Navigation path

Themes
Agriculture & food
Energy
Environment
ERA-NET
Health & life sciences
Human resources & mobility
Industrial research
Information society
Innovation
International cooperation
Nanotechnology
Pure sciences
Research infrastructures
Research policy
Science & business
Science in society
Security
SMEs
Social sciences and humanities
Space
Special Collections
  Avian & pandemic flu
  Cancer
  Earthquakes
  Floods
  HIV & AIDS
  Malaria
  Stem cells
  Volcanoes
  Water
Transport

Countries
Countries
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Finland
  France
  Georgia
  Germany
  Ghana
  Greece
  Hungary
  Iceland
  India
  Ireland
  Israel
  Italy
  Japan
  Kazakhstan
  Kenya
  Korea
  Latvia
  Lichtenstein
  Lithuania
  Luxembourg
  Madagascar
  Malta
  Mexico
  Montenegro
  Morocco
  Namibia
  Netherlands
  Nigeria
  Norway
  Peru
  Poland
  Portugal
  Romania
  Russia
  Senegal
  Serbia
  Slovakia
  Slovenia
  South Africa
  Spain
  Swaziland
  Sweden
  Switzerland
  Taiwan
  Tanzania
  Tunisia
  Turkey
  Uganda
  Ukraine
  United Kingdom
  United States


This page was published on 21/04/2005
Published: 21/04/2005

   Special Collections

Last Update: 21-04-2005  
Related category(ies):
Special Collections  |  Research policy  |  Environment

 

Add to PDF "basket"

Are we in for warmer, wetter and wilder weather?

European researchers studying the effects of changes in atmospheric greenhouse gases on North-Atlantic climate models think we could well be in for warmer, wetter and wilder weather. But the Norwegian, German and Russian scientists behind the study say there could be a silver lining, at least, in Northern Europe – bigger fish catches, longer growing seasons and potential savings in energy costs. On the wild side, we could expect coastal storms and increased avalanche risk.

Typical skies over southern Europe, or could it be the future for northern parts? © PhotoDisc
Typical skies over southern Europe, or could it be the future for northern parts?
© PhotoDisc
Europe's weather is dominated and controlled by the low-pressure activity in the North Atlantic. To learn more about the continent's weather patterns, meteorologists measure the difference in air pressure between the low-pressure areas south of Iceland and Greenland and the high-pressure zones near the Azores – known as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO).

The NAO has been around for several thousand years, say experts (at least as long as the Norwegian Sea has been ice-free). Strong low-pressure systems south of Iceland give a positive NAO-index reading, leading to strong south-westerly winds, high temperatures and precipitation over northern Europe, while southern Europe and the Mediterranean has fine weather and little precipitation under these conditions. Weaker low-pressure activity south of Iceland (giving a negative NAO-index) leads to strong winds and heavy precipitation in the south and cold northerlies, together with dry weather, in the north.

One of the fundamental questions climate researchers are now asking is how do increasing man-made greenhouse gases affect natural weather systems – in Europe's case, the North Atlantic Oscillation?

An EU-backed research group – made up of the Nansen Centres in St Petersburg (RU) and Bergen (NO), the Geophysical Institute and the Bjerknes Centre at the University of Bergen, and the Max-Planck Institute of Meteorology, Hamburg (DE) – published findings to answer this question. Their paper, entitled The North-Atlantic Oscillation and greenhouse-gas forcing, appeared recently in the scientific journal Geophysical Research Letters, published by the American Geophysical Union.

Decades ahead
”By participating in the international consortium ‘Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project' (CMIP2), we got access to the results of 12 global climate models from leading climate institutes in the world,” noted the research leader Ola M Johannessen of NERSC in Norway. To test the different models and resulting NAO readings, the group first compared air pressure models and observations – and to their delight, they stood up to the scrutiny.

The group then carried out two simulations of what the climate might be like decades from now. The first simulation used constant (present-day) levels of CO2 in the atmosphere and the second showed atmospheric CO2 levels increasing by 1% each year – roughly to levels that we might expect at the end of this century.

“The first simulation gives us the natural variation of the NAO-system, while the second gives us the natural variation and the effect of increasing greenhouse gas [emissions],” explains Johannessen. By comparing the two simulations and calculating the difference (trend), the team set out to measure what – if any – impact greenhouse gases have on the NAO weather system.

The resulting NAO trend shows a marked increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere over recent decades, clearly higher than the simulations using constant CO2. So this means the NAO-index is already indicating weather changes due to increasing greenhouse emissions. Future simulations point to the same conclusion: eight of the 12 models show a considerable increase (30-40%) in the NAO-index with climbing emission rates.

For the weather, the higher NAO-index means increased low-pressure activity which, in turn, leads to warmer weather, more precipitation and more storms, the researchers warn. “It should be mentioned that this result is based on simulations 80 years [from now], but since we analysed 12 climate models from the best climate research institutes worldwide, the results still give a good indication of what will happen with the low-pressure activity (the NAO-weather system) in this century,” says Johannessen.

If the team's prediction rings true, it will have major – positive and negative – consequences, such as more rain in northern Europe which could improve hydro-based electricity options, warmer climate leading to longer growth seasons for crops and lower heating costs, expanded fishing areas during winter and better conditions for oil- and gas-exploration. But the downside could be more storms along the coast affecting sea transport, fisheries and coastal populations, while warmer weather and more precipitation could increase the risk of avalanches and flooding.

“It is, therefore, important to focus our research on how greenhouse gas release[s] into the atmosphere will influence the natural climate variations, and to increase our understanding in order to predict this better in the future,” the researchers say in a statement.

NERSC

Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


loading


Search articles

Notes:
To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also

Read the findings (on NERSC, PDF icon [166 Kb])


Contacts
Research Contacts page
  Top   Research Information Center