Navigation path

Press Release Archive for February 2011
E-mail this pageE-mail this pagePrintPrint

From 28 to 1 February 2011:

GDP per inhabitant above EU average in Ireland's Southern and Eastern Region, but Border, Midland and Western Region falls short

24 February 2011 - In 2008, the Southern and Eastern region of Ireland had the 19th highest GDP per inhabitant, expressed in terms of purchasing power standards, of the EU 27's 271 NUTS-2 regions. This is according to new data released today by Eurostat which puts Southern and Eastern Ireland's GDP per inhabitant at €37,000, or 148% of the EU average. However, the figure for the Border, Midland and Western region of Ireland fell below EU average. In this region, GDP per inhabitant was €23,300, or just 93% of the EU average of €25,100.

GDP per inhabitant in the NUTS-2 regions ranged from 28% of the EU average in the region of Severozapaden in Bulgaria, to 343% of the average in Inner London in the United Kingdom.

The leading regions were Inner London (343% of the average), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (279%), Brussels in Belgium (216%), Groningen in the Netherlands (198%), Hamburg in Germany (188%) and Praha in the Czech Republic (172%). Of the 40 regions exceeding the 125% level, ten were in Germany, five in the Netherlands, four each in Austria and the United Kingdom, three each in Spain and Italy, two each in Belgium and Finland, and one each in the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Slovakia, Sweden and Ireland, as well as the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

It should be noted, however, that in some regions the GDP per inhabitant figures can be significantly influenced by commuter flows. Net commuter inflows in these regions push up production to a level that could not be achieved by the resident active population on its own. The result is that GDP per inhabitant appears to be overestimated in these regions and underestimated in regions with commuter outflows.

Full statistics are available here: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/1-24022011-AP/EN/1-24022011-AP-EN.PDF

Top

Ireland has lowest number of flat-dwellers in EU: Report on housing conditions in the EU27

23 February 2011 - A report on housing, out today from Eurostat, the EU's statistical office, shows that Irish people are far less likely to live in flats than any of their European neighbours. In the EU overall, an average of 42% of the population live in flats, compared to 3.1% in Ireland.

Ireland also has one of the lowest overcrowding rates in the EU with 3.7%, compared to an EU average of 17.8%.

Other figures show that almost no one in Ireland has to make do without a bathroom or indoor toilet. Looking further at the condition of dwellings, 13% of Irish people live in damp conditions, below the EU average of 16% and well below many other EU countries.

In the EU overall, housing conditions differ greatly between Member States. These differences can be seen both in the type of housing in which people live and in the housing problems they have. Scroll down for more information and tables.

Today's data were collected in the EU-SILC (Statistics of Income and Living Conditions) survey. This survey is the EU reference source for comparative statistics on income distribution and social exclusion. Comparable figures on these issues are considered essential for policy makers at national and EU level.

(Figures refer to 2009, the latest complete set of comparable figures. Scroll down for tables. Source: Eurostat, Statistics in Focus 4/2011, "Housing conditions in Europe in 2009". The publication is available free of charge in PDF format on the Eurostat website.)

MORE

On average in the EU27 in 2009, 42% of the population lived in a flat, 34% in a detached house and 23% in a semi-detached or terraced house. Of the EU27 population, 18% lived in an overcrowded dwelling, while 16% lived in a dwelling where a leaking roof or damp were perceived as a problem, 7% considered their dwelling to be too dark, 4% had no indoor flushing toilet and 3% no bath or shower.

Across the Member States, flats are most common in Latvia, detached houses in Slovenia and semi-detached houses in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom

The type of dwelling in which people live varies greatly between Member States: in twelve Member States, detached houses are the most common type of dwelling, in ten flats and in five semi-detached or terraced houses.

In 2009, over half of the population lived in flats in Latvia (66%), Estonia and Spain (both 65%), Lithuania (58%), Greece (56%), the Czech Republic, Germany and Italy (all 53%), in detached houses in Slovenia (69%), Hungary (68%), Romania (61%), Denmark (58%) and Sweden (51%), and in semi-detached or terraced houses in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (both 61%) as well as Ireland (58%).

Between 1% of the population in Cyprus and 58% in Latvia live in an overcrowded dwelling

Overcrowding depends upon the relation between the number of persons in a household and the number of rooms in each dwelling. In 2009, the share of persons living in an overcrowded dwelling ranged widely between Member States, from 1% in Cyprus, 2% in the Netherlands, 3% in Spain and 4% in Ireland, Belgium and Malta to 58% in Latvia, 55% in Romania and Hungary, 49% in Poland and Lithuania and 47% in Bulgaria.

One person in six lives in a dwelling where a leaking roof or damp is a problem

Housing conditions can also be analysed through the problems of damp, darkness or the availability of sanitary equipment. The proportion of the population living in a dwelling where they declared there was a problem with a leaking roof or damp in the walls ranged from 5% in Finland, 7% in Slovakia and Sweden and 8% in Denmark to 31% in Slovenia, 29% in Cyprus, 26% in Latvia and 24% in Bulgaria.

The share of the population living in a dwelling where darkness was considered to be a problem varied from 4% in Slovakia, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Finland to 16% in Slovenia, 11% in Latvia and the United Kingdom.

There were significant differences between Member States when considering the sanitary equipment of dwellings. The share of persons living in dwellings with no indoor flushing toilet ranged from less than 1% in 15 Member States to 43% in Romania, 26% in Bulgaria and 17% in Lithuania and Latvia. The proportion of the population living in dwellings with no bath or shower ranged from less than 1% in 17 Member States to 41% in Romania, 18% in Latvia and 16% in Lithuania and Bulgaria.

Type of dwelling, 2009

 

Share of population living in a:

Flat

Detached house

Semi-detached/

terraced house

Other*

EU27

41.7

34.3

23.0

1.1

Belgium

19.6

38.0

41.5

0.8

Bulgaria

42.1

48.1

9.4

0.4

CzechRepublic

52.7

36.4

10.3

0.5

Denmark

28.8

58.4

12.8

0.0

Germany

53.1

29.2

16.0

1.8

Estonia

65.1

29.5

5.0

0.5

Ireland

3.1

39.1

57.6

0.2

Greece

56.0

34.7

9.3

0.0

Spain

64.6

14.2

21.1

0.2

France**

34.0

43.9

22.0

0.2

Italy

53.4

24.6

18.7

3.4

Cyprus

22.4

46.0

30.6

1.0

Latvia

66.2

29.1

4.4

0.3

Lithuania

57.8

34.1

8.1

0.0

Luxembourg

32.5

41.4

25.5

0.6

Hungary

29.5

67.6

2.6

0.4

Malta

44.5

6.4

48.5

0.5

Netherlands

16.0

17.6

61.4

5.0

Austria

42.6

43.4

13.2

0.8

Poland

47.8

47.0

4.9

0.2

Portugal

35.4

42.0

22.0

0.6

Romania

37.7

60.7

1.6

0.1

Slovenia

27.0

68.7

3.9

0.4

Slovakia

49.9

48.5

1.4

0.2

Finland

32.7

47.0

19.8

0.5

Sweden

40.1

50.8

8.7

0.4

United Kingdom

14.2

24.7

60.9

0.1

Iceland

45.3

34.8

18.5

1.4

Norway

16.9

62.4

20.0

0.7

Switzerland

58.0

25.0

14.0

3.0

*     Other kinds of accommodation include accommodation that are situated in buildings that are used for other purposes than housing (schools etc.) and fixed habitations such as a hut.

**   France excluding Overseas Departments

Housing condition indicators, 2009

 

Share of population living in an overcrowded dwelling, %

% of the population living in a dwelling with:

Leaking roof or damp**

Darkness***

No indoor flushing toilet

No bath or shower

EU27

17.8

15.9

7.3

3.5

3.1

Belgium

3.9

15.2

9.6

0.6

0.9

Bulgaria

47.0

23.9

6.8

26.2

15.6

Czech Republic

26.6

14.6

4.3

0.7

0.5

Denmark

7.8

7.8

4.5

0.0

0.7

Germany

7.0

14.0

4.8

1.2

0.3

Estonia

41.2

20.2

4.7

12.2

12.8

Ireland

3.7

13.2

5.6

0.3

0.6

Greece

25.0

17.6

6.7

1.8

1.1

Spain

3.2

17.6

6.9

0.0

0.0

France*

9.6

12.6

7.5

0.8

0.6

Italy

23.3

20.5

7.9

0.2

0.4

Cyprus

1.0

29.4

5.7

0.7

0.7

Latvia

57.7

25.7

10.9

16.6

18.2

Lithuania

49.0

21.3

8.8

17.2

15.9

Luxembourg

6.4

17.5

7.0

0.8

0.2

Hungary

55.0

14.5

8.4

7.1

4.2

Malta

4.0

10.0

6.7

0.0

0.2

Netherlands

1.7

14.2

3.7

0.0

0.0

Austria

13.2

15.3

6.5

1.3

0.7

Poland

49.1

17.6

8.3

4.8

5.6

Portugal

14.1

19.7

8.6

2.4

2.7

Romania

55.3

22.0

8.7

42.5

41.2

Slovenia

38.0

30.6

15.5

0.6

0.6

Slovakia

39.7

6.6

3.5

1.1

0.3

Finland

5.9

4.9

4.4

0.8

1.0

Sweden

10.5

6.6

6.1

0.0

0.5

United Kingdom

7.2

14.6

10.6

0.5

0.2

Iceland

7.3

17.4

1.8

0.3

0.1

Norway

4.8

8.2

4.1

0.1

0.1

Switzerland

7.6

8.6

5.8

0.1

0.1

 

*     France excluding Overseas Departments

**    Whether the persons living in the dwelling perceive it having a problem with a leaking roof, dampness in the walls, floors or foundation or rot in window frames or floor.

***  Whether the persons living in the dwelling consider it as being too dark.

Top

Declaration by the High Representative Catherine Ashton on behalf of the European Union on Libya

23 February 2011 - The full text of the Declaration made on 23 February by Catherine Ashton, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, on behalf of the European Union on Libya is reproduced below.

The European Union expresses its grave concern about the situation unfolding in Libya. We strongly condemn the violence and use of force against civilians and deplore the repression against peaceful demonstrators which has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of civilians.
These brutal mass violations of human rights are unacceptable.

The EU reiterates its call for an immediate end to the use of force and for steps to address the legitimate demands of the population, including through national dialogue. All restrictions of freedom of expression, including the internet, and of peaceful assembly must be lifted immediately. The will of the people in Libya must be respected and the EU stands by them.

We welcome the UN Security Council statement of 22 February 2011, which calls on the Government of Libya to meet its responsibility to protect its population and which calls on the Libyan authorities to respect human rights and international humanitarian law. We also welcome the Arab League statement of 22 February.

Immediate access should be provided for international human rights monitors and humanitarian agencies. The EU is ready to supply humanitarian aid where needed.

The EU also urges the Libyan authorities to ensure the safety of all foreign nationals, and to facilitate the departure of those wishing to leave the country.

The EU also welcomes the UN Security Council's call for a transparent, credible and independent investigation into events in Libya and the holding of a special session of the UN Human Rights Council on 25 February.

In this context, the EU stresses that those responsible for the brutal aggression and violence against civilians will be held to account. The EU has decided to suspend negotiations with Libya on the EU-Libya Framework Agreement and is ready to take further measures.

Top

Ethiopian Spud Appeal to sustain an area the size of Ireland for the next 5 years

Barbara Nolan with Eanna Ní Lamhna at the launch17 February 2011 - Today, Thursday February 17, Vita (an Irish NGO working in the Horn of Africa) are launching their spud appeal to provide seed potatoes for thousands of Ethiopian families in a region the size of Ireland, thus helping them take charge of their own destiny by securing food supply and income for the next 5 years.

Barbara Nolan, Head of Representation at the European Commission in Ireland, and radio celebrity and renowned botanist, Eanna Ni Lamhna, are helping Vita to launch the Spud Appeal at 2.30pm at European Union House, 18 Dawson Street.

Vita have shown local families that one bag of seed potatoes can yield ten bags. This increases income from €50/year to €500/year and an ability to pay back, in kind, the original bag plus another bag. These 2 bags will go into a community-based co-op to, be used by other families in delivering overall food security and income generation in the region.

Vita has become renowned in Ethiopia for turning hungry families dependent on aid into thriving farmers with food and money to raise their families.  During 2010, Vita piloted the Irish seed potato program to 300 farmers and the yields were five times more than for the traditional Ethiopian potatoes.  In September, the European Commission awarded Vita top marks of A for their work with farmers in Ethiopia. 

Now Vita is targeting thousands more families in an area the size of Ireland.  Eanna Ni Lamhna lauded the role of the potato in Vita’s work:  “The Irish potato, so much part of Ireland’s history, is a key to a sustainable future for Ethiopia”.  The UN have called potato a “hidden treasure” for poor countries for its high starch content, and 2008 was declared the “Year of the Potato”

About Vita

Vita is an Irish international development agency that is fighting hunger and climate change in Africa. The mission of the agency is to bring an end to extreme poverty and reduce the vulnerability of people in Africa by helping them to build sustainable long-term livelihoods for themselves. Vita is supported by the Irish Government through Irish Aid (the international aid section of the Department of Foreign Affairs), the European Union through EuropeAid, and by voluntary work and donations of the people of Ireland.

Top

Vice-President Kroes calls on Ireland to take urgent measures on mobile satellite services

17 February 2011 - Ireland is among the twenty-one EU Member States who have today been urged to rapidly introduce all legislative measures necessary for the pan-EU deployment of Mobile Satellite Services (MSS). These services can be used for high-speed internet, mobile television and radio or emergency communications to EU consumers and businesses.

According to a timetable agreed by the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers in 2008, MMS should be introduced in all Member States by May 2011 at the latest. On 13 May 2009, Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited were selected by the Commission to provide pan-EU mobile satellite services. Ireland is one of twenty-one Member States who have not yet adopted all of the national rules needed to facilitate MSS deployment.

Neelie Kroes, European Commission Vice-President for the Digital Agenda, said: "Member States should urgently take all measures necessary to allow the introduction of mobile satellite services throughout the EU. Mobile satellite services have an important role to play in providing innovative services to businesses and citizens across Europe, including in rural or remote areas, and in meeting our Digital Agenda targets of making broadband available to everyone in Europe." The key role that wireless broadband (both satellite and terrestrial) can play in ensuring widespread broadband coverage, particularly in remote and rural areas, is underlined in the Digital Agenda for Europe.

Vice-President Kroes has today written to the twenty-one Member States in question urging them to remove remaining legal uncertainties, such as licence fees, and to put in place all necessary implementation measures without further delay. The twenty-one Member States are Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and the United Kingdom.

For more information:

The study on measures taken by Member States for the introduction of mobile satellite services can be found here.

Neelie Kroes' website

Digital Agenda website

Top

Commission welcomes Court ruling confirming Member States' discretion to determine free to view sporting events

17 February 2011 - The European Commission welcomes today's  EU Court of Justice ruling confirming that individual Member States have discretion under EU law to decide which sporting events are of major importance for their public and so should be available on free-to-view television.

The rulings concerned an appeal by on FIFA and UEFA against a Commission decision to approve lists of football matches to be available on free-to-view television submitted by Belgium and the United Kingdom.

The Court found that the Commission acted correctly in approving the lists of events of UK and Belgium. Consequently, FIFA’s and UEFA’s actions were dismissed.

Both Belgium and the United Kingdom had submitted lists including the whole final tournament of the FIFA Football World Cup (i.e. 64 football matches) and the UK's list also included all the UEFA European Football Championship (EURO - i.e. 31 matches).

Under the EU’s Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive (Article 14), Member States can draw up a list of events of major importance for their general public and take measures to ensure that these events (like the Olympic Games) are accessible on free-to-view television.

These lists can be submitted to the European Commission for approval in order to get recognition in other Member States. At present, the lists in 8 Member States have been approved by the Commission (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy and United Kingdom).

The Court rulings (on cases T-385/07 and T-68/08 (FIFA/Commission), and in case T-55/08 (UEFA/Commission) found that the Member States' decisions to consider that all of the matches of those competitions are of major importance for society is compatible with the relevant provisions of EU law (the AVMS Directive). The Court found that ‘prime’ and ‘gala’ matches, and non-prime matches, could be considered of major importance for the UK and Belgian societies and can therefore be included in a national list specifying the events to which the public should be able to have access on free television.

In particular, the Court ruled that in the absence of harmonisation in the European Union of specific events which Member States may consider to be of major importance for society, a number of different approaches concerning the inclusion of the World Cup and EURO matches in a national list may be compatible with the AVMS Directive.

Background

FIFA and UEFA sought the annulment before the Court of First Instance of the decision of the Commission approving the list of events submitted by Belgium and the UK. FIFA and UEFA argued that the whole final tournament cannot be considered as an event of major importance. Conversely, the Commission argued that the final tournament of the FIFA World Cup is quoted in the AVMS Directive itself as an example of event of major importance, that there is a wide margin of discretion for each Member States to decide which event is of major importance for its own society and that, in its review of the Belgian and UK list, the Commission did not find them manifestly erroneous.

Top

Commission welcomes European Parliament approval for bus and coach passenger rights

The European Commission welcomes the European Parliament voting in favour of a regulation on rights of passengers travelling by bus and coach after difficult negotiations.

After air, rail and water, now transport by road will also be covered by a specific set of rights for passengers, thus completing the legal framework for users of all transport modes at EU level.

Bus and coach passengers, and in particular passengers with a disability and people with a reduced mobility, will enjoy new rights that will protect them when they travel anywhere within the European Union.

Siim Kallas, Commission Vice-President in charge of transport, said: "Thanks to this new regulation, passenger rights will be extended also to bus and coach transport. Passengers travelling by road will benefit from the same basic service quality standards wherever and however they travel in the Union. With the adoption of a regulation on rights for bus and coach passengers EU passenger protection will now cover all modes. I am very satisfied that the EU has established the first integrated area of passenger rights for all modes of transport in the world."

The adoption of the regulation on bus and coach passenger rights follows shortly after the adoption of regulation 1177/2010 on passenger rights for maritime and inland waterways transport which will enter into force in December 2012.

Now that the coverage of all transport modes by EU passenger rights legislation has been achieved, the Commission will prepare a communication reviewing the features of passenger protection in all transport sectors in view of enhancing their consistency and effectiveness in the context of an ever-increasing intermodal transport.

The new rights applicable to long distance services (i.e. of more than 250 km) include amongst others:

  • protection of passengers in case of death, injury, loss or damage caused by road accidents (national law cannot set a maximum amount lower than €220,000 per passenger and €1,200 per item of luggage),
  • protection of passengers with regard to immediate practical needs in case of an accident (with the possibility to offer up to two nights' hotel accommodation, for a total amount of €80 per night),
  • specific assistance free of charge for disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility both at terminals and on board, and, where necessary, transport free of charge for accompanying people,
  • guarantee of reimbursement or rerouting in situations of overbooking or in case of cancellation or following a delay of more than 120 minutes from the estimated time of departure,
  • adequate assistance (snacks, meals and refreshments) in situations of cancellation or following a delay of more than 90 minutes in the case of a journey of more than three hours,
  • more particularly, obligation in those cases, for carriers, if necessary, to provide two nights' hotel accommodation to stranded passengers, for a maximum amount of €80 per night, except in case of severe weather conditions and major natural disasters,
  • compensation of 50% of the ticket price following more than 120 minutes' delay from the estimated time of departure, cancellation of a journey and if the carrier fails to offer the passenger either rerouting or reimbursement.

Additionally, the following rights will be applicable to all services (beyond or below 250 km):

  • non-discrimination against passengers based - directly or indirectly - on nationality,
  • non-discriminatory treatment of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility as well financial compensation for loss or damage of their mobility equipment in case of accident,
  • minimum rules on travel information for all passengers before and during their journey as well as general information about their rights in terminals and online,
  • a complaint handling mechanisms by carriers available to all passengers,
  • independent national bodies in each Member State with the mandate to enforce the Regulation and where appropriate to take penalties.

Next steps

After yesterday's vote in the European Parliament and Council's endorsement on 31 January 2011, the regulation will be formally adopted. Its publication is expected before summer. The Regulation is due to enter into application two years after its publication.

Top

1000th EU quality food name registered - Irish labels show strong export record

16 February 2011 - The Piacentinu Ennese, a sheep's cheese from Italy, yesterday became the one thousandth name to be registered under the European Commission's agricultural product and foodstuff quality labels.

Four Irish products already have the EU Quality label: Clare Island Salmon, Connemara Hill Lamb, Imokilly Regato, and Timoleague Brown Pudding. These products were worth €30 million to the Irish economy in 2007 and have a strong track record in the export market. 12% of Irish products bearing EU quality labels are sold within the Irish market, 82% are sold to other EU countries, and 6% are sold outside of the EU. In the EU as a whole the opposite is the case, as the vast majority of quality label products are sold within their country of production. This difference reflects the strong export-oriented nature of Ireland's food production industry.

Dacian Ciolos, Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, said: "The one thousandth name registered is a significant milestone for the quality schemes. There is still great potential for these schemes that give visibility to Europe's quality products and valorise agricultural traditions and rural heritage. The EU's quality schemes are the cornerstone of the Commission's Quality Package currently in discussion in Parliament and Council. With this proposal we reinforce the PDO/PGI schemes in particular, increasing the role and responsibilities of groups, and breathe new life into the TSG scheme."

There are three different quality schemes:

  • Protected Destination of Origin (PDO) products owe their characteristics to their place of production and the knowledge of local producers.
  • Protected Geographical Indications (PGI) products are those whose reputation or characteristics are closely linked to production in a particular geographical area.
  • Traditional Specialities Guaranteed (TSG) products are produced in line with a traditional specification.

Since their creation in 1992, the EU schemes have registered quality agricultural products and foodstuffs from across the EU and beyond. In recent years there has been a boost in applications due to EU enlargement and a growing interest from non-EU producers from India, China, Thailand and Vietnam, among others.

More on the EU’s food quality labelling system

 

Top

Irish are highest users of text messaging services when roaming in the EU

15 February 2011 - 81% of Irish mobile users roaming in the EU use text messaging services, the highest rate of all EU countries, according to a new Eurobarometer survey released today. 62% of Irish people use voice services when roaming and 10% use internet services. Across the EU, women and young people are more likely to send text messages while men and older people prefer to make voice calls.

Almost three quarters of Europeans are worried about the cost of using their mobile phone while travelling in the EU. 72% of travellers limit their roaming calls due to high charges, even though the majority of them are aware that prices have fallen since 2006. Only 19% of people who use internet-related services on their phones when abroad believe that the charges are fair.

Despite this, more people are using their mobiles while travelling in the EU than four years ago, when the EU first introduced caps on roaming prices. While there was an estimated 13% fall in travel between 2006 and 2010, the overall volume of calls and texts sent and received while abroad grew during that period. Travellers report making 32% more calls, receiving 31% more calls and texting 43% more since 2006.

The EU's Council of Ministers and the European Parliament, acting on a proposal from the European Commission, first introduced caps on roaming prices in 2007. In July 2009 revised rules were adopted to cut roaming prices further, so that by July 2011 the maximum charges allowed would be 35 cents per minute for calls made and 11 cents for calls received.

The results of this Eurobarometer survey, along with the public consultation on the future of the Roaming Regulation, will feed into the Commission's review of current EU roaming rules, due in June 2011. The performance target set by the Commission is that the there will be a negligible difference between roaming and national tariffs by 2015.

Eurobarometer Report: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/roaming/docs/survey2011_en.pdf

Top

European Commission sets out EU agenda for the rights of the child

15 February 2011 - How can the EU help protect children's rights in the courtroom? How can we make sure that decisions on cross-border custody cases are enforced as quickly as possible? And how can we prevent kids from getting bullied online?

The European Commission today presented an EU agenda for reinforcing the rights of the child by putting the principles of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights into practice. It includes a series of concrete actions where the EU can provide added value to policies for children's well-being and safety, including promoting child-friendly justice, better informing children about their rights, and making the internet safer for kids.

“Children’s rights are fundamental rights,” said Vice-President Viviane Reding, the EU's Justice Commissioner. “The EU and its 27 Member States need to make sure they are protected and that the best interests of the child are our guiding principles. Notably, child-friendly justice should make sure that the rights of the child are taken into account whenever children are involved with justice systems, either as victims, suspects or when their parents divorce and disagree over custody.”

Vice-President Antonio Tajani emphasised the need to fight the sexual exploitation of children linked to tourism. “Sexual exploitation is a crime, a gross violation of human dignity and of children’s physical and mental integrity. It is an area where we need joint strategies and international cooperation, awareness raising and firm action,” he added.

Today's EU Agenda lists 11 actions that the Commission will take over the coming years. The initiative aims to reaffirm the strong commitment of EU institutions and Member States to promoting, protecting and fulfilling the rights of the child in all relevant EU policies and to turn them into concrete results.

In the future, EU policies that affect children directly or indirectly should be designed, implemented, and monitored taking into account the principle of children’s best interests.

Children can face severe obstacles when they are involved with justice systems. Their rights may even be violated if they face non child-friendly justice systems. In addition, particularly vulnerable children – either growing up in poverty, social exclusion or disabled – require special protection. The Commission will take special account of children as part of a proposal on protecting victims of crime, proposing safeguards for child suspects and revising existing rules in cross-border custody cases.

The Commission will actively protect and empower children as users of online technologies and counter cyber-bullying, grooming, exposure to harmful content, and other uncomfortable experiences of using online technologies. To raise awareness and promote active citizenship among children, the Commission will establish a single entry point for children on the EUROPA portal with easily accessible information on children's rights and EU policies.

The Commission's action on the rights of the child is part of its efforts to implement the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is legally binding on the EU's institutions when they propose laws and on Member States when they are implementing EU law. In October 2010, the Commission adopted a strategy for effectively implementing the provisions of the Charter (IP/10/1348). Next month, it will publish the first annual report on fundamental rights, which will also monitor progress on applying children’s rights.

Background

The Treaty of Lisbon requires the EU to promote the protection of the rights of the child. The rights of the child also form part of the fundamental rights that the EU is committed to respect under Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In addition, all 27 EU countries have ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The Europe 2020 Strategy (IP/10/225) and the Commission's Action Plan to implement the Stockholm Programme (IP/10/447) set out a vision for the 21st century of a Europe in which the children of today will have a better education, access to services and resources that they need to grow up as well as a solid protection of their rights.

For more information

Children's rights in the EU
 
Justice Newsroom

Homepage of Viviane Reding, Vice-President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship

ANNEX
Overview of 11 actions

The Commission will contribute to making the justice systems in the EU more child-friendly and to improving children's well being notably by:

  1. adopting, in 2011, a proposal for a Directive on victims’ rights raising the level of protection of vulnerable victims, including children;
  2. tabling, in 2012, a proposal for a Directive on special safeguards for suspected or accused persons who are vulnerable, including children;
  3. revising, by 2013, the EU legislation facilitating the recognition and enforcement of decisions on parental responsibility with a view to ensuring, in the interest of the child, that decisions can be recognised and enforced as quickly as possible, including, where appropriate, the establishment of common minimum standards;
  4. promoting the use of the Council of Europe Guidelines of 17 November 2010 on child-friendly justice and taking them into account in future legal instruments in the field of civil and criminal justice;
  5. supporting and encouraging the development of training activities for judges and other professionals at European level regarding the optimal participation of children in judicial systems.
  6. supporting the exchange of best practices and the improvement of training for guardians, public authorities and other actors who are in close contact with unaccompanied children (2011-2014);
  7. paying particular attention to children in the context of the EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies, which will be adopted in spring 2011 and will notably promote the more efficient use of structural funds for the integration of Roma;
  8. strongly encouraging and providing support to all Member States to ensure the swift introduction and full functioning of the 116 000 hotline for missing children and the child alert mechanisms (2011-2012);
  9. supporting Member States and other stakeholders in strengthening prevention, empowerment and participation of children to make the most of online technologies and counter cyber-bullying behaviour, exposure to harmful content, and other online risks  namely through the Safer Internet programme and cooperation with the industry through self-regulatory initiatives (2009-2014);
  10. continuing the implementation of the 2007 EU Guidelines on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of the Child  that focus on combating all forms of violence against children. The EU will also evaluate the implementation of the Guidelines. The EU will implement the EU Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflicts based on the 2010 Revised Implementation Strategy;
  11. setting up, in the course of 2011, a single entry point on EUROPA with information for children on the EU and on the rights of the child. The Commission will invite other EU institutions to join this initiative.

Top

Ireland records second highest trade surplus in the EU (Jan to Nov 2010)

15 February 2011 - Latest figures from Eurostat show that Ireland recorded the second highest trade surplus in the EU after Germany for the period January to November 2010.  During that period, Irish exports rose by 5% to € 81.2 bn while imports dropped by 1% to €40.9 bn, giving a trade surplus of €40.3 bn. Furthermore this represents a rise of €4.4 bn over January to November 2009 when the total trade surplus was €35.9 bn.

Ireland had however the lowest export growth (5%) behind Greece (6%) and Denmark (9%). (Luxmbourg is lower but distorted for various reasons). Imports dropped only in Ireland (-1%) and Greece (-22%).

The United Kingdom (-105.4 bn) registered the largest deficit, followed by France (-57.4 bn), Spain (-46.5 bn), Italy (-24.5 bn), Greece (-21.0 bn), Portugal (-18.1 bn) and Poland (-11.9 bn).

The first estimate for the euro area (EA16) trade balance with the rest of the world in December 2010 gave a 0.5 bn euro deficit, compared with +3.2 bn in December 2009. The November 2010 balance was -1.5 bn, compared with +2.7 bn in November 2009. In December 2010 compared with November 2010, seasonally adjusted exports fell by 0.4% and imports by 1.1%.

The first estimate for the December 2010 extra-EU27 trade balance was a 10.5 bn euro deficit, compared with -2.9 bn in December 2009. In November 2010 the balance was -15.4 bn, compared with -7.7 bn in November 2009. In December 2010 compared with November 2010, seasonally adjusted exports fell by 0.3% and imports by 0.4%.

During 2010, euro area trade recorded a surplus of 0.7 bn euro, compared with +16.6 bn in 2009. The EU27 recorded a deficit of 143.3 bn in 2010, compared with -108.1 bn in 2009.

These data are released by Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union.

Full report and more tables here.

EU27 detailed results for January to November 2010

The EU27 deficit increased for energy (-267.1 bn euro in January-November 2010 compared with -218.4 bn in January-November 2009), while the surplus for manufactured goods rose (+156.7 bn compared with +142.5 bn).

EU27 trade with all its major partners grew in January-November 2010 compared with January-November 2009. The most notable increases were recorded for exports to Brazil (+48%), China and Turkey (both +38%), and for imports from Russia (+33%), China (+31%) and India (+30%).

The EU27 trade surplus increased with the USA (+67.0 bn euro in January-November 2010 compared with +42.6 bn in January-November 2009), Switzerland (+18.5 bn compared with +13.5 bn) and Turkey (+16.8 bn compared with +6.8 bn). The EU27 trade deficit increased with China (-154.8 bn compared with -121.7 bn), Russia (-61.2 bn compared with -45.9 bn) and Norway (-33.0 bn compared with -28.6 bn). The deficit remained nearly stable with Japan (-19.8 bn compared with -19.4 bn) and South Korea (-10.4 bn compared with -10.3).

Concerning the total trade of Member States, the largest surplus was observed in Germany (+140.3 bn euro in January-November 2010), followed by Ireland (+40.3 bn), the Netherlands (+38.1 bn) and Belgium (+16.5 bn). The United Kingdom (-105.4 bn) registered the largest deficit, followed by France (-57.4 bn), Spain (-46.5 bn), Italy (-24.5 bn), Greece (-21.0 bn), Portugal (-18.1 bn) and Poland (-11.9 bn).

Member States’ total trade (intra-EU + extra-EU) - non seasonally adjusted data      bn euro 

 

Total exports

Total imports

Trade balance

Jan-Nov 09

Jan-Nov 10

Growth

Jan-Nov 09

Jan-Nov 10

Growth

Jan-Nov 09

Jan-Nov 10

Belgium

242.4

285.8

18%

229.8

269.3

17%

12.6

16.5

Bulgaria

10.7

14.2

32%

15.5

17.3

12%

-4.7

-3.1

CzechRepublic

74.7

92.0

23%

69.1

86.9

26%

5.6

5.1

Denmark

61.9

67.3

9%

54.5

58.2

7%

7.4

9.1

Germany

735.5

875.6

19%

609.2

735.3

21%

126.4

140.3

Estonia

5.9

7.8

32%

6.6

8.3

26%

-0.7

-0.5

Ireland

77.2

81.2

5%

41.2

40.9

-1%

35.9

40.3

Greece

13.4

14.2

6%

45.2

35.3

-22%

-31.7

-21.0

Spain

149.1

169.4

14%

192.0

215.8

12%

-42.9

-46.5

France

318.5

358.8

13%

367.0

416.2

13%

-48.5

-57.4

Italy

267.0

307.8

15%

272.7

332.4

22%

-5.7

-24.5

Cyprus

0.8

1.0

17%

5.2

5.7

11%

-4.3

-4.8

Latvia

5.0

6.5

29%

6.4

7.8

21%

-1.4

-1.3

Lithuania

10.7

14.1

32%

12.0

15.8

32%

-1.3

-1.7

Luxembourg

14.0

13.6

-3%

16.2

16.5

2%

-2.2

-3.0

Hungary

54.7

66.1

21%

51.2

61.0

19%

3.4

5.1

Malta

1.5

1.7

17%

2.8

2.9

5%

-1.3

-1.2

Netherlands

325.8

392.6

20%

289.1

354.5

23%

36.8

38.1

Austria

90.3

105.1

16%

93.8

109.2

16%

-3.5

-4.1

Poland

89.9

108.4

21%

98.3

120.3

22%

-8.4

-11.9

Portugal

29.3

33.6

15%

47.1

51.7

10%

-17.8

-18.1

Romania

26.7

34.0

27%

35.7

42.6

19%

-8.9

-8.7

Slovenia

17.3

20.4

18%

17.4

20.7

19%

-0.1

-0.3

Slovakia

36.9

45.1

22%

36.5

45.6

25%

0.4

-0.5

Finland

41.5

47.7

15%

39.9

46.8

17%

1.6

0.8

Sweden

85.8

108.4

26%

78.5

101.7

30%

7.4

6.7

United Kingdom

230.3

277.7

21%

316.8

383.1

21%

-86.5

-105.4

 

Top

Olli Rehn's remarks following euro-zone ministers' meeting

14 February 2011 - Remarks of Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner Olli REHN following the meeting of euro-zone Finance Ministers in Brussels this afternoon:

Today (Monday), euro-zone Finance Ministers held their planned meeting in Brussels.

Commissioner Olli Rehn said in remarks following the meeting:

"I'm following the Irish debate closely. The European member states have signed a memorandum of understanding with the Republic of Ireland.

"We expect continuity of the memorandum. If there are changes to the pricing policy*, which I support and the commission supports ... it will take place for European reasons. It is essential to respect the memorandum, especially for 2011.

"Concerning outer years, there is more room for manoeuvre."

* interest rate

Top

Commission calls on Member States to increase awareness of Europe's single emergency number 112

11 February 2011 - Three out of four EU citizens do not know Europe's single emergency phone number 112, according to an EU-wide survey released today. This life-saving free-phone number can be used to reach emergency services in all EU Member States. Ireland is placed near the bottom of the table, with just 18% of Irish citizens able to spontaneously identify 112 as the number to call the police, fire brigade or ambulance services from anywhere in the EU. Only citizens of Greece, Italy, the UK and Cyprus fared worse.

To mark European 112 Day on 11 February, the European Commission is urging Member States to step up their efforts to increase public awareness of the existence of 112. EU telecoms rules require Member States to make their citizens aware of the number. Neelie Kroes, European Commission Vice President for the Digital Agenda said: "The European emergency number 112 saves lives, but only if people know about it. Member States must do more to ensure that everyone knows they can dial 112 in an emergency."

Progress at EU-level has been minimal in recent years, with awareness increasing by just 4% since 2008. While most countries report that they have taken some action to promote the number, only 27% of EU citizens received information related to 112 during the course of last year. In view of the slow progress, the Commission is assessing whether Member States are adequately fulfilling their obligation to inform citizens about 112.

New EU telecoms rules to be implemented by 25 May will increase the effectiveness of 112. These rules will require Member States to improve the accuracy and reliability of caller location information, thus speeding up the arrival of emergency services. They will also require that information about 112 be made available to travellers, for example in airports, train stations and bus terminals.

112 in Ireland

The Commission for Communications Regulation (ComReg) has just launched a new website, www.112.ie, to raise awareness of the 112 EU emergency services number and to ensure the appropriate use of this service.

In Ireland, 112 can be used in parallel with 999. Dialling any of the two numbers from a handset will connect the caller to the emergency services. Calls to the emergency services are free of charge.

More

European Commission 112 Website

112 in Ireland 

Latest Eurobarometer 'The European Emergency Number 112'  

Latest COCOM report of the implementation of 112

Top

Commission publishes report on Economic Adjustment Programme for Ireland

10 February 2011 - The Commission has just published a report on the Economic Adjustment Programme for Ireland. The report analyses the development of the bubble in Ireland. Construction, notably housing, was at the heart of the domestic credit boom. Between the mid-1990s and 2006 house-price inflation was the highest among EU countries. However from 2003 to 2008 external competitiveness deteriorated, with labour costs rising and productivity declining. Budgetary policy did not sufficiently lean against the wind and significant imbalances built up in the domestic banking sector.

The report goes on to explain the economic build-up to the Economic Adjustment Programme, and how it is designed to fix Ireland's banking sector and put the public finances back on a sustainable path.

The report also looks at the risks ahead and concludes that:

  • The programme rests upon strong foundations. The fiscal consolidation package is strongly frontloaded and fully specified. National support for fiscal adjustment is strong. The extraordinary amount of financing available and the broad support of the programme by Ireland's international partners further add to the programme's credibility.
  • Key risks for the success of the programme were addressed in designing the programme. In particular, the programme is of sufficient scale to provide capital to the banking sector. At the same time, even with the inclusion of a sizeable contingency element, gross public debt is put on a firm downward path towards the end of the programme period. The activation of this financial assistance programme primarily aims at restoring confidence regarding Ireland, notably in the banks by providing assurances about their solvency and longer-term viability as well as by enhancing the credibility of the sovereign guarantees. Considering the prudent assumptions under the programme and the sharp economic adjustment that has already occurred, disciplined implementation of the programme should ensure external and sovereign debt sustainability and go a long way towards restoring Ireland's credibility vis-à-vis foreign investors, and help the country to successfully recover access to international capital markets.
  • The programme is built on conservative assumptions. This regards the yield of fiscal consolidation measures as well as banking sector developments. The same holds for the macroeconomic outlook underlying the programme. In this context, it should be considered that Ireland entered the crisis early and has experienced important adjustment of its imbalances also compared to other euro-area economies. Downward adjustment of prices (including asset prices) and wages has been sizeable and restored much price competitiveness. Real economic activity has plummeted providing scope for some rebound.
  • While prudent, the macroeconomic and banking sector projections underlying the programme are subject to considerable uncertainty.
    • Economic growth could be lower than currently projected, especially in the near term. Domestic demand developments could be more unfavourable than projected if positive confidence effects only kick in very gradually or if lending activity remains subdued on account of slower-than-expected restructuring in the financial sector. Lower growth would inter alia lead to negative surprises regarding government revenue and expenditure. Moreover, in the highly leveraged Irish economy, further negative feedback loops between growth, the financial sector and the public finances cannot be excluded. With an export-led recovery being projected, growth prospects depend strongly on the outlook for Ireland's main trading partners, as well as on exchange rate developments, especially vis-à-vis USD and GBP. While a deterioration in the outlook for the main trading partners would reduce the growth prospects of the very open Irish economy, cautious assumptions in conjunction with the volatility resulting from Ireland's export structure imply that the external sector is also a possible source of upside risks.
    • While lower-than-expected inflation would further support the economy's competitive adjustment, it would add to the real burden of debt. This could have negative implications for households with high mortgage debt and other leveraged agents, as well as altering public debt dynamics.
    • Additional recapitalisation needs could arise in the banking sector as result of loan losses. Prudent assumptions have been made under the programme with an immediate recapitalisation of €10 bn allowing large capital buffers in the banking sector, while a further €25 bn would be available under the programme in case further unforeseen losses were to be revealed. In particular, such losses could be driven by the deleveraging process, which is expected to begin after completion of the PLAR 2011. Also, were the macroeconomic situation to worsen significantly beyond the scenarios envisaged under the stress tests, further pressures on banks' asset quality and solvency could call for additional capital injections. However, LMEs (such as those launched recently by AIB and BOI) could be a strong mitigating factor reducing recapitalisation needs.28 In addition, BOI is looking for external sources of capital to keep the bank majority private-owned.
    • The envisaged financial sector deleveraging may in turn be hampered by market conditions that could prevent sales of assets.
    • If the programme were slow to restore market credibility, elevated spreads could persist for an extended period of time. Market sentiment could also deteriorate were adverse developments in other euro area Member States to occur. Also, the new legislation on resolution and restructuring which has addressed the issue of burden sharing by subordinated shareholders could affect the price of new bond issuances. The fiscal programme is robust to a slow improvement in market sentiment as the Irish sovereign does not need to access the sovereign bond market before end-2012, but stabilisation of spreads at a high level would negatively impact the private sector risk premium and economic growth, with repercussions on the budgetary position.
    • Implementation risks also exist. The planned reforms are substantial, will take a number of years, and engage a wide range of stakeholders both public and private. An election in Ireland is now imminent and a change of government is very likely. In this context it should be noted, however, that in the preparation phase the programme partners met the leaders of the main opposition parties. Many aspects of the programme have a legislative component, and these will need the approval of the Irish parliament.

Progress in programme implementation will be monitored by European Commission, ECB and IMF teams through quarterly programme reviews.

Further information:

The full report is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/2011/pdf/ocp76_en.pdf

Top

Manufacturers deliver the common mobile phone charger

9 February 2011 - European Commission Vice President, Antonio Tajani, today received a sample of the new European common mobile phone charger from Bridget Cosgrave, Director-General of DIGITALEUROPE. The common charger is a European Commission initiative designed to make life easier for consumers and to reduce the amount of electronic waste generated by mobile phone chargers. The common charger will be introduced to the EU market during the course of 2011.

In March 2009 the Commission urged phone manufacturers to adopt a common charger or else be subject to mandatory EU legislation.  As a result, in June 2009, Europe's 14 major mobile phone manufactures signed a Memorandum of Understanding which committed the industry to the provision of compatible chargers on the basis of a Micro-USB interface. New technical standards were published in December 2010, and the Commission is confident that the charger will become available early this year.

The European common charger means that consumers will not need to buy a new charger together with every mobile phone, and they may also benefit from cheaper stand-alone chargers. On top of this, consumers will no longer have the problem of not being able to borrow a friend's charger due to incompatibility with their own phone. The environmental benefits are also expected to be significant. Reducing the number of chargers sold will reduce the associated electronic waste. The common chargers are also expected to reduce energy consumption as they will comply with the newest European standards on energy efficiency.

Antonio Tajani, Commission Vice President with responsibility for industry and entrepreneurship, said: "I welcome the roll out of new chargers for mobile phones based on the new EU standard. This is genuine good news for the European consumer. Now we await the arrival of the new charger and compatible mobile phones on the shelves. I urge industry to speed up their introduction in the market to enable citizens throughout the EU to enjoy the advantages of a common charger as soon as possible."

The common charger is tangible proof of how standardisation can make life easier for Europeans. Standardisation is one of the key elements that the Commission promotes to untap the potential of the Single Market.

One Charger For All Website: http://www.onechargerforall.eu/en/
Viral Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIyo29pjgDI&feature=player_profilepage

Top

Safer Internet Day: Irish internet users only half as likely to have caught a computer virus as other EU users

8 February is Safer Internet Day

Data presented by Eurostat for Safer Internet Day shows that just 15% of Irish internet users caught a computer virus in the twelve months prior to the survey, less than half the EU average of 31%. Bulgarian users were the most likely to have caught a virus at 58%.

Ireland was also below the EU average of 4% for privacy violations, with just 2% of users suffering an abuse of personal information sent on the internet. In the same period, 3% of internet users in the EU experienced financial loss due to phishing or pharming attacks or payment card misuse. Ireland was slightly above average at 4%.

While Irish internet users are less likely to have caught a virus, they are also less likely to use IT security software to protect their computer and their data. This type of software is used by 80% of Irish users compared to 84% of all EU users. Internet users in the Netherlands are the most careful, with 96% of them using anti-virus software during this period.

The use of parental filtering is quite uncommon in the EU. Just 14% of internet users who live in a household with children had a parental control or web filtering software installed. Irish use of parental filters was below the EU average at 10%. Romania and Slovakia were bottom of the table at just 3%.

Safer Internet Day is organised by INSAFE, a European internet safety network co-funded by the European Commission. It is part of a global drive to promote a safer internet for all users, particularly children and young people.

Top

If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!

8 February 2011 - February is International Scams Awareness Month

Have you ever been contacted out of the blue and offered the chance to make large sums of money through little or no effort? Most of us have. While extra cash is always tempting, how do you know if the offer is genuine or if it is a scam? One rule of thumb is that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

While most of us may be confident that we can easily recognise a scam, scammers are becoming increasingly clever and inventive. One emerging type of internet fraud involves scammers posting false profiles onto dating websites to lure victims into sending large amounts of money to their online 'boyfriend' or 'girlfriend'. 

Research carried out last month in the UK by the Office of Fair Trading reveals that almost one in twenty people admit to having been scammed in the last year. The true figure is likely to be even higher as many victims are reluctant to acknowledge that they have been scammed. In fact, the OFT's research shows that 39% of scamming victims did not report the incident to the authorities.

So how do you know if you are dealing with a scam? Firstly, it is important to remember never to rush into sending money to someone you do not know, however genuine they may seem. You should also be wary of companies who ask for payment via money transfer. Money transfer is untraceable and should not be used to buy goods or services. If in doubt, talk to your family or friends, or contact the European Consumer Centrefor advice.

Top

EUROTRIP is back! Are you up for the challenge?

6 February 2011 - This week sees the re-launch of Eurotrip, an exciting competition which affords two media-savvy adventurers the opportunity to have a free trip around Europe this Spring, kicking off in Athens and finishing in Brussels, taking in some of Europe's most exciting capitals on the way.

Check out the video of last year’s Eurotrip winnersfor an idea of what we’re looking for.

But the winning duo's trip around Europe has a twist. The winners must cover 10 countries in just 12 days – no small feat – and, if that wasn’t enough of a challenge, they will also be given 12 uniquely quirky and challenging tasks, designed to test their limits and that of Ireland’s EU membership.

The two lucky winners will be asked to share their findings along the way online, by tweeting and facebooking each day, talking about the places they visit, the people they meet and how they dealt with the challenges they were faced.

Euro-trip is organised as part of the "Talk to EU" public information initiative funded by the European Commission.

Ruth Deasy, Press Officer at the European Commission Representation said: "The aim is to unearth some interesting findings and insights on what it means to be European. We’re encouraging those interested to visit the website http://www.talktoeu.ie/?page_id=1680 and to get involved. We’re looking for creative entries that stand out from the crowd and we’re encouraging interested participants to upload a video to showcase their personalities”.

The closing date for entries is the 11th of March at 5pm. All entrants must be over 18 and free to travel from the 11th to the 24th April 2011

Top

Kildare Student Wins EU Young Translators Contest

4 February 2011 - Fintan McGrath, a student at Confey College in Leixlip, Co. Kildare, is the Irish winner of the European Commission's annual 'Juvenes Translatores' Young Translators Contest. 'Juvenes Translatores' allows secondary school students from across Europe to test their translation skills in any of the 23 official EU languages. Each entrant has two hours to translate a one-page text, with Irish winner Fintan McGrath choosing to translate from Irish into English. Irish has been an official language of the EU since January 2007.

Around 3,000 17-year-old secondary school students participated in the competition on 23 November last. The 2010 contest received a record number of entries, up 25% on 2009, with more schools than ever applying to take part. The winners, one from each EU country, will be invited to an award ceremony in Brussels on 7 April.

The completed translations were marked by staff translators from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Translation. Each was assessed by a native speaker of the language into which the text had been translated. A selection board then picked the best translation from each EU country.

The prize will include a three-day trip to Brussels for each winner and an accompanying adult. The award ceremony will take place on 7 April where the winners will receive their prizes and certificates from Rytis Martikonis, the new head of the Commission's Translation Directorate-General. They will also have the opportunity to meet EU translators at work in the Commission.

Androulla Vassiliou, the European Commissioner for Education, Culture, Multilingualism and Youth, said: "I am delighted to see that the Young Translators' Contest continues to go from strength to strength. The record numbers involved highlights a strong commitment to language learning and I hope this will inspire other schools. Language learning opens doors and helps boost young people's development and employability."

'Juvenes Translatores' was run for the first time in 2007 as a pilot project to give young people a taste of what it is like to be a translator in an EU institution and to raise the profile of the translation profession and of language learning in schools. It has proved to be hugely popular, with 99% of participating schools saying that they would like to enter again. The contest has helped many young people to decide on their future careers, with several winners of previous rounds going on to study languages at university.

More

Official Contest Website

Facebook Page 

Winning Irish Entry

Top

EU proposal for passenger data to fight serious crime and terrorism

2 February 2011 - The European Commission presented today a proposal for an EU Passenger Name Record (PNR) Directive to fight serious crime and terrorism.

The proposal obliges air carriers to provide EU Member States with data on passengers entering or departing from the EU, whilst guaranteeing a high level of protection of privacy and personal data.

 

"This proposal for an EU PNR Directive is an important part of EU security policy. Common EU rules are necessary to fight serious crime such as drugs smuggling and people trafficking as well as terrorism, but also to ensure that passengers' privacy is respected and their rights fully protected in all Member States. The proposal requires Member States to anonymise all PNR data that is collected", said Cecilia Malmström, European Commissioner for Home Affairs.

In this proposal, the Commission lays down common rules for EU Member States to set up national PNR systems.  The data would become anonymous after one month except where a specific request is made by another Member State investigating a serious crime.

MORE

The Commission proposes:

  1. That air carriers transfer data on passengers on international flights held in the carriers' reservation systems to a dedicated unit in the Member State of arrival or departure. Member States will analyse and retain the data for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting serious crime and terrorist offences.
  2. Strong protection of privacy and personal data. PNR data may not be used for any purpose except fighting serious crime and terrorist offences (strict purpose limitation). Law enforcement authorities in Member States must make the data anonymous 1 month after the flight, and data must not be retained for more than five years in total (short retention period). Sensitive data that could reveal racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, or religious beliefs may never be transferred by air carriers to, or in any way used by, the Member States. Member States will not be able to access the databases of air carriers, the data must be requested and sent to them by the air carriers concerned (‘push method’). Member States must set up dedicated units to handle the data and keep it secure and ensure those units are monitored by an independent supervisory (data protection) authority. Clear rules on passengers' right to accurate information about the collection of PNR data are also introduced, as well as rules giving passengers the right to access, rectify, and delete their data, and to compensation and judicial remedies.
  3. Clear rules on how data should be transferred, for example how many times data may be transferred by the air carriers to Member States and the security of such transfers, aimed at limiting the impact on privacy and minimising the costs for air carriers.

Background

Passenger Name Record (PNR) data consists of information provided by passengers and collected by carriers during the reservation and booking of the tickets and when checking in on flights.

In practice many law enforcement authorities in Member States already collect PNR data on a case-by-case or on a flight-by-flight basis. The Commission proposal would allow for a more systematic use of the data for all relevant flights, and create a coherent approach across all Member States. This will avoid uneven levels of protection of passengers' personal data, as well as security gaps, increased costs, and legal uncertainty for air carriers and passengers.

Processing of PNR data under the proposal will be in line with the data protection rules laid down in the Framework Decision on Data Protection from 2008, and will therefore ensure a high level of protection of personal data.

The United States, Canada and Australia currently oblige EU air carriers to make PNR data available for all persons who fly to and from these countries. The experience of those countries, and of the EU Member States that use PNR data, confirms that PNR data are necessary to fight serious crime and terrorism.

This proposal replaces the Commission's proposal for a Framework Decision on the use on PNR data from 2007. Following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the 2007 proposal needed to be re-tabled under the new Treaty rules.

Next steps

It is expected to take approximately 2 years to negotiate the proposal in the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament.

Top

New Innovation Union Scoreboard: Ireland an innovation 'follower'

1 February 2011 - Ireland comes in with the innovation 'followers' in the EU's new Innovation Scoreboard, out today.

The figures also show that the EU is failing to close the innovation performance gap with its main international competitors: the US and Japan.

Within the EU, Sweden is the most impressive performer followed by Denmark, Finland and Germany. The UK, Belgium, Austria, Ireland, Luxembourg, France, Cyprus, Slovenia and Estonia, in that order, form the next group.

Although the trends in most EU Member States are promising despite the economic crisis, progress is not fast enough. While the EU still maintains a clear lead over the emerging economies of India and Russia, Brazil is making steady progress, and China is catching up rapidly.

Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science said: “This new and improved Innovation Union Scoreboard highlights the innovation emergency in Europe. Innovation is as essential to a successful modern economy as water is to life. It is at the core of economic policy-making and the main way economies create jobs. So today's Scoreboard is a central plank of the Europe 2020 Strategy. We want Member States to make full use of it to build on their strengths and to address weaknesses."

MORE

These are some of the main conclusions from the 2010 Innovation Union Scoreboard (IUS) published today by the European Commission. This is the first edition under the Innovation Union initiative (IP/10/1288) and replaces the former European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS). The Scoreboard feeds into the recently published Annual Growth Survey (IP/11/22) to help Member States identify strengths and weaknesses and to boost innovation performance through their Europe 2020 National Reform Programmes.

The 2010 Scoreboard draws on 25 research and innovation-related indicators and covers the 27 EU Member States, as well as Croatia, Serbia, Turkey, Iceland, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Norway and Switzerland. The indicators are grouped into three main categories:

  1. "Enablers", i.e. the basic building blocks which allow innovation to take place (human resources, finance and support, open, excellent and attractive research systems);
  2. "Firm activities" which show how innovative Europe's firms are (firm investments, linkages & entrepreneurship, intellectual assets); and
  3. "Outputs" which show how this translates into benefits for the economy as a whole (innovators, economic effects).

Comparing the indicators for the EU27, US and Japan shows that the EU27 is not closing its performance gap with its main competitors.

The largest gap appears in the "Firm activities" category where the EU27 lags behind in terms of public-private co-publications, business R&D expenditures, and, compared to Japan, in PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) patents.  This shows that Europe's research and innovation gap lies primarily in the private sector. The priority should therefore be to create the regulatory and other framework conditions that will encourage more private sector investment and facilitate the exploitation of research results by the business sector, in particular through a more efficient patent system; The gap is particularly large and rapidly increasing in license and patent revenues from abroad. This is an important indicator of economic dynamism. It shows that the economic model and functioning of the internal market for protected knowledge in the EU need to be improved. It also shows that the EU is producing fewer high impact patents (i.e. those that generate significant income from third countries) than the US and Japan and that it is not positioning itself sufficiently well in high global growth sectors;

The still substantial gap in the number of people completing tertiary-education is slightly decreasing, with relatively high growth in the EU. 

The EU27 is, however, outperforming the US in public R&D expenditures and knowledge-intensive services exports.

Over the last five years, the strongest growth of the EU27 innovation indicators has been in open, excellent and attractive research systems (international scientific co-publications, high-impact publications, non-EU doctorate students) and intellectual assets (Community trademarks, PCT patents and Community designs).

Overall, the EU27 is holding its lead over India and Russia. However, the EU27 is losing part of its lead over Brazil and, above all, over China, which continue to rapidly narrow their performance gap with the EU (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Comparison with key competitors

The Scoreboard places  Member States into the following four country groups (see Figure 2):

  1. Innovation leaders: Denmark, Finland, Germany, Sweden all show a performance well above that of the EU27 average.
  2. Innovation followers: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Slovenia and the UK all show a performance close to that of the EU27 average.
  3. Moderate innovators: The performance of Croatia, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Spain is below that of the EU27 average.
  4. Modest innovators: The performance of Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania is well below that of the EU27 average.

Figure 2: Member States' Innovation Performance

Note: Average performance is measured using a composite indicator building on data for 24 indicators going from a lowest possible performance of 0 to a maximum possible performance of 1. Average performance in 2010 reflects performance in 2008/2009 due to a lag in data availability.

The performance of Innovation leaders is 20% or more above that of the EU27; of Innovation followers it is less than 20% above but more than 10% below that of the EU27; of Moderate innovators it is less than 10% below but more than 50% below that of the EU27; and for Modest innovators it is below 50% that of the EU27. 
 
Background information:

Following the adoption of the Innovation Union Communication in October 2010, the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) - a well established and recognised tool for assessing innovation performance in EU Member States - has been reworked and renamed the Innovation Union Scoreboard (IUS). Commissioned by the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry of the European Commission, the Innovation Union Scoreboard is prepared by the Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training centre on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT) in collaboration with the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC).
 
The full report is available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analysis/index_en.htm
and http://www.proinno-europe.eu/metrics
For more information, see MEMO/11/56.
Innovation Union
Europe 2020

Top




Last update: 08/03/2011  |Top