...
| # | Modules | Your choice |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction to eInvoicing | x |
| 2 | The legal background | |
| 3 | The European norm and its content | x |
| 4 | Infrastructure based on the eDelivery DSI architecture | x |
| 5 | eInvoicing from a user perspective (including ordering and payments) | |
| 6 | Examples of early adopters of large scale eInvoicing – lessons learned | |
| 7 | Basic XML using examples from the EN-syntaxes + mapping/conversion considerations | x |
| 8 | XML Validation mechanisms | |
| 9 | Understanding OASIS UBL 2.1 | x |
| 10 | Understanding UN/CEFACT CII D16B | x |
| 11 | Funding and grants for e-Invoicing | x |
| 12 | Introduction to the eInvoice DSI resources and tools | |
| 13 | Introduction to CEF Digital and e-Invoice readiness checker |
Participants feedback
...
Questions to/from the audience
| Question | Response | No of feedback etc | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
Do you have a profile at CEF Digital? | Asked later just before the coffee break - only 1 has an account on CEF Digital | Did not ask due to timing | |
| Do you see other areas where trainings or webinars could be of interest? | Did not ask due to timing | ||
| The European standard requires a very high level of information quality. Can this prove to be a challenge in your coming implementation? |
| 2-3 participants | |
| Validation is a central function in the European standard. Are the service providers ready for the technology? | In Sweden when where not all service providers have full control of the user input in the invoice this can cause interruption to the invoice process | Only speaker input | |
| CIUS – benefits and challenges, what is your opinion? | A Finnish CIUS is being prepared by the Tax authorities in Finland. The exact scope is unknown to the public yet. In Sweden the CIUS will be a replica of the PEPPOL profile - in other words not very restricted. Same situation in Norway and Denmark. There is a long list of codes which really isn't useful for the wider majority Do not restrict your CIUS too much since it will be a burden to your interoperability both nationally and internationally | 1 participant and speakers | |
| Two formats – do you see this as primarily an opportunity or a challenge? | In payment industry only one is working and that was just the case... What about versioning?
It can be very difficult to update the standards once implemented - that is a drawback | ||
| Is CEF eDelivery/PEPPOL relevant for you? | Some service providers are connected to PEPPOL. | ||
| Has anyone here applied earlier or intending to do so in this years call? | No | ||
| What is your estimate for creating and implementing a CIUS? | At the CEF Digital website there is a wiki with a list of CIUS projects where you can find very good help on how national legislation can affect the CIUS and cross-border transactions of eInvoicing | Question from audience - answer from speakers | |
| How many are connected to PEPPOL | (Question raised by the speaker) 3 participants | Service Providers | |
| Are there acknowledgments between access points? | Yes, the transport protocols (AS2/AS4) always acknowledge receipt. OpenPEPPOL is also developing an Invoice Response Message which can be used by the buyer to inform the seller that for example the order reference is incorrect. | ||
| Where can we find code list ISO 6523 and code list for Exemption reason code for VAT? | No answer given in the workshop. Martin Forsberg will follow up. |
Presentation
The presentation can be found here:
| View file | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|