|
![]() |
| For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
| 1.1. Contact organisation | STATISTICAL SERVICE OF CYPRUS |
||
| 1.2. Contact organisation unit | ENVIRONMENT STATISTICS UNIT |
||
| 1.5. Contact mail address | Michael Karaolis Street, CY-1444 Nicosia, Cyprus |
||
|
|||
| 2.1. Metadata last certified | 28 June 2024 | ||
| 2.2. Metadata last posted | 28 June 2024 | ||
| 2.3. Metadata last update | 28 June 2024 | ||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1. Data description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See sub sections.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.2. Description of methods determining waste generation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General description of methodology Data set 1: Waste generation by waste category (EWC-STAT) and economic activities (NACE) Data on waste generation were produced by appropriately combining the results of a sample survey with extensive data obtained from waste collectors and waste treatment plants. Determination of waste generation by sample survey A specially designed questionnaire was drawn up which encompassed all requirements of the Waste Statistics Regulation. The questionnaire required respondents to report the quantities of waste generated by waste stream and the type of treatment (incl. waste collection by municipal authorities) for each waste stream. A letter was dispatched to all units sampled, laying down the scope of the survey and informing them that an interviewer will soon contact them in order to arrange for a meeting with them for the completion of the questionnaire. Note that this practice of holding personal interviews for the collection of statistical data is a long-standing tradition for the majority of business surveys in Cyprus and has proved to yield very high response rates. Determination of waste generation on the basis of information on waste treatment For reference year 2022, data on waste generation are based both on information obtained from a dedicated survey as well as on information from waste treatment facilities. This was even more accurate for hazardous waste.
For reference year 2022, data on waste collection was mainly used for cross checking and tracking movements of waste quantities. Municipal waste collection was only used for the determination of waste generated by the waste source “households”. Determination of waste generation on the basis of administrative sources Household waste is not directly detectable since municipal waste contains an unidentifiable amount of waste not generated by households. Past experience has revealed that household waste constitutes around 70% of municipal waste.
The sources are the businesses (18 NACE groupings) and households which generate waste. The waste types are the 51 waste categories for which data is required under the Waste Statistics Regulation. Annexes: Table: Description of methods determining waste generation- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.3. Estimation of waste generation in the economy on the basis of a sample survey | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Determination of waste generation by (sample) survey
Annexes: Determination of waste generation by sample survey |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.4. Estimation of waste generation in the economy on the basis of information on waste treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This table shows the proportion of waste generation covered by indirect calculation on the basis of waste treatment and how the method is applied. Row 1 indicates what proportion of waste generation is covered by information concerning waste treatment. This can be done by referring to selected parts of the economy or to selected waste streams. This should be consistent with the table in the concept 3.1.2. Row 2 identifies the number of waste treatment facilities included in the calculation. The numbers are expected to be equal to the number of facilities in the table in the concept 3.1.8 . Any differences should be explained. Rows 3 to 4.3 provide a more detailed description of the methods applied. Does the original data set contain quantities of waste classified by the List of waste, by the European waste Classification for Statistics (EWC-Stat) or by a national classification? On what basis is waste which has been treated transformed into waste which has been generated? How are non-specific wastes distributed across sources and how are imported wastes excluded?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.5. Description of the estimation of waste generation in the economy on the basis of administrative sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimation of waste generation in the economy on the basis of models or other methods
This table is similar to the table in the concept 3.1.4 in that it shows the proportion of waste generation covered by other methods and how these methods are applied. Within this table, a distinction is made between methods based on modelling and other methods. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.6. Determination methods for waste generated by households | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This table focuses on the methods applied in order to estimate the amount of waste generated by households. The various methods are identified in different parts of the table. An important distinction is made between waste generated by households, on the one hand, and waste generated by businesses, i.e. ‘commercial contamination’, on the other. Determination of waste generated by households As from the year 2002 and up until 2018, the Statistical Service was carrying out a bi-annual survey in order to produce data on the amounts of municipal solid waste collected, as well as their distribution by type and by origin. The survey was addressing a questionnaire to all municipal authorities in the country, which are responsible for the collection and treatment of the municipal waste generated. As already outlined, this amount included waste collected from households, as well as waste collected from businesses (agricultural, industrial, commercial and other services activities). In 2018 only municipalities in the Lefkosia district were covered in this manner. The information on municipal waste generated in all other districts was obtained directly from the waste treatment facilities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.7. Description of data sources and methods by treatment category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Determination of treated waste quantities
Data sets 2 and 3: Waste treatment General description of the methodology used Cyprus has still some work to do in order to implement fully what is foreseen in national legislation, which requires that all treatment facilities for incineration, recovery or disposal purposes obtain an appropriate licence from the competent authorities.The registers kept have proved to be deficient since the provisions of the legislation are not properly implemented. Therefore, the Statistical Service continues to collect data directly from the enterprises in order to cross check the quality of the data. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.8. Coverage of waste treatment facilities and criteria for exclusion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This table identifies the number of waste treatment facilities, which are included in or excluded from the compilation of data. There can be several reasons for excluding waste treatment operations: because they treat only internal waste, because they are pre-treatment facilities or because the capacity is below a nationally defined threshold, etc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.9. Registers used for identification of treatment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This table gives details of the registers used to gather information on waste treatment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.2. Classification system | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For economic activities NACE Rev. 2 is used. For waste types, the European Waste Catalogue is used. Administrative sources provide data according to the List of Waste(LoW) codes. Enterprises that may don't know the LoW, give a description of their waste and then the allocation is made to waste types. Waste treatment facilities provide information about recovery (R) and disposal (D) treatment codes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.2.1. Description of classification used | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.3. Coverage - sector | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste generation and waste treatment data (set 1 & set 2) have complete coverage. The data refer to all waste generated in the country, covering all economic activities and households, as well as all waste treated nationally. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical concepts and definitions used are based on the thorough implementation of the provisions of the Waste Statistics Regulation and the guidelines being given by Eurostat. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.5. Statistical unit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The statistical unit is the enterprise or the treatment facility. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.6. Statistical population | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste generation data refers to waste generated on the national territory (Government controlled area of Cyprus). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.7. Reference area | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data cover the Government controlled area of Cyprus. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.8. Coverage - Time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data have been produced biennially since 2004. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.9. Base period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
Data are reported in tonnes of normal wet waste; for sludge (Stat-EWC 3.2, 3.3,11, 12.7), the dry matter in tonnes is reported. |
|||
|
|||
The reference period is 2022. |
|||
|
|||
| 6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
Data on the generation and treatment of waste are collected on the basis of the Regulation on waste statistics (EC) No. 2150/2002, amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No. 849/2010. The Waste Statistics Regulation was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on 25 November 2002 and revised in 2010. Since 2002, several implementation measures have been adopted:
The Regulation consists of a general part and three Annexes. The Annexes deal with the generation of waste (Annex I), the treatment of waste (Annex II) and the waste classification (Annex III) which should be used for observation and registration. The Regulation starts with the usual “whereas” phrases, giving the reasons and considerations which motivated and led to the creation of the Waste Statistics Regulation in the form in which it was adopted. Moreover, at national level the Official Statistics Law of 2021 (Law No. 25(I)/2021) provides the legal basis for the development, production and dissemination of official statistics in Cyprus. |
|||
| 6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
|
|||
| 7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Official statistics are released in accordance with the confidentiality provisions laid down in the following:
Under the provisions of the Official Statistics Law, all the information collected is treated as confidential and is used solely for statistical purposes. No data for any individual enterprise is published or disclosed to either public bodies or private individuals. Annexes: Confidentiality Policy |
|||
| 7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
No data is considered confidential at the level published. Annexes: Guidelines for the Protection of Confidential Data |
|||
|
|||
| 8.1. Release calendar | |||
Data for Waste Statistics collected based on the Regulation, are published on the national website on a biennial basis. They are included in the Statistical Abstract. National data are are also published by Eurostat on its database on a biennial basis. |
|||
| 8.2. Release calendar access | |||
The release calendar for the current year is available on the web portal of the Statistical Service. Release dates are confirmed on the week before dissemination. |
|||
| 8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
|
|||
The results are envisaged to be disseminated nationally in December 2024 via the web portal of the Statistical Service. |
|||
|
|||
| 10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
There are no releases on the national website. |
|||
| 10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
Data are scheduled to be published in the forthcoming edition of the statistical yearbook entitled “Statistical Abstract”, due to be released by the end of the year. Furthermore, the results have been transmitted to Eurostat accompanied with this data quality report, in accordance with the provisions of the Waste Statistics Regulation. |
|||
| 10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
It is planned to upload the data on the national online database in December 2024. Data are available also on Eurostat's database. |
|||
| 10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | |||
Not available. |
|||
| 10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
| 10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
| 10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
| 10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
Eurostats's methodological guidelines are used. |
|||
| 10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
| 10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
See Article 11 of the Official Statistics Law of 2021 (Law No. 25(I)/2021) which is linked at concept 11. |
|||
|
|||
| 11.1. Quality assurance | |||
The quality of statistics in CYSTAT is managed in the framework of the European Statistics Code of Practice which sets the standards for developing, producing and disseminating European Statistics as well as the ESS Quality Assurance Framework (QAF). CYSTAT endorses the Quality Declaration of the European Statistical System. In addition, CYSTAT is guided by the requirements provided for in Article 11 of the Official Statistics Law No. 25(I) of 2021 as well as Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics, which sets out the quality criteria to be applied in the development, production and dissemination of European statistics. Moreover, CYSTAT follows the guidelines provided in Eurostats' for Waste Statistics manual which sets standardsfor the compilation of the data. Annexes: Quality Assurance |
|||
| 11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
The quality of statistics is assessed according to five quality criteria: relevance, accuracy, timeliness and punctuality,accessibility and clarity, coherence and comparability. CYSTAT endorses the Quality Declaration of the European Statistical System. In addition, CYSTAT is guided by the requirements provided in Article 11 of the Official Statistics Law of 2021 (Law No. 25(I)/2021) as well as Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics, which sets out the quality criteria to be applied in the development, production and dissemination of European statistics. |
|||
|
||||||
| 12.1. Relevance - User Needs | ||||||
In a country like Cyprus, where natural resources are scarce and pressures and strains are intense on the country’s natural fabric, environment is a subject of great concern and interest. The response, in the form of environmental protection measures, has been substantial in the last few decades. In assessing the state of the environment and formulating, managing and monitoring the outcome of these policy measures, statistics has a vital role to play by providing relevant, reliable, timely and comparative quantitative information to support these tasks. Waste statistics, as a component of environment statistics, concerns not only politicians, but the ordinary citizen as well.
|
||||||
| 12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | ||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||
| 12.3. Completeness | ||||||
See sub sections. |
||||||
| 12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | ||||||
Waste generation and waste treatment data (set 1 & set 2) have complete coverage. The data refer to all waste generated in the country, covering all economic activities and households, as well as all waste treated nationally. |
||||||
| 12.3.2. Description of missing data in the waste generation dataset | ||||||
No missing data. |
||||||
| 12.3.3. Description of missing data in datasets on treated waste and quantities and capacities of facilities | ||||||
Information is missing about the capacity of disposal sites for inert waste for most of the landfills, as well as the number of backfilling sites. No information is available about the number of backfilling sites. It is very difficult to monitor exactly how many such sites exist. They are not constant and are not the same over time, since they vary according to the building projects running in the year and the restoration of mines and quarries. The capacity of landfills for inert waste was not reported due to the lack of data. No volumetric measurements were made by the enterprises. |
||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cyprus has still some work to do in order to implement fully what is foreseen in national legislation, which requires that all treatment facilities for incineration, recovery, or disposal purposes obtain an appropriate licence from the competent authorities.The registers kept have proved to be deficient since the provisions of the legislation are not properly implemented. Therefore, the Statistical Service continues to collect data directly from the enterprises in order to cross-check the quality of the data. Over the last years, a considerable improvement in data availability on waste treatment from administrative sources has been observed which has greatly facilitated the production of statistics. Detailed administrative records were made available from treatmentfacilities, at least for particular waste streams. However, despite this big step forward, deficiencies were discovered that required thorough investigation on our side and consultation, both with the Department of Environment and the treatment facilities themselves. These deficiencies are expected to diminish with time. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.2. Sampling error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coefficients of variation for the total amount of waste generated and the total amount of waste treated cannot be calculated since these aggregates no longer result exclusively from the sample survey but are to a large extent also based on administrative data. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3. Non-sampling error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The table “Totals and coefficients of variation for the key aggregates” does not apply to Cyprus. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.1. Coverage error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As far as treatment operations are concerned, we have gathered the information for both licensed and non-licensed treatment facilities. In the case of landfill sites, only those that are still active have been accounted for. Determination of extractive waste generation The main mining activities in Cyprus relate to the quarrying of building stone, marble, gypsum, sand, gravel, havara, bentonite,clay, umber and other ochres (NACE Rev. 2 classes 08.11, 08.12 and 08.91). Moreover, the enterprise that operated the single active copper mine in Cyprus was allocated in NACE Rev. 2 class 24.44. The enterprise closed by the end of 2020. Topsoil, overburden and waste-rock are partially covered in the data. As a general practice, if the wastes are removed from the extraction site and used for backfilling then they are reported, whereas if they are used inside the extraction site they are not reported as waste. As far as the non-hazardous tailings are concerned, these are generally excluded since they are used inside the extraction site. The Mining Wastes Directive was transposed into national legislation in 2009. The Department of Environment, which is the competent authority for the management of waste from extractive industries, carried out a study about the status of extractive waste sites. An inventory has been prepared with all active and closed sites. According to this inventory, 31 active sites of extractive waste and 76 closed sites of extractive waste exist. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.1.3. Comparison of the number of units in the Register of Business and the number of units included in the calculation of the amount of waste generated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* for the needs of the GENER dataset (occurring in the administrative system / participating in the statistical survey) Data for NACE A, NACE F are calculated using other methods, Also data for Services, NACE B and NACE 38 are calculated with both sampling and other sources. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.1.4. Coverage of waste statistics with regard to extractive waste | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.1.5. Description of issues related to the allocation of mining waste to NACE section B or C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See comments in 13.3.1. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.1.6. Coverage of waste treatment facilities and criteria for exclusion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See table in the concept 3.1.8. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.2. Measurement error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The quantities are quite precise, since most of the municipalities actually weigh the waste they collect, whereas enterprises estimate the quantities of waste they produce based on their production. Moreover, waste treatment facilities weigh the quantities received and treated. Data are reported in tonnes. Possible mistakes that could arise in transferring the data from the questionnaires to the database were handled through thorough consistency and validation checks. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.3. Non response error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data collection in Cyprus is governed by the Official Statistics Law of 2021, which renders the provision of data to the Statistical Service mandatory for all respondents. Furthermore, it is a tradition in Cyprus for data collection to be carried out by personal interview, under the guidance of specially employed and trained interviewers, which assist the enterprises in comprehending what is required of them, so that the data obtained is as reliable as possible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.4. Processing error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data collection was followed by a thorough check of the questionnaires and of the detailed data reported by the waste treatment facilities regarding unexpected waste types produced, the quantities produced, the correct allocation among waste categories, the correct R/D code assignment, as well as the validity of licences owned by the treatment facilities. As a next step we proceeded to the data entry, validation and consistency checks, where once again we have checked for possible errors in the NACE classification, the entry of quantities and the R/D coding. The process of verification and the final extraction of the tables was done using Microsoft Excel. The process included recoding and some statistical checks, like the detection and handling of possible extreme values. Based on the above checks, different corrections had been made in order to ensure the robustness of thedata. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.3.5. Model assumption error | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
| 14.1. Timeliness | |||
Data transmission to Eurostat was performed within the time period set by the Waste Statistics Regulation. |
|||
| 14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||
Time schedule of the whole process:
|
|||
| 14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
| 14.2. Punctuality | |||
Data for the reference year 2022 were transmitted via EDAMIS on the 28th of June 2024. |
|||
| 14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||
Data for the reference year 2022 were transmitted via EDAMIS on the 28th of June 2024 and are planned to be published in December 2024 on the national website. |
|||
|
|||
| 15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
Data have been collected based on the methodological guidelines provided by Eurostat through the Waste Statistics Regulation, the waste statistics manual and the discussions that took place in the relevant working groups and workshops. Based on the experience of the previous surveys and in order to set the right base for future surveys and to maintain quality and comparability, a country specific methodological guidebook was produced for use by the interviewers, providing them with useful informationwhich would assist them during the interview. It is worth mentioning that for those economic activities and waste streams where significant differences can be observed between the values reported for 2022 and those reported for 2020, data have been verified and the reasons behind these differences are appropriately explained. |
|||
| 15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
| 15.2. Comparability - over time | |||
| Restricted from publication | |||
| 15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | |||
| Restricted from publication | |||
| 15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
The data produced maintain absolute coherence with the municipal waste data produced, since these had been used to extract household waste quantities. |
|||
| 15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | |||
The Statistical Service compiles data according to the provisions of the Waste Statistics Regulation biennially. |
|||
| 15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
| 15.4. Coherence - internal | |||
Data are coherent as the total equals the sum of the breakdowns. However, generation data is not the same as treatment data, nor the total or per waste stream category, mainly due to storage of waste and exports and imports of waste |
|||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
See 16.1. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.1. Burden on respondents | ||||||||||||||||||||
Well-trained interviewers had been employed, who could fully understand definitions and classifications. They also had the knowledge in advance regarding the expected waste types that an enterprise of a specific economic activity will most likely produce. This enabled them to have very specific questions, and hence, not imposing further burden to the enterprises. Despite ourgreat efforts though, multiple problems have been encountered, since many enterprises do not keep records regarding the information that the Regulation requests and are not aware of the European Waste Classification. This imposed a time burden to the respondents. Another problem that was encountered is that the number of business surveys has greatly increased over recent years and in a small country like Cyprus, the burden on enterprises is disproportionately high. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
| 17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
There is a formal revision policy at Cystat. Cystat publishes its Revision Policy on its website, describing the generalrules and principles governing the procedure of revising data published by Cystat. The policy is based on the guidelines of the European Statistical System (ESS) also taking into account the Quality Assurance Framework of the ESS and the European Statistics Code of Practice. Annexes: Revision policy |
|||
| 17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
Data if necessary is revised every two years when the data for the most recent reference year are transmitted. |
|||
| 17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
No data revisions are made for this repoting year. |
|||
|
||||||||||||||
| 18.1. Source data | ||||||||||||||
See the concept 3.1.1 above. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.2. Frequency of data collection | ||||||||||||||
Data are collected biennially by the Statistical Service of Cyprus. Data for municipal waste is collected annually. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.3. Data collection | ||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.3.1. Description of methods of data collection on capacity of treatment facilities (Dataset FAC: facilities of treatment of waste) | ||||||||||||||
In order to identify the enterprises that operate treatment facilities, we used not only what was reported in the survey carried out by the Statistical Service, but also the register kept by the Department of Environment, which lists all enterprises that are licensed to treat waste. In addition, the register of all landfill sites was utilised. Over the years, of course, the Statistical Service has also developed its own list of treatment facilities. In Cyprus, three landfill sites (2 MBT-D5, 1 Ladfill-D1) were operating in 2022. The largest one services the districts of Lefkosia, Larnaka andAmmochostos, the second one the district of Lemesos and the third one the Pafos district. The uncontrolled landfill site previously servicing the Lefkosia district was closed down at the end of 2018. Moreover, there are 11 landfills for inert waste. The reported value of 48,404 m3 in data set 3 refers to the remaining capacity of the three landfill sites that comply with the Landfill Directive and the capacity of one inert landfill. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.4. Data validation | ||||||||||||||
Extensive validation was performed on the data, which included comparisons over time, the shares of waste generation by economic activity, the share of hazardous waste to the total amounts generated, treatment operations by waste category, etc. Implausible combinations of waste categories and treatment operations were also checked. These validation checks have resulted in improvements of the final data released. However, some fluctuations over the years are unavoidable, firstly due to the structure of the economy and the existence of very few large enterprises that may lead to outliers, secondly due to one-off projects and finally due to the possibility of wrong classification of waste streams by the reporting enterprises. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.5. Data compilation | ||||||||||||||
This section is about collecting data on capacity of treatment facilities. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.5.1. Imputation - rate | ||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.5.2. Wet matter for sludges | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| 18.5.3. Indicators | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| 18.6. Adjustment | ||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||
| 18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | ||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||
|
|||
No other comments. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||