Navigation path

Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece

Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece


   Infocentre

Published: 26 October 2015  
Related theme(s) and subtheme(s)
Information societyMicroelectronics and nanotechnology
NanotechnologyIndustrial  |  Nanoelectronics  |  Nanomaterials  |  Nanomedicine
Science in societyPublic opinion  |  Science communication  |  Science communication
Success storiesScience communication  |  Science communication
Video reports
Countries involved in the project described in the article
Austria  |  Belgium  |  Czech Republic  |  Denmark  |  France  |  Germany  |  Israel  |  Italy  |  Lithuania  |  Spain  |  United Kingdom
Add to PDF "basket"

Capturing the public's view of nanotechnology

Nanotechnology has become part of daily life - be it in stain-repellent fabrics, sunscreens or hundreds of other applications. But what do people actually know about nanotech? And how do they feel about it? The EU-funded project NanOpinion found people to be positive in principle and used its findings to formulate policy recommendations.

Photo of a hand writing with a pen
© sepy - fotolia.com

Entering a dialogue about nanotechnologies with people from all over Europe was at the heart of the NanOpinion project. The project took a varied, broad approach: one tactic saw teams travelling to city squares, shopping centres, libraries and festivals in 18 countries across Europe. There, they engaged people in experiments and discussions around nanotech and asked them to fill in an extensive questionnaire to learn more about their knowledge as well as their stance on nanotech.

At the same time, NanOpinion organised 20 workshops, debates and other live events. All in all, a total of 8 330 people filled in the questionnaire. Roughly 15 000 citizens participated in events. Over 1 500 students took part in school activities, while teachers had the chance to follow workshops. In addition, NanOpinion posts on social media reached thousands of users, while the media partners carried out a mass media campaign, broadcasting radio programmes and publishing newspaper supplements and 161 articles that reached hundreds of thousands of listeners and readers.

Insights into people’s minds

The wealth of quantitative and qualitative data from questionnaires and workshop reports was then analysed to produce a comprehensive picture of nanotechnology from the public’s point of view. This may be used to help plan future public engagement in the field and manage nanotechnology regulation.

“We found that, generally speaking, Europeans do not have an assured opinion on nanotech and do not feel competent to discuss it, as they know little about it,” explains Katharina Handler of the Austrian Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI). “They feel the need for more information from those media outlets that they use on a daily basis. However, their attitude towards nanotech is positive in principle, and they trust science.”

In its policy recommendations, the NanOpinion team comes to the conclusion that European citizens are in favour of labelling of nanotech products, along with detailed, accessible information. They would like to see certification in the hands of independent institutions and expect extensive monitoring, testing and regulation. Such regulation should also provide for an exit strategy, should unexpected risks become evident.

Honest and balanced information, including ethical, legal and social aspects of nanotech, is seen as key, and multi-channel science communication campaigns should be considered. To foster public engagement, NanOpinion recommends investing in a network of stakeholders engaging citizens in live dialogue and reflection. Debate and collaborative learning should be emphasised to help develop opinions.

Nanotech as a tool for STEM education

The team realised that “nanotechnology can be an excellent platform to promote science and technology education for young people,” says Yoel Rothschild of ORT Israel, an educational network of comprehensive schools in Israel and one of the NanOpinion partners. Calling for a real change to education systems, he suggests that nanotechnology should be taught from a very young age, exposing students to industry, researchers, and nanotechnology products.

However, this would require an investment in teacher training and support at local, national and European level, as teachers themselves are often unsure about the subject. According to the project consortium, nanotechnology as a multidisciplinary subject should be integrated into curricula in a flexible way and could ultimately give a boost to multidisciplinary science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education.

The project brought together a total of 18 partners and nine third-party organisations, including research institutes, but also educational institutions and various large media outlets.

Project details

  • Project acronym:NANOPINION
  • Participants:Austria (Coordinator), Lithuania, Israel, Belgium, UK, Denmark, Spain, Czech Republic, Germany, France, Italy
  • Project Reference N° 290575
  • Total cost: €2 328 406
  • EU contribution: €2 087 600
  • Duration:May 2012 - October 2014

Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


loading


Search articles

Notes:
To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also

Project web site

Project information on CORDIS

Contacts
Unit A1 - External & internal communication,
Directorate-General for Research & Innovation,
European Commission
Tel : +32 2 298 45 40
  Top   Research Information Center
 
Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece

Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece