...
| Question (Audience/Speaker) | Answer (Audience/Speaker) | Notes | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| How many from public sector | 60% | ||
| Private sector | 40% | ||
| Service provider | 30% | ||
| Knowledge about eInvoicing | 80% | ||
| Knowledge about CEF | 10% | ||
| Knowledge about the EN | 0% | ||
| Do you have a CEF Digital profile? | 1 participant | ||
| Other topics that would be of interest (webinars) | - | ||
| Straight through processing - how does it relate to public procurement - this could be an issue to have automatic approval processes in some administrations? | It depends on the country and its legal constraints - in Sweden there is a cap/limit on how much the invoice can be at for an automatic approval. Then there is the problem of electronic signatures - in some countries like Sweden we dont have that in place, it is enough with the electronic signing on the serverside. | ||
| How many here have heard about PEPPOL and the four corner model? | 6-7 participants | ||
| In Poland is work process for automated invoices support already in place? | A few participants thinks it has to be done before the directive goes into place | ||
| Which format for eInvoicing are being used here in Poland today - EANCOM / EDIFACT we know. | Some XML formats are used but not widely | ||
| The European Standard requires a lot of information and high quality - is the a problem? | Yes, some participants agrees to this | ||
| Two formats for eInvoicing - do you think this is a good option or not? | Mainly participants think this should only be one format | ||
| Validation is a central part of the standard - is the service providers ready for this in Poland? | YES! Broad agreement to this | ||
| How is the public authorities in the different member states coping with more standards? | In general we hear that most authorities will continue to support more than one standard eg their own national standard and this new standard |