Status
UNDER REVIEW - Information compiled by the CEF eDelivery team based on data provided by the respective Informal Cooperation Network member
INFO NOT AVAILABLE - Information not available. Please let us know in case you want to share any relevant information (you can use the comments section at the bottom of the page or send an email to CEF-BUILDING-BLOCKS@ec.europa.eu)
VALIDATED - Information validated by the respective Informal Cooperation Network member
Status | Platform/project | Entity(ies) involved | Status | Governance | Architecture | Use of AS4 (Y/N) | Intention to use AS4 (Y/N) | Additional information | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Austria | VALIDATED | There are currently two eDelivery systems in place in Austria. A general purpose eDelivery system for the public administration and an eJustice system called ERV. The general purpose system can be used by all public administrations, businesses and citizens. | General purpose system: Ministry of Digital and Economic Affairs, private eDelivery service providers. As users: public administrations, businesses, citizens. eJustice system: Ministry of Constitutional Affairs, Reforms, Deregulation and Justice. As users: courts, departments of public prosecution, lawyers. | General purpose system: in production since 2004. ERV: in production since 1990. | Both systems operate on Web Services based platforms with custom specifications and profiles carrying both metadata of the delivery message and related attachments. Both systems foresee non-repudiation of receipt services. | N | To be assessed. Potentially use case for eIDAS AP towards systems of other Member States. | ||
2 | Belgium | UNDER REVIEW | There is a federal service allowing the exchange of information between federal and European institutions, exchanging more than 10 million messages per month. The eBox platform enables citizens to receive official documents from social security administrations. There is currently a standard API being developed to allow the integration with eBox. | BOSA | There was an eDelivery Proof of Concept with Domibus but eBox is not using AS4. An AS4 node will be connected to local institutions, although this is not a priority. ERDS is part of eBox. | BOSA and its digital transformation office ensure a process oriented and service integration approach. It aims to enable the digital agenda for Belgium. BOSA is the national authority for SMP. | N | Y | ||
3 | Bulgaria | UNDER REVIEW | There is an information system for electronic delivery working horizontally as part of the eGovernment IT resources of Bulgaria. | State e-Government Agency | This system is currently available for validation and delivery of electronic documents to and from citizens, businesses and public administrations. The mail service is offered free of charge and it replaces the paper letter delivery of documents. The system allows the storage of documents, ensures the security of the exchanges and allows the use of certified time stamps. All public administrations, as well as third party systems, can integrate this system into their own information systems or use it via a user interface (https://edelivery.egov.bg/). | The State eGovernment Agency ensures the system's maintenance, operation and development. There are legal and technical developments planned for this system. The State eGovernment Agency’s responsibility is to ensure the technological means for exchanges between public administrations, citizens and businesses. | Bulgaria is currently developing an Entreprise Architecture Framework for eGovernance. This framework will include not only eDelivery, but also electronic authentication, electronic payments and a centralised portal for the request and deliver of public services. | N | Y | |
4 | Croatia | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
5 | Cyprus | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
6 | Czech Republic | VALIDATED | There is a large centralised eDelivery system (Data Boxes) in place in Czech Republic since 2009 intended for delivery of official documents and for communication with public authority bodies. It is mandatory by law for all public administrations and businesses to use this system and citizens can use it if they want. There are currently almost 1 million users exchanging around 100 million messages per year. | Ministry of Interior | The system is based on a standard, but it is not AS4 compliant. Currently the AS4 compliance is being assessed and there is an intention to expand it to cross-border use to allow sending of messages to foreign parties. | N | Maybe | |||
7 | Denmark | UNDER REVIEW | The Danish national scale eDelivery project launched an initial design and is currently in analysis phase. There is no commitment yet to implement but it is foreseeable in the future. This project is focused on three areas: Technical, analysing the interaction between eDelivery components and national systems; Governance implementation, looking at stakeholder management, lifecycle management, assess agreements, core service operations etc. and Financial business model, with cost estimates, qualitative benefit estimates and specific business cases focused for example on healthcare and digital post. | Danish Agency for Digitisation | Danish Agency for Digitisation is responsible for digitalisation at the national level in Denmark, developing the national interoperability architecture framework, aligned with EIRA and working at the semantic interoperability level. The agency is responsible for some infrastructure (such as eID, eSignature) component management. The agency is also responsible for the Digital Post and for centralised systems for payment initiations in the public sector. | The eDelivery approach is similar to Norway. Denmark has recently released a reference architecture for data sharing, access to base registries, data portals and a messaging based reference architecture. This architecture will be adopted for future use. | N | Maybe | ||
8 | Estonia | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
9 | Finland | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
10 | France | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
11 | Germany | UNDER REVIEW | There is a national standard called OSCI transport protocol in use since in 2002, which is close to the 4-corner model; separation of a business and transport level. There is a built-in end-to-end-security on the business level, which ensures confidentiality and authenticity on the business level. The OSCI standard was developed by a national project financed by the Federal government aiming to enhance eGovernment and eJustice services. An IT coordination council coordinates the standard ensuring an easier access to the common infrastructure. This infrastructure is i.e. used to update residency registers, which are decentralised in Germany, and updates of the business registers. It is also used over the internet, not just over closed networks. | IT Planning Council, the central body responsible for national IT cooperation. | The IT Planning Council is, according to the German Basic Law, the central body responsible for national IT cooperation in federal and state public administration. The IT Planning Council reports directly to the Head of the Federal Chancellery and the Heads of the state chancelleries. | N | Maybe | |||
12 | Greece | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
13 | Hungary | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
14 | Ireland | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
15 | Italy | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
16 | Latvia | UNDER REVIEW | Currently, there is a portal Latvia.lv with over 150 electronic services available. In 2018, Latvia started using an official electronic address enabling each citizen to communicate with state institutions through the portal Latvia.lv. The single authentication model via eID and mobile phones is in place and the aim is to have all state institutions using this model. | Latvia started 10 years ago to enable electronic data exchange. The creation of digital services raised many issues related to data exchange (e.g. interoperability between document management systems) and there were no standards in place in Latvia. | Ministry responsible for IT policy and technical implementation | N | Maybe | |||
17 | Lithuania | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
18 | Luxembourg | UNDER REVIEW | Luxembourg is operating a PEPPOL Access Point since 2016. This Access Point is in use at central government level and can also be used by local entities. Luxembourg is also involved in the BRIS project. | State IT Center (CTIE - Centre des technologies de l'information de l'État) | PEPPOL Access Point is currently in use. | State IT Center (CTIE - Centre des technologies de l'information de l'État) is the contact point for EU policy related initiatives at national level. | Y | |||
19 | Malta | VALIDATED | Malta participated in the EESSI (European Exchange of Social Security Information) and eCodex projects. | EESSI project - Ministry For Health, Ministry for the Family, Children’s Rights and Social Solidarity eCodex - Courts of Malta | Malta is interested to have information about ongoing initiatives to implement eDelivery at EU and national levels. EESSI project - Member States are currently completing their national implementation by June 2019 eCodex - in production | MITA (Malta Information Technology Agency) provides IT services to the government and agencies. eCodex project - meCodex an EU Funded Consortium consisting of Member States and working under the Governance of the EU Council. | EESSI project - All message exchanges between Social Security institutions within the EESSI system are performed using Access Points that ensure the link between the national and international domain. Beside the institution to institution communication there are also message exchanges between the central EESSI systems themselves and possibly with national systems. These system message exchanges involve repository synchronisation, reporting, audit trail, message archiving, etc. These system message exchanges differ from the regular business messaging because they are executed between directly two systems, i.e. they are point-to-point exchanges. | Y | Maybe | Malta's National Data Strategy available here |
20 | Netherlands | UNDER REVIEW | RINIS foundation and some ministries | There is a governmental model for data exchange in place and a Proof of Concept was undertaken. The ministries involved allocated budget to support the creation of business cases. | There is a steering committee for eDelivery where some ministries are represented (RINIS foundation has a project lead role in this committee and is part of two active projects involving several ministries). | The Netherlands is starting a project to build their own SMP gateway. | N | Y | The RINIS foundation is currently setting up a Program Office International to coordinate, together with the Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, the alignment with European policies on data exchange. | |
21 | Norway | UNDER REVIEW | There is a centralised platform in place with some limitations. It will not disappear but it will be an ERDS service provider within the national infrastructure. | DIFI | Currently the focus is on this national model and the governance of the infrastructure at technical and management level to coordinate cross-domain interactions. | DIFI created a reference architecture for eDelivery in 2017, which is based on CEF eDelivery to accommodate the needs of the Norwegian public sector. Its vision is that this reference architecture becomes the basis for a new national eDelivery architecture in Norway. | ||||
22 | Poland | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
23 | Portugal | UNDER REVIEW | Portugal has been participating in some EU projects such as eCODEX, eJustice, BRIS and the eHealth pilot. PEPPOL is in use with a private company and ESPAP. | ESPAP | ESPAP is currently working to ensure interoperability of all public procurement platforms (with 80 services available) and the use eDelivery for this purpose is being assessed | N | Maybe | |||
24 | Romania | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
25 | Slovakia | INFO NOT AVAILABLE | ||||||||
26 | Slovenia | UNDER REVIEW | eDelivery is in place in Slovenia to exchange documents between public administrations. These exchanges are based on legislation and administrative procedures in place. The Supreme Court of Slovenia is advancing on exchanging documents using eDelivery. At state level government there is a central solution in place to enable the exchange of official documents between institutions. | Ministry of Public Administration | Currently Slovenia is working on preparing citizens to use a data-box type solution. | N | Y (possible use of eDelivery in the central solution in place) | |||
27 | Spain | VALIDATED | There are several platforms in place dealing with Exchange of data and documents: | All these platforms depend on the Ministry of Finance and Public Function, specifically the General Secretariat of Digital Administration. | Transmissions are increasing exponentially in most of these platforms, detailed statistics can be consulted in the DATAOBSAE Website (http://dataobsae.administracionelectronica.gob.es/cmobsae3/dashboard/Dashboard.action?selectedScope=A2&selectedLevel=L0&selectedUnit=TOTAL&selectedTemporalScope=1&selectedTemporal=31/07/2018). | Article 28 of Law 39/2015, of Common Administrative Procedure, includes, as a right for all citizens, the right not to provide any data or document that is in the possession of the Public Administration. | The architecture of these platforms is decentralised, data and documents are storaged in the competent body and there is a central platform through which the messages are transmitted. | N | N | PID: https://administracionelectronica.gob.es/pae_Home/pae_Estrategias/Racionaliza_y_Comparte/elementos_comunes/Intermediacion_de_datos.html#.W21tEaKvzmg |
28 | Sweden | UNDER REVIEW | Sweden participates in cross-border projects such as EESSI, TOOP and others and has a project to implement eDelivery at national level. | Agency for Digital Government (DIGG) | DIGG created two pilots: one to transform economic information to XBRL to be transmitted via eDelivery to audit agencies (including a SML instance); another one focusing on secure digital communication of documents and pictures, involving both private and public sector organisations. A study about data exchange is currently being conducted and it should be finalised by August 2019. This study will inform the decisions taken for DIGG's project to implement eDelivery at national level. | DIGG is the contact point for eDelivery in Sweden and is the entity coordinating the national eDelivery implementation. | Y | - | ||
29 | UK | INFO NOT AVAILABLE |