REDI: The Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index - Measuring regional entrepreneurship - (April 2014)
The main outcome of the project is a new index (REDI - Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index) that describes the entrepreneurial process. The index takes into account both individual attitudes and characteristics and the regional context and, accordingly, not only whether people are willing to start a business but whether the conditions to do so are in place in the region concerned. The index is composed of three sub-indices covering entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations. Each of the sub-indexes has an individual component (relating to the individual decision making behaviour) and an institutional component (relating to the context). Entrepreneurial attitudes indicate the attitudes of the population in a region as they relate to entrepreneurship, including elements such as perception of opportunities and risks, cultural support and networking. These are measured by indicators of market agglomeration, social capital and the extent of corruption. Entrepreneurial abilities measure characteristics of entrepreneurs and business start-ups with high growth potential, such as the take-up of technology, the level of human capital and the degree of market competition.
The index contains both individual-level and institutional or environmental indicators, which reflect the regional context. For example, a factor such as the perception of risk is the outcome of combining an institutional factor (the actual business risk faced by a start-ups as measured by the business closure rate) and an individual one (the personal acceptance of risk by entrepreneurs, measured by the proportion of the population aged 18-64 stating that the fear of failure would not prevent them starting a business).
Co-financing Salaries, Bonuses, Top-ups from Structural Funds during the 2007-2013 period - (June 2014)
The legislative framework for the 2007 – 2013 period allows Member States to use Technical Assistance funding also for paying salaries, bonuses or top-ups of employees directly involved in the implementation of Structural Funds (as defined by Art. 46 of the consolidated version of the Council Regulation (EC) 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006). This should support Member States and regions in order to strengthen their capacity to manage the funds.
In order to obtain more in depth information, the Commission recently carried out an expert assessment with the aim to identify the extent and modalities of the use of Technical Assistance funds by Member States for different forms of staff salary support. The assignment was carried out by an independent expert during the second half of 2013 and covered all EU 28 Member States. The principal working methods were on-line questionnaires and interviews with all relevant national/regional stakeholders. The scope of the assignment was only ERDF and CF (ESF not covered).
Financing the energy renovation of buildings with Cohesion Policy funding - (February 2014)
Helping managing authorities in planning and deploying sustainable energy investments in buildings within their Cohesion Policy operational programmes – this is the main goal of the 'Financing the energy renovation of buildings with Cohesion Policy funding' technical guidance.
Tackling energy consumption in European buildings is vital. Nearly 40% of final energy consumption –as well as 36% of all greenhouse gas emissions – is attributable to housing, offices, shops and other buildings across the public and private sector. A major and sustained increase in public and private investment is needed for the European Union to meet its 2020 climate and energy targets. In the 2014-2020 period, Cohesion Policy funds will play a major role in the refurbishment of buildings with the allocation of a minimum of €23bn for investments in the shift towards to low-carbon economy, including energy efficiency and renewable energy use in buildings.
The guide informs managing authorities about the European requirements on buildings and energy efficiency, provides a list of good practice approaches and case studies, and explores the different financing mechanisms that managing authorities can use to support sustainable energy projects with the aim to launch large scale investments in the energy renovation of buildings and to attract greater levels of private-sector investments.
Promoting multi-level governance in support of Europe 2020 - (December 2013)
The Commission recognises that regional and local public authorities play an important role in conceiving and delivering public policies that are relevant for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. However, regional and local public authorities have very diverse mandates and capacities and work under different institutional and governance arrangements. There are therefore difficulties to identify models of governance or partnership that work effectively and can easily be transferred.
The main purpose of the study is to identify and document the processes and success factors leading to strong, high quality political and administrative partnerships across levels of governance, primarily between municipal, regional and national public authorities and including relevant political powers and to test the transfer of lessons learned. Four case studies in each of the two policy fields of "promoting energy efficiency policies" and "social inclusion in an urban context" will provide the basis for networking and transfer to 8 other partnerships in each policy field.
Quality of life in cities - Perception survey in 79 European cities - (October 2013)
This Flash Eurobarometer, “Quality of life in European cities” (No 366), was conducted at the request of the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy to get a snapshot of people’s opinions on a range of urban issues. Earlier surveys were conducted in 2004, 2006 and 2009.
This survey included all capital cities of the countries concerned (except for Switzerland), together with between one and six more cities in the larger countries. In each city, around 500 citizens were interviewed. A total of 79 European cities were used in this analysis. In addition to these, the surroundings areas of Athina, Lisboa, Manchester and Paris were analysed. The report therefore refers to “83 cities”, though a more accurate terminology would be “79 cities and 4 surrounding areas”.
Housing investments supported by the European Regional Development Fund 2007-2013: Housing in sustainable urban regeneration
Across the EU, significant challenges remain in dealing with poor quality, unaffordable and low energy efficiency housing. Such problems tend to be deep-seated and complex, and differ between Member States. Housing problems in Western European cities tend to focus on high-rise building blocks, stemming from poor materials and design; wider urban issues such as traffic problems and social problems linked to poverty and unemployment, and inadequate management of housing estates. Housing problems in Central and Eastern Europe are similar, but have developed through different processes. A range of factors, including state-led allocation mechanisms and a state-controlled economy were followed by a transition period during which an aversion against collective forms of ownership emerged. The resulting problems are centered on the large scale deterioration of urban peripheral housing estates or traditionally built inner city areas. This report also notes that problems of segregation are present not only in big cities but also in middle-sized and smaller cities.
Green Public Procurement: Criteria for Waste Water Infrastructure
Cohesion policy provides significant financial support to Member States and regions in order to invest in waste water treatment infrastructures. In the programming period 2007-13, about EUR 14.4 billion are planned to co-fund related projects while significant funding was already invested in this area in the previous programming period of cohesion policy. In order to increase the environmental benefits of these infrastructures, specific Green Public Procurement criteria on waste water infrastructure have now been developed with a specific focus on reducing the costs of these installations over their lifetime. These criteria could in particular, where relevant, help public authorities building or upgrading their waste water infrastructure in the 2014-2020 programming period through cohesion policy. The guidance is at the moment only available in English. Translations into all EU languages will be made available in the second semester of 2013.
Urban Development in the EU: 50 Projects supported by the European Regional Development Fund during the 2007-13 period
The Commission has published a study on European Regional Development Fund projects improving the standards of living and working in Europe's cities. 'Urban development in the EU' presents 50 projects which received ERDF investment and offers an information package for selected cities, with detailed information on projects and results there. The study gathers a range of good urban practice, and is a 'state of play' in how the cities have put local urban policies into action with ERDF investment from 2007-13. The cities highlighted reveal interesting ideas, solutions and cooperation or collaboration methods serving as inspiration for other urban areas and managing authorities.
EU15 countries benefit from cohesion investments in Visegrad countries
EU cohesion funding for the Visegrad Group (V4) countries (ie Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Poland) has benefited the economies of the EU15 countries, according to research carried out for the Polish Ministry of Regional Development. The study found that EU cohesion funding had increased consumer, investment and intermediate demand in the V4 countries. This increased demand concerned to a large extent concerns goods and services from EU countries. €1 spent by EU15 countries resulted in 61 cents of additional exports to the V4 countries. The study also looked at the benefits in terms of research and development, innovation, environmental protection and transport.
Measuring the impact of changing regulatory requirements to administrative cost and administrative burden of managing EU Structural Funds
A study "Measuring the impact of changing regulatory requirements to administrative cost and administrative burden of managing EU Structural Funds (ERDF and the Cohesion Fund)" commissioned by DG Regional Policy shows that there is considerable scope for reduction of administrative burden for beneficiaries under the Commission proposals for 2014-2020. A reduction of 20% compared to the period 2007-2013 could be expected by implementing the simplifications proposed by the Commission.
Study on migration and demographic trends in the outermost regions
The study is aimed at deepening the understanding, the knowledge and the projections of the demographic and migratory trends in the Outermost Regions. The report describes the major short and medium-term impacts of the demographic and migratory trends as well as their probable impact on the economic and social cohesion. Using the result of the analysis, the experts outline the main risks and the opportunities associated with these phenomena.
The research consisted in the analysis of data and literature as well as interviews of local stakeholders which took place during 2011.
Caveat: the independent consultant is responsible for the contents which do not bind the European Commission.
Cohesion Policy and Sustainable Development(March 2012)
The purpose of this study was to examine how Cohesion Policy could contribute to managing the shift to the green economy and to contribute to the development of the framework for Cohesion Policy post-2013.
The study assessed the impact of cohesion policy investments 2007-2013 on the environment, and the way that sustainable development considerations have been integrated into planning, implementation and follow-up at the strategic, programming and policy level. This was done through a number of case studies, as well as analysis of the available data at EU level, in particular in relation to expenditure. It also made a number of recommendations on how the integration of sustainable development into cohesion policy could be improved.
The study was completed in December 2011 by a consortium led by the Institute for European Environmental Policy.
Final Report - Executive summary - Supporting paper 1 - A Literature Review - Supporting paper 2 - Cohesion Policy Performance - Supporting paper 3 - Role of non-Cohesion Policy Instruments - Supporting paper 4 - Case studies - Supporting paper 5 - Tools for Sustainable Development
Comparative study on the project selection process applied in Cohesion Policy programmes 2007-2013 in a number of Member States (February 2012)
Selecting projects best contributing to fulfilment of the programme objectives with minimum administrative resources is crucial for delivery of the Cohesion Policy. DG Regional Policy commissioned a study comparing the project selection process in Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, the Netherlands, Slovakia and Slovenia in the fields of research and development, innovation in the small and medium enterprises and urban regeneration. The study identified a number of areas for improvement of the process, in particular for reduction of the administrative burden, and provides recommendations and good practice examples for setting-up the project selection structures and procedures for this and the next programming periods.
The impact of single market on cohesion : Implications for Cohesion Policy, Growth, and Competitveness (December 2011)
The study assessed the impact of the Single Market on growth, competitiveness and employment in EU27, in particular as regards its role in generating disparities and convergence processes. It also analysed the institutional and policy linkages between cohesion policy, the Lisbon process and the Europe 2020 strategy. The study draws on a range of sources, including desk-based research, modeling work, econometric analysis as well as qualitative assessment through a number of case studies covering regions with different characteristics. The study draws conclusions concerning the alignment of cohesion policy with the Europe 2020 strategy, the integration of regions into the Single Market, the role of leading regions, the quality of public investment as well as the framework conditions for investments and addresses governance challenges.
Cities of tomorrow - Challenges, visions, ways forward - (October 2011)
More than two thirds of the European population lives in urban areas. Cities are places where both problems emerge and solutions are found. They are fertile ground for science and technology, for culture and innovation, for individual and collective creativity, and for mitigating the impact of climate change. However, cities are also places where problems such as unemployment, segregation and poverty are concentrated. The ‘Cities of tomorrow’ reflection process will provide inspiration for policymakers and practitioners involved in urban development, whether at local, regional, national or European level.
Cities of tomorrow - Thematic issue papers
- Urban social challenges
- Urban economic challenges
- Urban environmental challenges
- Urban governance challenges
- Mapping of urban foresights
Regional Challenges in the Perspective of 2020 – Phase 2: Deepening and Broadening the Analysis
The Commission Staff Working Document "Regions 2020 – An Assessment of Future Challenges for EU Regions" from November 2008 analysed the effect of global challenges on European regions. The paper led to a substantial discussion among stakeholders as well as the academic community, and the need for a follow-up analysis became clear. The adoption of the Europe 2020 Strategy in March 2010 reinforced the need for a follow-up study.
The follow-up study Regional Challenges in the Perspective of 2020 – Phase 2: Deepening and Broadening the Analysis" started in January 2010 and finalised in August 2011. The study was carried out by the OIR (Austrian Institute for spatial planning) and a number of other partners including Spatial Foresight, the Federal German Institute of Research on Buildings and Spatial Affairs, Pöyry and the Vienna University for Soil Sciences. The study uses an interdisciplinary approach which analyses the vulnerability of regions to different challenges. It also examines the capacity of regions to adapt to these challenges. The methodology was originally developed to analyse the effects of climate change by using biophysical indicators. This approach has been extended to other areas like economics, demography and energy. The examined challenges were globalisation, demographic change, climate change, secure, sustainable and competitive energy, social polarisation, and the economic and financial crisis. The analysis was carried out for European regions as well as for neighbouring countries.
Considering the variety of challenges, it becomes clear that a place based and regionally differentiated cohesion policy is required to reach a sustainable recovery path as envisaged in the Europe 2020 Strategy. Member States and regions would need to clearly capture, describe and communicate the regionally differentiated needs and vulnerabilities in order to provide tailor made answers to the actual challenges within the framework of Cohesion Policy.
EU Cohesion policy in a global context
The main purpose of the study was to provide a better understanding of the specificities of EU cohesion policy in a global context through comparative research of regional development policies in a number of selected OECD countries (Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, UK and USA) and international financial institutions (EBRD, EIB and the World Bank). It involved the benchmarking of cohesion policy against other economic development policies, identifying the commonalities and differences in policies, and the lessons to be learned from these other policies. The study focused on two key headings. The first is performance management, including: the use of contracts and co-financing; the use of programmes, targets and guidelines; conditionalities (ex ante, ex post, structural, governance); incentives/sanctions (reputational, financial); and, the role of evaluation and reporting in policy feedback. The second is assurance, including: the scope of assurance systems, the operation of systems (e.g. division of responsibilities); and the role of audit. The study concluded with a number of policy recommendations for the future development of cohesion policy.
Quality of Government in EU Member States and regions
This report has analysed a wide range of governance indicators and shows that a significant number of EU Member States score poorly on all of these indicators. Poor governance undermines social and economic development and can reduce the impact of Cohesion Policy. For example, poor governance can hinder economic growth, damage the environment or reduce personal safety and well-being. The report concludes that four issues are particularly relevant for the EU: 1) corruption, 2) rule of law, 3) government effectiveness and 4) voice and accountability. This study is the first to measure the quality of government in the EU at the regional level. It is based on the largest multi-country, regional quality of government survey to date. This survey shows that several Member States are confronted with a large internal variation in the perceptions of quality of government. The report concludes with ten case studies which provide insight into how regional quality of government can be enhanced. This study was financed by the European Commission. Nevertheless, the study represents solely the views of its authors and cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the Commission.
Lessons from shared management in cohesion, rural development and fisheries policies
The aim of this study is to offer a comparative perspective of the views of officials of the Commission Services concerning the systems and practices specific to the shared management system applied to structural policies, i.e., cohesion policy, rural development policy and fisheries policy. To achieve this objective, the study maps existing arrangements in the three policy areas concerned and explores how well the systems function on the basis of interviews with EC officials.
The Objective of Economic and Social Cohesion in the Economic Policies of Member States
This study identifies which are the most relevant policies of Member States for the objective of economic, social and territorial cohesion enshrined in the Treaty of the European Union. It describes how such policies are designed and implemented with a view to determining how and to what extent they contribute to the achievement of these objectives. The study contains a main part which presents the main results for the whole EU and then a second part with a single country report per Member State.
Report on joint study on regional policies in China and EU
A study which compares aspects of regional policy in China with cohesion policy in the European Union – financed by the Commission under its EU-China Policy Dialogues Support Facility - has been carried out in 2008-2010. The study examines the regional policies of the European Union and China to assess their potential to speed the economic growth of regions which are lagging behind. The study is on practical aspects of policy-making and regional development. It concentrates, in particular on: the definition and economic classification of regions; the governance and co-ordination of regional policy; and the role of regional policy in improving competitiveness, sustainable development and urban and rural development. As illustrations, the study report describes examples of best practice in these subject areas in China and the EU.
- Less Poverty, More Employment: Helping the European Union to achieve its 2020 targets - A Study of the organisation of the European Union Cohesion Policy with special reference to anti-poverty policy in the People’s Republic of China
- EU–China Cooperative Research Program on Regional Policy : Research Report of the Chinese Expert Group
Regional governance in the context of globalisation: reviewing governance mechanisms and administrative costs
This is the first study to provide a systematic evidence-based survey of the administrative workload and costs for Member State public authorities of the implementation of the European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund during the 2007-2013 period.
The study concluded that:
- an estimated 3-4% of total eligible expenditure is devoted to administration
- there are considerable variations in administrative costs and workload between programmes
- the highest proportion of administrative costs lies with the Managing Authorities
- there is a heavy workload associated with project selection and verification of deliverables.
Study on the development of diagnoses and regional innovation strategies in the French regions under the ERDF Operational Programmes for the 2007 – 2013 programming period (July 2010)
The aim of this study was to analyse the development of diagnostics and of the Regional Innovation Strategies (RIS), and more particularly to examine: the process of developing and adapting the RIS in the regions, and the chosen methods of governance; - the main developments or reorientations in relation to the initial situation in 2007, and how the process and its constitutive elements may have contributed; the main conclusions drawn from the RIS exercise, particularly with a view to the mid-term review of the ERDF operational programmes.
The regional impact of technological change in 2020 (2010)
This study highlights the great diversity in development pathways and trajectories of innovation across European regions. A regional knowledge-based economy has multidimensional aspects. It includes a variety of knowledge activities and multiple interactions among a range of actors including universities, research institutes, enterprises, knowledge workers and institutions. The spatial patterns and trends for the different aspects of the knowledge-based economy vary significantly across Europe. Most aspects show convergence and generate catching-up processes, while some show divergence between European regions.
„Regionale Herausforderungen mit Blick auf 2020 – Regionale Unterschiede und zukünftige Herausforderungen“ („Regional Challenges in the Perspective of 2020 - Regional disparities and future challenges”) (Dezember 2009)
Die Studie trägt dazu bei, die Gesamtszenarios regionaler Unterschiede mit Blick auf 2020 zu zeichnen und bindet Nachbarschaftsfragen in die Diskussionen über die Herausforderungen ein. Es fanden fünf Themenworkshops unter Mitwirkung der Weltbank und der Bertelsmann Stiftung statt. Ein zusammenfassender Bericht stellt die Hintergrundpapiere zusammen, die im Rahmen der einzelnen Workshops erarbeitet wurden. Die Studie erweitert und vertieft die im Rahmen von „Regionen 2020” durchgeführte Analyse und untersucht die Auswirkungen von fünf wichtigen Herausforderungen, mit denen die Regionen in der Zukunft konfrontiert sind:
'Regionen 2020' bietet eine erste prospektive Analyse der voraussichtlichen regionalen Auswirkungen der vier größten Herausforderungen, mit denen Europa konfrontiert ist: Globalisierung, demografischer Wandel, Klimawandel und Energieversorgung.
Mithilfe einer Reihe von Indikatoren wurde in dem Bericht ein „Verwundbarkeitsindex“ erstellt, der angibt, in welchem Grad die einzelnen Regionen für die Auswirkungen von Globalisierung, demographischen Veränderungen, Klimawandel und Energieproblemen anfällig sind. Untersucht werden die möglichen Einflüsse bis zum Jahr 2020.
Die Ergebnisse des Berichts, den die für Regionalpolitik zuständige Generaldirektionen der Kommission erarbeitet hat, werden in den Reflexionsprozess über die künftige europäische Kohäsionspolitik einfließen.
Bericht: - (indices )
The main objective of these studies is to provide background material and support for the forthcoming negotiations on the preparation of the 2014-20 ERDF interventions. The reports present a global overview at national and regional level of the current situation in Spain on key thematic areas for 2014-2020.
Each study provides information on:
- Analysis of the current situation
- Assessment of past and present ERDF interventions
- Policy guidelines and investment priorities for the 2014-20 ERDF interventions
"Financial instruments and SME support co-financed by the ERDF in Spain in 2014-20: strategic guidelines and investment priorities"
"Study on Research and Innovation support to enterprises in Spain: Recommendations for strategic guidelines after 2013"
"Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energies in Spain: Recommendations for Strategic Guidelines and investment priorities for the ERDF programming period 2014-20"
"Sustainable urban development co-financed by the ERDF in Spain in 2014-20: Strategic guidelines and investment priorities"
The studies listed were commissioned by the European Commission as part of the preparatory work for the Sixth report on economic and social cohesion. The contents of these studies are the responsibility of their authors and do not bind the Commission.
EU-Index für regionale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit: RCI 2013 (2013) by Paola Annoni and Lewis Dijkstra
Der Index für regionale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit (RCI) wurde entwickelt, um die verschiedenen Aspekte der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit auf regionaler Ebene zu messen. Er wurde erstmals 2010 veröffentlicht. Der RCI 2013 zeigt, dass die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einen starken regionalen Aspekt hat, den die Indikatoren auf nationaler Ebene nicht einfangen. Der RCI legt die Stärken und Schwächen aller NUTS2-Regionen der EU offen. Er kann als Leitfaden bei der Frage dienen, auf was sich die einzelnen Regionen unter Berücksichtigung ihrer spezifischen Situation und ihres gesamten Entwicklungsniveaus konzentrieren sollten.
EU-Länder mit einer breiten Kluft oder großen Unterschieden in der regionalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit sollten sich überlegen, inwiefern diese Kluft der nationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit schadet und ob sie geschlossen werden kann. Zum Beispiel ist die Kluft zwischen der Hauptstadtregion und der zweitwettbewerbsfähigsten Region in Rumänien, der Slowakei und Frankreich sehr groß, während die regionale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit in Deutschland keine großen Unterschiede zeigt. Bereits 2010 stellte der RCI einen Mangel an Übertragungseffekten, insbesondere in der Umgebung der Hauptstädte in einigen weniger entwickelten EU-Ländern, fest. Auch wenn die Krise das potenzielle Wachstum regionaler Übertragungseffekte womöglich beschränkt, sollten diese Effekte mittelfristig doch gestärkt werden. Die Gesamtwettbewerbsfähigkeit eines Landes hängt von der Leistung aller Regionen ab, nicht nur von der Hauptstadtregion.
Quality of Life at the sub-national level : an operational example for the EU (2013) by Paola Annoni and DorotaWeziak-Bialowolska with contribution of Lewis Dijkstra
Der Bericht über die Lebensqualität auf regionaler Ebene beleuchtet zwei wichtige Aspekte der Lebensqualität auf regionaler Ebene: Lebensstandards und Gesundheit. Der Bericht verbindet „objektive“ und „subjektive“ Daten oder in anderen Worten beobachtbare und wahrnehmungsbasierte Daten. Im Hinblick auf den Lebensstandard berücksichtigt der Bericht absolute Armut, relative Armut sowie Verdienst und Einkommen. In Sachen Gesundheit deckt der Bericht objektive Gesundheit sowie subjektive Gesundheitsprobleme ab. Zu guter Letzt schlägt der Bericht Maßnahmen vor, mit denen in Zukunft die Ungleichheiten zwischen den Regionen angegangen werden können. Der Bericht ist der erste seiner Art, der sich mit der Frage der Lebensqualität auf regionaler Ebene in der gesamten EU befasst, und enthüllt wichtige Unterschiede in der Lebensqualität zwischen den Regionen in einzelnen Ländern und zwischen verschiedenen Ländern. Die Analyse betont auch, dass in den meisten Regionen die objektiven und subjektiven Gesundheitsindikatoren zwar übereinstimmen, in einigen Regionen die subjektiven Indikatoren jedoch deutlich besser oder schlechter sind als die objektiven Indikatoren. Der Bericht verbindet Informationen aus einer Vielzahl von Quellen, darunter die SILC, die britische (USS) und deutsche (SOEP) Haushaltsbefragung sowie Eurobarometer, Eurostat und andere.