...
| Question | Answer | Notes/Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Info about the audience | 80% public 20% private about 50 attendees | |
| Heard about CEF DSI? | 5-10% yes. Several participants have taken part in CEF calls for grants. 2-3 with profile. | |
| How many here have heard about PEPPOL? | About half of the people here knows about PEPPOL | |
| Do the public authorities in Greece have electronic workflow support for managing invoices? | No - unsure what is in place | |
| Which invoicing formats are currently being used? | No answer | |
| The European Standard is high level of information quality - Can this prove to be a challenge? | No answer | |
| Are there any public available schematrons? | There are schematrons available but not through CEN - they are still assessing how to publish these | |
| Two formats - do you see this as an opportunity or a challenge? | 5 participants thinks it should one syntax 5 participants thinks it should be more syntaxes as it gives the flexibility to chose from the client Other comments: Syntaxes must however exist as we (the service providers) has seen too many exchanges without prober structured syntaxes. From the public authority it is too expensive to cover more than one syntax for sure | |
| if a country implements an extension do we still need to support the full standard? | Extensions is per definition not compliant to the directive - so yes you need to support both. | |
| Do you know any countries that uses or plan to use extensions? | No countries - so far - plans for this that we are aware of. | |
| How much time does it take to get from 0% invoices to a significant number | Very dependent on what instruments are available to force/push uptake. Through requirements in contract, by law or by relying on individuals driving the uptake. Clear policy and backing from management are the most important measures. Collaboration is key here - between the public authorities, the service providers and the banks - all needs to be involved. | |
Pictures from the workshop
...