.25 L

Mass

23.13.11.70

Glass containers for transporting or packaging of pharmaceutical products of nominal capacity <2.5 litres

Mass

70.10.90.71

Glass bottle, flasks, tubular packaging and other containers for the commercial transport or packaging of pharmaceutical products, of nominal capacity > 0.055 l but < 2.5 l (excl. vials, containers made from a glass tube and vacuum-insulated bottles and containers)

Mass

70.10.90.79

Same for nominal capacity <= 0.055 L

Mass

23.13.11.80

Glass containers for transporting or packaging of a nominal capacity of <2.5 litres (except for food and beverages; for pharmaceuticals; containers made from a glass tube)

Mass

70.10.90.91

Colourless glass carboys, bottles, flasks, jars, pots, tubular packaging and other receptacles for transporting or commercial packaging, of a nominal capacity < 2.5 l (excl. for food, beverages or pharmaceuticals) vials, glass tube containers, vacuum insulated bottles and containers, perfume vaporisers and spray bottles, vials, etc.)

Mass

70.10.90.99

Same for nominal capacity < 2.5 L

Mass

List of PRODCOM and CN8 Customs codes considered for the glass sector

 

Quantification of filled packaging placed on the market in France:

The HS* codes are used to estimate the import and export of filled packaging (see the French methodology presented in the Informal discussion group “Placed on the market (POM) based on coefficients and production and trade statistics” and available on Circabc). This filled packaging balancing is the only data that must be modelled since only data about quantities of products are available. The filled packaging database is built on HS8 codes from the customs database of about 9000 HS8 codes. First, in order to obtain a representative, realistic, reproducible and verifiable result, France proceeds on a grouping of the HS8 codes from the customs database into manageable homogeneous categories. This results in the identification of 357 different products or groups of products. This grouping is initially done based on the characteristics of the products themselves before being cross-checked with information available on the packaging of these products.

This grouping was done on the basis of different criteria: the representative stakes of the tonnages of products at levels HS2 and HS4; the homogeneous nature of products at HS8 level allowing their grouping; the specific nature of some HS8 codes where the packaging format is specified.

Depending on the product, the SH* code is split depending on the existing packaging format. Several packaging formats are possible for the same product / group of products. A market share is then applied.

The final result is that these products correspond to 413 product segments. For each of these segments, the tonnage of imported and exported products is calculated based on data from the customs database.

To the tonnages of products imported and exported from the customs database, the calculation model assigns different parameters relating to the packaging that com-poses them, mainly: the proportion of packaged products (distinction with bulk); the portion of the packaging of the product by type of material; the relative weight of each packaging material for each product and for each of the primary, secondary and tertiary packaging). Depending on the product code considered, the average "packaging weight / product weight" ratio is obtained by two different methods: either the unit weight of packaging (in grams) by material and by format is known, or it is evaluated directly in % (average percentage of packaging weight per packaged product weight, by material).

Data is associated with an uncertainty in order to obtain a packaging weight (by mate-rial and by type) with its uncertainty rate. The value of the flow of full packaging linked to foreign trade used for reporting to the European Commission is as follows: mean value minus uncertainty. In the case of a net import balance, this value decreases (x kt – y kt uncertainty). In the case of a net export balance, its absolute value increases (-x kt – y kt uncertainty). If the mean value is less than the uncertainty calculated, an equilibrium balance is retained (0).

Distinction between HS Codes and CN codes:

  • The HS Code, or "Harmonized System Code", is a standardized system developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to classify products traded around the world. It primarily aims to facilitate trade by providing uniform terminology to classify goods.
  • The CN code, or “Combined Nomenclature”, is a classification specific to the European Union. Although it builds on the structure of the HS system, it has been designed to meet the needs of EU customs, tax, trade and statistical regulations more specifically.
  • International harmonization: The first six digits of the CN code are identical to the HS Code. This correspondence ensures harmonization with the international classification system, which facilitates international trade.
  • EU-specific subdivisions: After these first six digits, the CN code incorporates two additional subdivisions (7th and 8th digits). These subdivisions allow a more detailed classification of products according to the specific needs of the EU.

 

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

We take into account the amount of wooden packaging that is repaired for reuse in the calculation of the targets laid down in point (f), point (g) (ii), point (h) and point (i) (ii) of Article 6 (1) of Directive 94/62/EC. The adjusted rate is 37,1%.

We take into account the amount of metals in incineration bottom ash (IBA) for calculation of the targets.

3.4.1. Types of reuse system in place for each material type

The organizational arrangements for reusing EIC packaging in B to B vary depending on the companies and sectors of activity. We can nevertheless distinguish the following five modalities illustrated by the diagram below:

 download

This illustration makes it possible to distinguish:

 

  1. “Shuttle” packaging between a customer (distributor, end user) and its supplier (packer, importer of packaged products). Full packages are sent from one company to another company, who returns the packaging once emptied. Pallets, crates, bins are often used as shuttle packaging shuttle.
  2. Packaging reused in a “closed loop” for which packaging is exchanged between more than two companies, but remain within a closed logistics circuit. The reuse circuit is known and controlled between several companies. Some examples of reused industrial and commercial packaging concerned: pallets, plastic bins and crates, wooden boxes, cans, barrels…
  3. Packaging reused via a packaging manager or “pooler” who manages the logistic, reconditioning, washing and control. Packaging is managed by an owner manager of packaging whose role is to provide ready-to-use packaging and to collect empty packaging. Some examples of reused industrial and commercial packaging concerned: pallet, bins, crates.
  4.  packaging reused in an “open loop”, packaging is exchanged between more than two open loop companies, that is to say without necessarily returning to the initial company. In this case, the different users of the packaging are not known to the initial producer. Some examples of reused industrial and commercial packaging concerned: pallets, boxes.
  5. Packaging with a single-use element: the packaging is reusable but contains a disposable part. This is for example the case of certain IBCs with a reusable cage and a disposable bag.

Note: in practice overlaps are possible between certain modalities. 

Type of packaging

Material

Sectors concerned

Pallets and crates pallets

Wood

Used in a large majority of areas

of activity: manufacturing industry (chemistry and pharmaceutical, metallurgy and glass, transport and

energy, electrical and electronic equipment,

paper/cardboard), agri-food industry (fruits and

vegetables, cheeses, oyster farming), transport (automobile industry, aeronautics, space), construction, distribution, …

Note: the food industry is the main

outlet of pallets and pallet boxes

reconditioned

Plastic

Large distribution, food industry, agricultural sector, automotive industry, pharmaceutical industry

Steel

 

IBCs

Steel (cage) HDPE bag

The chemical industry (pharmacy, para-pharmacy, cosmetics) and the food industry (drinks, food products, agriculture), cleanliness-detergency, oil tanker

Barrels

Steel

Chemical, petroleum, water treatment, construction sectors,

cosmetic,

200 liters drums mainly for chemical and petroleum products

Plastic

Packaging of liquid or viscous products in agri-food sectors, cleaning-detergency,

chemical industry, pharmacy, agriculture

Boxes

Plastic

Reusable crates, bins and boxes used in

distribution, pharmaceutical,

cosmetics, agri-food, automotive and agricultural industries.

Catering bottle transport boxes

Wood

Crates for transporting products requiring a

mechanical protection

Cardboard

Automotive, food industry

Steel

Specialized industries

Containers and buckets

Plastic

Packaging of liquid or viscous products

agri-food and chemical industry sectors

Steel

Big Bag

Plastic

Bulk product packaging

Covers, nets

or straps

palletizing

 

Transport of palletized products

Drums

Plastic

Cable manufacturers, electrical and electronic sectors

Bois

Metal containers for compressed or liquefied gases

Steel

Sectors: chemistry, medical

3.4.2. Other recovery of waste

Mixed flows incinerated with household waste are taken into account and, inside, the part of packaging waste (see report on the treatment of Household and Similar Waste Le-traitement-des-dechets-menagers-et-assimiles-itom-2022). Packaging waste in plastic, wood, aluminium (thickness less than 50 µ) and paper/cardboard are subject to energy recovery.

 

 

3.4.3. Information on temporary storage of packaging waste

With the COVID-19 health crisis, the production of glass cullet steeply decreased in France in 2020. At the same time, the collection of glass packaging for recycling continued and has not decreased, resulting in a stock of unprecedented magnitude. To ensure the traceability of the management of this tonnage, the eco-organizations have commissioned an audit firm in charge of considering the data from the glass manufacturers.

The accurate management of the destinations of these stocks was too complex to rely on the the glass manufacturers' declarations. So for 2021 and 2022, we used the reliable data from the EPR scheme (not including the stocks) for the household, and we reported the 2020 data for the non-household (no EPR scheme for I&C packaging yet but the 2020 data was accurate because it was calculated as the difference between the results -household and non-household- of a comprehensive survey of glass manufacturers and the EPR scheme data -household-) adjusted for 2022 regarding the 2,5 months of quarantine in 2020.

In order to avoid this issue, 2023 POM is based on household EPR 2023 POM and renewed 2022 non-household POM, instead of packaging production.

3.5. Statistical unit

France collects data from:

  • producers of empty packaging placed on the market in France (empty packaging produced and placed on the market in France, packaging elements intended to be incorporated into another material sector produced and placed on the market in France)
  • importers and exporters of empty packaging
  • importers and exporters of filled packaging
  • professional federations
  • PROs
  • waste operators
  • recycling plants
3.6. Statistical population

INSEE data: The statistical population is made up of all legal units in the industrial economic sectors (sections B to E of the NAF rev. 2), as well as non-industrial legal units with a secondary activity relating to industry.

Placed on the market approach: Total packaged products placed on the national market for the first time by all economic operators

Treatment: Treatment plants treating nationally generated packaging waste" or “sorting plants” (it depends if data is available at calculation point).

3.7. Reference area

France including French overseas departments.

3.8. Coverage - Time

The statistics covers the 2023 calendar year. 

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

INSEE data: Production volume depends on the products (defined by the PRODCOM list – see tables in the section 3.3). If data are exclusively available in units and no conversion in mass is possible (example: steel and aluminium INSEE data), we use data from sectorial professional organizations.

Customs data: All data are available in mass.

Reporting data: Tonnes


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

INSEE data: Legal acts and other agreements:

At the European level, European business statistics (EBS: European business Statistics) are governed by a transversal legal framework for the collection, compilation, transmission and dissemination of European statistics on structure, economic activity, competitiveness, global transactions and business performance. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 was adopted on 30 July 2020.

At the national level, the committees which gave INSEE the right and legitimacy to collect this data are:

  • The Cnis which examines each new project, whether it is a survey, a directory or the exploitation of administrative files... These projects are presented by all the institutions which contribute through their work to the construction of public statistics. The discussion concerns in particular the purpose of the project, its place in the information system and the planned conditions for its dissemination. It is necessary to check that each operation meets a need of general interest and does not duplicate existing sources of information, in other words to ensure its appropriateness. He gives notice of opportunity. All public statistics surveys labeled by the CNIS and approved by the Minister are included in the annual program published by a decree in the Official Journal;
  •  The label committee, within the CNIS, ensures that it respects the statistical quality criteria. This ensures that the survey meets the statistical quality criteria with regard to the collection and sampling method (sampling plan, data adjustment method, treatment of non-responses guaranteeing the reliability of the results. ..), relevance of the questioning and adaptation of the dissemination to the announced objectives. It also ensures that the investigation does not cause an excessive burden on the investigations, that consultation has been carried out with the partners concerned and that the wishes expressed by the CNIS during the appropriateness debate have been taken into account. account. It gives a label of general interest and statistical quality.

 

EPR data: The EPR scheme in France covers the household packaging and the restauration packaging (from 2024). The household packaging sector was the first to have implemented, in 1992, the principle of extended producer responsibility (decree No. 92-377 from April 1, 1992). Three PROs are currently state-approved in the household packaging sector: Citeo, Adelphe and Léko.

The AGEC law (February 2020) created the EPR scheme for packaging used by catering professionals. Decree No. 2023-162 of March 7, 2023, establishes this new scheme.

An EPR scheme covering the industrial and commercial packaging is due to entry into force on January 1, 2025 (article L. 541-10-1 from the Environmental Code).

The decree of December 12, 2022 (Legifrance) sets the data that these eco-organisms have to report to the administrative authority.

 

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

The National Agency for Ecological Transition (ADEME) is in charge to centralize all data about packaging and waste packaging collected in the framework of the 94/62/EC Directive. Every year, The Extended Producer Responsibility Supervision department (DSREP) from ADEME is responsible for ensuring the reliability of this data. The DSREP was created by the article 76 of the national Anti-Waste and Circular Economy Law (AGEC Law) . The Article R131-26-1 of the Environmental Code precises missions of the DSREP. The ADEME shares data with the Ministry of ecological transition which is the reporting entity.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Reporting data: No data collected individually from an actor is published. All data is aggregated before being reported/published. All parts of this report can be published (non-confidential data/informations).

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

INSEE data: Regarding internet collection, the collection site is completely secure and the standards for managing survey access codes are strict and standardized for all surveys undertaken. For legal units choosing to use paper, data entry is carried out by managers, with strict respect for the confidentiality of the data collected.

Before the distribution of data, secrecy is applied:

primary secrecy: a result is marked as confidential if fewer than three legal units contribute to this result, or if one legal unit alone represents 85% of the result;

secondary secret: a result is hidden if it allows results to be found in primary secret, by addition or subtraction with the margins of the tables or other data already published.

Customs data: The DSECE respects statistical secrecy, the obligations of which fall under texts at the national level (Law No. 51-711 of June 7, 1951 on the obligation, coordination and secrecy in matters of statistics) and European level (the general regulation on data protection and Regulation 223 relating to European statistics).

Reporting data: No data collected individually from an actor is published. All data is aggregated before being reported/published.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Reporting data is published on Eurostat website (Data Browser - Statistics) each year after validation stage.

Furthermore, a report called "Valorisation des emballages en France - Données 202X" and/or "Packaging recovery in France – 202X data" (english version) is published on the ADEME website  

every year in the autumn. This report describes methodology applied to quantify packaging waste generated, recycled and recovered in France.

8.2. Release calendar access

Reporting data: Eurostat databrowser.

Report: Librairie.

8.3. Release policy - user access

The report called "Valorisation des emballages en France - Données 202X" and/or "Packaging recovery in France – 202X data" is a public report.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Data are reported to Eurostat and disseminated every year.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Not applicable

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

"Packaging recovery in France" report:

  • 2023 data version is not yet available (autumn). It will be published on this website : website.  
  • 2022 data version is available here :  website.
  • 2021 data version is available here :  webiste.
10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Not applicable

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not applicable

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not applicable

10.6. Documentation on methodology

"Packaging recovery in France" report:

  • 2023 data version is not yet available (autumn). It will be published on this website : website.
  • 2022 data version is available here : website.
  • 2021 data version is available here :  website
10.7. Quality management - documentation

"Packaging recovery in France" report:

  • 2023 data version is not yet available (autumn). It will be published on this website : website.  
  • 2022 data version is available here : website
  • 2021 data version is available here :  website


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

INSEE data: The annual production survey was presented to the Label Committee in 2019. The label of general interest and statistical quality was thus renewed for a period of 5 years, from 2020 to 2024.

The Label Committee's mission is to examine on behalf of the National Council for Statistical Information (Cnis) all projects for which the visa provided for in Article 2 of the law of June 7, 1951 is requested. The Committee has builds over time a method and jurisprudence to examine the files submitted to it. Based on considerations expressed in terms of burden or proportionality of the collection to the objectives pursued, the Committee broadened its examination rules to cover all dimensions of statistical quality, as formalized in the Code of good practices of the European statistics. The Committee thus constitutes a lever to ensure compliance with these principles, whether in terms of consultation, methodological quality, proportionate burden, dissemination or provision of duly documented statistical sources.

Regarding the European Statistics Code of Good Practice, it constitutes the reference for assessing the quality of the production of national statistical institutes.

 

Customs data: The data collected and statistical productions are regularly evaluated and validated in order to improve the collection and production processes.

Completeness of collection:

  • In extra-EU trade in goods, 100% of import and export operations are taken into account because they are linked to customs formalities.
  • In order to reduce the statistical burden on companies, data concerning intra-EU trade have been collected since 2022 via the monthly survey on intra-EU trade in goods (EMEBI) which is carried out among a sample of companies. The data collected from this sample still represents around 95% of the amounts imported or exported of goods between Member States of the European Union.
  • Intra-EU trade in goods collected other than by survey, also referred to as “data below the threshold”, is subject to an overall estimate which is integrated into the calculation of the FOB/FAB economic indicator. The other statistics presented do not take into account the estimation of these data.

Data received late or missing:

  • For exchanges of extra-EU goods declared in customs clearance forms (DAU = single administrative document), the data is received as soon as it is validated by the customs service. There are no reports received late.
  • For intra-EU trade in goods collected as part of the statistical section of the trade in goods declaration (DEB) until December 2021 then as part of the monthly survey on intra-EU trade in goods (EMEBI) from January 2022, responses from surveyed companies may be submitted late. In order to minimize the impact of data collected late, the DSECE specifically monitors the filing of declarations by the largest operators and carries out systematic reminders within the population of other companies. Data received late or absent are subject to an estimate.

Declarative errors:

  • Errors may be made in the declarations submitted by the declarants. Declaring goods according to NC8, which includes nearly 10,000 items, is in fact rather difficult. Sometimes operators assign their product to an incorrect code. Other statistical variables (partner countries for example) may also be erroneous. In order to reduce the impact of these errors, tools are regularly developed and implemented in the automated process of collecting and calculating foreign trade results.

After their first publication, foreign trade statistics are revised monthly for a period of 35 months. Data supplemented by corrections and declarations received late replace the initial data. Estimates for late data are recalculated.

 

Reporting data: The National Agency for Ecological Transition (ADEME) is in charge to centralize all data about packaging and waste packaging collected in the framework of the 94/62/EC Directive. Every year, The Extended Producer Responsibility Supervision department (DSREP) from ADEME is responsible for ensuring the reliability of this data (consistency checks and changes observed from one year to the next). Each new data/source used have to be reliable to be taken into account. The detailed data collected for the reporting are checked and challenged by experts from the professional organizations during an annual sectorial meeting (usually held in March/April N+2) and multiple exchanges about data take place with these organizations between this meeting and June.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

See 11.1


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main users of these data can be presented in different groups, namely:

  • Institutions at European level: European Commission, Eurostat;
  • Institutions at the national level: Ministries (Environment, Industry, Economy, Finance, etc.), public authorities, régional/local authorities, etc.;
  • Others: PROs, professional federations, design offices, engineering consultants, journalists, students, etc.
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Information not available

12.3. Completeness

All types of packaging are covered by statistics.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

The main issue of the data accuracy concerns the foreign trade statistics, which rely on a mandatory but declarative basis. A few products' codes data are identified as abnormal and should be treated before use (in this case we mainly reconduct the previous year value as the delay for the official data correction is not compatible with the deadline for the reporting to the EC ; this process nevertheless ensures that next year data should be correct as the declarant of the erroneous data is made aware of the problem). Most of the time, the problem affecting a NC8 code is limited to the trade with a specific country inside this NC8 code. 

Moreover, many PRODFRA quantities (10 digits production codes from INSEE based on PRODCOM codes) became unavailable in 2021, 2022 or 2023. We managed to get an overall value for the PRODCOM code which is in fine more accurate than summing PRODFRA tonnages where some codes could be unavailable (in this case we've been reconducting the previous year value).

 

13.1.1. Statistical surveys used regarding packaging waste generation and treatment

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.

 

Component of packaging waste Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 Glass (reusable bottles)  2023  Glassmakers  100%

54 499 t

(of 2 573 794 t PoM = 2,1 %)
 Not available  Not available  No adjustment  Not available
Plastic (bottles integrated production) 2023 Bottlers

Soda: 14%

Water: 43%

Juice: 100%

Milk: 100 %

= 79% of tonnages (21% extrapolated)

95 955 t

(of 2 424 496 t PoM = 4,0 %)

 95%  5%  No adjustment  Not available
Plastic (pots integrated production) 2023

“Fresh dairy products” sector of the National Union of Fresh Dairy Product Manufacturers (Syndifrais)

100%

 

32 720 t

(of 2 424 496 t PoM = 1,3 %)
 Not available  Not available  No adjustment  Not available
Plastic (trays integrated production) 2023

Federation of French Charcuterie Catering Companies (FICT)

55%

= 73 % of tonnages (27% extrapolated)
 

24 980 t

(of 2 424 496 t PoM = 1,0 %)
 95%  5%  Extrapolation carried out from the number of employees per company  Not available
Wood 2023

Manufacturer of Light Wooden Packaging

Manufacturer of Industrial Packaging

Pallet and pallet box operator

73% (in economic weight)  

954 998 t

(of 1 846 291 t PoM = 52 %)
 Not available  Not available  This survey substitutes the INSEE source  Not available
13.1.2. Statistical surveys used regarding reusable packaging

The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.

 

Packaging material Year Statistical units Percentage of population surveyed Data (tonnes) Confidence level Error margin Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year Other details
 Glass  2023  Bottlers  100%  

54 499 t

(of 2 573 794 t PoM = 2,1 %)
 Not available  Not available  No adjustment  See 18.3.5.
Wood 2023 Pallet and pallet box operator 73% (in economic weight)

369 770 t

(of 1 846 291 t PoM = 20 %)
Not available Not available This survey substitutes the INSEE source See 18.3.5.
13.2. Sampling error

Not available.

13.3. Non-sampling error

The Extended Producer Responsibility Supervision department (DSREP) from ADEME is responsible for ensuring the reliability of this data (consistency checks and changes observed from one year to the next) and treat the errors and inconsistencies occurred.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Final data for year n are available at the reporting deadline (n+18m). 

14.2. Punctuality

The release schedule is generally respected. The data is transmitted to Eurostat each year before the deadline (June 30).


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

INSEE data: the results are always published in pairs: results from year N and year N-1 with nomenclature N. Comparison over 2 years, down to the finest level, is therefore guaranteed. However, no further retropolation is made. Temporal comparisons can be made over 2 consecutive years for the PRODFRA level.

 

Customs data: Controls ensure the internal consistency of the data presented on the site (i.e. arithmetic and accounting equalities are checked). The concepts and nomenclatures used comply with international standards, if they exist. When national needs impose specific nomenclatures or treatments, their compatibility with international standards is guaranteed. With this same concern for transnational comparability, France's foreign trade statistics are the subject of regular comparisons with the equivalent statistics of countries which have trade with France. The continuity of the series published on the site is guaranteed. When changes cause breaks in the time series, the series are, if possible, backcasted. If this is not the case, the break is reported and explained.

 

Reporting data: Every year a comparison between N data and three previous years data is made. However, we don’t proceed in further retropolation, excepted in specific case.

 

Many breaks in series between 2022 and 2023 data:

For every materials (excepted “plastics”): foreign trade of filled packaging is based on the foreign trade of products itself with the application of a ratio on the quantity of packaged goods and a ratio on the weight of the packaging with respect to the weight of the goods. Most of those ratios on the weight of the packaging were updated.

For "plastics": Extrapolation of non-household plastic packaging waste declaration is based on a new source (Eurostat data of PELD exported from France : Eurostat database on EU trade by HS2-4-6 and CN8 (ds-045409)). Agricultural PELD non-packaging waste exported, household PELD films identify by EPR and estimated PELD production wastes are subtracted from PELD exported from France, and compared to non-household PELD declared to get extrapolation multiplying factor applied to the other plastic flows.

For "wood":

  • Between 2021 and 2022, the main source of data shifted from INSEE to the FNB (French Wood Federation). The overall number of pallets is close between the two data sets but the FNB provides a realistic breakdown by type of pallets and enables the removal of pallets that doesn't undergo a preparation for reuse but are resold directly (that represents ~31% of the whole pallets). In 2023, repaired pallets are now accounted directly from the FNB (adjusted with the INSEE data evolution) instead of taking a part of the total amount of pallets which is assessed less precise.
  • Only Euro pallets were considered as reusable until 2022 data. From 2023 data, a portion of each kind of pallets is accounted as reusable.
  • Until 2022, only pallets were considered as reusable wood packaging. From 2023, cable drums are also accounted as reusable (sales packaging), but no information could have been collected on rotations.

For “aluminium”: The reusable aluminium packaging are based on CO2 gas cylinders, faced data confidentiality issues (only a few actors) until 2022 data, but could have been estimated for 2023 data. (moderated impact)

For ”glass”:

  • Until 2022, the accurate management of the destinations of stocks was too complex to rely on the glass manufacturer's declarations: reliable data from the EPR scheme (not including the stocks) were used for the household, and non-household data was the 2020 one adjusted for 2022. To avoid this issue, 2023 POM is based on household EPR 2023 POM and renewed 2022 non-household POM (to which we add the change observed on POM households between 2022 and 2023), instead of packaging production.
  • In 2023, for the first time, output of cullet preparation from the glass manufacturer's declaration could have been used for both non-household and household glass packaging recycled in France, completed by EPR data for household exports and glass manufacturer's declaration for non-household exports.
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The internal consistency of the data is ensured. 

15.4.1. Explanation for any component with a greater than 10 % variation

Explanation detailing the causes of the tonnage difference (in relation to which waste streams, sectors or estimates have caused the difference, and what the underlying cause is) for any component of packaging waste generated and recycled which shows greater than a 10 % variation from the data submitted for the previous data year.

Material Variation (%) Main reason for variation
 Plastic - Recycling outside the EU  +639,6%  For 2022 data, non-household packaging waste exported outside the UE was estimated by applying the share of household packaging waste exported outside UE. For 2023, destination was asked to plastic waste exporters in their declaration.
Wood - Repair of wooden packaging  -28,2% Repaired pallets are now accounted directly from a structural study, instead of taking a part of production statistics, which is assessed less precise.
Ferrous metal - Recycling outside the EU -30,1% Directly linked to ferrous metal wastes from French Overseas Departments and Territories exported to Asia, which decrease between 2022 to 2023.
Aluminium - Recycling in the Member State -14,7% This evolution reflects a general increase in exported streams, more important than the increase in quantities recycled.
Aluminium - Recycling in other Member States +78,4% The exports for recycling from household waste (EPR schemes data) and IBA have strongly increased between 2022 and 2023.
Aluminium - Recycling outside the EU -87,6% In 2023, like 2021, no aluminium waste from French Overseas Departments and Territories are exported.
Aluminium - Energy recovery -12,2% The tonnages sent to incineration plants with energy recovery is directly linked to the packaging waste generated minus the recycled waste. As the increase in the recycled quantities is important and the generated quantities slightly decrease, the recovered tonnages decrease.
Glass - Recycling in other Member States +38,0% In 2023, for the first time, output of cullet preparation from the glass manufacturer's declaration could have been used for both non-household and household glass packaging recycled in France, completed by EPR data for household exports and glass manufacturer's declaration for non-household exports.
Glass - Recycling outside the EU -12,6% Directly linked to glass wastes from French Overseas Departments and Territories exported outside EU, which decrease between 2022 to 2023.
Paper and cardboard - Recycling outside the EU +32,3% Strong increase (+40%) of the CCR and Kraft exports outside the UE (source: customs)
Paper and cardboard - Energy recovery -81,9% The tonnages sent to incineration plants with energy recovery is directly linked to the packaging waste generated minus the recycled waste. As the increase in the recycled quantities is faster than the increase in the quantities generated, the recovered tonnages decrease.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Reporting data: No revisions are applied to the data except if more reliable source is identified.

Nevertheless, institutional organizations (INSEE and customs) sometimes modify some previous year values when publishing data for year N. These adjusted data are tracked and used only to compute (and analyse) the real evolution between N-1 and N.

17.2. Data revision - practice

No major revisions are planned.

The main next change with an impact on the results will be a source change. As mentioned in the national waste law (AGEC, Anti-Waste and Circular Economy Law), the EPR packaging should cover the complete packaging scope, including the industrial and commercial packaging by 2025. At this time the French PoM approach should shift to a PoM approach based on EPR schemes (as the data will be available).

When the revision of the method is affecting calculation procedures, the whole timeseries will be revised – according to data availability.

When the revision is causing a change of data sources, the timeseries will be updated back according to data availability of the new source.

 


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Data used come from many sources:

  • INSEE (French National Statistical Institute): INSEE data (production volumes) are used to quantify empty packaging quantity produced in France, placed on the market and exported from which we deduce the quantity of empty packaging exported (based on CN-codes)
  • Customs: Customs data are used to quantity filled packaging flows (based on the use of HS* codes), empty packaging flows (based on CN codes) and exported industrial paper and cardboard packaging recycled abroad,
  • National sectorial federations,
  • SYDEREP (national declaration system for PROs),
  • Citeo and Léko (French PROs),
  • ADEME - National Agency for Ecological Transition,
  • Recycling plants in France (Glass processing plants, paper mills, plastic material regenerators),
  • Plastic waste exporters.
18.1.1. Waste samples from waste analysis

The waste samples for waste analysis are taken from:

 

Approach Details about the flows of waste covered
Directly from the bin  Waste analysis not applied
From the waste trucks  Waste analysis not applied
Other approaches  Waste analysis not applied
18.1.2. Source of waste flow data for estimation
  Sources Materials covered
Waste collectors  plastic packaging waste exporters reporting  plastic
Waste treatment operators  plastic material regenerators and transformers reporting, glass processing plants reporting, paper and cardboard mills reporting  plastic, glass, paper and cardboard
Municipalities    
Others  National sectorial federations, French PROs, ADEME - National Agency for Ecological Transition, Customs  wood, ferrous metal, aluminium, paper and cardboard, glass, plastic
18.2. Frequency of data collection

A specific study led by ADEME is carried out every year in order to collect data for the annual reporting of packaging and packaging waste.

18.3. Data collection

See different sections below.

18.3.1. Description of the methodology and verification of data on packaging waste generated in case waste analysis is used

Only the PoM approach based on other sources is used for the France’s reporting.

For plastic material, the WCA method has been developed. Results will be reported in the POR statement. 

18.3.2. Description of the methodology to report on composite packaging

The composites were already identified in the previous years.
The professional organizations helped us identifying these packaging.
Each material component of composite packaging is extracted and included in its respective material, except for the aluminium in the carton packaging (which represents 4% of the weight of the carton).

18.3.3. Description of methods for determining packaging waste treatment
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Data collection methods
Administrative reporting  no yes no no no  no  no  no 
Surveys no  yes   yes  yes  yes  no  yes no 
Electronic registry no  yes   no no  no  yes  yes no 
Waste analysis no   no no  no  no  no   no no 
Data from waste operators no   yes no  no  no   no no  no 
Data from municipalities no   no no  no  no  no  no  no 
Data from extended producer responsibility schemes no  yes  no  yes  yes  yes   yes no 
Other no  no  no  no  no  no   no no 

 

Additional information about the methodology, including the combination of methods used:

See the report “Valorisation des emballages en France – données 2022”: 

Librairie, document for the complete detailed methodology, described for each material.

The report “Valorisation des emballages en France – données 2023” will be published on this website.  (autumn)

 

  • For "glass", the data on packaging waste recycled in France comes from an electronic registry led by ADEME. The data on packaging waste recycled abroad comes from this electronic registry and EPR scheme. The data on packaging waste from oversea territories recycled in these oversea territories comes from EPR scheme.
  • For "plastic", the quantities of household and non-household packaging waste recycled in France and the exports of non-household packaging waste for recycling come from two distinct electronic registries led by ADEME completed by surveys and Eurostat database on EU trade by HS2-4-6 and CN8 (ds-045409) to ensure the completeness of the data. The quantity of household waste packaging exported for recycling come from PROs.
  • For "wood", the results of the survey come from the UIPP, the French wood-based panel manufacturers organization. The tonnages of shreeded pallets for littering, mulching, ... are based on a 2022 national study.
  • For "paper and carboard", the quantities of packaging recycled in France come from an electronic registry led by ADEME completed by data from COPACEL (French union of cardboard, paper and cellulose industries) to ensure the completeness of the data and the exports for recycling are based on the customs data.
  • For "ferrous metals", the survey concerns only the industrial packaging, the data on household packaging waste being declared by the PROs.
  • For "aluminium", the non-household packaging waste is estimated through a survey carried out by the French aluminium recycling organization and the data on household waste packaging are declared by the PROs.
  • For "other", no recycling is identified.
18.3.4. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on the generation and treatment of packaging waste

Website to annual production survey INSEE.
Website to customs data.

See the report “Valorisation des emballages en France – données 2022”:Dechets-economie-circulaire / packaging-recovery-in-france-2022, document for the complete detailed methodology, described for each material.

The report will be published on this website :Valorisation des emballages en France – données 2023”:(autumn).

18.3.5. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on reusable packaging

Glass data on reusable packaging is collected through a survey. Each year, an email containing an NDA is sent to our contacts in order to collect the tonnages of reusable bottles put on the market two years ago. Then the confidential data are aggregated and extrapolated using a correction factor based on imports.

Wood: data come from survey conducted by the professional federations of wooden packaging.

18.3.6. Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash

Calculation of recycling of metals from incinerator bottom ash : Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash in accordance with the Commission Implementing Act adopted in accordance with Article 37(7) of Directive 2008/98/EC.

 

Data Description of the measurement method to obtain the data
Total amount of metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash Data come from the French EPR compliance scheme (Citeo).  
Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken The ratio of aluminium in metal concentrate is estimated at 1% (survey from professional organization).  
Proportion of waste entering incineration plants that is packaging waste, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken Hypothesis of same proportion of packaging waste as in household waste.
The ratio of packaging for each material comes from the French waste analysis MODECOM carried every 10 years (last one based on 2017 data)  

 

For metals, both ferrous and aluminium, the same data collection and data treatment processes are applied.

The incineration bottom ash quantities are collected by the EPR eco-organisms as they provide a financial support (€/t) for the tonnages directed towards the recycling of metals recovered from household waste treatment units (incineration clinker). These data are then integrated in an annual recovery report, separately for ferrous IBA and aluminium IBA.

Given the specificity of the recycling sector after an incineration process, i.e. the metals are systematically embedded in the residual waste, the IBA data is not corrected (in accordance of Article 5 of Decision 2005/270/EC).

Nevertheless, another double correction factor is applied: a packaging ratio (in order to exclude quantities from non-packaging metals) and a metal ratio (in order to exclude quantities from inerts).

The packaging ratio is given by the results of the French national MODECOM survey (the last one dates back to 2017). This huge survey aims at characterizing household and assimilated waste. The packaging ratio is 71.4% for ferrous and 70.8% for aluminium.

The metal ratio is a mean value taking into account various treatment processes. The data has been obtained through discussions with experts from professional organizations. The metal ratio is 70% for ferrous and 60% for aluminium.

 

 

18.4. Data validation

See. 11.1 and see sections below.

18.4.1. Detailed description of the system for quality control and traceability for packaging waste pursuant to Article 6a(3) and (8) of Directive 94/62/EC

Article 6a(3) of Directive 94/62/CE :

Household packaging waste: Data relating to the quantities of generated and recycled packaging waste are declared by the PROs on the EPR Sector Reporting System called SYDEREP ( website). 

The Extended Producer Responsibility Supervision department (DSREP) from ADEME is responsible for ensuring the reliability of this data (consistency checks and changes observed from one year to the next).

Recycling of household and non-household packaging waste: From 2021, the National Agency for Ecological Transition (ADEME) has established electronic registries, in order to gather data directly from the various operators in the recycling value chain for 3 materials (plastic, glass and paper-cardboard) and from exporters of plastic packaging waste for recycling.

The detailed data collected for the reporting are checked and challenged by experts from the professional organizations during the annual sectorial meeting (usually held in March/April N+2).

 

Article 6a(8) of Directive 94/62/CE :

In France, PROs are non-profit private companies with a public service purpose. They have to follow terms of reference imposed by the State.

  1. From 2018, the public authorities impose on PROs, in the approval specifications, a regulatory control procedure for a selection of their adherent “marketers”, in accordance with articles R.541-126 to R.541-129 of the Environmental Code. For the 2018-2022 period, these controls should cover at least 80% of contributions and 15% of contributions per year. The selection of clients who give rise to this regulatory control is done randomly by a bailiff. 
  2. For the calculation of the amount of recycled packaging, PROs have to follow several provisions relating to the traceability and control of recycling operations which are specified in the EPR scheme approval specifications:
  • Traceability: Whatever the part-exchange option chosen by the local authority, with the exception of streams whose part-exchange and recycling are organized by the PRO, the PRO reserves in the various agreements that it concludes with the actors concerned the possibility of ensuring the effective recycling of packaging waste that complies with standards and their traceability to the recycler-end user of the material. For this purpose, the PRO ensures that the buyer provides the following supporting documents:
    • elements of traceability of quantities and qualities based on checks carried out by or on behalf of the buyer;
    • the recycling certificate;
    • proof that any processing carried out outside the European Union, where applicable, took place under conditions equivalent to the legal requirements applicable under Article 6 “Recovery and recycling” of amended Directive 94/62/EC. 
  • Control: In order to ensure the accuracy of the supporting documents, the PRO carries out or has carried out the necessary external checks on documents (declaration) or on site at the buyers, and among recyclers-end users of the material (audit). These controls concern at least:
    • verification, with those involved downstream of the sorting center until final recycling, of the accuracy of the tonnages declared, taken back and recycled, by sampling batches declared as taken back and establishing the traceability of these batches to the recycler-end user;
    • verification that tonnages exported outside the European Union only contribute to recycling objectives if they are recycled under conditions equivalent to the legal requirements applicable under Article 6 “Recovery and recycling” of amended Directive 94 /62/EC;
    • verification of compliance with the provisions set out in VI.1.b on material standards.

To meet the obligations of the specifications and guarantee compliance with the performance objectives, financial security and fairness of the system, two types of controls are put in place by Citeo & Adelphe:

  • Consistency control: It consists of checking the declarations of the local authorities under contract and their buyers and aims to detect the slightest anomaly from the triggering of the declaration (e.g. inconsistency between the declarations of the authorities and their buyers, lack of traceability to the recycling plant, failure to provide the information and supporting documents required under the export standards for processing carried out outside te European Union, etc.), therefore the risks linked to errors or omissions in declaration are reduced.
  • Audit: Carried out by an accredited third-party organization selected by Citeo and Adelphe, the audit covers a smaller number of auditees and a broader field of investigation. These audits can be carried out at any point in the recycling chain, from the sorting or processing operator to the final recipient, but the majority of controls relate to recycling plants. The main objective being to verify compliance with the rules concerning material standards, traceability to the recycler-end user and, for any new non-EU factory declared from the first quarter of 2021, compliance with the export standards such as specified below.

       3. Export referential: The cumulative principles retained in the export referential by Citeo and Adelphe with reference to Article 6 of the amended Directive 94/62/EC, as part of the controls carried out on recyclers-end users located outside the European Union are as follows:

  • The company has authorizations to import household packaging waste and carry out its activity;
  • The recycling process uses industrial techniques to process household packaging waste under conditions essentially equivalent to the applicable requirements of EU environmental law;
  • The company has a waste management system for its activity enabling the disposal of residues from the recycling process under conditions substantially equivalent to the applicable requirements of EU environmental law.

For more details, please see the Citeo's control reference document:  Emballages and the recycling certificate.

The approval specifications provide that at the end of the approval period, approved PROs must have inspected buyers and recyclers-end users representing at least 95% of the tonnages recycled per material.

 

18.4.2. Traceability of waste treated outside the member State and ensuring its treatment in conditions broadly equivalent to the requirements of EU environmental law
Packaging waste material Subject to final treatment in the Member State (yes/no) Shipped to another EU Member State (yes/no) Exported outside the EU (yes/no) Description of specific measures for quality control and traceability of packaging waste, in particularly as regards monitoring and validation of data
Plastic  Yes  Yes  Yes  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Wood  Yes  No  No  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Ferrous metals  Yes  Yes  Yes  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Aluminium  Yes  Yes  Yes  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Glass  Yes  Yes  Yes  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Paper and cardboard  Yes  Yes  Yes  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Others  No  No  No  Not available
18.4.3. Description of measures to ensure broadly equivalent waste treatment

See 18.4.1.

18.4.4. Verification of data on packaging waste generated

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic Yes  Yes   No Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector federations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions  
Wood  Yes  Yes No   Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector federations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions 
Ferrous metals Yes  Yes   No  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector federations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions 
Aluminium Yes  Yes   No Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector federations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions  
Glass  Yes  Yes  No  Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector federations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions 
Paper and cardboard  Yes Yes  No   Annual detailed review of :
- the current year data with the commentaries of the sector federations about their values
- systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions 
Others  No  No No  Not applicable 
18.4.5. Verification of data on packaging waste recycling

The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.

 

Packaging waste material Cross-check (yes/no) Time-series check (yes/no) Audit (yes/no) Verification process
Plastic  Yes  Yes No   Annual detailed review of:
  • the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
  • systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Wood  Yes Yes  No   Annual detailed review of:
  • the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
  • systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Ferrous metals  Yes  Yes No   Annual detailed review of:
  • the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
  • systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions
Aluminium  Yes  Yes  No Annual detailed review of:
  • the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
  • systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions 
Glass Yes   Yes No  Annual detailed review of:
  • the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
  • systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions  
Paper and cardboard Yes Yes No Annual detailed review of:
  • the current year data with the commentaries of the sector associations about their values
  • systematic analysis of the N/N-1 evolutions 
Others  No  No  No  Not applicable
18.5. Data compilation

See sections below.

18.5.1. Methods for determining packaging waste generation
Approach % of waste generated based on this approach
Approach 1
Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR data, complemented with estimates to ensure full coverage of the EPR data
 22%
Approach 2
POM based on sources other than EPR (e.g. based on production and import statistics and factors to estimate the amount of packaging associated to these product flows)
78% 
Approach 3
Waste analysis
 0%
Other approaches :  0%
18.5.1.1. Approach 1 - Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR

Not applicable, excepted for glass 2023 data. For other materials, France doesn't use this approach.

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
EPR scheme data 20%  Not applicable Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable   94% Not applicable  Not applicable   Not done
Administrative reporting different from EPR Not applicable   Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 0%  Not applicable   Not applicable Not done 
Surveys Not applicable  Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  0%  Not applicable  Not applicable   Not done
Electronic registry:  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 0%  Not applicable  Not applicable Not done 
Other : 1%  Not applicable   Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 6% Not applicable  Not applicable  Not done 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered 

18.5.1.2. Approach 2 - Put on the market (POM) calculated from production and reign trade statistics and using coefficients of packaging for the sold goods in question

Primary sources and their shares in the total.

 

Sources for calculation of PoM % of packaging total covered Threshold of this source(*)
Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Production statistics 33% 23%  14%  28%  85%  Not applicable   59% Not applicable  Not done for all materials (only plastic) 
Foreign trade statistics  27% 52%  39%  30%  0%  Not applicable  27%  Not applicable  Not done for all materials (only plastic) 
Specific surveys :  9% 19%  47%  0%  0%  Not applicable   0% Not applicable  Not done for all materials (only plastic) 
Electronic registry : 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%   Not applicable 0%   Not applicable Not done for all materials (only plastic) 
Other : 9%   5% 0%   43% 15%  Not applicable  15%   A ratio of production for the "other materials" is applied to the whole production of other packaging (0,04%) Not done for all materials (only plastic) 

(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered

18.5.1.3. Approach 3 - Waste analysis

Not applicable (France didn't use this approach).

Packaging waste generated estimated by waste analysis

Type of waste Number of samples taken Total volume or weight of samples taken What proportion does the sample represent of the total waste generated
(in %)
Frequency of sample
Volume in cubic metres Weight in tonnes
Mixed household and similar waste Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable 
Separately collected municipal waste  Not applicable  Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Separately collected business waste Not applicable   Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
Others :  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable

See 18.3.1 about explanations of waste analysis in progress.

18.5.2. Information on estimates for packaging placed on the market

See the report “Valorisation des emballages en France – données 2022”: Packaging recovery in France - 2022 data",

 document for the complete detailed methodology, described for each material.

The report “Valorisation des emballages en France – données 2023” will be published on this website.  (autumn)

The source for packaging POM is the production data from the French National Statistics Institute (INSEE), completed by the foreign trade of empty packaging and the simulation of the foreign trade of filled packaging (based on the foreign trade of products itself with the application of a ratio on the quantity of packaged goods and a ratio on the weight of the packaging with respect to the weight of the goods). Nevertheless, a few production data need treatment (as an example the gross production of molded cellulose includes both packaging and non-packaging uses, so a ratio on the packaging use part has been applied): the hypothesis and the data retreatment is explained in the above mentioned file.

18.5.3. Presence and calculation of estimates and indication of added volume in % of the total
Packaging waste material Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Validation
Corrections for underreporting of units covered by the above sources  No No  No   No No  No   No No 
Estimates for units below the threshold (de minimis)  No  No No  No   No No   No No 
Estimates for other units legally exempt from reporting No   No No  No   No No  No  No 
Estimates for freeriders  No  No No  No   No  No  No  No
Private imports /exports by private parcels  No No  No  No  No  No  No  No 
Private imports /exports (from journeys)  No  Yes 0,01% No   No No  No   No  No
Internet imports and exports i.e. on-line sales  No No   No  No  No  No  No  No
Other corrections  No Yes 1,64%   No  No No   No No   No
18.5.4. Measurement points for recycling applied

Packaging waste material

Description of measurement points used (at calculation point or at the output of sorting operation with subtraction of non-target materials as appropriate, end-of-waste criteria, etc.), including variation at regional and local level

Plastic

At calculation point for waste packaging recycling in France (declaration of the regeneration or transformation units of plastic packaging waste).

Declaration of private sector waste management plant operators for exports of non-household packaging with application of coefficients (non-target, humidity, etc.) as appropriate

Exported household packaging data come from PROs with application of coefficients (non-target, humidity, etc.) as appropriate

Wood Input to recycling plant with application of a non-target coefficient as appropriate
Ferrous metals  Output of sorting plant with application of coefficients (non-target, humidity, etc.) as appropriate
Aluminium  Output of sorting plant with application of coefficients (non-target, humidity, etc.) as appropriate
Glass

 Output of cullet preparation unit in France

 Output of sorting plant in France for household packaging exported which doesn’t go through a French cullet preparation unit

Application of coefficients (non-target, humidity, etc.) as appropriate for each.

 

Paper and cardboard

 Input in paper mill in France with application of coefficients (non-target, humidity, etc.) as appropriate

Output of sorting plant for exports with application of coefficients (non-target, humidity, etc.) as appropriate

Others  Not available

 

1. For "plastic", no correction is applied for the recycling in France (at the calculation point, that is at the output of the shredding line except in cases where this measure point is not possible -integrated production- where the measure is taken at the output of granulation), but a loss rate is applied for the exports (output of sorting plant).

  • Recycling in France: An annual declaration campaign of regeneration and transformation units of plastic packaging waste in France is carried out each year by ADEME with the support of the professional organization SRP (Federation of companies running regeneration units of plastic waste in France) and the engineering consultant AJBD. No loss rates are applied because data is measured at calculation point.
  • Recycling abroad:
    • The household plastic packaging waste: The household plastic packaging waste collected for recycling is known precisely through the data of the recovery observatory, fed by PROs. Loss rates are then applied.
    • The non-household plastic packaging waste: An annual declaration campaign is carried out each year by ADEME with the support of professional organizations (FEDEREC, FNADE, SNEFID) in order to collect from collectors their tonnages of post-user non-household plastic packaging waste collected and exported abroad. As the tonnages are not measured at the calculation point, a loss rate is applied for the exports (output of sorting plant).

2. For "wood", an impurity coefficient is applied to the measurement point.

3. For "ferrous metals", the measurements points (output of sorting) for both household and non-household packaging need to be corrected by an impurity coefficient and a correction coefficient for humidity.

4. For "aluminium", the measurements points (output of sorting) for both household and non-household packaging need to be corrected by an impurity coefficient and a correction coefficient for humidity.

5. For "glass", the measurements points (output) need to be corrected by an impurity coefficient and a correction coefficient for humidity.

6. For "paper and carboard", the measurement point in France (input to pulper) need to be corrected by a ratio of packaging, an impurity coefficient and a correction coefficient for humidity; the measurement point for the exports (output of sorting) need to be corrected by an impurity coefficient and a correction coefficient for humidity.

18.5.4.1. Detailed description of the methodology to calculate the amount of non-target materials removed between the measurement and the calculation points, where applicable

For each material, the professional organizations provided, for each waste stream (separate collection, industrial and commercial waste, …), an impurity coefficient (in order to take into account non-target materials) and a correction coefficient for humidity (in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging). For some materials, a global loss rate is used. These coefficients are either based on detailed data from the professional organizations, or on averaged main values also from the professional organizations or on standards. When the measurement is made at the calculation point, no correction is applied.

See the paragraph answer for 18.5.4 for measurement points used for each material.

See the paragraph answer for 18.6.1 for loss rates applied for each material.

Zoom plastic loss rates:

We apply loss rates to the quantity of plastic waste packaging exported for recycling. These loss rates come from two sources: SRP (National union of plastic material regenerators) and Valorplast (company responsible for ensuring and promoting plastic recycling):

- SRP methodology:

The SRP is the French organization representative of companies which manage a regeneration unit of plastic waste in France. Annual SRP statistics come from a compilation of confidential information transmitted by all of its members, following an exhaustive survey carried out each year at the start of year N+1.

The loss rates communicated are the result of dividing the quantity of Regenerated Raw Material (RRM) produced by the quantity of waste used for their production.

- Valorplast methodology:

For the household flows regenerated on French sites, the data comes from the annual reports transmitted by the regenerators to Valorplast.

This is a weighted average based on the tonnages processed by each site.

The regenerators declare for one year:

  • Tonnages processed
  • The quantities produced (straws or granules)
  • Quantities of co-products from the process by category (sludge, wire, labels, fines, sorting rejects, etc.)
  • For each co-product it is specified whether it is a recovery (recycling or energy) or an elimination

The recycling rate is based on the quantity of material regenerated in the form of flakes or granules and includes all fractions (co-products) oriented towards recycling (caps, labels, fines, sorting rejects, etc.).

Household plastic flows: The loss rates used in the calculations are an average between loss rates from these two sources.

Non-household plastic flows: The loss rates used in the calculations come from the SRP source.

18.5.4.2. Detailed description of how compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants has been identified and recorded in the data

Not applicable.

18.5.5. Methodology to determine recycled amounts from composite packaging or packaging composed of multiple materials

Paper mills which treat these carton packaging declare to the ADEME, in the framework of the declaration campaign for paper mills located in France and receiving household and professional post-consumer paper and cardboard packaging waste, the quantity of POLYAL produced and sent for recycling. These tonnages of POLYAL are distributed among the plastic and aluminium sectors in proportion to the share represented by each of these two materials in complexed packaging for liquids: 21% plastic, 4% aluminium considered.

Recycled composite packaging is not reported as recycled paper and plastic packaging (no double counting). Quantities of 5.03.00 and 5.03 A are therefore accounted for 75% in the paper and cardboard material (with deductions for unwanted materials and humidity) because we consider that these flows are composed of 75% paper, 21% plastic and 4% aluminium. The outgoing quantities of POLYAL are therefore be counted pro rata in the plastic material and aluminium material.

18.5.6. Use of Average Loss rates (ALRS)

Description of the sorted packaging waste to which ALRs are applied, types of sorting plants to which different ALRs apply, the methodological approach to calculating ALRs at such point(s), including the statistical accuracy of any surveys used, or the nature of any technical specifications.

 

Sorted waste material and sorting plant type ALR applied (in %) Description
 18.5.4., 18.5.4.1.  18.5.4., 18.5.4.1.  18.5.4., 18.5.4.1.
18.6. Adjustment

See 18.6.1, 18.6.2 and 18.6.3

18.6.1. Adjustment for impurities and humidity
Factors Total Plastic Wood Ferrous metals Aluminium Glass Paper and Cardboard Other
Correction factors for impurities and humidity in % of waste See details for each material below        
How the correction factors are derived  See details for each material National sectorial federations National sectorial federations PROs,
National sectorial federations, MODECOM national campaign
PROs,
National sectorial federations, MODECOM national campaign
PROs,
National sectorial federations 
EN 643, 
National sectorial federations
 See details for each material
If no correction of impurities and humidity is applied, how they are accounted  Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ferrous Metal: 

 

Percentage of impurities and non-targeted material

Moisture deviation relative to new

Separate collection

5%

2%

Eco DDS

5%

2%

Steel closure systems

0.5%

0%

Drums

0.5%

0.5%

Waste treatment centre

2%

2%

 

IBA coeff

Packaging share (MODECOM)

Scrap removal*

70%

71.4%

*Scrap metal (70% IBA coefficient * 71,4% packaging ratio)

Aluminium:

 

Percentage of impurities and non-targeted material

Moisture deviation relative to new

Separate collection

10%

0%

Miscellaneous collection

10%

0%

Aluminium closures

0.5%

0%

 

IBA coeff

Packaging share (MODECOM)

Scrap removal*

60%

70.8%

 

*Scrap aluminium (60% IBA coefficient * 70,8% packaging ratio)

  • Wood:
 

Percentage of impurities and non-targeted material

Humidity correction *

Sorted wood

3%

0%

 

*On new packaging, the density is calculated on a basis of 20% humidity. For panel makers, the dry tonne is reduced to 20% humidity. Thus, all tonnages are estimated considering this humidity of 20% and no humidity correction should therefore be applied.

 

  • Paper and Cardboard:

Rates applied to paper and cardboard packaging recycled in France:

EN 643 Type

Estimated packaging share for each type (%)

Percentage of unwanted materials

Humidity rate differential

(with 7% natural humidity when marketed)

1.01.00

50%

3%

3%

1.02.00

60%

2.5%

3%

1.02 CS *

30%

2.5%

5%

1.04.00

100%

3%

3%

1.04 CS *

100%

5%

5%

1.04.01

100%

3%

3%

1.04.02

100%

3%

3%

1.05.00

100%

2.5%

3%

1.05 A *

100%

1%

5%

1.05.01

100%

2.5%

3%

4.02.00

100%

2.5%

3%

4.03.00

100%

2.5%

3%

4.04.00

100%

2%

3%

4.06.00

100%

1%

3%

5.02.00

100%

3%

3%

5.02 A *

100%

5%

5%

5.03.00

100%

5%

5%

5.03 A *

100%

5%

5%

5.04.00

100%

2%

3%

5.05.00

100%

2.5%

3%

5.05.01

100%

1%

3%

5.11.00

100%

2%

3%

5.12.00

100%

2%

3%

5.12.01

100%

1%

3%

5.14.00

100%

2.5%

3%

*Type corresponding to selective collection from households.

Rates applied to paper and cardboard packaging recycled abroad:

 Average non-target/waste humidity/natural humidity: household (3,5%/12%/7%), non-household (2,6%/10%/7%) determined on the base of the coefficients applied paper type by paper type for paper and cardboard packaging recycled in France (see above).

  • Plastic:
 

Loss rate *

Household

 

PET

20,95%

PE/PP

22,4%

Films

42,05%

Industrial

 

Rigid

9,2%

Films

11,4%

*The loss rate used is global and represents material losses after the first step involved in preparing the material (including target material losses, impurities and a moisture differential from the new material).

See the paragrah answer for 18.5.4.1 for the methodology developped to estimate these plastic lost rates.

  • Glass: 
 

Percentage of impurities and non-targeted material

Moisture deviation relative to new

Collection

2%

1%

18.6.2. Attribution of waste to packaging and non-packaging types and correction for humidity

Description, where applicable, of the methodology to exclude non-packaging waste from the reported amount of recycled packaging waste and of the methodology to correct the amount of packaging waste at the measurement point in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging (including by using relevant European standards). Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of packaging waste (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 Plastic  Plastic regeneration and transformation units & exporters  Not available  

Plastic packaging waste recycled in France: The plastic recyclers and transformers have to separate in the electronic registry they send to the ADEME the share of plastic packaging waste for each flow they declare.

Industrial and commercial plastic packaging waste recycled abroad: exporters had to separate in the electronic registry they send to the ADEME the share of plastic packaging waste for each flow they declare.

For household plastic packaging waste recycled abroad, data come from PROs.
 Glass  Glass treatment plants  Not available

Only packaging flows are reported by cullet preparation units.

For glass packaging waste recycled abroad without going through a French cullet preparation unit, data come from PROs.

 Paper and cardboard  Paper mills  Not available

For paper and cardboard household packaging waste recycled abroad, data come from PROs.

For paper and carboard industrial and commercial packaging waste recycled abroad, data come from customs with application of a coefficient of part of packaging in the flows (coefficient determined with professional organisations)
 Metal  Not available  Not available

For data from PROs, PROs ensure that not packaging quantities are not taken into account.

For data from federations, quantities are transmitted as packaging.

 Wood  Not available  Not available For data from federations, quantities are transmitted as packaging.
18.6.3. Attribution of waste

Description of the methodology to exclude waste originating from other countries, where applicable. Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.

 

Packaging waste material Facility type Share of waste from the Member State (%) Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage
 Plastic  Plastic regeneration and transformation units  The quantities collected abroad then imported for each of the materials were not considered as recycled and are not accounted for in the calculation of the tons recycled in France, like the quantities of non-packaging waste.  The plastic recyclers and transformers had to separate in the electronic registry the origin of their waste : "France" or "import".
 Glass  Glass treatment plants  The quantities collected abroad then imported for each of the materials were not considered as recycled and are not accounted for in the calculation of the tons recycled in France, like the quantities of non-packaging waste.  The glassmakers had to separate in the electronic registry the origin of their waste: "France" or "import"
 Paper and cardboard  Paper mills  The quantities collected abroad then imported for each of the materials were not considered as recycled and are not accounted for in the calculation of the tons recycled in France, like the quantities of non-packaging waste.  The papermakers had to separate in the electronic registry the origin of their waste: "France" or "import".
 Metal  Not available

For data from PROs, PROs ensure that quantities collected abroad are not taken into account.

For data from federations, quantities are transmitted as not coming from the import.
 Not available
 Wood  Not available  Quantities are transmitted by federations as not coming from the import.  Not available


19. Comment Top

We remain at your disposal should you need any additional information.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top