Summary:
The successful development of preventative strategies against HIV-1 infection
(microbicides, vaccines or their combined effects) would provide a pivotal
turning point in global efforts to combat the pandemic spread of AIDS
providing an incalculable impact on solving societal prob-lems associated with
this disease. The principal aim of this project is to bring together EU scien-tists
from the microbicide and vaccine fields to embrace a co-ordinated approach
to HIV-1 infec-tion prevention research. Partners in
the EUROPRISE consortium represent 13
projects funded by the European
Commission from the sixth Framework
Programme as well as four projects
funded by the Gates Foundation.
These projects involve 132
institutions from 22 countries.
EUROPRISE is, in this respect, the
first consortium to purposely
bring these groups together in a
truly integrated fashion from both
within Europe and internationally.
EUROPRISE will offer an integrated
programme of research; co-ordinate
a wide portfolio of activities and
encompass the whole pipeline of vaccine
and microbicide development; from early
discovery, through to early clinical trials. This
unique approach places the Network at the international forefront, for understanding
the interface between these two technologies; pursuing a critical path
to the develop-ment of effective HIV-1 infection prevention strategies.
Background:
Although therapeutics for HIV infection and AIDS continue to improve and
initiatives for mak-ing these products available in developing countries have
been introduced, ultimately, the global incidence of HIV infection is critically
dependent on the development of safe and effec-tive strategies to block and
prevent HIV transmission.
The design and implementation of effective microbicide and vaccine
strategies, individually and possibly in combination, will be key to achieving
this goal. Ideally, microbicides will pro-vide chemical and vaccines immune
protection respectively, at the mucosal surfaces of the va-gina and rectum,
which represent the major portals of viral entry. The combination of these approaches
may maximise potential synergy between both technologies.
It is now well established that under most circumstances, vaccines delivering
non-replicating antigens fail to induce sufficient mucosal responses and
immunological memory to provide protection against high viral challenge.
In contrast, while it may be technically easier to develop microbicides that
prevent transmission when applied before intercourse, their duration of
protection is likely to be short-lived and their efficacy will be critically
dependent upon user compliance. To date, both fields have been slow to work
together in the development of products that provide multiple levels of
protection. This network is focusing on the premise that microbicides and
vaccines that target multiple stages of mucosal transmission will have the best
chance of success. Since both target the same proc-esses, there is a clear
overlap between the two fields.
Indeed, there are compelling reasons as to why the two fields should work
together on develop-ing effective strategies to prevent mucosal vaginal or
rectal transmission including:
- Approximately 80% of new HIV infections are now heterosexual and
the main portal of entry is across the vaginal or rectal mucosa. Local
immunity at the site of infection is likely to be the most potent form of
protection
- Topically applied products are likely to have a high level of
acceptance. Importantly, their use would be female initiated. This is an
important factor for women who have no means to protect themselves
if their partners do not use male condoms or do not allow female condoms
to be used
- Effective microbicides are likely to be available before effective vaccine
candidates. Thus it is highly likely that in the not too distant future all
vaccine efficacy trials will be carried out in an environment where there
is widespread use of vaginal microbicides. Consequently, it will be
important to understand the interaction and potential interface of these
different prevention technologies. Furthermore, microbicides, if
successfully introduced, may pro-vide an established route for vaginal
delivery of formulations designed to stimulate and/or activate
protective immunity. The future combination of strategies developed in
this pro-gramme - either through crossover of microbicide and vaccine
use in common populations or as a result of a deliberate strategy to
develop a combined vaccine-microbicide modality - has the potential
to maximise the protective effects of both strategies.
Aim:
The successful development of preventative strategies against HIV-1
(microbicides, vaccines or their combined effects) would provide a pivotal
turning point in global efforts to combat the pandemic spread of AIDS
providing an incalculable impact on solving societal problems asso-ciated with
this disease. The principal aim of this proposal is to bring together EU scientists
from the microbicide and vaccine fields to embrace a coordinated approach
to HIV-1 preven-tion research.
Delivery of the goals will be achieved through the following scientific and
technical objectives:
- Standardisation and harmonisation of research tools
- Identification of new anti-HIV INFECTION AND AIDS vaccine and
microbicide candi-dates and combinations to prevent HIV infection /AIDS
- Establishment of a clinical development pathway for vaccines and
microbicides within a European framework
- Provision of Scientific training in microbicide and vaccine development
- To facilitate access to information relevant to HIV-1 microbicides and
vaccines
- Provision of a single focus for European HIV-1 microbicide and vaccine
research.
Expected results:
- Standardisation and harmonisation of research tools as applied to
basic, animal and clinical research and related to microbicides and
vaccines. Verifiable aspects will be the develop-ment of core protocols,
provision of standardised reagents and the establishment of a quality
assurance programme
- The development of a portfolio of existing and new prevention
candidates (vaccines, micro-bicides and combinations) that can be
evaluated on a one-on-one basis to prioritise the most promising leads
for progression into translational clinical research. Verifiable indicators
will be the development of an evolving portfolio of prevention
candidates and their progress through preclinical evaluation
- Provision of an accessible toolbox to support the translation of HIV-1
vaccine or microbi-cidal products from basic research in the European
Research Area (ERA) into clinical trials. Verifiable indicators will be the
accessibility and utility of the translational toolbox
- The increased integration of European research in the fields of HIV-1
vaccine and microbi-cide research. Verifiable indicators will be seen
through workshop, conference attendance, scientific exchange and
attainment of high degrees
- The development of an Internet resource that will be used by
EUROPRISE participants and the scientific community. Verifiable
indicators will be the utility and maintenance of the EUROPRISE website
- Effective integration and identity of European microbicide and vaccine
research. Verifiable indicators will view: an increase in collaborative
research; publications; new joint research proposals; active
engagement of community groups; and strong international
representation of EU HIV prevention (conferences, expert panels,
advisory boards, and publication of con-sensus documents).
Potential applications:
The potential strategic impact on solving societal problems for any project
aimed at developing a preventative strategy against HIV infection /AIDS
(microbicides or vaccines) is almost incal-culable. HIV infection /AIDS is a
global issue and UNAIDS/WHO estimate that at the end of 2004, 40 million
people globally were living with HIV, of which 28.5 million were in Sub-
Saharan Africa. In Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a rapid increase in HIV
infections resulted in 1.4 million people being affected. InWestern Europe, an
estimated 610,000 people were liv-ing with HIV.
Globally, there are 14,000 new HIV infections per day, of which 95% are in
developing coun-tries. Approximately 12,000 of these infections are in
persons aged 15-49 years of age, of whom almost 50% are women, and
50% are 15-24 years of age. In S. Africa, 1 in 4 women are infected with HIV
by the age of 22.
It has been estimated that a 60% efficacious prophylactic treatment,
introduced into 73 low-income countries and used by only 20% of women,
would avert 2.5 million HIV infections over a period of 3 years in women,
men and infants.
In some countries, public health programmes have achieved modest results in
reducing HIV rates of infection. Although the use of condoms has slowly
increased in countries most severely affected by the HIV epidemic, many
vulnerable women are unable to ensure routine use.
The development of new anti-HIV infection and AIDS vaccines and
microbicides has been identified as key areas in FP6. This builds on past highquality
research programmes on vac-cines and therapeutics supported by the
EU, through the programmes FP4 and FP5. However, while significant
progress has been achieved in understanding immune response to HIV-1 antigens
and in the development of effective antiretroviral therapy, significant
challenges to the development of effective preventative strategies still remain.
The potential direct impact of this network, therefore, is multifaceted and broad
in scope. There is a clear and urgent need to network European microbicide
and vaccine research and provide a clear and coordinated strategy for the
development of new prevention technology against HIV infection and AIDS.
Such an approach has obvious potential for direct health benefits that will
translate into social stability and development. It will offer scientific benefits;
by the creation of new knowledge as well as maintaining a strong science
base in Europe. It is generally accepted that HIV vaccines and microbicides
will have the most significant impact on the growth of this pandemic in both
the developing world and within Europe. The potential to derive enormous
health benefits, by itself, argues for a strong, integrated approach to the
development of HIV-1 prevention strate-gies.
Coordinator:
|
1 - Administrative Coordinator:
Robin Shattock
Centre for Infection
Department of Cellular and
Molecular Diseases
St George’s Hospital Medical School
Cranmer Terrace / Tooting, London
SW17 ORE
United Kingdom
Tel: +2087255855
Fax: +2087253487
E-mail: shattock@sgul.ac.uk
|
2 - Scientific Coordinator:
Hans Wigzell
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm - Sweden
E-mail: hans.wigzell@mtc.ki.se
3 - Co-Coordinator for Vaccines:
Rino Rappuoli
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics srl
Via Fiorentina 1
53100 SIENA - Italy
E-mail: rino_rappuoli@chiron.com |
Partners:
| Nº |
Principal
Scientific
Participants |
Official Address |
Other Information |
| 4 | R Shattock / Dr M Cranage
J Ma / Dr D Lewis | St. George’s Hospital University
of London
London
UK | |
| 5 | H Wigzell / Dr BWahren / Dr F Chiodi
A-L Spetz | Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm
SE |
| 6 | R Rappuoli / Dr S Barnett
G Del Giudice | Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
Siena
IT | |
| 7 | D Medaglini / Prof G Pozzi | Universita di Siena
Siena
IT | |
| 8 | A Tagliabue | ALTA
Siena IT | |
| 9 | G Voss | GlaxoSmith Kline
Rixensart
BE | |
| 10 | H Katinger / G Steiglere | Polymun
Vienna
AT | |
| 11 | C Kelly / T Lehner
L Klavinskis | Kings College London
London
UK | |
| 12 | G Scalae | Universita di Napoli
Naples
IT | |
| 13 | K Uberla | Ruhr Universitaet Bochum
Bochum
DE | |
| 14 | H Holmes / N. Almond
R Stebbingse | National Biological Standards Board
Potters Bar
UK | |
| 15 | R Weiss | University College London
London
UK | |
| 16 | F Gotch / S Patterson | Imperial College of Science,
Technology & Medicine
London
UK | |
| 17 | V Jespers | Prince Leopold Institute
for Tropical Medicine
Antwerp
BE | |
| 18 | S McCormack / A Nunn
J Bakobaki | Medical Research Council
London
UK | |
| 19 | G Scarlatti / G Poli / P Lusso | Centro San Raffaele
Milan
IT | |
| 20 | R Le Grand | Commissariat a l’Energie Atomique
Paris
FR | |
| 21 | B Verrier C Lacey
| Institut National de la Sante et de la Medecine FR
University of York
York
UK | |
| 22 | Q Sattentau | University of Oxford
Oxford
UK | |
| 23 | P La Colla | Università di Cagliari
Cagliari
IT | |
| 24 | Christiane Stahl-Hennig | Deutsches Primatenzentrum GmbH
Goettingen
DE | |
| 25 | Fenyö | Lunds Universitet
Lund
SE | |
| 26 | F Tangy | Institut Pasteur
Paris
FR | |
| 27 | H Schuitemaker | Sanquin
Amsterdam
NL | |
| 28 | J Alcami / Prof R Najera | Instituto de Salus Carlos III
Majadahonda
ES | |
| 29 | G Leroux-Roels | Ghent University
Ghent
BE | |
| 30 | D Zipeto | Università di Verona
Verona
IT | |
| 31 | S Norley | Robert Koch-Institut
Berlin DE | |
| 32 | E Karamov | Ivanovsky Institute of Virology,
Russian Academy of Medical Science
Moscow
Russia | |
| 33 | K Nihlmark | Mabtech AB
Stockholm
SE | |
| 34 | N Dedes | European AIDS Treatment Group e.V
Dusseldorf
DE | |
| 35 |
C Moog | Universite Louis Pasteur
Strasbourg
FR | |
|