Pesticide use in agriculture (aei_pestuse)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: National Statistics Office (NSO)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

National Statistics Office (NSO)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries Statistics Unit

1.5. Contact mail address


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

See sub-categories below.

2.1.1. Main characteristics of statistics

The data set comprises the quantity of actives substances contained in plant protection products used on selected crops for a chosen year in a five-year period and the area treated with each of these substances, according to the Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/269 of 16 February 2017 as regards the list of active substances.

2.1.2. Reference period of data collection

The reference period was the crop year 2018/2019 for the data collection carried out in the last quarter of 2019. 

2.1.3. National legislation
No
2.1.3.1. National legislation - Name

There is not any national legislation regarding the use of plant protection products

2.1.3.2. National legislation - Link

Not applicable see section 2.1.3.1

2.1.3.3. National legislation - Responsible organisation

Not applicable see section 2.1.3.1

2.1.3.4. National legislation - Year of entry into force

Not applicable see section 2.1.3.1

2.1.3.5. National legislation - Coverage of variables required under EU legislation

Not applicable see section 2.1.3.1

2.1.3.6. Divergence national definitions from EU regulation

Not applicable see section 2.1.3.1

2.1.3.7. National legislation - Legal obligation for respondents to reply (Yes/No)
No
2.1.4. Additional comments data description

No addional comments

2.2. Classification system

The classification used for pesticides corresponds to Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 (http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1185/2017-03-09) of the European Parliament and of the Council.
The classification system for crops derives from the Annual crop statistics Handbook 2019 (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/apro_cp_esms_an1.pdf).

2.3. Coverage - sector

Agriculture is the main sector covered by the data set.

The selected crops are the main crops that are sprayed with pesticides in Malta. Such information has been compiled from similar surveys carried out in the past. Agricultural crops with a low intensity of usage such as fodder and potatoes were surveyed, as these are the most commonly grown. Crops with a low-intensity usage, a low coverage area, or a few agricultural holdings, such as plums, were excluded as the overall impact of PPP use would be negligible. Certain types of crops were grouped in order to obtain the coverage of the UAA of the holding although PPP usage was not asked for. A case in point is where, for example, a farmer simultaneously cultivated green beans and peas. These were grouped together under a code for other vegetables.

2.3.1. Crops covered by the statistics

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

2.3.2. Commercial non-agricultural uses of pesticides

Information on the commercial non-agricultural use of pesticides is not available.

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The data reported are the quantity of each active substance listed in Annex III of Regulation 1185/2009 contained in plant protection products used on a selected crop, expressed in kg. The area treated with each substance is expressed in hectares.

2.5. Statistical unit

Agricultural holding

2.6. Statistical population

Agricultural holdings with a total area of 0.224ha or more. 

2.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

2.7.1. Geographical area covered

The entire territory of the country.

2.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

This is not applicable to Malta.

2.8. Coverage - Time

Pesticides use has been collected in a consistent manner in 2005, 2007, 2014, and 2019.  In view of this, the data can be considered to be comparable.

2.9. Base period

Not applicable for Pesticide Use Statistics, because it is not based on an index number of time series.


3. Statistical processing Top
3.1. Source data

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

3.2. Frequency of data collection

The survey was carried out in 2019 and covered the crop year 2018/2019.  Similar surveys were carried out in 2005, 2007, and 2014.

3.3. Data collection

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

3.4. Data validation

Data were immediately vetted after the interviewing stage. Emphasis was placed on the interviewers to report back to the NSO after the first five completed questionnaires in order to monitor the data collected by the interviewer. Any errors made by the interviewer were corrected at once with the interviewer so that successive errors would not be repeated. In certain cases, where NSO vetters could not correct the data, the questionnaire was sent back to the interviewer, who had to contact the farmer for verification of the data or correction of the data. 

During the interviewing stage, an excel application including a number of validations has been developed by the Unit. This has been used by the interviewer to input the data collected from the farmer and then this was provided to the Unit.

3.4.1. Data validation measures
Manual
Automatic
3.4.2. Target of data validation measures
Completeness
Outliers
Aggregates
Consistency
3.4.3. Specification target of data validation

Not applicable

3.5. Data compilation

A stratified sample survey is used; the stratification is based on the size, and specialization of the agricultural holdings. 

There was no imputation. Non-response is very low because the agricultural holdings have an obligation to provide information to the National Statistics Office.

The total amount of kilograms and/or litres used of every product is collected from the farmer. Then by using the composition in weight, the total amount of active substance used for each crop is compiled. Then, the data are aggregated into the categories as stipulated in Annex III of Regulation 1185/2009. 

3.6. Adjustment

This is not applicable.


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

4.1.1. Quality management system in organisation
No
4.1.2. Specification of implementation

Not applicable.

4.1.3. Peer review
No
4.1.4. Main conclusions peer review

Not applicable

4.1.5. Future quality improvements
Further automation
4.1.6. Specification of quality improvements

Not applicable

4.1.7. Additional comments quality assurance

No additional comments

4.2. Quality management - assessment

The data covers the whole country and is collected by applying high standards in compliance with the methodological guidelines and ensuring a high degree of comparability.

4.2.1. Overall quality
Stable
4.2.2. Relevance
Stable
4.2.3. Accuracy and reliability
Stable
4.2.4. Timeliness and punctuality
Stable
4.2.5. Comparability
Stable
4.2.6. Coherence
Stable
4.2.7. Additional comments quality assessment

No additional comments


5. Relevance Top
5.1. Relevance - User Needs

The national user of the data is mainly the Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority (MCCAA) who is responsible for the National Action Plan regarding the sustainable use of pesticides. 

5.1.1. Unmet user needs

Not available.

5.1.2. Plans for satisfying unfilled user needs

Not available.

5.1.3. Additional comments user needs

No more comments

5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

No survey on customer satisfaction on the topic.

5.2.1. User satisfaction survey
No
5.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey

Not applicable

5.2.3. Satisfaction level
5.2.4. Additional comments user satisfaction

No additional comments

5.3. Completeness

See sub-category below.

5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Pesticide Use Statistics because in this data collection, there is no target on the number of data. Member States are asked to collect data on representative crops without stipulating the number of crops.


6. Accuracy and reliability Top
6.1. Accuracy - overall

The accuracy of the results is considered to be sufficient especially from the perspective of current use. An improvement can be only achieved by an increase in the sample size or by enforcement on the farmers to provide the records of the use of pesticides kept according to Regulation 1107/2009 to the competent authority and in return, such data is shared with the Office. 

6.1.1. Grading of accuracy
Moderate
6.1.2. Factors lowering accuracy
Other
6.1.3. Specification of factors

Small sample size and agricultural diversity

6.1.4. Additional comments overall accuracy

No other relevant information

6.2. Sampling error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

6.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

6.3.1. Coverage error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

6.3.2. Measurement error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

6.3.3. Non response error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

6.3.4. Processing error

See the attached Excel file in the Annexes.

6.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

Seasonal adjustment is not applicable to pesticide use statistics since all plant protection treatments associated directly or indirectly with the crop during the reference period are reported.

6.5. Data revision - policy

At the NSO, there is currently no internal policy governing revisions that occur for all statistics produced. Nonetheless, a revisions policy is being drafted to safeguard a coordinated revisions system across statistical domains. This policy will take account of the need and causes for revisions; time and frequency of revisions; data and other statistical products affected by such revisions; and length of periods revised.

6.6. Data revision - practice

There have been no revisions yet.

6.6.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable

6.6.2. Data revisions - conceptual changes
No
6.6.3. Reason for revisions

Not applicable

6.6.4. Impact of revisions
Not important
6.6.5. Additional comments data revisions

No additional comments to make.


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top
7.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

7.1.1. Time lag - first result

15 months

7.1.2. Time lag - final result

15 months

7.1.3. Reasons for possible long production times?
7.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

7.2.4. Punctuality - delivery and publication

There was a delay of 90 days in the delivery of such data.

7.2.1. Data release according to schedule
NO
7.2.2. Data release on target date
NO
7.2.3. Reasons for delays

The delay of the data delivery was due to the priority given to the Census of Agriculture that has been carried out in the last quarter of 2020. Another reason was due to the limited number of human resources available in the Unit. 


8. Coherence and comparability Top
8.1. Comparability - geographical

Data are collected on a country level (NUTS 0). Therefore, the data are not comparable on a regional level. The geographical comparability between countries is evaluated by Eurostat.

8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Pesticide Use Statistics.

8.2. Comparability - over time

Not applicable for Pesticide Use Statistics, because it is not based on time series.

8.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable for Pesticide Use Statistics, because it is not based on time series.

8.3. Coherence - cross domain

Data can be indirectly compared to the amount of active substance sold.

8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable for Pesticide Use Statistics, because the data collection is based on a five-year period.

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable, because it has no relevance for national accounts.

8.6. Coherence - internal

A good internal coherence of the data was ensured due to the harmonised classification of pesticides and crops.


9. Accessibility and clarity Top
9.1. Dissemination format - News release

No news release was published

9.1.1. Publication of news releases
No
9.1.2. Link to news releases

No news release has been published.

9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

No publication was published

9.2.1. Production of paper publication
No
9.2.2. English paper publication
No
9.2.3. Production of electronic publication
No
9.2.4. English electronic publication
No
9.2.5. Link to publications
9.3. Dissemination format - online database

Data is not available on-line

9.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not applicable

9.3.2. Accessibility of on-line database
No
9.3.3. Link to on-line database

Not applicable.

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Fully anonymised micro-data may also be made available by NSO to accredited researchers upon request as specified on the NSO website.

Further information on access to microdata can be accessed through:

https://nso.gov.mt/en/Services/Microdata/Pages/Access-to-Microdata.aspx

9.4.1. Accessibility of micro-data
Yes
9.4.2. Link to micro-data

Further information on access to microdata can be accessed through:

https://nso.gov.mt/en/Services/Microdata/Pages/Access-to-Microdata.aspx

9.5. Dissemination format - other

Not applicable

9.6. Documentation on methodology

Work processes and procedures for the compilation of the Pesticides Use Survey are documented and the report is only available internally.

9.6.1. Availability of national reference metadata
No
9.6.2. Link to national reference metadata

Not available

9.6.3. Availability of methodological papers
No
9.6.4. Link to methodological papers

Not available

9.6.5. Availability of handbook
No
9.6.6. Link to handbook

Not available.

9.7. Quality management - documentation

Not available

9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not available

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

Not available.

9.7.3. Availability of quality report
NO
9.7.4. Link to quality report

Not available


10. Cost and Burden Top

During 2019, besides the Pesticides Use Survey there was also the FADN (which is carried out by the Agriculture Rural Payment Agency).  The pesticide use survey was conducted after the FADN survey and therefore there were farmers that were interviewed for both surveys in a couple of months.

Being a small country, there are certain farmers who are contacted several times a year to provide information on agriculture, business, other items outside statistics.  With surveys like PPP use, which are quite complicated, this can result in farmers refusing to take part in other surveys.  A major problem is faced when a large farmer does not want to take part in the interview.  Fortunately, in the survey carried out in 2019, there were no refusals.

Apart from cost constraints, we are also facing human resource problems.  Such surveys required skilled human resources, which in many cases, national statistical institutions do not have.

10.1. Efficiency gains
None
10.2. Specification efficiency gains

Not available

10.3. Measures to reduce burden
Less respondents
10.4. Specification burden reduction

Not applicable.


11. Confidentiality Top
11.1. Confidentiality - policy

At the National level:

The NSO requests information for the compilation of official statistics according to the articles of the Malta Statistics Authority (MSA) Act – Cap. 422 (https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/422/eng/pdf) and the Data Protection Act – Cap. 586 (https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/586/eng/pdfof the Laws of Malta implementing the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR).

Article 40 of the MSA Act stipulates the restrictions on the use of information while Article 41 stipulates the prohibition of disclosure of information. Furthermore, Section IX of the Act (Offences and Penalties) lays down the measures to be taken in case of unlawful exercise of any officer of statistics regarding confidentiality of data.

Since its inception, the NSO has always assured that all data collected remains confidential and that it is used for statistical purposes only according to the articles and derogations stipulated in the laws quoted above. The Office is obliged to protect the identity of data providers and refrain from divulging any data to third parties that might lead to the identification of persons or entities.

During 2009, the NSO has set up a Statistical Disclosure Committee to ensure that statistical confidentiality is observed, especially when requests for microdata are received.

Upon employment, all NSO employees are informed of the rules and duties pertaining to confidential information and its treatment. In line with stipulations of the MSA Act, before commencing work, every employee is required to take an oath of secrecy whose text is included in the same Act.

An internal policy on anonymisation and pseudo-anonymisation is in place to ascertain that adequate methods are used for the protection of data that the office collects and shares with the public in its capacity as the National Statistics Office. The policy is meant to safeguard the confidentiality of both personal and business data entrusted to the NSO. The document provides guidance for all NSO employees who process data on a daily basis as to how anonymisation and pseudo-anonymisation methods should be applied. The policy applies to all confidential, restricted and internal information, regardless of form (paper or electronic documents, applications, and databases) that is received, processed, stored, and disseminated by the NSO.

11.1.1. Transmission of confidential national data to Eurostat
Yes
11.1.2. Confidentiality according to Regulation
Yes
11.1.3. Data confidentiality policy
11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

If an active substance has been flagged as confidential in the annual compilation related to sales of plant protection products, then it has been flagged also as confidential for the use survey.

11.2.1. Procedures for confidentiality

See section 11.2

11.2.2. Additional comments confidentiality - data treatment

No additional comments.


12. Comment Top

No other comments


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
ESQRS_ANNEX_PESTUSE_2015-2019