...
| Question (Audience/Speaker) | Answer (Audience/Speaker) | Notes | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| How many from public sector | 60% | ||
| Private sector | 40% | ||
| Service provider | 30% | ||
| Knowledge about eInvoicing | 80% | ||
| Knowledge about CEF | 10% | ||
| Knowledge about the EN | 0% | ||
| Do you have a CEF Digital profile? | 1 participant | ||
| Other topics that would be of interest (webinars) | - | ||
| Straight through processing - how does it relate to public procurement - this could be an issue to have automatic approval processes in some administrations? | It depends on the country and its legal constraints - (Example from Sweden: it's imporant to have a process in place for approving the rules for automatic matching. For order-matched invoices, the order is approved and the delivery is approved. Then the invoice can be automatically accepted if it matches. For thresholds for phone subscriptions or rental invoices, the max/min rules need to be approved before hand. But if the invoice falls within the threshold the invoice is automatically matched. | ||
| How many here have heard about PEPPOL and the four corner model? | 6-7 participants | ||
| In Poland is work process for automated invoices support already in place? | A few participants thinks it has to be done before the directive goes into place | ||
| Which format for eInvoicing are being used here in Poland today - EANCOM / EDIFACT we know. | Some XML formats are used but not widely | ||
| The European Standard requires a lot of information and high quality - is the a problem? | Yes, some participants agrees to this | ||
| Two formats for eInvoicing - do you think this is a good option or not? | Mainly participants think this should only be one format | ||
| Validation is a central part of the standard - is the service providers ready for this in Poland? | YES! Broad agreement to this | ||
| How is the public authorities in the different member states coping with more standards? | In general we hear that most authorities will continue to support more than one standard eg their own national standard and this new standard | ||
| What do you think about the CIUS? Good thing or pandoras box? | There is a risk if everybody does their "own thing" and most will probably do, it will put an impediment to the wider adoption and interoperability of the standard. | ||