IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to adisclaimerand acopyright notice
  European Commission > Regional Policy


Newsroom Newsroom Commissioner Debate Issues Directorate General

Glossary | Search | Contact | Mailing lists
 

Information Society and Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion 2000-2006: a new opportunity

Conclusions and Recommendations -
Director-General Guy Crauser
DG Regional Policy, European Commission

19th December 2000
Conference in Lyon


The information society: a means to the end of realising the competitiveness of regions and the creation and maintenance of stable jobs.

eEurope will contribute to this through its objectives of providing all Europeans with cheaper, faster and secure Internet access, and by giving Europeans the skills they need to exploit the Internet's potential. But need to work hard to achieve goals of information society for all as defined in the eEurope Action Plan.

Digital Divide runs through Europe, through regions, through society. Our role is to help close it, one tool at our disposal - the Structural Funds. Are an important catalyst in financing the process towards knowledge-based society. All depends on how we use funds - their impact can be disproportionate to the size of the investment.

As Commissioner Barnier said: 2000-2006 opportunity to do more and do better in this respect.

Now, general commitments need to be translated into concrete investment decisions, need to ensure efficiency in selecting and implementing projects. This conference has helped to provide some input and ideas.

Discussions have resulted in a number of recommendations for all actors involved - the regions, the Member States, the Commission, the business community, the citizens.

Summarise main points:


1. The Regions should:

Key message is: information society measures financed under the regional development plans need to be result of integrated and single strategy. RISI (Regional Information Society Initiatives) model for information society strategies based on the principles of partnership, collaboration and consensus big success. Regions successful where regional authorities show leadership in a broad public-private partnership. Thus contribute to creating and strengthening regional identity.

These strategies ensure that regional IS investments reflect regional needs of enterprises and people and are basis for solutions that stimulate demand. Call on regions who have not yet developed such a strategy to do so in co-operation with the different stakeholders.

 

2. Member States and Regions should:

Use Structural Funds to stimulate demand and capacity to effectively use ICT - few key elements

Regional Administrations should keep up efforts to modernise as well as re-engineer their processes on the basis of IT. In addition a great effort should be directed in staff training and awareness raising for public employees, especially for educational institutions.

Work should be intensified on eDemocracy and on making administration processes more transparent, taking into account the "democratic divide", personal autonomy, social inclusiveness and security.

As concerns enterprise development bringing seed capital to less developed regions is still a major concern. Commission fully supports this, encourages regions to use such alternative methods of financing with help of Structural Funds.

Create better links to the universities, polytechnics and research institutes in their regions which remains a problem especially in Southern regions of Europe. With innovation key to business and regional competitiveness research knowledge for both IT and traditional sectors.

As regards education and training - apart from addressing key bottleneck of training teachers - there is also need for validation of IT skills. Member States in collaboration with Commission to agree fast on an IT-skills certification system.

Assess very carefully under which conditions co-finance infrastructure through Structural Funds

Public support from Structural Funds should be made available only to tackle specific problems such as the absence of commercial incentives to invest in infrastructures and networks or a lack of private initiative in particular areas to fulfil specific social objectives (e.g. in rural, deprived urban areas). More work to be done on identifying specific criteria - to be done by Commission together with regions.

Public support has a major role to play to stimulate demand, particularly in the area of public services (education, healthcare), thereby leading to infrastructure improvements (without adequate infrastructure, it is not possible to deliver those services).

Use of Structural Funds on telecommunications infrastructure should be determined within an IS development strategy of the regions, and not financed as isolated projects with the sole objective of upgrading infrastructure.

Use the opportunities for co-operation between regions, trying out innovative approaches, networking and benchmarking foreseen by Structural Funds

Use possibilities of transborder, transnational and interregional co-operation in the framework of INTERREG.

Regions to invite candidate countries and businesses to participate in joint activities, exchange of experience, in particular, see how they can develop common projects using Interreg and Phare CBC (Cross-Border-Co-operation) funds.

Encourage regions to present regional programmes for innovative actions incorporating either one or more of the three strands:

  • eEurope Regio
  • helping less-favoured regions raise their technological level
  • regional identity and sustainable development

Regional Information Society Initiatives (RISI) financed under innovative actions 1994-1999: a great success. Basis for mainstreaming of IS measures in new regional development plans in many regions.

New programmes of innovative actions possibility to further develop strategies, experiment and test new projects. Decided on change of approach vis à vis last programming period: now ask regions to submit regional programmes. Main aim is to ensure better links between innovative actions and mainstream funds, to convince regional decision makers of validity and necessity of SF spending on more innovative areas such as, technology transfer, the Information Society, and education and training.

Also Commission recognises the need and value-added of interregional exchange of experience delivered by networks and tools as presented in workshop 6 (Erisa and Locregis). Therefore opportunity for regions to present proposals for co-financing of networks and tools for the exchange of experience, identification of good practice and benchmarking with specific indicators relevant to measure progress achieved in the regions as part of accompanying measures of regional programmes for innovative actions. Use it.

One crucial element of successful networks is trust between partners, takes a long time to build, therefore continuity is an important element for the success of networks and similar initiatives.

Another crucial element of initiatives to exchange best practice, especially when using web-based tools is visibility. Could be useful to link such webpages to Inforegio, the European portal for information related to regional development.

3. The Commission will:

Help to ensure efficient implementation of IS earmarked funds

Some MS have set themselves ambitious targets for 2000-2006 for developing the IS. Necessary because less favoured regions have to catch up.

Organise seminars

In 2001 at the initiative of Commission together with national and regional authorities organise targeted technical seminars in a number of Objective 1 areas to guide them in the development of regional IS strategies and ensure that funds earmarked for the IS are translated into projects that meet regions' needs. Use especially experiences from RISI regions. Seminars addressed to national and regional authorities - Structural Funds managers and Monitoring Committee members.

Setting up a monitoring mechanism

The Structural Funds Regulation foresees that each year Member States submit implementation reports which are then reviewed by Commission and the managing authority in regular meetings.

Will make progress in achieving objectives with regard to the Information Society and knowledge-based economy a fixed agenda point of these meetings. Indicators defined in the Community Support Frameworks and Single Programming Documents will be important point of reference.

Improve synergies between the Community Research Programme and the Structural Funds

Well-known fact that scope exists to improve take-up and widespread deployment of ICT-applications developed with the help of EU research funds in regions. (Information Society Technologies or IST-Programme, TEN-Telecom).

Therefore next year's IST work programme will contain a cross-programme action line calling for the development of regional pilots and demonstrators of ICT applications in the area of supporting access of SMEs to the digital economy and public service applications. These pilots should reflect the needs of regions and enjoy the support of key regional players. If results are successful then could use also Structural Funds for funding of full deployment. Encourage regions to participate in this call for proposals.

When regions submit regional programmes for innovative actions make use of applications developed under IST-Programme or TEN Telecom Programme.

Reinforce collaboration between the RTD and SF communities by promoting cross participation in RTD and SF actions, by inviting RTD participants at SF seminars and by organising a workshop on IST-Regional Development in 2002, at the end of the IST programme (results available) and one year before the SF mid-term review.

Prepare for the future - prepare for the mid-term review

Although negotiations for 2000-2006 period not finished need to plan ahead - i.e. for mid-term review. Regions use this opportunity to re-orient funding towards the IS.

To prepare for this process: Commission will launch next year an evaluation of Information Society interventions for both programming periods (1994-1999 and 2000-2006).

In addition, launch evaluation of RISI programme.

Results of this evaluation together with results from other assistance and accompanying measures will be presented at the next European conference on information society and cohesion in 2002 as a preparation for mid-term review negotiations.

Finally, stress that help from the structural funds for regions is a window of opportunity that will not be open forever. Enlargement will mean that not all regions eligible today will be eligible in the future.

Bear in mind that success of regions increasingly determined by ability to innovate, to generate a vibrant enterprise culture and to embrace opportunities offered by ICTs.


 

Last modified on