Evaluating EU cohesion policy
Guidance Documents for the 2014 – 2020 funding period
The European Commission has suggested a more results – oriented approach for EU cohesion funding in its legislative proposals for 2014 - 2020
- Concepts and recommendations
- Additional documents
- Result Indicator Pilot Report
- Task force on outcome indicators – prepared by a team of academics and experts to inform the reflexions on future cohesion policy :
- Outcome Indicators and targets – Towards a Performance oriented EU Cohesion Policy (Fabrizio Barca, Philip McCann)
- Meeting climate change and energy objectives
- Improving the conditions for innovation, research and development
- Guidance for the Design of Quantitative Survey-Based Evaluation
- Guidance for the design of qualitative case study evaluation
- Good practices in the selection and use of outcome indicators
- Experience of the 2007-2013 Italian Performance Reserve (PR) – measurable objective for public services provision in Mezzorgiorno
- Guide on ex-ante evaluation
- Guidance on evaluation of innovation
Impact evaluation centre
In any programme, the crucial questions are "what do you want to change?" and "how would you know if you have changed it?" These evaluation questions are not just bureaucratic requirements, but the essence of good programming. Impact evaluation mobilises scientific and statistical tools to follow up on these questions.
Impact evaluation in DG Regional Policy falls into two broad categories:
- The "Theory-based" impact approach, which follows each step of the intervention logic and focuses on the mechanisms leading to the observed change, is particularly appropriate for answering the questions "why?" and "how?" and "in what context?" an intervention works.
- The counterfactual impact approach , i.e. the use of control or comparison groups, is particularly useful in answering "how much?" of the change is due to the intervention and comparing the effects of different instruments (or the same instrument applied to different target groups).
The two approaches are complementary and the most useful impact evaluations draw on a mix of methods: counterfactual methods to quantitatively estimate an impact, theory-based methods to understand the underlying mechanisms and the context of an intervention thus helping to modify or generalize it to other contexts.
- Frequently asked questions (FAQS)
- Counterfactual impact evaluations of Cohesion Policy. DG Regional Policy has been working in this field since 2008 and we have a growing body of evidence for impacts. Each evaluation has a non-technical summary.
- Going deeper - reference materials and resources. Includes training opportunities and online reference works
- Frequently asked questions (FAQS)
- Guidance on theory- based evaluation
- Going deeper - reference materials and resources.
For further information, support or training opportunities, please contact email@example.com
Guidance Documents 2007-2013
Working Documents on evaluation
- Working Document No 1: Indicative Guidelines on Evaluation Methods: Ex-Ante Evaluation
- Working Document No 2: Indicative Guidelines on Evaluation Methods: Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators
- Working Document No 3: Commission Methodological Paper giving guidelines on the calculation of public or equivalent structural spending for the purpose of additionality
- Working Document No 4: Guidance on the Methodology for carrying out Cost-Benefit Analysis:
- Working Document No 5: Indicative Guidelines on Evaluation Methods : Evaluation during the Programming Period
- Working document No 7: "Reporting on core indicators for ERDF and Cohesion Fund"
Other supportive documents
- Analysis of Errors in Cohesion Policy for the years 2006-2009 - Actions taken by the Commission and the way forward
- Regions 2020: An Assessment of Future Challenges for EU Regions - November 2008
- Fostering the urban dimension: Analysis of the Operational Programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (2007-2013) - November 2008
- Innovation in the national strategic reference frameworks (working document) - October 2006
- The Smart Guide to Innovation
Based Incubators (IBI)
February 2010 - 20 Case studies
Innovative strategies and actions: Results from 15 Years of Regional Experimentation
- EVALSED: The updated guide for the evaluation of Socio-Economic Development
- Handbook on SEA (Strategic Environmental Assesment) for Cohesion Policy 2007-2013:
- Checklist Water and Waste Major projects (20/11/09)
Guidance Documents from previous funding periods
Guidance documents 2000-2006
- 1.Vademecum on the preparation of Plans and programming documents
- 2.The Ex-Ante Evaluation of the Structural Funds interventions
- 3.Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation: An indicative methodology
- 4.Implementation of the performance reserve
- 5.Verification of additionality for Objective 1
- 7.Ex Ante Evaluation and Indicators for INTERREG (Strand A and B)
- 8.The Mid Term Evaluation of Structural Fund Interventions
- 8a.The Mid Term Evaluation of Structural Fund Interventions - INTERREG III
- 8b.The Mid Term Evaluation of Structural Fund Interventions - URBAN
- 9. The Update of the Mid-term Evaluation of the Structural Fund Interventions
Other Guidance Documents:
- Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects
Published by DG Regional Policy in 2002
- Guide to the Cohesion Fund 2000-2006
- Application of the Polluter Pays Principle
- Information society and regional development : ERDF Interventions 2000/2006
- Mainstreaming equal opportunities for women and men in Structural Fund programmes and projects.
- Vademecum for URBAN II Programmes
- Application of the “n+2” rule
2002: (~ 35KB)
- Guidelines on Criteria and Modalities of Implementation of Structural Funds in Support of Electronic Communications
Guidance Documents 1994-1999
- Technical assistance
- COMMISSION WORKING DOCUMENT (February 2004)- Application of Article 151(4) of the EC Treaty: use of the Structural Funds in the field of culture during the period 1994-1999 (75KB) - (75KB) + annexe (1,5MB)
Guide to Cost benefit analysis
Evaluating socio-economic development
Note: Both Evalsed - evaluation guide and the Sourcebook – Methods and techniques are under revision.
For definition of the main concepts, in line with the new legal provisions on regional policy, please consult the section Guidance documents for the 2014 – 2020 funding period and in particular the Working Paper on Concepts and Recommendations.