| Although lending
an almost 'miraculous' property to materials, for many decades superconductivity
was bound by what seemed to be an intransigent law. It only occurred
at critical temperatures (Tc) lying at the very extremes of the
physics of matter, in a zone just a few degrees above the impassable
barrier of the famous absolute zero (or zero kelvins – 0 K
– equivalent to 273°C).
For more than seven decades following Kammerlingh Onnes' discovery,
all observations, including the first Theory of Superconductivity
published in 1957 (see box), confirmed this basic principle. What
is more, the only way to descend to such extremely low temperatures
was through the production of cold (or cryogenics) associated with
the liquefaction of helium (at a temperature of 4 K). Finally, there
were other constraints which applied to all elements likely to serve
as superconductors: superconductivity disappeared almost instantly
the moment the surrounding magnetic field or current exceeded certain
values.
Remarkable applications based on superconductivity – such
as medical imaging – were developed, nonetheless, during the
closing decades of the last century (see article The
long and winding road). Yet this cold constraint remained a
seemingly insurmountable obstacle and, by the early 1980s, all the
'dreams' of a stream of new and revolutionary applications for this
unique property of matter seemed to have melted away in the face
of this harsh reality.
The 1986 breakthrough
Then suddenly it all changed. In 1986, Alex Müller and Georg
Bednorz, two Swiss physicists working at the IBM laboratory near
Zurich, announced that they had developed a compound of the cuprate
family (copper oxides), containing lanthanum and barium, which acted
as a superconductor at 30 K. This sudden temperature rise –
all the more surprising since it was obtained in a ceramic material,
which shows all the characteristics of an insulator at normal temperatures
– was greeted with astonishment in the world of physics.
Researchers all over the globe set about making cuprates and, just
a few months later, in February 1987, a team from the University
of Alabama-Huntsville announced triumphantly that, by replacing
lanthanum with yttrium in Müller and Bednorz's compound, they
had increased the critical temperature to an incredible 92 K, almost
ten times higher than all the elements classified to date! This
giant step forward marked the beginning of the era of the HTS (High
Temperature Superconductor) and a whole new ballgame. By raising
the temperature it was now possible to replace the costly and difficult
technique of helium cryogenics with the much more commonplace industrial
liquefaction of nitrogen (obtained at 77 K).
Back down to earth with a bump
This breakthrough in critical temperatures was immediately heralded
as a huge advance and led to many research projects all over the
world. But, after the initial enthusiasm, the world of research
soon came back down to earth with a bump. As promising as it was,
the discovery of HTS also marked the beginning of a complex and
laborious chapter in the long saga of superconductivity. The reality
was that converting these new materials into 'electricital superconductors'
that could be used in practical applications posed enormous problems.
Europe saw major multidisciplinary efforts by the very best laboratories,
both public and industrial, with Union support, make a significant
contribution to scientific co-operation in this field. The long
quest for superconductive applications was now well and truly under
way, with the promise of radical changes to technology in the not-too-distant
future.
Box
 |
|
|
| |
| Where
theory fears to tread
Why
do some materials become superconductors when they approach
absolute zero? It was 50 years before fundamental physics
provided the first 'reasoned' explanation for this phenomenon.
In 1957, a trio of US scientists – John Bardeen,
Leon Cooper and Jon Schrieffer – proposed their
Theory of Superconductivity (later known as the BCS
Theory after their initials), which came to be universally
recognised and accepted. They showed that, under the
extremely cold conditions of very low critical temperatures,
changes occur in the vibrations and energy levels of
atoms within the crystalline structure. In this state,
the usual repellent force between electrons ceases and
they pair off, forming a flux that is able to move without
encountering any resistance.
Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer
were awarded the Nobel Prize in 1972. Unfortunately,
since the discovery of new High Temperature Superconducting
(HTS) materials in 1986, the BCS theory is no longer
able to explain fully the phenomena with which today's
physicists are working. Therefore, we have reached the
limits of theory. Although empirical hypotheses have
been put forward – for example, the notion that
the superconductivity of HTS may be linked to a certain
degree of alignment, arranged in the same direction,
of the 'grains' of matter that make up the material
– they have not been demonstrated.
|
|
 |
| |
|
 |
|