Navigation path

Home

Rights of suspects and accused RSS

Pile of ancient books © Mikael Damkier, fotolia

The EU works towards achieving common minimum standards of procedural rights in criminal proceedings to ensure that the basic rights of suspects and accused persons are protected sufficiently.

Common minimum standards are necessary for judicial decisions taken by one EU country to be recognised by the others, according to the principle of mutual recognition.

For mutual recognition to operate well there must be measures promoting mutual trust.

To develop this area of justice based on mutual recognition and mutual trust, the Commission was asked in the Stockholm Programme pdf български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv) to submit proposals to strengthen the procedural rights of suspects or accused persons pdf български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv). This political mandate for a strong focus on strengthening citizens’ rights in criminal proceedings, to ensure the right to a fair trial across the European Union, resulted in the Commission’s Procedural Rights Agenda. The Commission was invited to submit proposals regarding a number of measures considered to be fundamental procedural rights.

To achieve such standards and create the basis for mutual trust, a Roadmap on procedural rightspdf was adopted in 2009 by the Justice Council proposing five legislative measures on a 'step by step' basis:

  • the right to interpretation and translation ;
  • the right to information about rights (Letter of Rights);
  • the right to legal advice, before and at trial and legal aid;
  • the right for a detained person to communicate with family members, employers and consular authorities ;
  • the right to protection for vulnerable suspects ;
  • a Green Paper on pre-trial detention.

The Stockholm Programme also called on the Commission to examine further elements of minimum procedural rights for suspects or accused persons, and mentioned, in particular, the presumption of innocence.

The Commission works together with the Council and the European Parliament to implement the roadmap. Much progress has been made to date. Directives on interpretation and translation pdf български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv) and on the right to information in criminal proceedings pdf български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv) were adopted on 20 October 2010 and on 22 May 2012 respectively. Then, in October 2013, a new Directive was adopted which aims to ensure that minimum standards on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and on the right to communicate upon arrest are applied throughout the EU.

A Green Paper pdf български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv) on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention was launched in June 2011. The Commission received many replies Choose translations of the previous link  to this green paper from Member States, authorities and several organisations.

In November 2013 the European Commission presented a package of proposals to further strengthen procedural safeguards for citizens in criminal proceedings. These proposals, on the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv), on special safeguards for children suspected and accused in criminal proceedings български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv), and on access to legal aid български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv), aim to guarantee fair trial rights for all citizens, wherever they are in the EU.

When designing and implementing measures in this field, it is important for the EU to get the balance right between measures that protect such rights and those that facilitate the investigation and prosecution of crime.

Background

European measures such as the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant have generated a demand for the EU to consider fundamental rights, especially the rights of the defence, in a more concrete way.

The Commission originally proposed a draft Framework Decision pdf български (bg)czech (cs)dansk (da)Deutsch (de)eesti (et)ελληνικά (el)español (es)Français (fr)Gaeilge (ga)italiano (it)latviešu (lv)lietuvių (lt)magyar (hu)Malti (mt)Nederlands (nl)polski (pl)português (pt)română (ro)slovenčina (sk)slovenščina (sl)suomi (fi)svenska (sv) which covered five basic rights in 2004, but six EU countries did not support it.

The subject however remains a priority: many EU countries, the European Parliament as well as practitioners and other experts strongly support it. The need for a measure of this sort was confirmed in the 2008 Université Libre de Bruxelles report on mutual recognitionpdf(973 kB) Choose translations of the previous link .

The case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) shows that violations of defence rights, as set out in Articles 5 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) do occur.