| Dialogue |
Country |
General info |
| Annual Nano Safety for Success Dialogue: Building Trust in Nanotechnologies |
EU |
This year, the 3rd Annual Nanotechnology “Safety for Success” Dialogue Workshop will again bring together scientists, risk assessors, public authorities, industry, and consumer and environmental NGOs to examine and discuss issues related to the use of nanotechnologies, and to identify appropriate means to strengthen guidance in support of the safe, integrated, and responsible development of nanotechnologies. This time, the focus will be put on building trust in nanotechnologies and the conference will provide a platform to discuss specific applications that are already on the market. |
| Nanotechnology Issues Dialogue Group |
UK |
The Nanotechnology Issues Dialogue Group (NIDG), chaired by Go – Science, is enabling the responsible development of nanotechnologies and co-ordinating the activities described in the Government's response on nanotechnologies across departments, agencies and Research Councils. |
| Forumnano |
Germany |
Forumnano engages in dialogue with politics, the industry and society, and leads the debate on how nanotechnology can be applied in a more beneficial way. Only sustainable nanotechnology solutions will deliver the benefits which society expects to reap from this technology.
Forumnano has participated in the development of a number of codes of conduct, e.g. the “Responsible Nano Code”. |
| EMPA |
Switzerland |
NanoSafe Textiles Dialog
Several activities, see for example:
http://www.ncb.ch/documents/nanosafe_71116web.pdf
385 kB
http://www.ncb.ch/documents/78833.pdf 150 kB |
Nanoconvention (EMPA, Switzerland)
[Nanotechnologie und ihre Auswirkungen auf Medizin, Wirtschaft, Umwelt und Gesellschaft Dialog, Diskussionen, Erfahrungsaustausch, Impulse, Denkanstösse, Visionen]
http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/*/82191 |
| 2nd Annual Massachusetts Nanotechnology Workshop. Promoting the Safe Development of Nanotechnology in Massachusetts |
US |
This workshop provides a forum for a continuing dialogue with stakeholders from industry, government, research, academia, and others on approaches to protecting workers, public health and the environment from exposure to engineered nanoparticles. The focus is on existing Best Practices and Good Current Practices, the opportunities they present to support safe nanotechnology in Massachusetts, and techniques to measure airborne nanoparticle releases in the workplace. |
| NISE Net Nanoscale. Informal Science Education Network |
US |
The US National Science Foundation has supported a 20 million dollars program over five years (2005– 2010) to promote a network of science museum to foster public dialogue on nanotechnology. The NISE organisation coordinates the activities of five science museums to organise a series of exhibitions and public forums (about 3 a years) to inform and engage the public about N&N its related societal and environmental impact. |
| International Dialogue on a global co-operation in nanotechnology |
Belgium |
Third International Dialogue on Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology. Brussels, March 11-12 2008
ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/report_3006.pdf
7.5 MB |
| BASF |
Germany |
In dialogue: Nanotechnology at BASF |
| Nanotechnologien – Bedeutung für Gesundheit und Umwelt |
Switzerland |
Publifocus «Nanotechnologien und ihre Bedeutung für Gesundheit und Umwelt» |
| Meridian Institute - Series of global dialogues on nanotechnology |
US |
- Global Dialogue on Nanotechnology and the Poor: Opportunities and Risks
- International Dialogue on Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology
- Dialogue Series on Nanotechnology and Federal Regulation |
| Centers for nanotechnology in society |
US |
Arizona state university: http://cns.asu.edu/
University of California, Santa Barbara: http://www.cns.ucsb.edu/ |
| Evonik/Degussa Dialogue |
Germany |
Degussa fosters dialogue with authorities, consumers, journalists, politicians and environmental protection organizations at special events organized for this purpose. It fosters debate on the risks and benefits of nanotechnology and endeavors to make this technology transparent and to show the general public how this new technology can be beneficial. |
| Débat Public |
France |
Public debate on the general options in the development and regulation of nanotechnologies |
| Dialogue |
Country |
General info |
Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG) 809 kB |
UK |
The NEG was established in 2005 to document the learning from a series of groundbreaking attempts to involve members of the public in discussions about the development and governance of nanotechnologies. The NEG studied six UK projects that sought to engage members of the public in dialogue about nanotechnologies.
Completed in 2007 |
| EU funded specific support actions (FP6) |
Nano Dialogue |
Enhancing dialogue on nanotechnologies and nanosciences in society at the European level |
| Nanologue |
Facilitating the dialogue between research, business and the civil society to improve the quality of life, create wealth and reduce impacts to society |
| NanoDialog |
Germany |
EN: http://www.bmu.de/english/nanotechnology/
nanodialog/doc/37402.php
DE: http://bundesumweltministerium.de/
gesundheit_und_umwelt/
nanotechnologie/nanodialog/doc/37262.php |
| Nanodialogues |
UK |
Experiments in public engagement with science |
| Framing Nano |
IT |
Mapping study on regulation and governance of nanotechnologies.
A multi stakeholder dialogue platform framing the responsible development of Nanosciences & Nanotechnologies |
| CONANO - Comparative Challenge of Nanomaterials |
Switzerland, Austria, Germany |
Vergleichende Nutzen-Risiko-Analysen von abbaubaren und nicht abbaubaren Nano-Delivery-Systemen sowie konventionellen Mikro-Delivery-Systemen in pharmazeutischen und kosmetischen Anwendungen |
| Small talk |
UK |
The project looked at the benefits for the science communication community in working together on dialogue activities for an ‘upstream’ issue – nanotechnology |
| Nano Risk Framework |
US |
To develop an approach to manage risks that come with the promise of nanotechnologies.
The Framework helps to organize and evaluate what you already know; to assess, prioritize and address data needs; and to communicate clearly how to mitigate risks |
| Dialogue on Nanoparticles |
Germany |
Identification and evaluation of the environmental and health hazards posed by nanoparticles |
| NanoJury |
UK |
A contribution towards presenting a non-specialist perspective on these dilemmas, as well as being an opportunity for citizens to have a voice on an issue that they had chosen |