Navigation path

Themes
Agriculture & food
Energy
Environment
ERA-NET
Health & life sciences
Human resources & mobility
Industrial research
Information society
Innovation
International cooperation
Nanotechnology
Pure sciences
Research infrastructures
Research policy
Science & business
Science in society
  Education & popular sciences
  Ethics
  Future science & technology
  Governance
  People in science
  Public opinion
  Science communication
  Science prizes
  Women & science
  Other
Security
SMEs
Social sciences and humanities
Space
Special Collections
Transport

Countries
Countries
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece
  Hungary
  Iceland
  India
  Indonesia
  Ireland
  Israel
  Italy
  Jamaica
  Japan
  Kazakhstan
  Kenya
  Korea
  Latvia
  Lichtenstein
  Lithuania
  Luxembourg
  Madagascar
  Malaysia
  Malta
  Mexico
  Montenegro
  Morocco
  Mozambique
  Namibia
  Netherlands
  New Zealand
  Nigeria
  Norway
  Panama
  Peru
  Poland
  Portugal
  Romania
  Russia
  Senegal
  Serbia
  Slovakia
  Slovenia
  South Africa
  Spain
  Sri Lanka
  Swaziland
  Sweden
  Switzerland
  Taiwan
  Tanzania
  Thailand
  Tunisia
  Turkey
  Uganda
  Ukraine
  United Kingdom
  United States
  Vietnam


This page was published on 26/10/2006
Published: 26/10/2006

   Science in society

Last Update: 26-10-2006  
Related category(ies):
Innovation  |  Success stories  |  Research policy  |  Science in society

 

Add to PDF "basket"

New Member States more innovative in service sector?

A recent EU-funded report hints that new Member States, such as the Czech Republic and Latvia, may outperform the UK and France in the service sector. However, researchers point out that it may be an indication that new members are simply playing catch-up.

Services in Eastern Europe score high on new SSII index. © Jan Tik
Services in Eastern Europe score high on new SSII index.
© Jan Tik
The 2006 TrendChart report: “Can we measure and compare innovation in services?”, conducted by researchers at UNU-MERIT, a joint research centre of United Nations University and Maastricht University and funded by DG Enterprise, took a look at current methods of evaluating innovation to see if they are applicable to the services sector.

Their results suggest that is difficult to apply traditional innovation indicators to the services sector, and even harder to compare results across borders.

Typical indicators used by researches to measure innovation include total number of patents, total innovation expenditures and innovation sales shares, all of which were originally designed to assess technical innovation in the manufacturing sector.

To better understand innovation in services, authors of this year's TrendChart report developed the Service Sector Innovation Index (SSII), an indicator comprised of a combination of 24 other indicators, 22 of which are taken from the 3rd Community Innovation Survey, and divided into seven themes: human resources, innovation demand, technological knowledge, non-technological changes, sources of knowledge, commercialisation, and intellectual property.

They discovered that though some new Member States performed well on the SSII, it may be a bit premature to draw generalisations. They noted that a high score on the SSII does not necessarily mean that a country is particularly innovative in the services sector, but rather that those countries may be making advancements that other countries have already completed.

For example, Denmark, Austria and the Netherlands, countries that have done well on the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) survey that studies innovation across all sectors, scored low on the SSII. The authors suggest that this reflects a fundamental difference in innovation in the services sector as opposed to others.

They point out that the learning curve is not very steep for companies in the services sector compared with manufacturing, for example. It is relatively easy for companies to rapidly move towards best practice. There is much less room for innovation for companies in counties with a highly developed services sector because they are already near the limit of best practice.

The results of the survey will prove useful to the recently established Commission-backed expert group designed to help Member States improve service sector innovation. The expert group, which began work in last month, will also aid in the development of the pan-European platform to better link universities, entrepreneurship and finance, in order to foster innovative start-ups in the services sector. The platform was announced in the Commission's recent Communication on Innovation: Putting knowledge into practice: a broad-based innovation strategy for the EU.

Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


loading


Search articles

Notes:
To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also

The European TrendChart on Innovation
UNU-MERIT
Putting knowledge into practice: A broad-based innovation strategy for the EU





  Top   Research Information Center