38 innovative SMEs selected for funding under the SME Instrument Phase 2

Printer-friendly version PDF version

38 SMEs from 13 countries have been selected in the latest round of Horizon2020 SME Instrument Phase 2. Each project, 33 in total, will receive up to € 2.5 million (€ 5 million for health projects) to finance innovation activities like demonstration, testing, piloting, scaling up and miniaturisation, in addition to developing  a mature business plan for their product. The companies will also benefit from 12 days of business coaching. Most projects are proposed by a single SME but some companies team-up to elaborate a project.

The European Commission received 960 project proposals under Phase 2 by the third cut-off date for 2015 on 17 September. The success rate for this cut-off is 3.4 %, amounting to total project costs of € 55.3 million.

Italian SMEs were the most successful with 10 beneficiaries who will receive € 12.7 million in total, closely followed by 9 Spanish SMEs who will share € 13.5 million.

Since the launch of the programme on 1st January 2014, 311 SMEs have been selected under Phase 2 of the SME Instrument.


Lists of beneficiaries in Phase 2 

SME Instrument

Map of beneficiaries

Published on
  • Marco | Wed, 25/11/2015 - 16:16
    Subcontracting in SME Instrument

    Hello. I am looking for information about the number of universities and research organisations subcontracted in all Phase 2 projects of the SME Instrument. How many SMEs have or will use higher education/ research organisations, as indicated in the grant agreements?

    Grateful for any information.

  • faturma | Wed, 25/11/2015 - 16:32
    Subcontracting in SME Instrument

    Dear Marco, we don't have any statistics on this topic.
    Marie @EASME

Antonio Ornelas... | Thu, 26/11/2015 - 12:03
Success rate

How did you calculate the "success rate" (3,4%)?

  • martizr | Thu, 26/11/2015 - 14:49
    33 projects selected out of

    33 projects selected out of 960 projects submitted.

    Erwan @EASME

  • obls | Fri, 27/11/2015 - 12:16

    are there in this Cut-Off any proposals funded under the SPACE category?
    Are you going to publish such data?

  • martizr | Fri, 27/11/2015 - 14:33
    Please check the list of

    Please check the list of beneficiaries the information you are looking for is in there.

    Erwan @EASME

  • Nicolas | Fri, 27/11/2015 - 12:37
    Sucess rate per countries


    Could you publish any statistics about the success rate per countries ?


  • martizr | Fri, 27/11/2015 - 14:31
    Unfortunately we do not have

    Unfortunately we do not have time to produce this type of statistics.

    Erwan @EASME

  • Andrius | Tue, 01/12/2015 - 10:56
    submissions and success rates per country

    I'm quite sure this data is available in EASME, so it should not be a problem to publish it. It is valuable for national policy making and designing specific instruments to facilitate participation and/or proposal quality, so looking forward to see it!

  • Tani | Mon, 30/11/2015 - 16:22
    Above threshold

    Could you tell us how many projects have been rated above the threshlod?

  • faturma | Mon, 30/11/2015 - 17:50
    Above threshold

    Dear Tani,

    Phase 1 (Sept cut off: 1073 proposals, 336 above threshold, 122 funded)
    Phase 2 (Sept cut off: 960 proposals, 373 above threshold, 33 funded)

    Marie @EASME

  • Carmen | Tue, 01/12/2015 - 14:03

    Per country, is it possible to understand which areas are the most potentially funded?

  • faturma | Tue, 01/12/2015 - 14:28

    Dear Carmen,

    we don't publish such statistics. Marie @EASME

  • Tony | Tue, 01/12/2015 - 18:04

    Hi Marie,

    Do you have the breakdown of projects funded per topic? It's usually published with the main data.



  • faturma | Wed, 02/12/2015 - 09:40
  • Anonymous | Wed, 02/12/2015 - 16:52
    Thanks Marie,

    Thanks Marie,

    Looking at Phase 2, it's clear SMEI is now hopelessly oversubscribed for most topics. I note that Phase 2 proposals received in November are higher again at a record 1090 submissions versus 960 in September. With only 2 (two) projects funded from 113 Phase 2 submissions in NMP for example, it means in effect that it is no longer a meaningful competition, but a lottery.

    Accounting for the natural bias towards projects coming through Phase 1, we're now below 2% funding rate, less than 1:50 probability, perhaps nearer 1:100.

    If it costs €50,000 (the Phase 1 award) to create a strong proposal at Phase 2, even with a net grant of (say) €1M if successful, that's a 20:1 uplift on a 1:50 chance. With those numbers, SMEI is no longer a tenable business proposition, which is a great shame because the principles of the scheme are excellent.

    I don't know what you can do.

    Thanks again,


  • Xavi | Fri, 04/12/2015 - 13:56

    Is it possible to know which are the statistics by country (% approval / total submitted)?

  • faturma | Wed, 09/12/2015 - 12:40
  • Cristina | Mon, 14/03/2016 - 19:58
    Phase 2 without previous phase 1

    I would like to know how many of the sme phase 2 beneficiaries had previously been phase 1 beneficiaries. Do you have that information?

  • Joan Ribi | Tue, 10/05/2016 - 21:54

    Could you publish a list of proposal titles that were successfull at Phase 2.

    It is generally interesting to see what is regarded as `` cutting edge technology``

    Thank you

  • martizr | Wed, 11/05/2016 - 09:00
    Project database

    You can find the list of all funded projects with abstract on this page: https://ec.europa.eu/easme/en/sme-instrument-projects

    Erwan @EASME

  • Miguel González | Wed, 27/07/2016 - 15:11
    Threshold for funding in the call 2-2016-2017

    Is it possible to know which was the threshold score to get funding in the call H2020-SMEINST-2-2016-2017?
    I know that 13 points were not enough
    Thank you

  • New comment