- Created by Romain Ducenne, last updated on Aug 14, 2025 6 minute read
Responsible authority Refers to the government department or agency responsible for overseeing and implementing eInvoicing regulations in the country. Ministry of Digitalisation and Public Governance The Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ) Business-to-Government (B2G) mandate Refers to whether or not businesses are legally required to send electronic invoices for the contracts in public procurement. YES Business-to-Business (B2B) mandate Indicates if businesses are required to use electronic invoices when dealing with other businesses, including when dealing with Public Authorities in the country. NO Business-to-Consumers (B2C) mandate Indicates if businesses are required to use electronic invoices when dealing with consumers. NO European Standard for eInvoicing EN 16931 The European Standard (EN 16931) on eInvoicing defines a common format and data model for electronic invoices, ensuring they are structured, machine-readable, and compatible across EU systems. All public contracting authorities are required to accept and process electronic invoices that comply with the European Standard for eInvoicing for all public procurement contracts above EU Public Procurement thresholds [1]. Operating model for B2G eInvoicing Refers to whether there’s a specific system or process for exchanging eInvoices with government entities, such as a central platform or outlined procedures to ensure compliance. YES Use of CIUS and Extensions for European Standard for eInvoicing EN 16931 Relates to whether the country uses any additional technical rules or extensions beyond the European eInvoicing Standard. YES VAT Real-time reporting system mandate The VAT real-time reporting system is a system for VAT reporting based on eInvoicing. NO Monitoring mechanism This reflects if the country has a mechanism to monitor eInvoicing developments in the country. YES The Norwegian Ministry of Finance has launched a comprehensive evaluation on introducing mandatory eInvoicing for Business-to-Business, assigning the Norwegian Tax Administration (Skatteetaten) to explore implementation options. With initial proposals expected by June 2025, the initiative draws on Denmark’s successful model and aims to deliver efficiency gains of over NOK 5 billion annually for Norwegian businesses. In Norway, businesses are required to send eInvoices to government bodies as part of the business-to-government (B2G) eInvoicing mandate. This requirement is governed by regulations on eInvoicing in public procurement (FOR-2019-04-01-444), which incorporate the European eInvoicing Directive 2014/55/EU into national law. Since 2 April 2019, all public authorities, at both central and local levels, must receive and process eInvoices. These eInvoices must adhere to specific standards, using the Electronic Handelsformat (EHF) / Peppol BIS Billing system. They must also use the Peppol eDelivery network, an infrastructure that allows secure and efficient electronic communication and exchange of documents between businesses and government entities across Europe. Central government authorities must provide EHF/Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 invoices to businesses. Suppliers engaged in public sector transactions over 100,000 NOK (excluding VAT) under the Public Procurement Act are obliged to send eInvoices in the EHF format. There is no business-to-business (B2B) eInvoicing mandate. There is no business-to-consumer (B2C) eInvoicing mandate. Norway has fully adopted the European standard EN 16931 for eInvoicing. Within Norway, the Electronic Handelsformat (EHF) is used exclusively between domestic organisations, ensuring machine-readable and interoperable invoices in line with national requirements. For both cross-border and national transactions, the widely used Peppol BIS format is employed. These formats facilitate seamless exchange on public procurement platforms and enhance compliance with European directives, supporting efficient and secure electronic billing processes. Economic operators have the flexibility to submit eInvoices using their internal Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) or accounting systems, or through approved e-invoicing solution providers. The Norwegian eProcurement infrastructure is centred around the Peppol Business Interoperability Specifications (BIS) and the Peppol eDelivery Network. Norwegian public bodies recognise both the Peppol BIS format and the Elektronisk Handelsformat (EHF), both of which are based on UBL (Universal Business Language), ensuring compatibility and interoperability. The Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ) manages invoices for nearly 200 central government entities, and it authorises Norwegian-registered Access Points (AP) while operating the ELMA registry. This registry acts as a Peppol Service Metadata Publisher and includes nearly 360,000 receivers, detailing the identities and receiving capabilities of all Norwegian public entities and economic operators using the Peppol Network. The eInvoicing process in Norway is largely automated, with most public entities equipped to process Peppol invoices. Electronic follow-up systems manage invoice approval before payment, and while most payments at sub-central levels are electronic, The Norwegian government aims to automate more functions through the combined use of eOrder, eCatalogue, and eInvoice, with the ultimate goal of digitising the entire order-to-pay process. In Norway, the Core Invoicing Usage Specifications (CIUS) are applied through the national implementation of Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, which aligns with the European standard EN 16931. Norway utilises its own specifications known as Elektronisk Handelsformat (EHF) as the national CIUS. Essentially, CIUS provides a customised set of rules and guidelines that define how electronic invoices should be formatted and processed to ensure compliance with national and European regulations. Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 is a specification part of the Peppol framework that standardises electronic document formats to facilitate seamless cross-border and domestic transactions. By employing EHF specifications as its CIUS, Norway ensures that electronic invoicing is consistent, efficient, and interoperable across all levels of public and private sectors. Currently, there is no real-time reporting system in Norway. Since 2020, a monitoring system has been implemented with the aim of tracking the use of eInvoices with central and non-central bodies in Norway. The monitoring strategy is in place at both central and sub-central levels. The data is available in terms of the number of invoices submitted electronically. The Norwegian Ministry of Finance has launched an evaluation process on the potential introduction of mandatory eInvoicing for B2B. The Norwegian Tax Administration (Skatteetaten) is leading this assessment, with initial proposals expected by June 2025. [1] The European Standard on EU law sets minimum harmonised rules for tenders whose monetary value exceeds a certain amount and which are presumed to be of cross-border interest. More information can be found via: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/public-procurement/legal-rules-and-implementation/thresholds_en [2] The European Standard on eInvoicing (EN 16931) defines a common format and data model for electronic invoices, ensuring they are structured, machine-readable, and compatible across EU systems. [3] Ibid.2 [4] Ibid.1 Last updated:
Aug 14, 2025 17:15Summary
Highlights
Legislation
B2G
B2B
B2C
Status on the implementation of the European eInvoicing standard
Operating model for eInvoicing
Use of Core Invoicing Usage Specifications (CIUS) at national level
VAT Real-time reporting system
Monitoring mechanism
Next steps
Are you aware of further developments on eInvoicing B2G in this country? Contact us via email EC-DIGITAL-BUILDING-BLOCKS@ec.europa.eu.
You can also access the 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2023 and 2024 Invoicing Country Sheets via the eInvoicing User Community.
VERIFIED
| Status | VERIFIED |
|---|
How to comment
You can also use in-line comments to provide feedback.