Current portal location

Website content

Anti-subsidy

Investigations

What is an anti-subsidy investigation?

Once the Commission has received a valid complaint from an EU industry, providing sufficient prima facie evidence that a country is subsidising companies exporting a particular product to the EU and that this is causing injury to the EU industry, the Commission launches an investigation within 45 days to examine whether:

  • imports from the country/countries concerned are subsidised
  • there is injury to the EU industry
  • the subsidised imports are causing this injury
  • it is in/against the interests of the EU to impose measures (usually a countervailing duty).
Investigation procedure
  • A Notice of Initiation is published in the EU's Official Journal, detailing the product under investigation, the country/countries to be investigated, the rights and obligations of interested parties to the proceeding, and the deadlines which will apply.
  • At the same time, a questionnaire is sent to exporters and authorities (government and/or public bodies) in the country/countries concerned, Community producers and importers, and users. The deadline for replies to the questionnaire is specified in the Notice of Initiation.
  • Parties who do not reply to the questionnaire are considered to be not cooperating with the investigation. The Commission will continue the investigation and may use other information. The duty imposed on a non-cooperating exporter is likely to be higher than if it had cooperated.
  • The data submitted in response to the questionnaires is verified by case handlers. This is usually done by inspecting the respondent's records at the company premises.
  • The Commission then makes provisional findings. At this point it may:
    • impose provisional countervailing duties (usually in force for four months)
    • continue the investigation without imposing duties
    • terminate the investigation.
  • All interested parties receive a disclosure document explaining the essential considerations on which the Commission's provisional findings were based, and are invited to comment.
  • The Commission then continues its investigation, taking due account of the comments received.
  • When the Commission makes its final findings, it sends another disclosure document to interested parties.
  • Based on its final findings, the Commission proposes to the Council either that:
    • measures be definitively imposed, or
    • the case be terminated without measures.
  • The Council must impose any measures within 13 months of the initiation of the investigation.
Is it necessary to employ a lawyer?

There is no obligation to employ a lawyer. A company may defend its own interests during an investigation.

The Commission is available to answer queries from interested parties throughout the investigation – case officers' contact details are provided to parties to an investigation.

Anti-subsidy

Action against imports of subsidized products

Anti-subsidy measures counteract trade distortive subsidies which make subsidised goods artificially competitive (e.g. cheaper) compared to non-subsidised goods.

Trade defence logo

Notice board

What's new in Trade defence: listings of current and archived legislation, decisions, notices and corrigenda.