Waste generation and treatment (env_wasgt)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)

1.5. Contact mail address

Ground Floor, Seacole Block, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DF


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

[not requested]

2.2. Classification system

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.3. Coverage - sector

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.5. Statistical unit

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.6. Statistical population

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.7. Reference area

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.8. Coverage - Time

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.9. Base period

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.


3. Statistical processing Top
3.1. Source data

Section 12.1 Table 1: Institutions involved and distribution of tasks

Name of institution Description of key responsibilities
 UK: Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)

Co-ordination of UK data collection.

Sourcing of data and calculation of estimates on behalf of all UK for several types of waste (dredging, ELVs, mining, agriculture, fishing and offshore).

Combining of data collected by Devolved Administrations and data collected by Defra to form UK estimates. 

Identifying and adjusting for double counting that might occur during data collation.

Ensuring consistent approaches to reporting across the UK.

Submission of completed UK templates to Eurostat and solving of validation failures.

Preparation of UK quality report

 ENGLAND: Defra

Co-ordination and collection of England data sets 1, 2 and 3.  

Procurement of 'Reconcile' project for Commercial & Industrial estimates.

 ENGLAND: Environment Agency

Co-ordination and collection of England data for both infrastructure templates. Collating data from permits regulated under the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010 for England.  

Supply of treatment template completed in respect of permitted treatments.

Supply of generation template completed in respect of secondary waste from permitted treatment facilities.

Production of data and quality report aspects for England.

WALES: Welsh Government (WG), Natural Resources Wales Production of data (including construction and demolition, industrial and commercial and household) and quality report aspects for Wales.

SCOTLAND: Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)

Production of data (including construction and demolition, industrial and commercial and household) and quality report aspects for Scotland.

Production of estimates for UK forestry wastes.

NI: Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) Production of data (including construction and demolition, industrial and commercial and household) and quality report aspects for Northern Ireland.

 

  

 Data set 1: Waste generation

Table 2: Data set 1 (Waste generation), General description of methodology

The data set has been compiled from a variety of different data sources from each of the four countries which make up the UK. Due to the vast number of source it is not feasible to describe each in full detail in this report. England makes up 84% of the UK by population and accounts for around 85% of primary waste generated. As a consequence, the methods used in England will have most impact on the final results.

The key data sources for waste generation are:

  • Mandatory returns from all facilities with a waste permit.
  • Administrative data on all Local Authority Collected Waste.
  • Re-gross of historic sample surveys for industrial and commercial waste and construction and demolition waste (Wales only - see Section 8.2).
  • Data from other public sector organisations (e.g. Cefas, Department for Transport, Forestry Commission).

 

Continuity of the main data sources is thought to be good across the UK.  Much of the critical data comes from returns from waste treatment facilities which are permitted in keeping with The Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010, which are expected to continue and to provide annual data.  Local Authority collection data is currently seen as a high priority area in Defra and the Welsh Government and there is a legal requirement on Local Authorities to provide data.  Scotland has similar regulations covering permitting of sites that submit waste returns.  The Zero Waste Scotland aggregates directory is dependent on continued funding, and SEPA are considering legislative alternatives to obtain this data.  NI anticipate that data returns from waste management facilities will continue to be mandatory, similar to previous years. 

 

 

 

 

Table 3: Data set 1 (Waste generation)  Determination of waste generation by (sample) survey

No sample surveys were used to estimate waste generation for WStatR 2018. 

Wales determined Industrial & Commercial waste generation by (sample) survey as outlined in Section 8.2

 

 

 

Table 4: Data set 1 (Waste generation)  Waste generation in the economy on the basis of information on waste treatment
Description of the method
Scope of the indirect determination
(waste types and economic sectors covered)
Method(s) applied for differentiation
by waste sources (generating economic sector)
Restrictions of the applied methods

All UK: Secondary waste for columns E38 and G4677 of the generation template is taken from site returns of waste leaving permitted waste treatment facilities. 

All waste removed from 'treatment' sites is mapped to NACE E38.

All waste removed from Metal Recycling Sites is mapped to NACE G4677.

The data includes small amounts of primary waste.  These are identified and removed by Scotland.  The primary waste element cannot be identified for England, Wales and NI so they remain
England, Northern Ireland and Scotland: Commercial and Industrial waste for columns C10-33, D, E36_E37_E39 and G-U_X_G4677 are modelled, based on inputs into waste treatment facilities. Data is recorded at EWC code level.  For England and NI, these are mapped to NACE industries using mappings provided by experienced waste contractors as part of a methodological project. The data used does not indicate which sites waste has come from or is bound for.  As some waste passes through multiple treatment sites, a level of double counting will exist, however it is impossible to identify and remove this.
England and Northern Ireland: The modelling process to estimate all wastes attributed to the construction industry (NACE F) except for dredging spoils is based on estimating the final treatment of waste and then assuming that this is equal to the generation.  All waste from the process is assumed to be NACE F.  The largest proportion of the tonnage is derived from aggregate produced from CD&E waste materials.  In addition, all wastes backfilled are assumed to be CD&E, regardless of their EWC code.  Waste flowing through permitted sites is assumed to be from NACE F if it is a Chapter 17 code, however a proportion of Chapter 19 waste is also assumed to be from NACE F.  This proportion is as assumed to be equal to the Chapter 17 proportion of total waste received by permitted sites (transfer, treatment or MRS).  Large tonnages of Chapter 19 mixed waste are sent to landfill (around 4 million tonnes in England) and so the tonnage assumed to be construction waste is sensitive to fluctuations in the accuracy of this assumption year on year.
Details of the Scotland C&I waste generation method can be found on the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency website at https://www.sepa.org.uk/environment/waste/waste-data/waste-data-reporting/waste-data-for-scotland/.   In this method waste generated, including secondary waste, is estimated from operator surveys (large tonnage sites), EWC codes or inferred from historical surveys. It also includes waste data from surveys of aggregate producers from the Zero Waste Scotland Aggregate Directory.    
Wales Commercial and Industrial waste for columns C10-33, D, E36_E37_E39 and G-U_X_G4677 are based on a sample survey. Standard Industrial Classification codes used throughout the survey and verified with businesses surveyed Net changes in employment were assumed to represent changes in activity levels in a given sector, which themselves were assumed to be proportional to the change in the amount of waste generated. The estimation approach also assumes no changes in waste management practice between the time when the surveys were conducted (in 2012) and 2016.
Wales Construction waste was derived from the 2012 Construction & Demoliton survey that has been re-grossed. Standard Industrial Classification codes used throughout the survey and verified with businesses surveyed. Net changes in employment were assumed to represent changes in activity levels in a given sector, which themselves were assumed to be proportional to the change in the amount of waste generated. The estimation approach also assumes no changes in waste management practice between the time when the surveys were conducted (in 2012) and 2016.

England domestic sewage sludge: column E36_E37_E39, Common Sludges row is captured at final treatment as no measurements are taken further up the stream (i.e. generation or intermediate treatment).

The figure reported is the same reported for UWWT.  The assumption is that it is appropriate to consider this as generated by the water processing industry (part of E36_E37_E39) rather than households and businesses. It's unclear if intermediate processes such as AD have reduced the dry weight.

 

 

 

Table 5: Data set 1 (Waste generation)  Waste generation in the economy on the basis of information on waste collection
Description of the method
Scope of the indirect determination
(waste types and economic sectors covered)
Method(s) applied for differentiation
by waste sources (generating economic sector)
Restrictions of the applied methods

UK: The only estimates based on waste collection are for waste from households, which is described in detail in table 8 below.

 

 

 

 

 

Table 6: Data set 1 (Waste generation) Waste generation in the economy on the basis of information on administrative sources
Description of the method
Scope of the indirect determination
(waste types and economic sectors covered)
Source of dataset Data quality
UK Marine Dredging Spoils (F) Annual data on dredging waste dumped at sea is reported by the UK to OSPAR. Data was reported as dry weight.

Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS).

There were no projects on the Cefas register without data for 2018, so there were no  estimates.

England: Sewage sludge (E36_37_39, Common sludges)

Following the Eurostat project in late 2014/early 2015 to synchronise sewage datasets, it was agreed that this cell should be completed using final figures from the UWWT (Urban Waste Water Treatment) return.  This return is completed by the Environment agencies of the UK with reference to returns by water companies.  The administrative data reported on tonnages of sewage sludge (in dry weight) sent to different types of treatment outlets in 2018.  See also table 4.

Environment Agency collections from water companies.

Data quality has been improved by the Environment Agency through consultation with water companies to improve their understanding of what measurements to submit.  It is a relatively new data collection (since about 2012) and is likely to be conducted on an annual basis for the foreseeable future.

UK (except Scotland): Determination of Waste Generated by Offshore Operations.  This covers a range of waste types in small tonnages.  All of the tonnages from this exercise are allocated to NACE B (Mining) as this seems closest to oil extraction which is the main source of these wastes.

Data is collected annually on a voluntary basis through an on-line reporting system known as the Environmental Emissions Management System (EEMS)[1].  EEMS is the environmental database of the UK Oil & Gas industry and has been in existence since 1992. It provides measured and calculated data relating to emissions from offshore installations and associated onshore terminals, including data on waste generation.  All oil and gas operators in the UK report data through EEMS and as they are all covered by an Environmental Management System the quality of the data is expected to be good.

Industrial effluent sludges were converted from wet weight to dry by multiplying by a factor of 0.27, in line with wet/dry ratios used in previous returns.  Wastes described as ‘hazardous water’ were not reported at all as the dry weight was deemed to be negligible.

In Scotland, offshort waste was determined as part of the C&I dataset (for details see methodology at https://www.sepa.org.uk/environment/waste/waste-data/waste-data-reporting/waste-data-for-scotland/).  In this method, the waste source is determined by the geographic waste origin , inlcuding "offshore" origin, specified in the licensed waste site return.

[1] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/oil-and-gas-eems-database

 

 

Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

 

 

 

 

Table 7: Data set 1 (Waste generation) Waste generation in the economy on the basis of models or other methods
Description of the models
Scope of the model (waste types and economic sectors covered) Basic data for the estimations (production figures etc.) Description of the model Factors applied Main assumptions required Routines applied or foreseen to guarantee sufficient quality (periodical revision of factors, focused surveys for verification etc.)
Agriculture (NACE A) for UK Production, crop areas and livestock counts from the June Survey of Agriculture and Horticulture The Model works by applying unit waste arising factors by livestock numbers or crop areas in a spreadsheet.  Animal, vegetal and livestock wastes (EWC-STAT 09.1, 09.2, 09.3) are excluded since the majority are likely to be beneficially used on farm and will therefore not be classified as waste.  Numerous historic factors (e.g. polythene feed sacks per sheep stocked)  Factors do not change over time Agriculture has been identified as a small contributor to overall waste, so has received less scrutiny than other areas as a result.  The process was reviewed during the compilation of WStatR 2014.  Whilst there are several possible data sources/methods of estimation for this type of waste, no better method has been identified.
Forestry (NACE A) for UK  

For England, Wales and Northern Ireland, limited data for the forestry sector was provided by the Forestry Commission for previous returns[1]. Thus the data related to waste was generated by a small sample of workshops and additional observations on arisings of chemical and plastic wastes. As no new sources of data have arisen since 2008, estimates for waste generation have been produced using the same method of grossing up to wooded land area.

For Scotland, the forestry waste was estimated through the C&I methodology (see https://www.sepa.org.uk/environment/waste/waste-data/waste-data-reporting/waste-data-for-scotland/). In summary, the industry sector is obtain through survey of licensed site operators for high tonnages sites, and for other sites inferred from the EWC code or from historical surveys. 

[1]  Forestry Statistics 2016 - Woodland Areas and Planting [accessed 20 Feb 2018 https://www.forestry.gov.uk/website/forstats2016.nsf/0/85FE582A00A2511080257FE0004B2C9A?open&RestrictToCategory=1]

 Tonnes of waste generated per ha of woodland

 

No new sources of data have arisen for waste arisings since 2008 so this is likely to be reducing in accuracy.  The tonnages involved are negligible compared to other areas of waste generation so this has received a proportional level of focus.
Mining and Quarrying (NACE B) for UK Production of individual minerals, from the British Geological Survey.  Basic spreadsheet model.  A set of factors is used to estimate waste generated from the production of each mineral.  Each factor gives the ratio of waste to production.  Factors give the ratio of waste to production.    

The factors were thoroughly reviewed by the CBI (Confederation of British Industry) Minerals Group during the WStatR 2010 process.  It was felt that no further review was necessary for 2012 or 2014 as the factors should remain stable over time.  Informal checks were made to verify the influential factor for slate and on review for 2016, it was felt the factor was incorrect so was amended. Updates have been done for 2010, 2012 and 2014.

Limited data was available for 2018 so some proportions from 2014 were used to estimate production of various minerals, but data was available for the different countries.

 

Fishing Waste (NACE A) (England, NI, Wales) Demersal and shellfish landings in the UK published by the Marine Management Organisation.  Annual fish farm mortality data collected by SEPA.  Data on non-fish waste from sea fishing vessels, for example, oils, nets, packaging etc. collected at ports is held by the British Ports Association and the Northern Ireland Fishery Harbour Authority (NIFHA).

The main waste streams generated by fishing operations are as follows:

  • Fish discards and fish processing waste from sea fishing operations. These wastes are generally disposed at sea (data no longer available, from WStatR 2014 onwards).
  • Fish discards due to routine and catastrophic fish mortalities from commercial sea and freshwater fish farms
  • Other waste associated with sea fishing and fish farm operations (e.g. broken nets, packaging waste, waste oils)

The waste from the latter two waste streams identified above, generated in the UK by fishing operations in 2018 has been calculated using the following methodologies and sources:

 

Calculation of fish discards from commercial fish farming operations

The calculation of wastes associated with routine and catastrophic fish mortalities from freshwater fish farming have been done based on waste arisings related to trout farm mortalities per tonne of fish produced in 2003[1]. This factor have been multiplied by the fish produced in freshwater fish farms in the UK in 2018 (provided by a number of administrative sources) to obtain the fish waste associated with freshwater fish farms in the UK.

Scotland is the only country in the UK with marine caged fish farms. The data on waste arisings associated with routine and catastrophic fish mortalities in these farms in 2018 has been provided by SEPA as this data is collected on an annual basis.

Calculation of other wastes from commercial sea fishing and fish farming operations

Data on non-fish waste from sea fishing vessels, for example, oils, nets, packaging etc. collected at ports is held by the British Ports Association and the Northern Ireland Fishery Harbour Authority (NIFHA).  The data on non-fish waste collected from sea fishing vessels at the three major fishing ports in Northern Ireland in 2010-11 was provided by the NIFHA. This data was used to calculate the waste collected at all of the ports in the UK based on waste produced per tonne of fish landed from UK fleet in 2010-11 and this ratio was used to estimate 2018 waste tonnage based on 2018 landings . There was no data available for non-fish waste from fish farms.

 

[1] http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/03/20716/52858

 

 

 

     
Commercial and Industrial (C&I) waste in England.  Covers all types of waste in NACE C, D, E36_E37_E39, G-U_X_G4677 except for Common Sludges in E36_E37_E39.

 

Mandatory returns from all sites with a waste permit providing tonnages and EWC code of all waste consignments received and removed during 2018.  These are collected and collated by The Environment Agency.

 

Mandatory returns from all incinerators, providing tonnages and EWC code of all waste consignments received and removed during 2018.

 

Mandatory returns from reprocessors that handle packaging, under Producer Responsibility, from the National Packaging Waste Database.

 

Additional data on dry recyclates from UK trade associations

 

RDF export data from Environment Agency data on International Waste Shipments

 

 

 

Following the discontinuation of historical Defra C&I sector surveys after 2009, Defra commissioned a project to provide a new methodology to calculate waste generated by C&I in England, in order to continue to meet reporting requirements. This produced the ‘Reconcile’ methodology, along with estimates for 2010 and 2012 specifically formatted to contribute-to the Waste Statistics Regulation return and to provide a repeatable methodology. The project report was published in August 2014.

In the original process of repeating the ‘Reconcile’ methodology using Defra systems, several areas of double-counting were identified, and so the methodology was reworked to correct for these, resulting in a substantial reduction to the C&I arisings figures for England in the December 2016 publication of UK Statistics on Waste. Concerns raised by industry following these data revisions identified outstanding issues with the methodology.

Defra took this opportunity to develop a further modified version alongside industry experts, which was felt to improve the transparency of the methodology and better reflect current waste management processes. While the original ‘Reconcile’ methodology had reliable estimates for landfilled and incinerated waste and organic recycling, the estimates for dry recycling relied on multiple assumptions regarding intermediate treatment sites (such as MRFs) and tonnages processed under exemption, which result in considerable uncertainty. To improve the transparency of this aspect of the methodology, we have sourced alternative “end-point” data sources for key dry recyclates and removed the previous exemptions-based methodology.

The review also called into question one of the fundamental assumptions to the ‘Reconcile’ methodology to exclude waste input to transfer stations, in addition to secondary waste (essentially waste generated from the treatment of waste), on the basis that it would be captured at other points in the waste treatment chain. Upon detailed investigation, it was discovered that large tonnages (e.g. around 7 million tonnes in 2012) of waste enter transfer stations as ‘mixed municipal waste’ (EWC code 20 03 01; i.e. black bag waste) but are re-categorised as secondary waste (largely 19 12 12) before being sent on for treatment or disposal. This is due to increased sorting and early-stage treatment at transfer stations, coinciding with an increase in separation of refuse derived fuel (RDF) for export. We have therefore made additional improvements to capture these missed tonnages, which were not accounted for in the original methodology.

The new methodology makes no attempt to estimate waste processed under exemption that is not captured within the recycling data at end-point. Therefore, figures may underestimate the “true” tonnages of C&I waste arisings, but are the best estimate we can produce from the available data. 

Full details of the revised methodology can be found here

Essentially, it uses “end-point” estimates for landfill, incineration, recovery and recycling to make an estimate for total C&I and household waste. The local authority reported figures on Waste from Households figures from Waste Data Flow are then subtracted as far as is possible on a material-type basis, to leave an estimate for C&I waste. The remaining tonnage is then apportioned between NACE industries, based on EWC code.  The EWC code tonnages can then be consolidated up to EWC-STAT as used on the WStatR generation template.

 

A lookup table which apportions each EWC code between the NACE industries used on the WStatR generation template was devised by the original contractors.  The majority of waste (~83% of non-hazardous waste) is apportioned 100% to a particular NACE industry based upon the chapter of the EWC code.  Where the mapping is considered to span more than one NACE industry, EWC codes with more than 100Kt in 2012 were apportioned between multiple industries by the contractors using industry knowledge.  These apportionment factors are still used and have not been updated since the Reconcile methodology was first developed. For the remaining EWC codes (with smaller tonnages), which contribute only 1% of the total tonnage, allocation is done using EWC-STAT level mappings informed by Defra’s 2009 C&I survey.  This process apportions some tonnages to NACE industries not considered to be C&I, e.g. agriculture, mining, construction. 

 

C&I is considered to be NACE C, D, E36_E37_E39 and G-U_X_G4677.

Apportionment of EWC codes between NACE industries are assumed not to change over time.  We use factors provided by contractors in 2013.

Full details of the revised methodology can be found here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The latest methodology has been developed with considerable input from industry experts and sense-checked against alternative data sources.  Defra believe the latest estimates to be the most reliable figures that can be reasonably produced with the currently available data. Defra will continue to work with industry to ensure that C&I estimates remain relevant to the constantly evolving industry.

Construction, Demolition and Excavation waste in England.  Covers all types of waste in NACE F, except for marine dredging spoils. Mandatory returns from all sites with a waste permit providing tonnages and EWC code of all waste consignments received and removed during 2018.  These are collected and collated by The Environment Agency.

The modelling process to estimate all wastes attributed to the construction industry (NACE F) except for dredging spoils is based on estimating the final treatment of waste and then assuming that this is equal to the generation.  The possible final treatments for construction waste are identified as: Reprocessed into non waste at permitted treatment sites; Non-minerals reprocessed into non waste at non-permitted treatment site (reprocessor or exempt site); Mineral waste reprocessed into aggregate at non-permitted treatment site; backfilled; landfilled.

Waste reprocessed at permitted sites is taken to be the difference between construction waste received by treatment sites and construction waste removed.  The construction waste element of the permitted site returns (which provide EWC code) are all Ch17 waste plus a proportion of Ch19 waste.

Backfilling and landfill are considered separately. 

The individual estimates for different final treament/disposal options are added up to provide the total CD&E estimate.

 

 

The figure with by far the biggest influence on the tonnage of construction waste generated is the figure for aggregate produced from CD&E waste, accounting for approximately half of the overall tonnage.  This is taken from a report produced annually by the Mineral Products Association (MPA).  It is based on a 2008 estimate published in a WRAP report 'CDEW arisings use and disposal for England 2008' which is adjusted by the MPA each year in line with construction industry output.  The data is still based on a 2008 estimate published in a WRAP report 'CDEW arisings use and disposal for England 2008' which is adjusted by the MPA each year in line with the index of construction industry output, which is published by the Office for National Statistics. The WRAP figure was the result of a survey of aggregate producers conducted in 2009.

A similar figure for soils is taken from the same WRAP report and adjusted on an annual basis by Defra.  This is still significant at ~11Mt in 2018, but smaller and of less user interest than the aggregates figure.

Throughout the model a large number of assumptions are required regarding how the data represents real life waste flows and how the different estimates fit together.  They are too numerous to list every one, but the most influential are below.

Incineration of construction waste is assumed to be zero.  An investigation suggested that ~70Kt Ch17 waste was incinerated in 2012 which is negligible compared to overall tonnages.  There may be a construction waste element in the Ch19 waste that reaches incineration, but this is impossible to identify. 

A proportion Chapter 19 waste is also assumed to be from NACE F.  This proportion is set as the Chapter 17 proportion of total waste received by permitted sites (transfer, treatment or MRS).  It is assumed that this proportion is the same for Ch19 waste at all stages of the treatment process, including waste received by landfill.

CD&E waste is assumed to be solid waste only.  This has most relevant to the calculation of Ch17 waste as a proportion of all waste received.

Defra assume that all backfilling is covered by the permits ' Deposit for recovery' and 'Use of Waste'.  It is assumed that all of tonnages reported under these permits were generated by the construction industry.

Defra allocate all tonnages of the EWC-STAT 'Mineral waste from construction and demolition' to NACE F.  This model is assumed to include construction type waste collected from households (not included in the 'Waste from Households' measure used for the EP_HH column of the generation template).

It is assumed that all non-hazardous metal, glass, plastic and wood from construction (Ch17) that is not landfilled or backfilled is successfully reprocessed.  Reprocessors do not make returns under a waste permit, therefore we do not capture their operations directly and instead have to estimate.

 

 

 

 

  

Table 8: Data set 1 (Waste generation) Determination methods for waste generated by households
Indirect determination via waste collection Indirect determination via waste treatment
Description of reporting unit applied (waste collectors, municipalities) Description of the reporting system (regular survey on waste collectors, utilisation of administrative sources) Waste types covered Survey characteristics Method applied for the differentiation between the sources household and commercial activities Percentages of waste from commercial activities by waste types Population served by a collection scheme for mixed household and similar waste, in % Specification of waste treatment facilities selected Waste types covered Method applied for the differentiation between the sources household and commercial activities Percentages of waste from commercial activities by
Total no. of collectors /municipalities (population size) No. of collectors/municipalities selected for survey No. of responses used for the calculation of the totals Factor for weighting
Local Authorities (municipalities) in the UK (410 total) are required to collect waste from all domestic premises and from commercial and industrial premises if requested.

 Information has been collected in each country through a web based quarterly reporting system (WasteDataFlow – https://www.wastedataflow.org/). The system has been used across all parts of the UK since 2006.

Information collected includes arisings and management on regular household collection rounds (mixed waste), bulky waste collections, wastes separately collected for recycling or composting from households or from drop off schemes, wastes taken to civic amenity sites for disposal or recycling, street sweeping, litter, and commercial waste collections.  

In England there are 345 local authorities (municipalities) of which:

  • 222 are collection authorities, responsible for collecting waste
  • 31 waste disposal authorities, responsible for managing and disposing of wastes collected by waste collection authorities and for provision of civic amenity sites to which households may take their waste for disposal or recycling
  • 92 unitary authorities which combine waste collection and disposal roles in one body
Wales has 22 unitary authorities, Scotland 32, and NI 11.
 All the municipalities are surveyed  All responses, as survey is mandatory  N/A

Waste reported as generated by households (EP_HH column) is synchronised to the figure submitted to WFD.

England: Each Local Authority data provider reports data as household or commercial at collection. Waste going to treatment is not split between household and commerical by the data provider, therefore factors are applied to estimate the split.  

For ELVs, a total ELV generation figure is estimated for all sources.  This is based on tonnages of ELVs received at metal recycling sites, with deductions made for tonnages that are also removed from sites, to remove assumed double-counting. It is not possible to accurately differentiate between household and non-household ELVs and so all are reported as NACE G-U_X_G4677 (Services), apart from small tonnages of bicycles that are captured in the household column.

 

 No waste known to be generated by commercial activities is reported as waste generated by households  100%  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A

 

 

 

 

Data sets 2 and 3: Waste treatment

Table 9: Data sets 2 and 3 (Waste treatment): General description of methodology

 Identification of relevant treatment facilities: All waste treatment, recovery and disposal facilities in the UK are required to operate under an environmental permit or exemption issued by the relevant environment agency or local authority. Legislation requires relevant agencies to hold public registers of permitted and exempt facilities.  This data is held by each relevant environment agency and is believed to be complete.  From these registers, the number and type of all permitted waste treatment, recovery and disposal facilities has been extracted. 

Exemptions are issued for processes where the expectation of pollution is seen to be of a lower risk or is dealt with by other legislative controls.  They do not include incineration or landfilling activities, both of which would be strictly covered by full permits.  The number of sites operating under exemption have not been included in the infrastructure template.  From the register of exemptions it is difficult to determine individual and non-duplicated sites and in particular it is thought that a significant but unknown proportion of sites are registered but not used.  The number of registered exemptions is huge (~500,000 on ~100,000 sites) so to include potentially exaggerated numbers of genuine active sites would undermine the accurate reporting of the much lower numbers of permitted facilities.

In addition to EA permitted incinerators, there are approximately 100 small scale Local Authority PPC permitted incinerators.  The data on these was not sufficient to report their location, capacity or detail the waste treated by them, so they have been excluded entirely from the report.  A previous investigation suggested that the PPC incinerators treat approximately 1% of the tonnage incinerated in fully permitted facilities in England.

 

 

How are the data on treated quantities collected? UK data on treated quantities for recovery, incineration and disposal are primarily taken from returns based on waste management permit systems described above.  The table 11 below provides more details of the methods used

In England and Wales, returns from waste treatment facilities, accredited packaging re-processors and modelled estimates for construction waste were used to provide data for recovery processes. 

In Scotland, the treated quantities came primarily from permit based returns, primarily licenced site returns and waste exemptions. Data on all waste materials (packaging and non-packaging) recycled by accredited re-processors have also been reported. 

In Northern Ireland the treated quantities came primarily from permit and licence based site returns and some from waste exemptions. No estimates were made for exemptions in which a data return was not received in 2018.

 

 

How are the data on number and capacity of treatment facilities collected? Data on the annual capacity for waste management facilities operating under a waste management permit was collected from the site permits.  Capacity information for recovery operations other than energy recovery was not required for 2018.

(i)             England & Wales

The level of remaining landfill voidspace in England & Wales at the end of 2018 was provided by operators to the Environment Agency and Natural Resources Wales in 2019. For explanatory purposes ‘landfill capacity’ is defined as: site capacity with both a planning consent and an environmental permit (including void that was still to be created under a mineral extraction permission if the area was permitted), and included engineering surcharge (doming), daily cover and restoration materials. In Wales, some ‘non-hazardous’ landfills may have permitted ‘hazardous’ cells and thus some additional ‘hazardous’ waste capacity than reported

Annual incineration capacity was obtained from permits and checked to ensure it was up to date. Data on local authority registered incinerators (LAPPC) permitted under Part B of the PPC Regulations was produced for England from the Local Air Pollution Control (LAPC) Defra survey. Capacity was estimated to be the midpoint of the assumed minimum and maximum throughput for each facility type.

In England, permit types have been assessed and classified to allow those used for final rather than intermediate treatment to be isolated. 

 

 (ii)            Scotland

Data on the annual capacity for waste management treatment facilities operating under a PPC permit and WML was collected from the site’s permit or licence.  The data on remaining void space for landfills is collected annually from landfill operators via the licensed/permitted site return form.  Sites that did not submit the returns were contacted directly in order to obtain the information.

 

(iii)           Northern Ireland

The data on remaining void space for landfills was collected annually from landfill operators via annual reports due under their permits.

The data on capacities of Energy Recovery and Incineration (R1 / D10) were calculated from the maximum annual throughput allowed under the permits

 

 

 

Table 10: Data sets 2 and 3 (Waste treatment): Registers used for identification of waste treatment operations

Identification of register(s) used (name; responsible institution) Description of register(s) (coverage; frequency and procedure of updating, ..)
Scotland - SEPA’s National Public Register  The public register holds information on all environmental permits regulated by SEPA in accordance with legislative and procedural requirements. The information on the public register is maintained and updated on a daily basis.
England & Wales – Environment Agency’s & Natural Resources Wales register of permitted facilities The register holds information on all waste management permits regulated by the EA/NRW in accordance with legislative and procedural requirements. The information is maintained and updated on a daily basis.
England – Environment Agency’s IPPC register Used for data on the number and capacity of incinerators and landfills. 
Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) – registers on waste management licences, exemptions and permits. All waste facilities have a waste management licence, an integrated pollution prevention and control permit, an integrated pollution control permit, or have registered a waste management exemption at a particular location for a specified time period. This data is held by NIEA and is maintained and updated on a regular basis.

 

  

 

Table 11: Data sets 2 and 3 (Waste treatment): Determination of treated waste quantities

Description of data sources and methods by treatment categories
Item 1
Incineration
(R1)
item 2
Incineration
(D10)
Item 3a
Recycling
(R2 – R11)
Item 3b
Backfilling
Item 4
Landfilling
(D1, D5, D12)
Item 5
Other disposal
(D2,D3,D4, D6,D7)
Public registers – Operator’s monitoring data sent in accordance with the permit Public register – Operator’s monitoring data sent in accordance with the permit Public register – Operator’s statutory returns Public register – Operator’s statutory returns Public register – Operator’s statutory returns Ad-hoc data provided by operators
Ad-hoc data provided by operators Ad-hoc data provided by operators UK Packaging Waste Database – Accredited re-processors annual application data   Ad-hoc data provided by operators Admin information on disposal of dredging spoils
    Modelled estimates for construction waste treatment     Modelled estimates of disposal of mining waste
    UWWT for sewage sludge spread on agricultural land      
    Modelled estimates of simple registrations used to treat household and commercial waste considered not to have been captured elsewhere (England)      
    Voluntary returns to the Environment Agency from reprocessors regarding non-packaging waste (England)      
    Voluntary returns to SEPA from aggregate producing sites on the amount of waste processed to produce aggregates in Scotland      

 

 

 

Table 12: Data sets 2 and 3 (Waste treatment): How are the data on number and capacity of treatment facilities collected?

Number of waste treatment facilities selected by items
Description of the method
Item 1
Incineration
(R1)
item 2
Incineration
(D10)
Item 3a
Recycling
(R2 – R11)
Item 3b
Backfilling
Item 4
Landfilling
(D1, D5, D12)
Item 5
Other disposal
(D2,D3,D4, D6,D7)

All waste incineration facilities (R1) in the UK are required to operate under an environmental permit issued by the relevant environment agency.  The environment agencies supplied the number of incineration facilities based on the permits they had issued.

 

 All waste incineration facilities (D10) in the UK are required to operate under an environmental permit issued by the relevant environment agency. The environment agencies supplied the number of incineration facilities based on the permits they had issued. 

For England, Wales and Northern Ireland, smaller incinerators are required to operate under an environmental permit issued by the relevant local authority.  Data on these incinerators was not available and no estimate has been made.

 All waste recycling facilities (R2 - R11) in the UK are required to operate under an environmental permit or registration issued by the relevant environment agency. The environment agencies supplied the number of incineration facilities based on the permits and registrations they had issued.

 For England and Wales, backfilling was equated with 'Use of Waste' and 'Deposit for Recovery' operations.  All of these types of facilities in  England and Wales are required to operate under an environmental permit issued by the relevant environment agency. The environment agencies supplied the number of facilities based on the permits they had issued. 

In Scotland and Northern Ireland, waste recovered by backfilling was equated to operations licensed under relevant complex exemptions.  The number of facilities was taken from the annual returns made in respect of these exemptions. 

 All waste landfilling facilities (D1, D5, D12) in the UK are required to operate under an environmental permit issued by the relevant environment agency. The environment agencies supplied the number of facilities based on the permits they had issued.  Number of facilities was not required

 

 

 

Table 13: Data sets 1, 2 and 3: Sampling methodology

This is not applicable to almost all of the data submitted as no sample surveys were conducted for 2014 WStatR.

 

Wales undertook surveys of commercial & industrial waste generated in 2018 and construction & demolition waste generated in 2012.  Construction & demolition 2018 estimates were based on the results of the 2012 surveys.  Most business sectors were surveyed with the exception of: 

Businesses involved in agriculture, forestry & fishing mining and quarrying. 

Businesses involved in waste management and recycling (to avoid potential double counting)

 

The methodology was broadly similar for each survey – for example each uses the National Inter Departmental Business Register (IDBR) and Local Units for sampling, stratified by employment size and industry category. Published survey reports along with detailed sampling strategies are available online: https://naturalresources.wales/our-evidence-and-reports/waste-reports/?lang=en

 

 

3.2. Frequency of data collection

Data on local authority waste management is collected quarterly or optionally annual (in Scotland).

Waste treatment facilities report on a quarterly or annual basis according to the permit requirements.

Waste treated under Scottish permit complex exemptions is reported annually. 

NI data on local authority waste management and NI waste treatment facilities are both collected quarterly.

Welsh waste surveys are completed on an ad hoc basis. An I&C survey is being planned to obtain updated data for 2018 for Wales. These outputs will be ready for inclusion in the next EC Waste Stats Return.

 

Holders of registered waste exemptions in England are not required to provide any data on their activities.

 

The other numerous data sources used are second hand and are collected on an annual basis for another purpose by another organisation.  In most cases the data is only used by Defra/DAs to produce WStatR and therefore will only be used in even (WstatR) years.  Data sources are detailed in the table below.  In addition to these datasets, further data sources are used as factors or assumptions.  These are not listed below but the models are covered in more detail in section 12.1.

 

Process Description of dataset Source
Mining Tonnage of production of different types of mineral  British Geological Survey
Marine Dredging Tonnage and location of marine dredging sites Cefas
Fishing    
Forestry    
Offshore    
Agriculture Cropping areas, livestock counts, holding counts Defra and equivalent DA departments
Agriculture Milk production Defra Milk prices statistical notice
C&I  English incineration dataset - all waste received and removed from incinerators Environment Agency
C&I Tonnage of plastic and glass packaging received by accredited reprocessors and exporters (National Packaging Waste Database) Environment Agency
C&I RDF exports, from International Waste Shipments data Environment Agency

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3. Data collection

Data on local authority waste management for all countries in the UK is collected through the WasteDataFlow system.  It is an on-line portal for both data entry and statistical reports.  Data is entered by local authorities through a comprehensive set of questions covering waste collection and waste disposal.  There is a wide range of reports to provide statistics on recycling rates and on all aspects of waste management at local authority level.  There are at least two user groups per year in England to get feedback and inform developments to the questions and reports whilst the Northern Ireland and Wales user groups meet approximately once per year.  Some minor aspects of the data collection and reports are country specific.

 

Data on waste treatment is heavily based on data collected by the Environment Agencies in the four UK countries from permitted sites.  Data on tonnages and quantities treated are collected by the Environment Agencies as mandatory site returns.  Returns are mandatory for all permitted waste treatment operations and are made on either a quarterly or annual basis by the site operator.  In England, most operators return a pre-formatted Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, about 5% use an online portal and a few provide a paper return.

A variety of other data sources are used in modelling specific areas of waste generation, but collection of these is managed outside and independently of Defra and the Devolved Administrations.

 

 

3.4. Data validation

Data on local authority waste management is validated in various stages.  Firstly the local authorities validate their own data.  Secondly a set of standard validation tests are applied and data is passed back to local authorities to resolve and re-submit.  Thirdly Defra and the devolved administrations apply high level checks and identify and check outliers that affect national trends.  The accuracy of the data is paramount to the Local Authorities who collect the waste as they have implications for valuable contracts, so there are strong incentives for data providers to ensure accuracy through appropriate validation.

Permitting information about waste operations under the Environmental Permitting Regulations are stored on a database called REGIS (Regulation Information System).  All applications, modifications, transfers and surrenders are checked at area level.  All England data is received by a central office where data is checked for uncharacteristic values and cleaned where necessary.  In addition, some data validation is performed by site inspectors. All Wales data is now received by a central office in Wales separate to the England data. However, the process for receiving and checking the data remains similar to England.

High level validation was performed by Defra on final WStatR UK and country level templates.  This consisted of comparing 2018 templates with 2016 templates and ensuring that where large differences were observed, there is a satisfactory explanation.  Additional validation checks were applied to replicate the Edamis validation so that calculation conflicts within the templates can be spotted and resolved before trying to transmit the data.

 

3.5. Data compilation

Data was compiled using a set of Excel workbooks organised by waste process.  Separate processes were used for Agriculture, Commercial and industrial, Construction and demolition, Dredging spoils, Fisheries, Forestry, Household, Mining, Sewage sludge and Treatment facilities.  Each process delivered a full or partial column for the final template.

Almost all sewage sludge and dredging spoils have been collected dry weight with no wet weight equivalent.  Any wet weight would be based on an assumed factor and would be highly speculative.

Almost all Industrial effluent sludges and some common sludges are assumed to be recorded wet weight except where received by an incineration facility.  Where figures are assumed to be wet weight, a factor is used to convert to a dry weight equivalent.

 

 

3.6. Adjustment

[not requested]


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

4.2. Quality management - assessment

[not requested]


5. Relevance Top
5.1. Relevance - User Needs

[not requested]

 Statistics on waste arisings and management are required to provide a sound evidence base for policy development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.  Data are required at the national, country regional and sometimes local level. Users include:

  • central government, including Defra, the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), the devolved administrations in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, Environment Agencies and the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP);
  • local and regional government;
  • waste planning groups; and
  • the waste industry, producers and the community waste sector.

The data provided for the Waste Statistics Regulation are derived from sources used to meet the national needs described above. However, the sources, definitions, coverage or level of detail used for reporting under the Regulation may differ from national requirements.  For example, for national purposes, secondary wastes would not be included in total waste arisings; this would be considered double counting.  Also, specific data (e.g. from industry) for certain types of waste may be used for national purposes but it may not be possible to fit these within the overall reporting framework of the Regulation.

5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

[not requested]

5.3. Completeness
Description of missing data in data set 1 on waste generation

Description of missing data
(waste category, economic activity, ..)

Explanation

How to overcome the deficit

For some economic activities, large quantities of waste are recorded as ‘mixed & undifferentiated’ or ‘household and similar’, rather than as individual waste types. For example, around one third of the waste generation in the service economic activity (G-U) is of this type. The impact of this is that individual waste types are underestimated as some waste from the ‘mixed’ categories should belong to many of the individual waste type catergories. This issue occurs because waste is collected and managed in a way that waste is not always fully separated.  The overall total waste should be correct. Specific surveys on the composition of the mixed waste streams would be required. This would mean hand-sorting of waste and would be expensive.
Non-fish waste generated by aquaculture Insufficient data available A pilot study on the non-fish waste produced by fish farms could be carried out to provide data for an aquaculture waste model.  However, lack of resources and the fact that the missing waste is likely to be fairly insignificant mean that this is unlikely to happen in the short-term.
     

 

Description of missing data in data sets 2 and 3 on treated waste quantities and capacities

Description of missing data
(waste category, treatment category, region, ..)

Explanation

How to overcome the deficit

     
Waste other than packaging waste that is reprocessed  Reprocessors do not operate under waste permits and do not have to provide returns except for packaging waste.  Some reprocessors provide voluntary returns.  These cover what is thought to be a good proportion of paper reprocessing but do not cover other sorts of reprocessing (glass, plastic etc.).  Metal reprocessing can be estimated from permitted returns.  Mandatory reporting would have to be set up, or a survey or an improvement on the voluntary returns.
 Waste handled by mobile plants in Scotland The availability of data on waste handled by mobile plant permitted in Scotland is poor. It is also not clear which activities carry out final recycling activities. Since 2009 there has been a significant increase in the number of registrations for mobile plant in Scotland due to a change in the permitting regime in England and Wales which will increase the size of the problem. SEPA is developing a simplified return form for mobile plant operators which also aims to identify recycling activities.  In addition, more resources will be assigned to the collection and verification of this data
Waste treated in Northern Ireland using some exemptions from (full) licencing Certain treatment operations for certain wastes are exempt from reporting requirements and only have to be registered with the NI Environment Agency.  Previous analysis (from survey) has shown that only 23% (c 160 kT) of the total quantity of exempted waste is handled by non-reporting sites, however, not all of this will be waste undergoing final treatment. Northern Ireland Environment Agency are putting measures in place to extend the capture of administrative data of non-reported waste undergoing final treatment (recovery) which will reduce this data gap. The degree to which this can be achieved depends on cost-benefit considerations.
Waste generated by industries other than C&I and households in England and treated using methods exempt from permitting.  This would typically be recovery operations on non-hazardous waste.  Many activities may be internal recycling and therefore outside of the scope of WStatR Certain treatment operations are exempt from reporting requirements and only have to be registered with the Environment Agency.  The information available was judged to be insufficient to inform an estimate with acceptable accuracy. Defra have identified the issue as high priority and plan to investigate how to fill this evidence gap.  Significant resource has gone into building up more understanding of this waste by working alongside the Environment Agency.  Attempts have been made to build improved models, though this has proved exceptionally challenging due to the near complete lack of data.  The online registration system has been improved which will offer some improvements to data from 2016 onwards and consideration is being given to making reporting of these activities mandatory. 
5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

[not requested]


6. Accuracy and reliability Top

-

6.1. Accuracy - overall

[not requested]

6.2. Sampling error

For England, Northern Ireland and Scotland, sampling error should have negligible impact on the accuracy of results as sample surveys are not used directly by any of the results.  The only influence of sample surveys is a few instances where factors used as assumptions are based on the results of historic surveys.

For Wales, surveys were completed to obtain data for waste generated by industrial & commercial sectors in 2018 and construction & demolition sectors in 2012 (and re-grossed for 2018). The precision for the total waste generated by the industrial & commercial sectors combined was +/- 4.5% at 90% confidence. The precision for the total waste generated by the construction & demolition sectors was +/-33.2% at 90% confidence.

6.2.1. Sampling error - indicators
Totals and coefficients of variation for the key aggregates

Key aggregate

Amount of hazardous waste

[1000 tonnes]

Amount of Non-hazardous waste

[1000 tonnes]

Coefficient of variation hazardous waste
[%]

Coefficient of variation non-hazardous waste
[%]

Waste generation

Waste generated by households

 336  26,075  n/a  n/a

Waste generated by economic activities

 5,859  249.940  n/a  n/a
Waste treatment

Waste used as fuel (item 1) (incineration in the form of recovery R1)

 23 8,444  n/a  n/a

Waste incinerated (item 2) (incineration as disposal D10)

311  6,984  n/a  n/a

Waste recovered (R2 – R11), incl. backfilling (item 3a and 3b)

 876

 121,664  n/a  n/a

Waste disposed of by landfilling (D1, D5, D12) and other disposal operations (D2, D3, D4, D6, D7) (item 4 and 5)

818  75,532  n/a  n/a

 Notes

n/a        Not applicable as most or all data taken from administrative sources or estimates

6.3. Non-sampling error

-

6.3.1. Coverage error
Coverage of waste statistics with regard to extractive waste1)

Coverage

Topsoil

Overburden

Waste-rock

Tailings
(non-haz.)

Completely covered

 X X X X

Partially covered

       

Generally excluded

       

1)Please mark with an X whether the listed materials are completely covered, partially covered or generally excluded from waste statistics.

 

Description of issues related to the allocation of mining waste to NACE section B or C:

 All mining waste has been allocated to section B

 

Annex I on waste generation:

Annex II on waste treatment:

Description of the method(s) applied to reach 100% coverage:

The data have been compiled from a variety of different data sources from each of the four countries which make up the UK. Where data are not directly collected, estimates have been made with the intention of achieving 100% coverage.  In total, about a dozen separate estimation processes are combined for each of the four countries in the UK.  Extra efforts have been made for WStatR 2014 to identify and remove double counting where these processes overlap.  In England, initiatives are being undertaken to improve understanding of waste systems which should improve the accuracy of coverage further for future WStatR returns.

 

Description of the waste treatment facilities which are excluded from reporting and the reason for their exclusion: 

Data for Set 2 (waste treatment) on incineration, recovery and disposal quantities are primarily taken from returns based on permit systems. Waste treatment facilities have only been excluded here if they are not considered to be within scope of the reporting i.e. they are storage, transfer, intermediate, pre-treatment activities, subject to the following comments:

  • Certain facilities (either permitted sites or sites exempt from waste management permitting) were excluded because they were considered to be primarily intermediate activities and the outputs would be transferred for final recovery or disposal. It is possible that there may also be an element of recovery at these facilities but, because of the methodology adopted, the tonnages concerned will be excluded from the recovery tonnage figures.
  • As noted in 4.3., some waste is treated in England and Northern Ireland by methods exempt from permitting and therefore any reporting of the tonnages of throughput.  Estimates for waste treated by methods exempt from permitting have been included but these are subject to extremely high levels of uncertainty.
  • Waste accepting sites whose main activities are not part of Chapter 5 of Schedule 1 of The Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2000, the Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2011, or the Zero Waste Scotland Aggregate Directory, or are not registered as packaging waste accredited re-processors, have not been identified as they are not classified as waste management activities. Further investigations are being undertaken to identify other installations that accept waste as part of their activities (e.g. foundries, rendering plants) for future datasets. All installations that are not registered as packaging waste accredited re-processors in England and Wales have also not been identified.  Work will be done to address this for future reporting.
  • Similarly for England, reprocessors do not operate under waste permits and therefore do no have to make mandatory returns.  Reprocessing of all packaging produced by obligated (above a lower threshold) packaging producers is included as are voluntary returns from some reprocessors with limited coverage.

 

Coverage of waste treatment facilities and criteria for exclusion
 

No. of facilities included

No. of facilities excluded

Reasons for exclusion of facilities
and other comments

Item 1Incineration (R1)

 40  0  

Item 2Incineration (D10)

 91  ~100 In England, small incineration facilities not covered by the Environment Agency were excluded in 2016.  It is thought there may be about 100 of these. 

Item 3a Recycling (R2-R11)

 2,780  0 Facilities performing treatment operations in England that are exempt from reporting have been excluded from the infrastructure template. As noted in 4.3 those facilities performing recycling final treatment in Northern Ireland that are not required to report are not included in the no. of recycling sites on the infrastructure template.

Item 3b Backfilling

 756  0  

Item 4 Landfilling
(D1, D5, D12)

629  0  

Item 5 Other disposal
(D2, D3, D4, D6, D7)

 Not estimated  0 The number of 'Other disposal' facilities was not required as part of the WStatR templates and has not been estimated.  The intention is that full coverage has been achieved for tonnage purposes.

 

Commercial waste inclusion: Main problems description:

The amount of recovered material & residual waste collected from non-Household sources in the municipal waste collected by local authorities (LACMW) is declared by local authorities in the UK in their quarterly submissions of data into ‘WasteDataFlow’, the UK local authority municipal waste data portal. From 2014, special effort has been made to ensure that the figure reported in the EP_HH column of the generation template consists only of the 'Waste from Households' measure reported to Eurostat under the Waste Framework Directive.

 

In Northern Ireland the local authority may collect non-Household waste via an individual round i.e. separately to that of the Household waste, in which case the tonnage of non-Household waste is known. Alternatively this waste may be co-collected with Household waste, in which case the local authority makes a local estimate each quarter.

 

In England, prior to 2018, it was not possible to separate co-mingled waste collected exclusively from households (as opposed to commercial) into individual waste types (e.g. glass, plastic, metal).  Therefore the total tonnage, prior to 2018, for co-mingled waste collected has been recorded on the generation template as 'Mixed and undifferentiated materials'. For 2018 the co-mingled recylates collected exclusively from households have been separated into the individual materials using proportions derived from composition waste studies carried out by WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme). We are currently awaiting similar composition estimates for earlier years – we intend to makerevisions to the 2010,2012, 2014 and 2016 figures and will resubmit these  when complete. This will improve comparability between the household data within WstatR and that submitted under the Waste Framework Directive.

6.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

[not requested]

6.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

[not requested]

6.3.2. Measurement error

(i)             Application of statistical units

 

For site returns, the statistical unit is one treatment site.  Where permits cover more than one activity at one site, such as a landfill site with a composting facility and civic amenity site, each activity was assigned a separate R or D code and the inputs and capacity apportioned accordingly.

(ii)            Errors in precision of quantities

Permitted site returns: Where data is provided by volume, a conversion to tonnes takes place at the outset.  Standard conversion factors are used to convert volumes to tonnes.  This occurs mainly for liquid wastes that are reported in gallons or litres and occasionally for skips of waste. It is likely that some measurement errors exist within the actual data submitted in site returns by individuals involved in waste management. As a result, it is not possible to quantify the extent of any bias which may result from the error made in a site waste return in the majority of cases.  Permitting information about waste operations under the Environmental Permitting Regulations are stored on a database called REGIS (Regulation Information System).  All applications, modifications, transfers and surrenders are checked at area level

Industrial and Commercial and Construction & Demolition waste surveys 2012 (Wales only):   Where waste producers were able to provide data on the actual weight of waste they produced, this data was used.  If this was not available, the survey questionnaire asked waste producers for further information, about the number of waste containers they used, their size, how often they are collected/ emptied, the degree of compaction, the components of the waste. The surveys were conducted by the visit of surveyors trained to estimate quantities and types of wastes.  Conversion factors were used to change all volumetric measurements to cubic metres. Volumes were converted to tonnes by multiplying them by a material-specific density conversion factor (developed by the environment agencies). These factors had been developed through earlier research and reviewed.  Finally checks were made against other sources where possible to validate the outcomes. Full details on the surveys is available to download from http://naturalresourceswales.gov.uk/policy-and-guidance/waste-policy/?lang=en

Permitted site return forms: Standard forms are used with the information required also included in the permit.  Forms were discussed with the waste management industry prior to being introduced.  Operators are responsible for selecting the correct EWC to represent their waste.

Household Waste: Household waste comes from the WasteDataFlow system and on-line questionnaire.  These were developed with full central and local involvement and extensive consultation. The system includes extensive checking and validation processes. It is important that the data are accurate as they are also used to monitor local authority performance.  Most data are based on weighbridge figures.  There is some estimation to convert volumes to weights, e.g. for recyclables.  There are factors used to apportion comingled collection into material types that are updated every few years.

(iv)          Incentives for over and under reporting

For permitting systems there will inevitably be some incentive for under registering, for example costs of implementing permit requirements and fees and charges associated with registration, a lower application fee and annual subsistence fee is paid if the quantity of waste handled at a permitted site is below a certain threshold.  Against this there are advantages of registering e.g. legal compliance - avoiding prosecution and fines, meeting requirements of environmental accreditation schemes e.g. ISO14001 but little incentive to over report.  The extent of this effect is unknown but there is no evidence to suggest this is a significant issue.

 

6.3.3. Non response error

For England, results are based on admin data rather than survey data, or estimates are modelled. For the admin data sources, it is expected that full or almost full coverage has been achieved. Therefore non response error should be negligible.  The UK’s waste statistics are based on a variety of sources from each country and therefore it is not practicable to provide overall response rates at the level of the key aggregates. The table below gives an indication of the range of response rates known for key sources:

 

Response rates obtained at the key aggregates level

Country: UK

Data Collection Methods

Response Rates

Reference year: 2018

Waste Generated by Households

Local Authority Waste Management reporting using the WasteDataFlow system

100% for UK

 

Waste Generated by Businesses

Commercial & Industrial Waste survey (Wales only)

Construction & Demolition Waste survey (Wales only)

100% of revised sample frame

91% of revised sample frame

Returns from treatment facilities exempt from full permits (Scotland only)

57% (74% of tonnages applied for)

Waste Treated

Permitted site returns

90% - 100%* (England), 94% (Scotland), 95-100% (NI)

* This is the estimated response rate for permitted sites.  These make up the bulk but not the entirety of waste treatment.  There are exempt sites and reprocessors that do not have waste permits and therefore do not make a response.

Due to the high response, no estimate was made for English Northern Ireland or Scotland permitted site returns which were not received.  These are predominantly smaller sites.

6.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

[not requested]

6.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

[not requested]

6.3.4. Processing error

The data on which WStatR 2018 estimates are based come from a wide variety of sources.  For England, all data collection is performed outside of Defra.  Therefore Defra is reliant on the collecting organisation applying suitable checks to minimise processing errors.  All of the data for WStatR is sourced from respected public sector organisations which can be expected to employ rigorous controls to ensure high standards are maintained and reputation is not tarnished.

The data used in WStatR undergoes processing within Defra in a suite of Excel workbooks to assign values to the correct part of the generation and treatment templates.  The Excel workbooks were redesigned for the 2012 return to follow good spreadsheet design practice.  For 2014 Defra produced a suite of 'master templates' which included numerous basic checks designed to replicate those that the eDamis data input form applies.  This allowed early spotting of errors which is particularly important when all estimates include an element from 4 countries.

For England and Wales, site returns from permitted treatment facilities are compiled into a single administrative data system (for each country).  Extracts contain EWC codes and are mapped to the EWC-STAT waste categories using a lookup table which was devised between the countries of the UK for WStatR 2010.  The data system for household waste uses a unique waste categorisation and has had to be mapped to EWC-STAT waste categories by Defra with reference to the Manual on Waste Statistics.  To minimise this risk of processing error, check sums were used where possible and comparisons made to WStatR 2014 so that large differences could be identified and investigated.  For estimates of waste from the Construction industry, which are based on site return extracts, an industry group has been consulted to help determine whether certain waste codes should be classed as C&D or Excavation waste.

6.3.4.1. Imputation - rate

[not requested]

6.3.5. Model assumption error

The final WStatR estimates rely on a large number of models, which each have their own set of assumptions, both numerical and conceptual.  All models are built in Microsoft Excel and are simplistic in terms of the functions and operations that they perform.  Some models are complex in terms of the number of data sources that have been brought together, the number of operations, the complex concepts which are being modelled or the presence of 'manual adjustments' for individual observations. Defra conducted a major review of all models used for England WStatR 2012 results and some UK results.  This streamlined many models and made a formal list of all assumptions used.  This helped identify where assumptions needed to be refined, which assumptions were most critical and where model coverage needed to be increased or was overlapping with another model.

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

[not requested]

6.5. Data revision - policy

[not requested]

[not requested]

6.6. Data revision - practice

[not requested]

6.6.1. Data revision - average size

[not requested]


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top
7.1. Timeliness

 

September 2019: Local Authority managed waste data for 2018 finalised for Scotland

 

October 2019: Permitted site data for 2018 became available (all UK).

 

December 2019: Local Authority managed waste data for 2018 finalised for England and Wales.

 

January 2020: Regross of Welsh  Construction & Demolition waste survey results using 2018 business population data.

 

February 2020: Began series of regular telephone meetings to co-ordinate submission between Defra and Devolved Administrations

 

May 2020: Critical aggregate estimate for England C&D process received by Defra

 

May 2020: UK data for marine dredging received by Defra.

 

May 2020: Wales estimates for C&D, C&I and Waste from Households received by Defra from NRW.  Some revisions received in May.

 

May 2020: Scotland estimates for C&D, C&I, agriculture and Waste from Households received by Defra from SEPA. 

 

June 2020: NI estimates for C&D, C&I and Waste from Households received by Defra from NI EA. 

 

June 2020: UK data for sewage sludge received by Defra.

 

26th June 2020: Generation template, treatment template and infrastructure templates officially transferred to Eurostat via Edamis by Defra. 

 

 

 

 

7.1.1. Time lag - first result

[not requested]

7.1.2. Time lag - final result

[not requested]

7.2. Punctuality
Explanation for any delay in data transmission and measures taken to avoid delays in future:
All datasets were submitted on 26/06/2020, within the prescribed deadline.

 

7.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

[not requested]


8. Coherence and comparability Top
8.1. Comparability - geographical

[not requested]

8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

[not requested]

8.2. Comparability - over time

Changes compared with previous years:

Foreseen changes:

Specific issues concerning the data collection on reference year 2018:

Detailed description and consequences:

UK: Household figures synchronised with published values

 

 

Figures reported in EP_HH column of generation template represent published WFD Waste from Households generation.

The comparability between WStatR 2016 and WStatR 2018 remains good.  Tonnages reported in the EP_HH column in WStatR 2018 match published values.

England: Minor changes to CD&E methodology

 

 

The CD&E methodology relies heavily on estimates of aggregate and soil provided to us by the Mineral Products Association. For their 2016 data, they revised their methodology slightly, as well as back-revising some figures in line with revisions to the index for construction output that were published by the Office for National Statistics.

Revisions were made on a consistent basis and submitted for WStatR 2010, 2012 and 2014.

England: significant changes to Commercial & Industrial methodology 

 

 

Following consultation with industry, significant changes were made to the C&I methodology for England in 2018, and included in WStatR for 2016 onwards. These essentially removed the tonnages of waste received by “intermediate” treatment stages from the permitted site data, and replaced them with alternative estimates for dry recyclates from reprocessors and trade associations.  Additional improvements have been made to account for RDF and sorting residues from residual waste, which were not captured by the original Reconcile methodology. 

Revisions  have been made on a consistent basis for the 2010 and 2012 WStatR returns

England: Changes to Co-mingled waste

     

In England, prior to 2018, it was not possible to separate co-mingled waste collected exclusively from households (as opposed to commercial) into individual waste types (e.g. glass, plastic, metal).  Therefore the total tonnage, prior to 2018, for co-mingled waste collected has been recorded on the generation template as 'Mixed and undifferentiated materials'. For 2018 the co-mingled recylates tonnages collected exclusively from households have now been separated into the individual materials (glass, plastic, metal, textiles and paper) using proportions derived from composition waste studies carried out by WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme).  The total tonnages recorded on the generation template as ‘Mixed and undifferentiated materials’ will now be lower.

We are currently awaiting similar composition estimates for earlier years – we intend to make revisions to the 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016 figures and will resubmit these when complete. This will improve comparability between the household data within WstatR and that submitted under the Waste Framework Directive.

UK: updated slate waste factor for Mining waste

     For WStatR 2016 onwards, the waste to production ratio for slate was revised revised from 20:1 to 10:1, in line with industry insight. This led to a substantial reduction in slate waste tonnages, and hence overall Mining waste tonnages.

Revisions were made on a consistent basis and submitted for WStatR 2010, 2012 and 2014. Limited data was available for 2018so some proportions from 2014 were used to estimate production. This should not impact comparability.

 

UK: changes to methodology and reporting for ELVs

     

Prior to WStatR 2016, ELV figures were based on the ELV Directive data, plus additional estimates for non-directive vehicles and assigned to NACE EP_HH (Household). Additional relatively small tonnages were captured as part of the C&I and Agriculture methodologies.

 

The revisions to the C&I methodology introduced for WStatR 2016 have resulted in essentially all tonnages of ELVs being captured by the C&I methodology. There is no accurate way to apportion these between household and non-household sources and so they will now all be reported as NACE G-U_X_G4677 (Services), in line with Eurostat guidance. This has also improved the comparability between the Household column and the Waste Framework Directive data. The ELV tonnages were sense-checked against the ELV Directive data.

 

Additionally, following Eurostat Guidance issued at the 2018 Waste Statistics Working Group meeting, tonnages of “Discarded vehicles” have been removed from the Treatment template, on the assumption that these are double-counting later treatment of the constituent parts.

Revisions were made on a consistent basis and submitted for WStatR 2010, 2012 and 2014.

UK: freshwater dredging exercise not included

 

 

Previous to WStatR 2014. an exercise was carried out to estimate freshwater dredging across the UK.  A review determined that the tonnage is near negigible and may already be captured via CD&E or C&I processes.  This has no material result on comparability as the tonnages involved are so small (~100Kt), and the methodology has been consistent for WStatR 2014, 2016 and 2018.

 

UK: minor changes to Fishing waste methodology

 

    From WStatR 2014 onwards, the Maritime & Coastguard Agency ceased to keep central statistics on ship generated waste (owing to poor data quality and lack of resources). Therefore, while estimates were made for fish discards and fish processing waste from sea fishing operations prior to WStatR 2014, this is no longer a part of the methodology. As Fishing waste makes up only a small proportion of UK waste generation (<3kt), this change will have a minimal impact on comparability of the reported figures.

Northern Ireland:revisions to CD&E methodology

 

 

 Northern Ireland collected administrative data from more sources where aggregates reprocessing was undertaken to increase accuracy re this waste stream for 2016 onwards.

Scotland: significant changes to Commercial & Industrial methodology

 

 

C&I estimates for 2010 were largely survey based. Estimates for 2012 onwards have been based on site returns data. Operators were sent a summary of the annual returns and asked to allocate a SIC code to the waste generated. 

Scotland: inclusion of aggregate dataset

 

 

An aggregate directory for waste converted to aggregate meeting a quality protocol was used to estimate waste input to aggregate producers and aggregate produced.  2012 was the first year that this was used.  The aggregate directory is managed by Zero Waste Scotland (previously part of WRAP).  From 2016 this aggregate dataset was used to obtain waste data for sites that operated under a simple exemption only.  For sites that operate under a waste management licence, waste used to produce aggregate was calculated from the inputs and outputs to/from the sites of chapter 17 and chapter 19 coded waste.

Wales: regross of  Construction & Demolition 2012 survey estimates

 

 

 

Estimates for C&D 2012 were survey based. In the absence of a similar survey for 2018, the estimates were re-grossed. This approach is consistent with previous submissions for Wales in 2016 & 201 (re-grossed I&C and C&D 2012 survey estimates), 2010 (re-grossed I&C 2007 survey estimates) and in 2008 (re-grossed C&D 2005-06 survey estimates).

Using business population data from the Inter-Departmental Business Register (IDBR) extracts, a ‘growth factor’ was determined separately for each of the construction & demolition sectors. The growth factor looked at the net change in the number of employees in every active business in Wales between March 2012 and March 2018.

Net changes in employment were assumed to represent changes in activity levels in a given sector, which themselves were assumed to be proportional to the change in the amount of waste generated. There is likely to be a slight lag in the currency of IDBR extracts as a result of the detailed maintenance process that has to be applied to the IDBR, involving analysis of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) data and business profiling etc.

The growth factors are a ratio of the recent /historic population (Factor = 2018 population/2012 population) for each of the industry sectors. These were applied to the relevant 2012 waste estimates uniformly across waste types to generate 2018 estimates; i.e. the estimates assume that there have been no changes in the distribution of waste by waste type. This means that if the waste estimates for a particular sector and/or waste type was zero in 2012 then this will also be true in 2018, as any multiplication of zero and a growth factor will always result in a zero.

The estimation approach also assumes no changes in waste management practice (for example, due to any changes in legislation or new Regulations) between the time when the surveys were conducted (in 2012) and 2016.

Wales: CD&E survey replaced by modelling

 

 

 For 2016, Wales estimated CD&E by modelling past survey results rather than running the survey.

Wales: I&C survey 2018 completed

   

The survey methodology was consistent with 2012 and adopted a stratified sampling scheme based on Standard Industrial Classification sectors and size bands. For a given total sample size, the number of business units to be surveyed in each brick sample frames were optimised to provide the best possible precision for the total national waste generated for both surveys. This was done by taking into account (i) the total number of businesses in each the expected variation in waste generation among businesses in each brick. Businesses were recruited by telephone and selection was dictated by business size and sector in the sample matrix. Surveys were via a structured face-to-face interview at business sites, using a laptop and database questionnaire, with a subsequent site walk around to identify any waste streams that may have been overlooked during. Full details of the method of waste collection are available on the Natural Resources Wales website.

8.2.1. Length of comparable time series

[not requested]

8.3. Coherence - cross domain
Coherence with Environment statistics: Coherence with Socio-economic statistics:
 

Coherence in terms of waste types is good with all returns from permitted sites using LoW codes. 

The data on household waste uses a non-standard set of waste codes defined within the WasteDataFlow system, which applies in all four UK countries.  These have to be mapped to EWC-STAT.  For 2014 onwards Defra and the Devolved Administrations agreed on a synchronised set of mappings to ensure consistency across countries.

For other wastes, assumptions have to be made as to which EWC-STAT to use.  In most cases (e.g. dredging spoils and mining waste) these are obvious.  They are less obvious for waste processed under exemption.  Exemption holders are restricted to a list of specific EWC codes, but determining the split between these requires assumptions.

Coherence with other published statistics is good.  WStatR has now been established as part of an Official Statistics release first published in September 2014.  Care has been taken to ensure coherence with other statistics.  The EP_HH column of the generation template is synchronised with published WFD figures.  CD&E figures are synchronised with those reported under the WFD.  Differences will still exist, but will be easier to explain.  The Common Sludges field for industry E36_E37_E39 has been set to match the UWWT for each of the four countries of the UK. 

 

 

There are no obvious socio-economic datasets to compare WStatR to.

 

 

8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

[not requested]

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

[not requested]

8.6. Coherence - internal

[not requested]


9. Accessibility and clarity Top
9.1. Dissemination format - News release

[not requested]

9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

[not requested]

9.3. Dissemination format - online database

[not requested]

9.3.1. Data tables - consultations

[not requested]

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

[not requested]

9.5. Dissemination format - other

[not requested]

9.6. Documentation on methodology

[not requested]

9.7. Quality management - documentation

[not requested]

9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

[not requested]

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

[not requested]


10. Cost and Burden Top

Administrative returns completed by government officials or local authorities (e.g. WasteDataFlow) are assumed to incur zero additional burden for statistical purposes due to the data collected being essential for the operators themselves .  Site returns for fully permitted treatment facilities and treatment facilities licensed under complex exemptions (Scotland and Northern Ireland) are assumed to incur zero additional burden for statistical purposes as they are required for regulatory activities.  Some low risk and low tonnage waste processes are exempt from all reporting, so there would be zero burden for these too.

 

The Welsh I&C survey resulted in 16,952 number of calls made to businesses (including calls which resulted in there being wrong numbers, no answer, the contact was busy, a refusal to participate, a call-back being required, or an appointment being secured). 1,452 number of surveys were completed with an average response time of 1 hour. An additional 308 business sites dataset was collected centrally from businesses as bulk data (e.g. supermarket headquarters). The burden was minimised through training interviewers, clustering site visits, appointment reminders (with details of information for the business to prepare adequately in advance) and use of sophisticated software to collect information and quality assure data on input at site (to reduce likelihood of needing to contact the business again with follow up data queries).

 

 

 

 


11. Confidentiality Top
11.1. Confidentiality - policy
Description of the relevant confidentiality policy:

Please see 'Principle 5: Confidentiality' on page 9 of the UK Statistics Authority 'Code of Practice for Official Statistics', which can be downloaded from here: http://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/assessment/code-of-practice/

The text is provided below:

Principle 5: Confidentiality

Private information about individual persons (including bodies corporate) compiled in the production of official statistics is confidential, and should be used for statistical purposes only.

Practices

1. Ensure that official statistics do not reveal the identity of an individual or organisation, or any private information relating to them, taking into account other relevant sources of information.

2. Keep confidential information secure. Only permit its use by trained staff who have signed a declaration covering their obligations under this Code.

3. Inform respondents to statistical surveys and censuses how confidentiality will be protected.

4. Ensure that arrangements for confidentiality protection are sufficient to protect the privacy of individual information, but not so restrictive as to limit unduly the practical utility of official statistics. Publish details of such arrangements.

5. Seek prior authorisation from the National Statistician or Chief Statistician in a Devolved Administration for any exceptions, required by law or thought to be in the public interest, to the principle of confidentiality protection. Publish details of such authorisations.

6. In every case where confidential statistical records are exchanged for statistical purposes with a third party, prepare written confidentiality protection agreements covering the requirements under this Code. Keep an operational record to detail the manner and purpose of the processing.

11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

[not requested]


12. Comment Top

-


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top