Navigation path



Published: 28 April 2014  
Related category(ies):
Information society  |  Science in society  |  Industrial research  |  Health & life sciences


Countries involved in the project described in the article:
Belgium  |  France  |  Italy  |  Slovenia  |  United Kingdom
Add to PDF "basket"

Advising researchers on how to balance science and ethics

Although science is often seen as a discipline concerned with hard facts, it can be difficult to separate research from its ethical, social and political setting. Researchers struggling to balance science with ethics can now count on advice from a European project, EGAIS, that looked at how best to handle the wider ethical context.

Green board with words: regulations, guidelines, compliance

© Krasimira Nevenova fotolia

The European Union (EU)-funded project is expected to give researchers more scope to manage potential ethical dilemmas they face in their everyday work.The project, which ended in 2012, was called The Ethical GovernAnce of emergIng technologieS – New Governance Perspectives for Integrating Ethics into Technical Development Projects and Applications (EGAIS).

EGAIS researchers identified ethical governance approaches after they examined the EU’s monitoring of ethical aspects of emerging technologies, including ICT research projects. The team then made suggestions on improving ethical governance by taking account of rules, values and contexts related to each new technology in a multi-faceted approach.

EGAIS team looked at how ethical norms are constructed and implemented in projects, using documentation and interviews with project leaders. The team then provided recommendations to policymakers and researchers to help them plan, implement and assess ethical governance in research.

EGAIS project member Norberto Patrignani says there is room for improvement in current procedures for ethical assessment of scientific and technical research projects in areas like nanotechnology, nuclear technology and genetics. “We found that current procedures lack ethical reflexivity and are not open to society,” he explains. “We concluded that research should concentrate on creating the conditions for a true dialogue between the fields of science and society,” he adds.

Patrignani, associate lecturer of ICT and Information Society at the Catholic University of Milan, Italy, says this dialogue implies that all relevant actors – from policymakers and scientists to industry and civil society – should be involved in helping frame the ethical rules. “Ethical governance of emerging technologies cannot be left in the hands of researchers only,” he explains.

EGAIS team thus developed a framework for improved governance mechanisms to identify and address potential ethical issues arising from new and emerging technologies in the early stages of development. The team recommends that European research focuses on process rather than outcome, involves all stakeholders and reflects on all the different views.

According to Patrignani, the project’s aim was not to set guidelines, but to develop methods and habits that would help reconcile science, technology and society through governance. “Ethical governance can become an open dialogue, and a legitimate and effective force in a manner that is consistent, assessable and repeatable,” says Patrignani.

The project team concluded that ethical guidelines were a starting point, and not an ending one. It was more important to embed ethical thinking into the process than to merely follow a checklist. That means policymakers should raise awareness of the importance of ethics in ongoing research, setting up expert panels on possible ethical issues, opening up any debate to the wider public and ensuring there are ethical review procedures.

Perhaps the most important recommendation of the project team is to provide training and support for researchers to identify and address ethical issues throughout the life of a project. “It would expose them to ethical reflexivity as a means of dealing with the idea of ethical issues,” concludes Patrignani.


Project details

  • Project acronym: EGAIS
  • Participants: Italy (Coordinator), Belgium, France, Slovenia, UK
  • Project FP7 230291
  • Total costs: € 998 218
  • EU contribution: € 837 685
  • Duration: May 2009 - February 2012

Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


Search articles

To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also
Project web site
Project information on CORDIS

  Top   Research Information Center