Navigation path

Themes
Agriculture & food
Energy
Environment
ERA-NET
Health & life sciences
Human resources & mobility
Industrial research
Information society
Innovation
International cooperation
Nanotechnology
Pure sciences
Research infrastructures
Research policy
Science & business
Science in society
  Education & popular sciences
  Ethics
  Future science & technology
  Governance
  People in science
  Public opinion
  Science communication
  Science prizes
  Women & science
  Other
Security
SMEs
Social sciences and humanities
Space
Special Collections
Transport

Countries
Countries
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Cameroon
  Canada
  China
  Colombia
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Finland
  France
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece
  Hungary
  Iceland
  India
  Ireland
  Israel
  Italy
  Japan
  Kazakhstan
  Kenya
  Korea
  Latvia
  Lithuania
  Luxembourg
  Malta
  Mexico
  Netherlands
  Nigeria
  Norway
  Peru
  Poland
  Portugal
  Romania
  Russia
  Senegal
  Serbia
  Slovakia
  Slovenia
  South Africa
  Spain
  Swaziland
  Sweden
  Switzerland
  Taiwan
  Tunisia
  Turkey
  Ukraine
  United Kingdom
  United States


This page was published on 19/12/2006
Published: 19/12/2006

   Headlines

Last Update: 19-12-2006  
Related category(ies):
Social sciences and humanities  |  Research policy  |  Science in society

 

Add to PDF "basket"

EU research project asks if traditional accountability is suited for modern times

Public accountability has long been considered a cornerstone of European societies. Access to public officials' records and publicly traded companies' bank statements is considered such an ordinary concept that we hardly give it much thought. Yet, with today's overlapping layers of government coupled with a near-constant flow of information through numerous channels of communication some European researchers wondered what the traditional concept of public accountability means for contemporary Europe. Indeed, the rejection of the EU constitution was due in part to a lack of confidence in European public officials. For a closer look at such issues, the EU funded PubAcc, an FP6 project aimed at understanding public accountability within a contemporary context.

The French 'no' vote on the constitution was partly due to low confidence in public accountability. © Trainth
The French ‘no' vote on the EU constitution was partly due to low confidence in public accountability.
© Trainth
The project, coordinated by Dr Simon Joss of the University of Westminster, analysed public accountability in three different policy-making areas: genetically modified crops, household waste and transport infrastructure projects. It studied these themes at both national and European level. It also looked at the significance of public accountability for contemporary democratic governance and legitimacy.

The international team of researchers carried out 21 case studies covering the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Latvia, Portugal and the UK. For the purposes of their study, researchers related public accountability to science and technology policy and decision-making processes, the dynamics of social mobilisation, and wider public sphere discourse.

Through interviews and literature and media analysis they discovered, perhaps unsurprisingly, that the mere phrase “public accountability” had no exact equivalent in a number of European languages. They also noted that defined public accountability played out differently in practice across borders.

They argue that a difference in formal accountability structures and ‘lived' experience can be characterised as a “dysfunction of formal public accountability provisions”, and that as a result there has been a “growth in ‘extra-parliamentary' public accountability processes” where normal citizens pick up where formal institutions leave off.

As Europe's borders stretch further east, the process of Europeanisation has had dual effects in terms of public accountability, according to PubAcc experts. The researchers report that in some cases Europeanisation has “fostered public accountability provisions” where they hadn't previously existed, and in others accountability has “been curtailed due to the pressure to adopt EU law and regulation.”

Where science and technology are concerned, the project team noted that new forms of governance have been established with increased stakeholder and citizen participation thanks to the controversial nature of such issues. They found this to be particularly true for the Czech Republic and Latvia, where S&T topics proved less politically controversial. Despite such new mechanisms for public accountability, however, the researchers were unable to detect any new structures that rivalled traditional systems, suggesting that tried and tested measures are best suited to provide viable accountability of European public officials.


Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


loading


Search articles

Notes:
To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also

PubAcc homepage
Social Sciences and Humanities on Europa





  Top   Research Information Center