Navigation path

Themes
Agriculture & food
Energy
Environment
  Atmosphere
  Biodiversity
  Clean technology and recycling
  Climate & global change
  Cultural heritage
  Earth Observation
  Ecosystems, incl. land, inland waters, marine
  Health & environment
  Land management
  Natural disasters
  Sustainable development
  Urban living
  Other
ERA-NET
Health & life sciences
Human resources & mobility
Industrial research
Information society
Innovation
International cooperation
Nanotechnology
Pure sciences
Research infrastructures
Research policy
Science & business
Science in society
Security
SMEs
Social sciences and humanities
Space
Special Collections
Transport

Countries
Countries
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece
  Hungary
  Iceland
  India
  Indonesia
  Ireland
  Israel
  Italy
  Jamaica
  Japan
  Kazakhstan
  Kenya
  Korea
  Latvia
  Lichtenstein
  Lithuania
  Luxembourg
  Madagascar
  Malaysia
  Malta
  Mexico
  Montenegro
  Morocco
  Mozambique
  Namibia
  Netherlands
  New Zealand
  Nigeria
  Norway
  Panama
  Peru
  Poland
  Portugal
  Romania
  Russia
  Senegal
  Serbia
  Slovakia
  Slovenia
  South Africa
  Spain
  Sri Lanka
  Swaziland
  Sweden
  Switzerland
  Taiwan
  Tanzania
  Thailand
  Tunisia
  Turkey
  Uganda
  Ukraine
  United Kingdom
  United States
  Vietnam


   Environment

Last Update: 15-05-2013  
Related category(ies):
Success stories  |  Environment

 

Countries involved in the project described in the article:
Netherlands  |  United Kingdom
Add to PDF "basket"

Ensuring that 'green paradoxes' are understood when defining climate action policy

Applying advanced economic analysis to climate change policies and the efficient use of resources can sometime lead to surprising and counter-intuitive outcomes. Indeed the longer term impact of some well-intentioned policy initiative may end up having a negative impact.


© Inspiredme - Fotolia.com

It is important that these 'green paradoxes' are fully analysed and taken into account when setting climate action policy. For example, one green paradox suggests that subsidising a renewable energy source can actually increase the use of fossil fuels in the short-term. Anticipating future regulation, the owners of carbon resources may accelerate the production of fossil energy while they can, with the paradoxical effect of accelerating climate change and bringing forward the date at which fossil fuels become exhausted.

According to the economic analysis undertaken by the EU-funded project ‘Combating Climate Change: Political economy of Green Paradoxes (GP)’, one solution would be to introduce a CO2 tax which would rise at first, then gradually decline once the alternative energy source has been introduced.

The project is centred on the counterproductive side effects that climate change policies can have when they do not take into account the supply side of the fossil fuels markets.

Finding solutions to the effects of climate change requires scientific inputs from almost all disciplines including physics, biology, earth sciences, sociology, and economics. This research, which focuses on the economics underlying climate change, should help us identify methods both to mitigate the consequences of climate change and to adapt to its longer-term impact.

Ultimately, the GP project aims to provide policy recommendations by, for instance, examining imperfect competition in the oil market and distinguishing between dirty and clean alternatives for fossil fuels. These environmental policy proposals also address the adverse aspects of climate change policies such as green taxes on both developing economies and on the poorest countries of the advanced world.

Cees Withagen, Professor of Environmental Economics at VU University, Amsterdam, who received an ERC Advanced Grant 2010 for his GP project, explains that: “Many policy options can conceal a green paradox. For example, a subsidy favouring clean energy resources such as solar or wind will have the effect of decreasing the price at which this energy is supplied. But under some circumstances, the subsidy could have the unintended effect of increasing both extraction and emissions, instead of delaying them. The principal aim of the GP research project is to critically investigate such counter-intuitive outcomes and come up with sound policy recommendations which take into account both the demand and the supply dimensions of fossil fuels.”

Since 2007, over 50 projects have been funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7) to increase our understanding of the complexities of the climate model and its implications for societies and natural systems.

Project details

  • Project acronym: GP
  • Participants: United Kingdom (Coordinator), Netherlands
  • FP7 Project N° 269788
  • Total costs: €2 743 548
  • EU contribution: €2 743 548

Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


loading


Search articles

Notes:
To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also

Project web site

Project information on CORDIS

Contacts
Unit A1 - External & internal communication,
Directorate-General for Research & Innovation,
European Commission
Tel : +32 2 298 45 40
  Top   Research Information Center