TOPIC : Assessment of standardisation needs and ways to overcome regulatory bottlenecks in the process industry
|Publication date:||14 October 2015|
|Types of action:||CSA Coordination and support action|
|DeadlineModel: Planned opening date:||single-stage 20 September 2016||Deadline:||19 January 2017 17:00:00|
|Time Zone : (Brussels time)|
Topic DescriptionSpecific Challenge:
It is essential to take advantage of the potential important benefits from new technologies and materials while ensuring that there are mechanisms in place to prevent, identify and manage any potential risks that come about associated with certain use of such technologies. The European regulatory process should also instil consumer confidence in the approved marketed products and encourage the reduction of production costs and the increase of efficiency, improving of the quality of products and services, ensuring worker health and safety, and protecting the environment in order to keep jobs and a competitive economy.
The EU Regulation 1025/2012 defines the procedures to be applied when harmonised standards are used to provide a presumption of conformity with legal requirements.Scope:
Regulation should be simple and stable but, above all, should be reliable. Before any changes are considered, a very careful and well-thought analysis should be undertaken in order to minimise the risk of potential negative impact on innovation and on the uptake of technology. Furthermore, standards should be non-restrictive, reflecting a balance between a need for harmonisation and innovation.
A clear, consistent and predictable regulatory framework which avoids unnecessary administrative and financial burden is needed. Proposed support actions should cover the needs of the different industrial sectors representing big and small companies within the process industry. Their objective should be to identify and to propose solutions along the value chain, required to reach long term sustainability for Europe in terms of global competitiveness, ecology and employment.
Evaluation of standardisation and/or regulation needs could include recommendations within the following issues:
- Re-use of different grades of wastewater for industrial purposes.
- Re-use of different types of waste (e.g. through re-classification) as feed for industrial production and/or energy sources.
- Recovery of valuable materials, metals and minerals from waste.
- Lifecycle Assessment methodologies to allow a harmonised comparison between industries and sectors.
- Production of advanced renewable fuels from the use of CO2 as feedstock.
- General harmonisation of the European Waste, Water and Energy policies.
- Eliminating bottlenecks for the transferability of new technologies across European borders.
- Eliminating bottlenecks that prevent the stimulation of investments in new technologies, e.g. within clean and low carbon technologies.
- New standardisation methodologies that facilitate continuous production.
While in some cases it is necessary to recommend harmonisation on a European scale through regulation and European Standards, in other cases it may only be necessary to enable transferability of technology across sectorial boundaries.
Examples for this could be (but are not restricted to) the following:
- IT control systems and plant monitoring systems facilitating industrial symbiosis.
- Equipment for Process Intensification.
- Equipment for small scale localised production.
The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU between EUR 500000 and 1000000 would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.
No more than one action will be funded.Expected Impact:
- Enabling regulatory authorities to better address the different relevant issues based on a better assessment and taking into consideration the different stakeholders in SPIRE.
- Rationalising the process to deliver standardisation mandates to the European Standards Organisations.
- Successful implementation of different policies, regulations and standards within the SPIRE sectors.
- Enabling of industrial symbiosis and better use of industrial resources.
- Reducing cost of operation for the process industry.
- International cooperation.
Topic conditions and documents
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
LIST OF COUNTRIES and APPLICABLE RULES FOR FUNDING
described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects (follow the links to Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Hong Kong &Macau, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Taiwan).
- ELIGIBILITY and ADMISSIBILITY CONDITIONS
described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold:
described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme, with the following exceptions:
For single-stage and second-stage evaluations, the threshold for the criteria Excellence and Impact will be 4.
The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 12.
In case of equal overall scores in the ranked list, the priority order of proposals will be established in accordance with part H of the General Annexes, except that proposals will be ranked on the basis of individual scores for the Impact criterion before the Excellence criterion.
In case of equal overall scores in the ranked list, the priority order of proposals will be established in accordance with part H of the General Annexes, except, when comparing ex aequo proposals of different topics, the proposals will be ranked first according to the position in the topic ranked lists.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
- INDICATIVE TIMETABLE for EVALUATION and GRANT AGREEMENT
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
- PROVISIONS, PROPOSAL TEMPLATES and EVALUATION FORMS
for the type of action under this topic
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
- ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
- OPEN ACCESS
must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged.
Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
- ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction to Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEITs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Nanotechnologies, advanced materials, advanced manufacturing and processing, biotechnology
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Cross-cutting activities (Focus Areas)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Dissemination, Exploitation and Evaluation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: General Annexes
The submission system is planned to be opened on the date stated on the topic header.
National Contact Points (NCP) - contact your NCP for further assistance.
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
H2020 Online Manual your online guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Participant Portal FAQ – Submission of proposals.
IT Helpdesk- contact the Participant Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues