Navigation path

Themes
Agriculture & food
Energy
Environment
ERA-NET
Health & life sciences
Human resources & mobility
Industrial research
  Building & construction
  Coal & steel
  Industrial processes & robotics
  Materials & products
  Nanotechnology
  Standards, measures & testing
  Other
Information society
Innovation
International cooperation
Nanotechnology
Pure sciences
Research infrastructures
Research policy
Science & business
Science in society
Security
SMEs
Social sciences and humanities
Space
Special Collections
Transport

Countries
Countries
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece
  Hungary
  Iceland
  India
  Indonesia
  Ireland
  Israel
  Italy
  Jamaica
  Japan
  Kazakhstan
  Kenya
  Korea
  Latvia
  Lichtenstein
  Lithuania
  Luxembourg
  Madagascar
  Malaysia
  Malta
  Mexico
  Montenegro
  Morocco
  Mozambique
  Namibia
  Netherlands
  New Zealand
  Nigeria
  Norway
  Panama
  Peru
  Poland
  Portugal
  Romania
  Russia
  Senegal
  Serbia
  Slovakia
  Slovenia
  South Africa
  Spain
  Sri Lanka
  Swaziland
  Sweden
  Switzerland
  Taiwan
  Tanzania
  Thailand
  Tunisia
  Turkey
  Uganda
  Ukraine
  United Kingdom
  United States
  Vietnam


This page was published on 19/06/2007
Published: 19/06/2007

   Industrial research

Last Update: 19-06-2007  
Related category(ies):
Health & life sciences  |  Industrial research  |  International cooperation  |  Research policy  |  Science in society

 

Add to PDF "basket"

EU-funded research helps set international standards

A landmark paper on the use of evidence in policy making has just been published in the medical journal The Lancet. The study was carried out by Dr Andrew Oxman and Dr Atle Fretheim from the Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Services and Dr John Lavis from McMaster University in Canada. The EU-funded study, conducted between 2003 and 2004, involved researchers interviewing senior World Health Organisation (WHO) officials and analysing guidelines to determine how they were produced.

WHO
                Headquarters in Geneva  © WHO/Pierre Virot

WHO Headquarters in Geneva
© WHO/Pierre Virot

The policy research was undertaken as part of European Commission’s Fifth Framework International Collaboration with Developing Countries (INCO), which funded the project PRACTIHC (PRAgmatic Trials in Health Care systems). The international network facilitated information for action on priority health problems, providing an example of impact-orientated health systems and policy research.

The WHO, based in Geneva, Switzerland, is one of the project’s formal partners. The role of the organisation includes the production of health guidelines. These range from how to prevent the spread of bird flu and malaria control to enacting anti-tobacco legislation. WHO issues around 200 sets of recommendations each year and acts in the manner of a world arbiter for public health by combing different scientific theories and studies in order to produce the best policies.

WHO regulations dating back to 1951 stress the role of expert opinion in the development of recommendations. However, guidelines approved in 2003 stress the use of systematic reviews for evidence effects and processes that would permit the incorporation of value based information. The team studied the use of evidence, especially for effects in recommendations developed by WHO departments. They found that systematic reviews and concise summaries of findings were rarely used for developing recommendations. Furthermore, processes were non-transparent and found to rely heavily on experts from a particular specialty rather than those who must live with the recommendations.

The organisation recognised the need for proper procedures when it endorsed the rules for WHO guidelines in 2003. However, no systems have been established to check for compliance with the guidelines, which the study suggests are not being followed. WHO has not yet stated if and how it will help Member States to adapt and implement recommendations.

The Director of WHO Research Policy, Dr Tikki Pang, noted the criticism, commenting that time constraints and a shortage of both information and funds sometimes compromised the work of the international organisation. Often evidence may not exist and information from developing countries may be incomplete and during an outbreak the data may change. Dr Pang also explained that while some guidelines may be based on a limited number of expert opinions, others were drawn up after careful scrutiny and were therefore more reliable. One such example was WHO’s recent recommendations for the treatment of bird flu patients.

Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


loading


Search articles

Notes:
To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also

PRACTIHC on CORDIS
The Lancet homepage
International Cooperation efforts on Europa





  Top   Research Information Center