IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.
| Second European Report on S&T Indicators (ERSTI) |
Nr. 19 - June-July '98
|
European S&T - the state of playEurope is currently a major scientific power but, to retain its world position, it must promote long-term economic growth by stepping up investment in research, development, education and training. The vicious circle of less investment - less growth could become a big problem as we move into the 21st century
The gap between these leaders and the remaining 130 "S&T weak" nations - where a quarter of the world's population lives - is wide.
The "top 50": key figuresIn 1994, the "top 50" accounted for 98% of world R&D and education spending. They employed 95% of the world's scientists and engineers. These, in turn, were responsible for 98% of all publications in journals mentioned in the Science Citation Index and 99% of all patents issued in the US and Europe.Returns on this investment were equally impressive: the "top 50" generated 90% of world Gross Domestic Product (GDP), accounting for 92% of world industrial production. They attracted 99% of direct foreign investment and they were the source of more than 96% of international trade in manufactured products, and virtually 100% of high-technology exports. Between 1986 and 1994, the "top 50" consolidated their position: their long-term economic growth was three times greater than that of the other 130 countries in the world. The average economic wealth per head in these 50 countries grew by 1.1% per year in constant ECU. Their income has fallen over the last decade by 1.5% per year. Whilst the rich have got ever richer, the poor have got poorer (Figure 1).
National variationsWithin the "top 50", most of the indicators show that individual countries which invest more in scientific research, and exploit technology with greater efficiency, are the best economic performers. Several countries at the lower end of the "top 50" are now making substantial increases in their science investment budgets and are currently undergoing a process of catching-up.For example, between 1990 and 1996 the developed Asian countries built on knowledge generated in other parts of the world and invested heavily in science and technology. Just before the current financial turmoil, they had achieved economic growth rates of around 10% per year.
Europe's economic growth over the last decade has been much lower than Asia's
but in line with that of the US and Japan. All countries in the European
Union are, of course, within the 'top 50' and, collectively, the EU is currently
retaining its position as the world's second scientific power, behind the
US but ahead of Japan. It has a strong science base, its trade performance
has been improving since 1993 and the EU still holds first place in the
world as the source and destination of foreign investment.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |