I have been struck by the very different message coming from the regions - in those very same "net payer" countries. There have been a steady stream of them calling recently: from Cornwall to Yorkshire and Humberside, from the Scottish Highlands and Islands and the Welsh Valleys to the German Lander and the Dutch provinces. All of them are saying that local communities rely on these EU funds and that if they were to be cut, national treasuries would never replace them.
The current crisis has quite rightly concentrated minds on the need to ensure that every euro, every pound of taxpayers' money is spent even more wisely and well. In the context of regional policy, that means creating jobs and stimulating much needed growth. It means focusing funding where it will have the most impact, building on local strengths and at the same time promoting our wider aims of boosting competiveness by investing for example in innovation, business, sustainable transport and renewable energy. This is the dramatic transformation of our policy that I am overseeing – from being just a support mechanism for the poorest regions to being a modern instrument for investment.
In the UK, EU regional funds combined with national funding can claim huge successes in regenerating communities and cities and in fostering regional growth. Support for research and development, help for small and medium sized businesses- the life blood of our local economies- has been the principal focus of the funds. From 2007-2011 we estimate they have so far delivered 43,500 new jobs, safeguarding thousands of others. The UK's own figures record that between 2000-2006 , European Regional Development funds created 177,391 new jobs and supported 207,662 small and medium enterprises.
But I would stress the value of these co -managed funds under the umbrella of the European Union. One of the effects of this crisis is that regions and communities have been blighted by a lack of confidence, deserted by investors and deprived of hope.
I believe our funds have helped to mitigate the full impact of this.
That is partly due to the way EU spending is organised. Unlike the annual national budgets, fought over by domestic ministries and vulnerable to change at election times, our budget spans 7 years. This makes it inherently reliable and a valuable draw for private investment with more scope for strategic planning. As part of our modernisation of the policy, financial instrument schemes are taking a more prominent role, with huge benefits for local regeneration and growth. Indeed our project Finance for Business North East Funds has proved something of a beacon for the rest of Europe. Since 2010, £125m of loans and equity investments have been made available to local business in the North East of England - £44.25m from the European Regional Development Fund , another £18.25m in match funding , and £62.5m from the European Investment Bank. This in turn has so far attracted another £59m in private investments. For local people that has meant 532 new jobs so far, with another 1180 safeguarded.
But as we plan the new programmes for 2014-20 our approach is also very firmly anchored in the concept of local partnership.
For the first time we have launched a dialogue with member states, regions and communities to pin down where the investments will be most effective , even before the figures are agreed. On the ground, EU cohesion policy is mobilising local knowledge and resources. It is contributing across the UK to community participation and transparency , and represents a vital part of Britain's strategy for local growth.
This article was first published in "Politics First" magazine