Research & Innovation - Participant Portal

TOPIC : Support for the enhancement of the impact of PILOT projects

Topic identifier: NMBP-38-2017
Publication date: 14 October 2015

Types of action: CSA Coordination and support action
DeadlineModel:
Opening date:
single-stage
20 September 2016
Deadline: 19 January 2017 17:00:00

Time Zone : (Brussels time)
  Horizon 2020 H2020 website
Pillar: Industrial Leadership
Work Programme Year: H2020-2016-2017
Topic Updates
  • 11 January 2017 10:28

    Switzerland as associated country

    From 1 January 2017 Switzerland is associated to the whole Horizon 2020 programme instead of the previous partial association.

    This applies to all the grant agreements signed on 1 January 2017 and afterwards.

    For more information please see the relevant Note on the Participant Portal.

Topic Description
Specific Challenge:

To optimally support pilot production, there is a need for a "European Pilot Production Network" (EPPN) that would act as a coordination platform in the area of nanotechnologies and advanced materials upscaling and pilot actions. EPPN would exploit synergies and maximise impact of the various investments, innovation programmes and financing from H2020, regional and private sources, ensuring cooperation with the Member States and Associated Countries and regions, as well as other stakeholders.

Scope:

This action should support the development and work of a EPPN with a clear added value to current H2020 pilot activities. The coordination action shall aim in particular to actively identify best practise on maximising the impact of new and existing pilot line activities in Europe. The initiative, which is expected to last 3 years, will require close collaboration with relevant regional and national public bodies, industrial associations, technology centres, private investors and organisations. Sustainability of the networking activity beyond the duration of EU funding support should be considered.

EPPN activities may include:

  • Mapping of EU, regional and national projects and pilot installations and their services, market opportunities and the potential users of these facilities.
  • Mapping of EU, regional and national opportunities for supporting access to pilot facilities by SMEs/Start-ups and upscaling of new businesses and identification of any barriers, such as training, safety, standards or regulatory.
  • Alignment with relevant EU, national, regional activities, such as National/Regional Access Programmes and EU Vanguard initiative including identification and adoption of best practise business models, IP management and marketing.
  • Cooperation with regional-national brokerage events bringing pilot facilities, local companies and capital providers together, including dedicated training workshops for potential new pilot facilities and their users (funding for event organisation is not envisaged in the current topic).

The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU between EUR 0.5 and 1 million would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.

No more than one action will be funded.

Expected Impact:

The establishment and operation of the EPPN is expected to have impacts at three levels:

At Pilot line level:

Networking of individual pilot facilities to establish complete pilot ecosystems for key industrial value chains enabled by nanotechnologies and advanced materials; established and demonstrated examples of best practise business models, IPR management and marketing approaches.

At end-user level:

Promoting knowledge of EU, regional and national support opportunities, facilitating in particular SME access to pilot facilities. Successfully bringing pilot facilities, local companies and capital providers together, leading to the creation of new or scaling up of existing businesses.

At policy level:

Practical policy recommendations resulting from interactions with relevant regional and national public bodies, advancing the work of the NANOfutures Integrated Research and Innovation Roadmap (2013-2025) and the Multi-KETs Pilot Lines Final Report; Practical examples and recommendations directed to the relevant EU and National initiatives, for addressing horizontal barriers, in particular on funding and financing, but also including training, safety, standards, and regulatory issues.

Cross-cutting Priorities:

Open Innovation
Cross-cutting Key-Enabling Technologies (KETs)

Topic conditions and documents

Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
 

  1. LIST OF COUNTRIES and APPLICABLE RULES FOR FUNDING
    described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.

    Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects (follow the links to Australia, Brazil, Canada,
    ChinaHong Kong &Macau, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Taiwan).
     
  2. ELIGIBILITY and ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS
    described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.

    Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.


     
  3. EVALUATION

    3.1  Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold:

    The criteria, scoring and threshold are described in General Annex H of the work programme.

    The procedure for setting a priority order for proposals with the same score is given in General Annex H of the work programme. The following exceptions apply:

    Under 3 (a)
    Proposals are first ranked in separate lists according to the topics against which they were submitted (‘topic ranked lists’). When comparing ex aequo proposals from different topics, proposals having a higher position in their respective 'topic ranked list' will be considered to have a higher priority in the overall ranked list.

    Under 3 (b)
    For all topics and types of action, the prioritisation will be done first on the basis of the score for Impact, and then on that for Excellence.


    3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
        

  4. INDICATIVE TIMETABLE for EVALUATION and GRANT AGREEMENT

    Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
    Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
     
  5. PROVISIONS, PROPOSAL TEMPLATES and EVALUATION FORMS
    for the type of action under this topic


    Coordination and Support Action:

    Specific provisions and funding rates
    Standard proposal template
    Standard evaluation form
    H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
    Annotated Grant Agreement

     
  6. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS

    Horizon 2020 budget flexibility

    Classified information

    Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.

    Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.

     
  7. OPEN ACCESS

    Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions.

    Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.

    Open access to research data

    The Open Research Data Pilot has been extended to cover all Horizon 2020 topics for which the submission is opened on 26 July 2016 or later. Projects funded under this topic will therefore by default provide open access to the research data they generate, except if they decide to opt-out under the conditions described in annex L of the Work Programme. Projects can opt-out at any stage, that is both before and after the grant signature.

    Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they plan to open or share their data, and will not be penalised for opting out.

    Open research data sharing applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan.

    - Projects need to create a Data Management Plan (DMP), except if they opt-out of making their research data open access. A first version of the DMP must be provided as an early deliverable within six months of the project and should be updated during the project as appropriate. The Commission already provides guidance documents, including a template for DMPs.

    - Eligibility of costs: costs related to data management and data sharing are eligible for reimbursement during the project duration.

    The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.

     
  8. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

    Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment

    Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation

    Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme

    H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction

    H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction to Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEITs)

    H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Nanotechnologies, advanced materials, advanced manufacturing and processing, biotechnology

    H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Cross-cutting activities (Focus Areas)

    H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Dissemination, Exploitation and Evaluation

    H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: General Annexes

 

Submission Service

No submission system is open for this topic.

Get support

H2020 Online Manual your online guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Participant Portal FAQ – Submission of proposals.

National Contact Points (NCP) - 
contact your NCP for further assistance.

Research Enquiry Service
– ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

Enterprise Europe Network
– contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk
- contact the Participant Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

Contact the EIT for further assistance related to the call, topics and the content of proposals via the Contact Page on the EIT website.

Clean Sky 2 National Contact Points
- Clean Sky 2 JU States Representative Group

Clean Sky 2 Helpdesk:
Info-Call-CPW-2014-01@Cleansky.EU

ECSEL National Contact Points
– consult Annex G of the ECSEL Work Plan

ECSEL Helpdesk:
setupecsel@ecsel.europa.eu

IMI States Representative Group (SRG)
– contact you SRG member for assistance.

IMI JU IT Helpdesk
– for IMI2 topics contact the SOFIA IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

Shift2Rail Call Helpdesk: info-call@shift2rail.europa.eu

Ethics
– for compliance with ethical issues, see the Participant Portal and Science and Society Portal

European IPR Helpdesk
assists you on intellectual property issues

CEN
and CENELEC, the European Standards Organisations, advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal. Contact CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk at research@cencenelec.eu.

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment


Partner Search Services
help you find a partner organisation for your proposal

IMI Partner Search Tool
helps you find a partner organisation for your proposal